[PR] Simplify local testing [comdev-events-site]
sebbASF opened a new pull request, #9: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-events-site/pull/9 Add a rule to bypass redirect to https site if the hostname is events-site.local -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
Re: Approval for project "BoF" get-togethers ?
On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 02:07 -0400, David Smiley wrote: > Hello ComDev, > > I'm the Apache Solr PMC chair and I have some brading/trademark > questions > pertaining to policies around event organization and ASF rules of > such. > > I've read: > [1] Policy for Event names using Apache marks: > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/events.html#events > [2] Approval of small Apache-related events: > https://community.apache.org/events/small-events.html > > Question: > * At ASF Community-over-Code, if someone organizes a Birds of a > Feather for > Solr and it gets onto the event schedule, should it be necessary to > get the > Solr PMC's approval beforehand? Would it matter if the person who > arranged > it is a PMC member themselves or not? Please ultimately explain the > answer > with a rationale against the current policy. It's unclear if the BoF > *itself* is a "small Apache-related event" or if the fact that it's > at an > ASF ticketed conference overrides because then the policy wouldn't > apply at > all (nothing is "3rd party"). No, I see no need for that degree of process or overhead. Meetups, BoFs, local gatherings, are no different than chatting over dinner with friends, and I would *not* want to require PMC oversight there. The policy is for when the brand is being used to promote something publicly and there's a chance of confusion that you are somehow speaking on behalf of the project. A meetup does not have this kind of potential for confusion. > > * If such a BoF were to be organized at a non-Apache conference (e.g. > Berlin Buzzwords), presumably Solr PMC permission is needed as > specified by > [2]. Even there, I'd say no. Having a "let's get together to talk about Solr" gathering at All Things Open, or Open Source Summit, does NOT require the PMC's approval, or even acknowledgement. Now, if you're a group of project members making *decisions*, then that must go back to the mailing list to involve the whole community. But you already knew that. > > An unclear aspect of the policy is what the "event" is -- is it the > entire > conference or could it be the proposed BoF talk as well, even though > it's > composed as part of another event? If we're only looking at the > BoF/talk > itself, then would it be "3rd party" if the primary speaker is a PMC > member? The text at > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > (search for "third party") seems to contrast PMC members & committers > in a > way to imply they are *not* third party. Interesting question. I would never consider a BoF "an event" for the purposes of this policy. Nor would I consider something arranged on meetups.com or whatever to be "an event". An event implies marketing, tickets, and so on. Yes, it's a fuzzy line, but I am not in favor of creating process that discourages user meetups. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
Re: Building a chatbot over the ASF community website
On Tue, 2023-10-10 at 20:35 -0300, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello, > I am sorry but today at the Lighting talks I wanted to show how to > build in > 2 minutes a chatbot that is about to answer to questions about the > ASF > community website. > > I didn't know that at the Lightning talks it is possible to show your > laptop. > > I will put up the demo in a git repo as soon as possible and I will > share > it here. > > To run the demo you can you a laptop, and then we can run it on a VM > somewhere at some point. Apologies that I did not see this message prior to the event last night. By long-standing tradition, we don't do slides at the Lightning Talks, which is definitely limiting, but also adds to the challenge to make content engaging in the very short time available. --Rich - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
Re: Approval for project "BoF" get-togethers ?
I agree with Rich here. Organizing meetups, BoFs, etc. are essential for a healthy community. I would like to clarify though, that the meetups should not claim as being organized "by the PMC" without a prior notification to the PMC (private list?). On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:40 AM wrote: > On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 02:07 -0400, David Smiley wrote: > > Hello ComDev, > > > > I'm the Apache Solr PMC chair and I have some brading/trademark > > questions > > pertaining to policies around event organization and ASF rules of > > such. > > > > I've read: > > [1] Policy for Event names using Apache marks: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/events.html#events > > [2] Approval of small Apache-related events: > > https://community.apache.org/events/small-events.html > > > > Question: > > * At ASF Community-over-Code, if someone organizes a Birds of a > > Feather for > > Solr and it gets onto the event schedule, should it be necessary to > > get the > > Solr PMC's approval beforehand? Would it matter if the person who > > arranged > > it is a PMC member themselves or not? Please ultimately explain the > > answer > > with a rationale against the current policy. It's unclear if the BoF > > *itself* is a "small Apache-related event" or if the fact that it's > > at an > > ASF ticketed conference overrides because then the policy wouldn't > > apply at > > all (nothing is "3rd party"). > > No, I see no need for that degree of process or overhead. Meetups, > BoFs, local gatherings, are no different than chatting over dinner with > friends, and I would *not* want to require PMC oversight there. > > The policy is for when the brand is being used to promote something > publicly and there's a chance of confusion that you are somehow > speaking on behalf of the project. A meetup does not have this kind of > potential for confusion. > > > > > * If such a BoF were to be organized at a non-Apache conference (e.g. > > Berlin Buzzwords), presumably Solr PMC permission is needed as > > specified by > > [2]. > > Even there, I'd say no. Having a "let's get together to talk about > Solr" gathering at All Things Open, or Open Source Summit, does NOT > require the PMC's approval, or even acknowledgement. > > Now, if you're a group of project members making *decisions*, then that > must go back to the mailing list to involve the whole community. But > you already knew that. > > > > > An unclear aspect of the policy is what the "event" is -- is it the > > entire > > conference or could it be the proposed BoF talk as well, even though > > it's > > composed as part of another event? If we're only looking at the > > BoF/talk > > itself, then would it be "3rd party" if the primary speaker is a PMC > > member? The text at > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > > (search for "third party") seems to contrast PMC members & committers > > in a > > way to imply they are *not* third party. > > > Interesting question. > > I would never consider a BoF "an event" for the purposes of this > policy. Nor would I consider something arranged on meetups.com or > whatever to be "an event". An event implies marketing, tickets, and so > on. > > Yes, it's a fuzzy line, but I am not in favor of creating process that > discourages user meetups. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > -- Anshum Gupta
