[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin 1.2.0-1

[Stephen Connolly]

This vote has passed:

+1: Stephen, Michael, Mikhail
0:
-1:

I will proceed with the promotion of artifacts to central

-Stephen


On 14 February 2013 06:26, Mikhail Mazursky  wrote:

> +1. Please, release it.
>
>
> 2013/2/14 Stephen Connolly 
>
>> More I'm looking for somebody who is actively sing C* to test it (there
>> are a couple of users... The lot f you who asked me to roll another
>> release). I will roll a 1.2.1 once I close this vote... I could close with
>> lazy consensus, but feel more comfortable if it has ad some testing ;-)
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 13 February 2013, Michael Kjellman wrote:
>>
>>> Considering that 1.2.1 is out, and looking at your project very quickly
>>> (looks interesting)/overlaps a bit with CCMBridge no?/ I'd def say +1 :)
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Connolly >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>>
>>> Reply-To: "u...@cassandra.apache.org"
>>> mailto:u...@cassandra.apache.org>>
>>>
>>> Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:27 PM
>>> To: "d...@mojo.codehaus.org" <
>>> d...@mojo.codehaus.org>, dev <
>>> dev@cassandra.apache.org>, "
>>> u...@cassandra.apache.org" <
>>> u...@cassandra.apache.org>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin 1.2.0-1
>>>
>>> Ping
>>>
>>> On Monday, 4 February 2013, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to release version 1.2.0-1 of Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin
>>> to sync up with the 1.2.0 release of Apache Cassandra. (a 1.2.1-1 will
>>> follow shortly after this release, but it should be possible to use the
>>> xpath://project/build/plugins/plugin/dependencies/dependency override of
>>> cassandra-server to use C* releases from the 1.2.x stream now that the link
>>> errors have been resolved, so that is less urgent)
>>>
>>> We solved 1 issues:
>>>
>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12121&version=18467
>>>
>>> Staging Repository:
>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-013/
>>>
>>> Site:
>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cassandra-maven-plugin/index.html
>>>
>>> SCM Tag:
>>> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/cassandra-maven-plugin-1.2.0-1@17921
>>>
>>>  [ ] +1 Yeah! fire ahead oh and the blind man on the galloping horse
>>> says it looks fine too.
>>>  [ ] 0 Mehhh! like I care, I don't have any opinions either, I'd
>>> follow somebody else if only I could decide who
>>>  [ ] -1 No! wait up there I have issues (in general like, ya know,
>>> and being a trouble-maker is only one of them)
>>>
>>> The vote is open for 72h and will succeed by lazy consensus.
>>>
>>> Guide to testing staged releases:
>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> -Stephen
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>>  In the interest of ensuring (more is) better testing, and as is now
>>> tradition for Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin, this vote is
>>> also open to any subscribers of the dev and u...@cassandra.apache.org
>>> 
>>>
>>> mailing lists that want to test or use this plugin.
>>>
>>
>

[VOTE] Release Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin 1.2.1-1

[Stephen Connolly]

Hi,

I'd like to release version 1.2.1-1 of Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin
to sync up with the 1.2.1 release of Apache Cassandra.

We solved 1 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12121&version=19089

Staging Repository:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-015/

Site:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/cassandra-maven-plugin/index.html

SCM Tag:
https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/cassandra-maven-plugin-1.2.1-1@17931

 [ ] +1 Yeah! fire ahead oh and the blind man on the galloping horse
says it looks fine too.
 [ ] 0 Mehhh! like I care, I don't have any opinions either, I'd
follow somebody else if only I could decide who
 [ ] -1 No! wait up there I have issues (in general like, ya know,
and being a trouble-maker is only one of them)

The vote is open for 72h and will succeed by lazy consensus.

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Cheers

-Stephen

P.S.
 In the interest of ensuring (more is) better testing, and as is now
tradition for Mojo's Cassandra Maven Plugin, this vote is
also open to any subscribers of the dev and u...@cassandra.apache.org
mailing lists that want to test or use this plugin.

Re: real leveldb vs cassandra leveldb

[Radim Kolar]

Dne 13.2.2013 16:32, Jonathan Ellis napsal(a):

The only point here that would make a difference in practice is
leveldb using a worse hash function.  For us it's not worth making
partitioning worse to make compaction better.
then use two hash functions. one for spliting rows to nodes and second 
for index inside leveldb.


too much compactions is major problem of leveldb implementation in 
cassandra. Cassandra implements initial leveldb design ignoring 
improvements in about last 2 years in leveldb. You can try it yourself 
by benchmarking original and current leveldb.

Re: real leveldb vs cassandra leveldb

[Jonathan Ellis]

You have to use the same function if you want to do streaming i/o for
repair and node movement instead of random.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Radim Kolar  wrote:
> Dne 13.2.2013 16:32, Jonathan Ellis napsal(a):
>
>> The only point here that would make a difference in practice is
>> leveldb using a worse hash function.  For us it's not worth making
>> partitioning worse to make compaction better.
>
> then use two hash functions. one for spliting rows to nodes and second for
> index inside leveldb.
>
> too much compactions is major problem of leveldb implementation in
> cassandra. Cassandra implements initial leveldb design ignoring improvements
> in about last 2 years in leveldb. You can try it yourself by benchmarking
> original and current leveldb.



-- 
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
@spyced