Re: Log4j 3.0 and JPMS
Hi Ralph, On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 01:26, Ralph Goers wrote: > I am wondering which others need to be. I do not believe log4j-1.2-api should > be as I cannot see any application using Log4j becoming JPMS compliant. > > I have not checked other modules, such as log4j-kafka, to see if their > dependencies will allow them to be fully modularized. But I would like a list > of the modules we consider must-haves for a release. > > Thoughts? I think that `log4j-jul` and `log4j-to-jul` also need to be modularized. I just noticed that JUL is not in the `java.base` module. Piotr
log4net 2.0.15 vote
I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday. Ralph > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: > > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of > course only happen after the release is done via this vote. > > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures > are good, as I know nothing about .net development. > > -Robert Middleton > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl > wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 >> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 >> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however >> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at >> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net >> >> This is probably why download links from >> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't >> working? >> >> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something >> obvious ): >> >> Thanks >> -d
Re: Log4j 3.0 and JPMS
Thanks! I will tackle those first then. Ralph > On Jul 28, 2022, at 5:33 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 01:26, Ralph Goers wrote: >> I am wondering which others need to be. I do not believe log4j-1.2-api >> should be as I cannot see any application using Log4j becoming JPMS >> compliant. >> >> I have not checked other modules, such as log4j-kafka, to see if their >> dependencies will allow them to be fully modularized. But I would like a >> list of the modules we consider must-haves for a release. >> >> Thoughts? > > I think that `log4j-jul` and `log4j-to-jul` also need to be > modularized. I just noticed that JUL is not in the `java.base` module. > > Piotr
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Same here. I can review over the weekend. On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > > I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until > Saturday. > > Ralph > > > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: > > > > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually > > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of > > course only happen after the release is done via this vote. > > > > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures > > are good, as I know nothing about .net development. > > > > -Robert Middleton > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all > >> > >> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 > >> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: > >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 > >> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however > >> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at > >> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net > >> > >> This is probably why download links from > >> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't > >> working? > >> > >> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing > >> something obvious ): > >> > >> Thanks > >> -d >
