Re: iptables usage

2007-02-07 Thread SiegeM

What is happening here is:
1. When you close all ports of your computer from input but port 80,
the iptables will block the http response wich isn't to your port 80.

I think that you need to close all connections to input but the
response or related packages, then you open all connections to output
and everything is okay. Maybe, if you want to use cups, you can permit
the lo interface to input and output...

Sorry for my english.

On 2/7/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

franck wrote:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
>> [...]
> Hi,
>
> What about the OUTPUT chain ? Have you set up more rules ? By default,
> iptables policy is to ACCEPT all paquets.
>
> Have a look at :
>
> iptables -L -v to see your rules.
>
> An iptables tutorial can be found here :
>
> http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html
>
Thanks for the link, but as far as I know it should work. Those are the
only two rules I'm using, and it *is *working because after I run
iptables -A INPUT -j REJECT all of my connections drop. But since I
opened port 80 before that, shouldn't I still be able to use HTTP?


Andrei Popescu wrote:

> I'm no expert in iptables, but AFAIK the order of the rules *does*
> matter. If I understand what you are writing (as much as one can
> understand iptables syntax) you are telling it to ACCEPT traffic on
> port 80 and then you tell it to REJECT any traffic.

Exactly. First I opened port 80, and second I closed everything. Which
in the end should cause everything but port 80 to be closed. At least
this is my understanding. I've tried the other way around, but it still
didn't work for me.

> P.S. You should start a new thread for new problems, you might get more
> answers that way
I thought this /was/ a new thread? :-P


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: install KDE 3.5 on Debian 3.1

2005-12-26 Thread SiegeM
You can find some information in this link: http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdebase/faq/install.htmlThere, you can see the "
Installation instructions for the different package
formats"There, for debian users, is only one info: dpkg -i package_name.debI don't use debian, so I can't tell you if in any repository you can apt-get install the new kde version...I hope this helps.



Re: Window manager/desktop environment that's not RAM-intensive

2005-11-10 Thread SiegeM
2005/11/10, Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently converting the SOs laptop to Debian. Problem is that
>  it's rather underpowered in terms of RAM - 128 MB and no chance of
>  upgrading.
>
> So I'm looking for a window manager/desktop environment that doesn't
>  have the memory footprint of Gnome or KDE.
>
> Personally, I'm fond of Enlightenment as a window manager, but the
>  SO, who's only familiar with Windos and Gnome, needs something where the
>  look&feel is more consistent with what she knows. Most needed would be
>  some kind of "taskbar" and the possibility of having clickable
>  "shortcuts" to applications (and maybe documents) on the desktop.
> It doesn't matter if it's technically superior, has integrated
>  applications, virtual desktops or a constantly-running sound mixer,
>  the above pretty much sums up the whole list of requirements - the rest
>  I can handle myself.
>
> Any suggestions?

I would say Xfce or the Black Box