The way I see it, Debian is a "do-ocracy" in the sense that if you want
some sort of functionality of the software Debian offers, then you can
write the code and change things. I think what the OP intends by this
thread is that the everyday users of Debian should have been given more of
a say in the Systemd decision. There are lots of ways this could have been
done in a more open and transparent (meaning accessible to all) manner.
Afterall, what is the harm in opening a general vote on the Systemd move on
perhaps the Forums? And allow all registered users to vote. Perhaps even
requiring everyone to re-register in a more controlled manner before being
allowed to vote so that we can have some way of ensuring these people at
least use Debian and have some skin in the game? Just a thought, and it
would definitely provide fuel to silence the critics when the results are
posted.
In terms of the heated discussions over Systemd. I think it boils down to
what some (a lot, actually) of people feel that moving towards a monolithic
init system which seems to be gobbling up critical infrastructure functions
at an alarming rate runs counter to Linux fundamentals that have served
this Distro extremely well up until now, apparently.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 06:46 PM, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> Ric Moore writes:
>>
>>> You are free to boot Debian and use it...
>>>
>>
>> You are also free to copy it, modify it in any way you wish, and start
>> your own distribution based on it.
>>
>
> There ya go! You can do as you please. It is, after all, a club. :) Ric
>
>
>
> --
> My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
> "There are two Great Sins in the world...
> ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
> Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
> Linux user# 44256
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a
> subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5424c2a0.7050...@gmail.com
>
>
