how do i patch a freeswan kernel?

2003-02-19 Thread thing
whats the sequence of commands to patch please?

Thing


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



compaq 1600r's with Debian 2.4.18-686-smp

2002-12-20 Thread Thing
Hi,

I have 2 of these running dual p2-450 cpus, the problem is on neither machine 
cat /proc/cpuinfo shows the second cpu, ive swapped the cpu's about and 
booted with 1 cpu at at time and the server still boots so this suggests the 
hardware / cpus are fine.

anybody know a fix?

Im using standard smp debian kernels, eg 

apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686-smp

So im a bit stumped.

regards

Steven 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: compaq 1600r's with Debian 2.4.18-686-smp

2002-12-20 Thread Thing
dmesg does not detect the second cpu, yet the bios does and init's it.

cat/proc/interrupts shows 1, ditto cpuinfo

Ive compiled my own kernel, still the same, I have 2 such boxes both only see 
one, ive swapped cpu1 into slot 0 and booted fine, so the hardware seems OK.

this suggests a "common" problem across the hardware

regards

Steven

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:58, dave mallery wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 11:52:39AM +1300, Thing wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have 2 of these running dual p2-450 cpus, the problem is on neither
> > machine cat /proc/cpuinfo shows the second cpu, ive swapped the cpu's
> > about and booted with 1 cpu at at time and the server still boots so this
> > suggests the hardware / cpus are fine.
> >
> > anybody know a fix?
> >
> > Im using standard smp debian kernels, eg
> >
> > apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686-smp
>
> three things to look at:
>
> does the bios announce that it sees 2?
> the beginning of dmesg from boot up: reams of stuff about each one
> the output of top or ps:
>
> 3 root  19  19 00 0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00
> ksoftirqd_CPU0 4 root  19  19 00 0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00
> ksoftirqd_CPU1 5 root  18  19 00 0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00
> ksoftirqd_CPU2 6 root  18  19 00 0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00
> ksoftirqd_CPU3
>
> good luck
>
> dave


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: compiling a 2.4 kernel

2008-04-20 Thread thing
> On 04/20/2008 01:16 AM, Steven Jones wrote:
(>> Mumia W.. wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Each patch is designed to be used against a particular version of the
>>> Linux kernel. You might have an incompatible group of patches. For
>>> example, if [the] Asus board patch is for 2.4.27, but the sk98lin patch
>>> is
>>> for 2.4.32, you have a problem because you won't be able to get both
>>> patches into a single kernel.
>>
>> yes...I have found I can compile 2.4.36 but not .27 or .30I seem to
>> be in a messor 2.6.8, anything new like 36 has the buggy megaraid
>> driver so I can boot...
>>
>> :(
>>
>> The patches say 2.4.20+
>> [...]
>
> The patches /should/ apply then. Exactly what are the patches that you
> are trying to apply?

I will be applying lots!

My motherboard is an Asus P5K premium Wi-fiwith two on-board NICS, one
is on the pci-e bus (yukon) the other the pci bus (realtek). The chipset
for the sata is the ICH9-R and I have a wi-fi NIC. The raid card is an old
Perc 3CDL.

Other misc notes (if this helps anyone), the cd boot device is a LG DVD
SATA unit, I initially installed it on SATA channel 4 and the debian
netinst cd would boot but at the cd detection stage it locked up (went to
8% and nothing happened). Moving it to the first sata channel and it
booted, detected and installed fine. I also tried an Asus IDE DVD unit on
the ide channel and that also failed at the cd detection stage (also 8%).

Networking.

Marvel Yukon patch sk98lin, the one in 2.4.27.deb didnt work (using
modconf, failed to detect) but this one as a separate module now compiles,
and works...next job is to patch a kernel with it and build it in one go
(and not as a (M) but a (*). The realtek inbuilt 8110SC / 8169 didnt work
either, the r1000 v1.05 module from asus didnt compile, it now compiles
but does not work.

(NB. I think you? mentioned a GCC mis-match? I think you were right, I
rebuilt as a sarge box and it now compiles, before I had a sarge upgraded
to etch and found it couldn't compile any kernel).

I went to Realtek's website and found that Asus appear to be supplying the
wrong patch for the chipset. It needs a different one at least for my
version of the board. So I downloaded and compiled, it now works as a
separate build, but it is not in a format that can be used to patch a
kernel like the Yukon one can beat least not for a simpleton like me!
In that respect I recommend the Yukon one, it allows you to do an install
(compiles stand alone and patches your ready running kernel) or generates
a patch for you to apply to a kernel source and then compile all of it,
very good instructions making it easy.

WI-fi
Ive yet to look at this patch, I will be though.

ICH9R
Ive yet to look at this patch, I will be though.

Audio
I wont be bothering as its a server...

> How do you know that megaraid_mbox is failing? How does it fail (lockup,
> reboot, panic)?

lockup...for rhas5.1 it got to loading the megraid_mbox module and no
further, if I set the raid controller to I2O and not mass storage it goes
until the install, but cant see any disk to partition, if it was a
conflict I'd expect either way to lock up, but I could be wrong.

Ditto debian 4.0r3 netinst cdit gets to detecting hardware and no
longer responds. No issue with a netinst or 3.1r3.

For a 2.6 kernel off a running install it boots to the raid controller and
either no longer responds, or goes into a loop saying its resetting and
waiting 300secsjust does this over and overyet images 2.4.27-3 and
-4 boot fine...

>
> Perhaps a single kernel command line parameter is all you need to boot.
> The megaraid driver might be using the wrong I/O ports or IRQ's or
> memory ranges.

It is possible...however I have no idea how to address thissince 2.4
kernels work the iomem/interrupts would seem to be Ok...I'd suspect it is
a bug.

If I can/could I'd like to search against the changelogs? of 2.4 and 2.6
sources looking for a change in the megaraid module. Then compile a kernel
before and after that change(s). If the one before works but the later
does not it would strongly suggest an introduced bug.

There maybe a better way? but my skills around compiling kernels are very
limited

regards

Steven





regards

Steven







-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: compiling a 2.4 kernel

2008-04-21 Thread thing
Hi,

I need some help...

I can compile a bootable 2.4.27-4 kernel from debian packaged source, but
I cannot compile a bootable kernel using kernel.org source. I have tried
2.4.27, 28, 29, 30 and 36 none will boot with the megaraid module
(*)'d...however the debian packaged kernel 2.4.27-4 will boot happily with
the megaraid module (*)'d but not (M)'d.

So what would make the debian sourced source OK but the stock kernel not?
In the stock 2.4.27 I cannot see any changes in the changlog for the
megaraid module, I have to go back to 2.4.25to see a megaraid driver
update

regards

Steven




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installing squirrelmail cause apache2 to segfault

2009-12-19 Thread thing

Hi,

This also happens on installing phpgroupware...

So its more likely to be an Apache/php issue I suppose.

:/

So basically I cant install any web based webmail packages without 
totalling apache.


:(

regards

Steven

Nick Douma wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 19-12-2009 5:08, Steven Jones wrote:
  

Hi,

Can anyone recommend a webmail package as an alternative to squirrelmail?

regards

Steven





I use Roundcube for its simplicity, and Horde for its groupware
capabilities (calendar, notes, tasks, etc).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkssxasACgkQkPq5zKsAFij6hQCeKRmyOwBw5gRDvBpAtTl/jSfk
87YAnjG2IXP2Y887EE07NVaUwhNLLm6z
=n4jh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


  



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




(no subject)

2002-06-20 Thread thing
unsubscribe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]