Message size too large on get calls

2022-11-02 Thread Ashish Choudhary 
Hi,

We have been experiencing a weird issue wherein we are getting
org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets.MessageTooLargeException:
Message too large to send
exception while executing gemfire functions. Interesting bits are that
there are not puts in this call.

It makes sense if this issue was occurring if we do some insert/put of
fairly large data size but that's not the case here. Any idea on why this
is happening?

There is a data ingestion flow but that is separate from the API which gets
data from gemfire so which makes this whole thing difficult to understand.

Found this on SOW for reference.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59329795/geode-exception-org-apache-geode-internal-cache-tier-sockets-messagetoolargeexc

With best regards,
Ashish

Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

2022-11-02 Thread Dan Smith 
Any last votes on this? My current count:

Binding Votes:
1 vote to move to the attic (Xiaojian)

Non-binding votes:
2 votes to move to the attic (Donal and Ernie)
1 vote against and an offer to help maintain the project (Rupert)

I'll let the dust settle for another day and then close this vote.

-Dan

From: Xiaojian Zhou 
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:51 PM
To: u...@geode.apache.org ; dev@geode.apache.org 

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

!! External Email

Vote to move to attic.

Regards
Xiaojian Zhou, PMC of geode

From: Dan Smith 
Date: Friday, October 28, 2022 at 3:15 PM
To: u...@geode.apache.org , dev@geode.apache.org 

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic
There is still an ongoing discussion on the private@geode list, let's go ahead 
and extend the VOTE deadline until at least Wednesday, November 2.

As Anthony mentioned, only PMC member votes actually count. But all community 
members should feel free to cast their vote and help us reach a consensus. At 
the moment, I count zero PMC votes for or against this proposal.

Thanks,
-Dan

From: rup...@webstersystems.co.uk 
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 12:30 PM
To: u...@geode.apache.org ; dev@geode.apache.org 

Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

‼ External Email

Hello, I vote to keep an open source version.
Volunteer for PMC.
Please ping me.
Cheers.

-Original Message-
From: Anthony Baker 
Sent: 25 October 2022 18:38
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Cc: u...@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

I added the user@ list for visibility.

I believe the purpose of taking a VOTE here is to look for community consensus 
on this idea and perhaps find new people interested in carrying the project 
forward. The votes of the existing PMC members are the ones that count, just 
like for a release. Quoting from [1]:

"There are two expected mechanisms by which a project may enter the Attic. 
Either the managing Project Management Committee (PMC) decides it would like to 
move the project, or The Apache Software Foundation's board dissolves the PMC 
and chooses to move the project.”

And

"Projects whose PMC are unable to muster 3 votes for a release, who have no 
active committers or are unable to fulfill their reporting duties to the board 
are all good candidates for the Attic.”

I’m holding my vote for now. I would vote +1 if I don’t see sufficient ability 
for the PMC to carry the project.


Anthony

[1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdasmith%40vmware.com%7C37d98042d8ef49984ade08dabb0402fe%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638027923164232642%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gxqKYTayLzJG0r%2B4BT2ZfHjkgPN917aElv3qbsfqwoU%3D&reserved=0


> On Oct 24, 2022, at 10:51 AM, Dan Smith  wrote:
>
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Last week we discussed moving Geode to the attic [1]. I'm sad to find us at 
> this point. But given that we will soon be without three active members to 
> form a functional PMC, it's time to put this to a vote. I propose we dissolve 
> the Geode PMC and move the Geode project to the attic.
>
> Please cast your vote by Monday Oct 31st.
>
> Thanks,
> -Dan
>
> [1] 
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fbx6t1cppbj7nmfjnf9gtcqjljp8bdf0y&data=05%7C01%7Cdasmith%40vmware.com%7C37d98042d8ef49984ade08dabb0402fe%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638027923164232642%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R1A7eGrb%2B3My4s%2FYoqR3R6Z9J0%2F%2BNrSI11Bv5Q8h5dU%3D&reserved=0
>
> 
>
> ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do 
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

2022-11-02 Thread Anthony Baker 
Regretfully, I am voting +1 to retire the Geode project.

During the PMC roll call and open discussion on dev/user lists, we did not find 
enough PMC volunteers to carry the project forward even at a minimum level. 
While the PMC roster was large the vast majority of the members were either 
inactive, have resigned, or indicated they are contributing on a temporary 
basis only (including myself).

Beyond that, Geode is a significant project with a large codebase and a 
reputation for quality. Keeping the code, libraries, and build system 
up-to-date and CVE-free is no small endeavor. There are tens of thousands of 
tests that will need skilled hands to troubleshoot the inevitable failures and 
flaky results. With only a single commit in October I am not seeing an active 
committer base moving the project forward. This compares to over 120 commits in 
October 2021. I don’t believe this is an anomaly—project activity has 
effectively halted.

I think even if we met the minimum PMC criteria we are only delaying the 
inevitable without active committers.

Anthony


On Nov 2, 2022, at 1:54 PM, Dan Smith 
mailto:dasm...@vmware.com>> wrote:

Any last votes on this? My current count:

Binding Votes:
1 vote to move to the attic (Xiaojian)

Non-binding votes:
2 votes to move to the attic (Donal and Ernie)
1 vote against and an offer to help maintain the project (Rupert)

I'll let the dust settle for another day and then close this vote.

-Dan

From: Xiaojian Zhou 
mailto:zho...@vmware.com.INVALID>>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:51 PM
To: u...@geode.apache.org 
mailto:u...@geode.apache.org>>; 
dev@geode.apache.org 
mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

!! External Email

Vote to move to attic.

Regards
Xiaojian Zhou, PMC of geode

From: Dan Smith mailto:dasm...@vmware.com>>
Date: Friday, October 28, 2022 at 3:15 PM
To: u...@geode.apache.org 
mailto:u...@geode.apache.org>>, 
dev@geode.apache.org 
mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic
There is still an ongoing discussion on the private@geode list, let's go ahead 
and extend the VOTE deadline until at least Wednesday, November 2.

As Anthony mentioned, only PMC member votes actually count. But all community 
members should feel free to cast their vote and help us reach a consensus. At 
the moment, I count zero PMC votes for or against this proposal.

Thanks,
-Dan

From: rup...@webstersystems.co.uk 
mailto:rup...@webstersystems.co.uk>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 12:30 PM
To: u...@geode.apache.org 
mailto:u...@geode.apache.org>>; 
dev@geode.apache.org 
mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

‼ External Email

Hello, I vote to keep an open source version.
Volunteer for PMC.
Please ping me.
Cheers.

-Original Message-
From: Anthony Baker mailto:bak...@vmware.com>>
Sent: 25 October 2022 18:38
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Cc: u...@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

I added the user@ list for visibility.

I believe the purpose of taking a VOTE here is to look for community consensus 
on this idea and perhaps find new people interested in carrying the project 
forward. The votes of the existing PMC members are the ones that count, just 
like for a release. Quoting from [1]:

"There are two expected mechanisms by which a project may enter the Attic. 
Either the managing Project Management Committee (PMC) decides it would like to 
move the project, or The Apache Software Foundation's board dissolves the PMC 
and chooses to move the project.”

And

"Projects whose PMC are unable to muster 3 votes for a release, who have no 
active committers or are unable to fulfill their reporting duties to the board 
are all good candidates for the Attic.”

I’m holding my vote for now. I would vote +1 if I don’t see sufficient ability 
for the PMC to carry the project.


Anthony

[1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdasmith%40vmware.com%7C37d98042d8ef49984ade08dabb0402fe%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638027923164232642%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gxqKYTayLzJG0r%2B4BT2ZfHjkgPN917aElv3qbsfqwoU%3D&reserved=0