Re: 1.3.0 release

2017-10-01 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
Hi All,
We actually have gone up from 11 to 15 issues tagged for release with 1.3.
Based on recent activity (or lack there of) and features not related to
Security, I think we should not wait for the following issues for 1.3: (I
will remove 1.3 labels for these if there are no concerns in 72 hours)
GEODE-3563  SSL socket
handling problems in TCPConduit run
GEODE-3521  Allow region
set op to bootstrap JTA
GEODE-3622  The first
HeapLRU evictions on large region can consume high amounts of CPU
GEODE-3705  New client
protocol: Implement handshake
GEODE-3682  Trace
displaying incorrect indexes being used
GEODE-3637 
configureClientSSLSocket
call can block Acceptor thread

Which brings us down to the following 8:
GEODE-2817  Have the
function author determine what permissions the function execution requires
GEODE-2919  Provide finer
grained security
GEODE-3190  CI failure:
org.apache.geode.internal.cache.Bug48182JUnitTest.test48182WithRegionDestroy
GEODE-3495  Review and
update dependencies for 1.3.0
GEODE-3621  Revert
breaking changes in SecurityManager
GEODE-3628  fix required
permission for lucene query
GEODE-3685  MBean
wrappers are not always applied correctly
GEODE-3723  Reconsider
using Optional as the parameter for getRequiredPermissions


On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:11 PM Swapnil Bawaskar 
wrote:

> I took preliminary look and tagged some issues for 1.3.0.
> Looks like we have 11 issues remaining:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=92&projectKey=GEODE&view=planning&selectedIssue=GEODE-2788&versions=visible&selectedVersion=12340669
>
> Please take a look at these issues to see which are not critical to fix in
> 1.3 and also look at issues assigned to you/reported by you to see if they
> must be tagged for 1.3.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:36 AM Anthony Baker  wrote:
>
>> Excellent!  Can you review the open issues currently tagged for 1.3.0 (I
>> think it’s probably not accurate) and gather consensus on any remaining
>> changes needed?
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sound good.
>> >
>> > I would like to volunteer to be the release manager.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM Anthony Baker 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I think we should begin discussing scope and timeline for the 1.3.0
>> >> release.  I know we’re still finalizing 1.2.1, but we released 1.2.0
>> almost
>> >> two months ago and we’ve fixed almost 200 issues in that time.  IMO, we
>> >> should complete 1.2.1 and then immediately turn around 1.3.0.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?  Any volunteers for release manager?
>> >>
>> >> Anthony
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>


Re: Permission to assign issue to myself

2017-10-01 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
Hello,

This is Geode mailing list. You are asking in a wrong group.
There are no JIRA tickets in Geode JIRA reported by your username.

Sai

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Yuqi Li 
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I reported an issue related to Kafka Connect and I have a solution already.
> Would like to have the issue assigned to myself so I can work on it and
> open a PR.
> My JIRA username is  yuqili1...@gmai.com
>
> Thanks,
> Yuqi
>


[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #696 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2182 tests)

2017-10-01 Thread Spring CI

---
Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #696 was successful.
---
Scheduled
2184 tests in total.

https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-696/





--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo