Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.2

2016-01-10 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
+1

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Robert Stupp  wrote:

> +1
>
> --
> Robert Stupp
> @snazy
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Stupp
> @snazy
> > Am 08.01.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Jake Luciani :
> >
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.2.
> >
> > sha1: 3c6dfa4aa0b9ffb0a48a02b949bff2a8406764e6
> > Git:
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.2-tentative
> > Artifacts:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1096/org/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/3.2/
> > Staging repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1096/
> >
> > The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jake
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed).
> >
> > [1]: http://goo.gl/T8geYN (CHANGES.txt)
> > [2]: http://goo.gl/VDwYyf (NEWS.txt)
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.2

2016-01-10 Thread Jason Brown
+1

On Sunday, January 10, 2016, Sylvain Lebresne  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Robert Stupp  > wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Robert Stupp
> > @snazy
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Robert Stupp
> > @snazy
> > > Am 08.01.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Jake Luciani  >:
> > >
> > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.2.
> > >
> > > sha1: 3c6dfa4aa0b9ffb0a48a02b949bff2a8406764e6
> > > Git:
> > >
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.2-tentative
> > > Artifacts:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1096/org/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/3.2/
> > > Staging repository:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1096/
> > >
> > > The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jake
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed).
> > >
> > > [1]: http://goo.gl/T8geYN (CHANGES.txt)
> > > [2]: http://goo.gl/VDwYyf (NEWS.txt)
> >
>


Versioning policy?

2016-01-10 Thread Maciek Sakrejda
There was a discussion recently about changing the Cassandra EOL policy on
the users list [1], but it didn't really go anywhere. I wanted to ask here
instead to clear up the status quo first. What's the current versioning
policy? The tick-tock versioning blog post [2] states in passing that two
major releases are maintained, but I have not found this as an official
policy stated anywhere. For comparison, the Postgres project lays this out
very clearly [3]. To be clear, I'm not looking for any official support,
I'm just asking for clarification regarding the maintenance policy: if a
critical bug or security vulnerability is found in version X.Y.Z, when can
I expect it to be fixed in a bugfix patch to that major version, and when
do I need to upgrade to the next major version.

[1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg45324.html
[2]: http://www.planetcassandra.org/blog/cassandra-2-2-3-0-and-beyond/
[3]: http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/