Re: PDF forms and field issues

2015-01-31 Thread Curt
On 2015-01-30, Joel Rees  wrote:
>
> (I want to raise Cain with the US government for deciding that PDF
> with forms should be the only way to submit certain kinds of
> documents. When is the government of the "land of the free" going to
> recognize that formats from companies that claim to own the
> intellectual property used in the formats cannot be compatible with
> freedom?)
>

Veering off-topic but never (I must use adobe acrobatty for one form
that *must be submitted online* under threat of penal repercussions
beyond the scope of my life expectancy).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmcpa6f.1vp.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread Curt
On 2015-01-30, Brian  wrote:
>> 
>> apt-cdrom -d=/mnt add
>
> About a year ago I spent an afternoon investigating why this didn't work
> for me. Locating the notes I made would take time.
>

I can't find the bug today, although I did last night, but there is
indeed one in wheezy in the sense that you must add the
'--no-auto-detect' flag to add a pen drive to the sources
list (as that other man has already pointed out to the satisfaction of
everyone).

>From what I read last night this is not the case in jessie.

Found it:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745381

-- 
“There’s no money in poetry, but then there’s no poetry in money,
either.” —Robert Graves


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmcpbaf.1vp.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: Glibc 2.15 not found?

2015-01-31 Thread Håkon Alstadheim

On 29. jan. 2015 20:12, Stephen wrote:

On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:

If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
with.

Grüße,
Sven.

Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite 
adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Jessie releases 
if that is the case.





How would lxc be in this use-case? Specifically how would a container 
access a graphics display ?


Generally containers would be a great relief to have when playing with 
unsafe s^H computing :-) .




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ccb00a.40...@alstadheim.priv.no



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread Curt
On 2015-01-31, Curt  wrote:
>
>>From what I read last night this is not the case in jessie.
>

You didn't say that, B., sorry, I did.

-- 
“There’s no money in poetry, but then there’s no poetry in money,
either.” —Robert Graves


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmcpdbp.1vp.cu...@einstein.electron.org



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:23:25PM +, Brian wrote:
> 3. Your attention should focus on the pool directory.
> 
> 4. 'ls -l /mnt/pool' and 'ls -l /mnt/pool/main' gets you exploring.
> 
> 5. After checking, install the ppp package with
> 
>   dpkg -i /mnt/pool/main/p/ppp/ppp_2.4.5-5.1+b1_i386.deb
> 
> 6. Carefully read the screen and curse me for leaving you to work out
>the last bit of the puzzle for yourself.

As has already been mentioned, it looks as though the 'pon' command is
no longer in the ppp package, or is that now understood and I'm missing
something?

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131114058.GD5475@tal



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread Brian
On Sun 01 Feb 2015 at 00:40:59 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:23:25PM +, Brian wrote:
> > 3. Your attention should focus on the pool directory.
> > 
> > 4. 'ls -l /mnt/pool' and 'ls -l /mnt/pool/main' gets you exploring.
> > 
> > 5. After checking, install the ppp package with
> > 
> >   dpkg -i /mnt/pool/main/p/ppp/ppp_2.4.5-5.1+b1_i386.deb
> > 
> > 6. Carefully read the screen and curse me for leaving you to work out
> >the last bit of the puzzle for yourself.
> 
> As has already been mentioned, it looks as though the 'pon' command is
> no longer in the ppp package, or is that now understood and I'm missing
> something?

I think you may be referring to

  https://lists.debian.org/87wq44tlzd@thumper.dhh.gt.org

where Rodolfo Medina writes:
  
  >   My problem now is that after netinstall, even installing ppp in
  > expert mode, that command turns to be `not found' 

He was advised to try installing in expert mode and, when loading the
installer components, to choose the ppp-modules and ppp-udeb packages.
His expectation was to be able to use pon and poff, as he has been doing
on an already installed system. His expectations were unfounded.

pon and poff are in the ppp package. That package will be installed if
PPPoE is being used as the network connection because pppoeconf depends
on it. He doesn't want PPPoE as a network connection so pon and poff are
not available to him.

Even if they were he would have to have some way of configuring a PPP
connection within d-i to be able to use them.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131132730.gd14...@copernicus.demon.co.uk



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread John Hasler
> As has already been mentioned, it looks as though the 'pon' command is
> no longer in the ppp package, or is that now understood and I'm
> missing something?

I was wrong: it's there.  It's evidently missing from the udeb.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhkjuj2s@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread Brian
On Sat 31 Jan 2015 at 10:24:15 +, Curt wrote:

> On 2015-01-30, Brian  wrote:
> >> 
> >> apt-cdrom -d=/mnt add
> >
> > About a year ago I spent an afternoon investigating why this didn't work
> > for me. Locating the notes I made would take time.
> >
> 
> I can't find the bug today, although I did last night, but there is
> indeed one in wheezy in the sense that you must add the
> '--no-auto-detect' flag to add a pen drive to the sources
> list (as that other man has already pointed out to the satisfaction of
> everyone).

In case anyone looks - '--no-auto-detect' is undocumented in the Wheezy
manual.
 
> >From what I read last night this is not the case in jessie.

The '>' immediately in front of 'From' is an artifact of mbox. I usually
see it as such.

> Found it:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745381

I'd forgotton we had discussed this issue on -user. It saves having to
find my notes. :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/31012015142047.a9aa10b27...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk



Re: Network install

2015-01-31 Thread John Hasler
Brian writes:
> Even if they were he would have to have some way of configuring a PPP
> connection within d-i to be able to use them.

He can configure PPP with a text editor (copy the files from another
machine where it has been configured with some tool such as pppconfig)
and start it with a command line.  Pon and poff could be copied over too
but they are just simple convenience scripts.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87h9v7uioe@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Upgrade wheezy->jessie: Network interface: eth0 (atl1c) shows excessive power consumption

2015-01-31 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hi,

even though I do not use the eth0 interface

root@nanette:~# ifconfig 
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 04:7d:7b:5f:06:cd  
  UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:5943 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:5010 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:2
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
  RX bytes:4359690 (4.1 MiB)  TX bytes:695857 (679.5 KiB)

loLink encap:Local Loopback  
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:65536  Metric:1
  RX packets:757 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:757 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
  RX bytes:147821 (144.3 KiB)  TX bytes:147821 (144.3 KiB)

wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 74:e5:0b:d3:d6:b4  
  inet addr:192.168.178.27  Bcast:192.168.178.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fd00::76e5:bff:fed3:d6b4/64 Scope:Global
  inet6 addr: fe80::76e5:bff:fed3:d6b4/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:5050 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:4511 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
  RX bytes:2776701 (2.6 MiB)  TX bytes:727802 (710.7 KiB)

root@nanette:~# 

it uses after the upgrade to jessie an excessive amount of power

The battery reports a discharge rate of 9.75 W
The estimated remaining time is 2 hours, 10 minutes

Summary: 585.9 wakeups/second,  50.0 GPU ops/seconds, 0.0 VFS ops/sec and 
22.6% CPU use

Power est.  Usage   Events/sCategory   Description
  4.91 W  0.0 pkts/sDevice Network interface: eth0 
(atl1c)
  2.41 W 73.3%  Device Display backlight
  998 mW568.0 rpm   Device Laptop fan
  693 mW 50.5 ms/s 169.7Processkwin -session 
10e2d5d3650001348178311003743_1422711531_152502
  245 mW 89.1 ms/s 121.9Process/usr/bin/kmail -session 
10e2d5d36500014223087450038740015_142271153
 72.1 mW 32.3 ms/s  36.7Process/usr/bin/plasma-desktop
 46.5 mW 21.7 ms/s  13.3Process/usr/bin/X :0 vt7 -br -
nolisten tcp -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-6D3fMb
 28.8 mW  5.2 ms/s 110.8Interrupt  PS/2 Touchpad / 
Keyboard / Mouse
 11.4 mW  5.3 ms/s   3.5Processkdeinit4: konqueror 
[kdeinit] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=text%2Fhtml&t=k
 9.11 mW  2.2 ms/s  28.2Interrupt  [45] i915
 8.08 mW  1.6 ms/s  28.9Timer  hrtimer_wakeup
 6.50 mW  3.1 ms/s   1.3Process/usr/bin/konsole -
session 10e2d5d3650001422760019720029_1422711
 5.41 mW  0.9 ms/s  21.3Process[irq/44-iwlwifi]
 5.26 mW  1.1 ms/s  18.6Timer  tick_sched_timer
 4.85 mW  1.1 ms/s  15.9Process/usr/sbin/mysqld --
defaults-file=/home/rd/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.co
 3.69 mW  1.5 ms/s  0.05kWork  
ieee80211_sta_monitor_work
 3.63 mW 60.5 µs/s   2.8kWork  
iwl_bg_run_time_calib_work
 2.55 mW237.5 µs/s  12.5Process[rcu_sched]
 2.08 mW  1.0 ms/s   0.3Processksysguardd

Does anybody have an idea, how to debug this issue?

Thanks,
Rainer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/25407464.HLkONeo3Tk@nanette



Re: list non auto packages

2015-01-31 Thread Rusi Mody
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 10:30:05 AM UTC+5:30, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Rusi Mody wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the  packages the user has installed?
> 
> Try:
> 
>   apt-mark showmanual

Thanks
I think this will be very useful
[have yet to check - need to replicate some machines]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/30913f3e-3c8b-40ab-97b4-918478753...@googlegroups.com



Can't add pendrive stick as installation media (was: Network install)

2015-01-31 Thread Rodolfo Medina
Brian  writes:

> On Fri 30 Jan 2015 at 19:36:03 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> Brian  writes:
>> 
>> > By "install Debian" do you mean you go all the way through the installer
>> > menu and then finish the install by booting into the new system?
>> 
>> 
>> I'll try to explain better (strange, it seems so clear to me).
>
> Your explanation was full and understandable, apart from the lack of
> clarity about booting into the new system before using aptitude. A "yes"
> or "no" was all that was required in answer to my query.


Sorry, Brian: it was not to you in particular, but that I felt as I didn't
manage to have the listers understand what I meant.  My fault, of course.
Thank you indeed for your help, and all the listers.

Rodolfo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87h9v6sxn9@gmail.com



Can't add pendrive stick as installation media (was: Network install)

2015-01-31 Thread Rodolfo Medina

Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):

>  http://www.us.debian.org/CD/netinst/
> 
> I download the file debian-7.8.0-i386-netinst.iso and put it onto pendrive
> stick, then start the installation trough the Debian Installer.  Everything
> goes fine all the way through the installer menu until finishing the install
> by booting into the new system.
> 
> At that point, I need installing ppp, because, once installed ppp, I'll be
> able to connect to internet and download the remaining packages.  I do:
> 
>  # aptitude install ppp
> 
> The system tells me to insert the debian CD-ROM, because it `doesn't know'
> that I have no CD-ROM at all, but instead a pendrive stick.  I insert the
> pendrive stick with debian-7.8.0-i386-netinst.iso on it, but the system
> insists on wanting a CD-ROM.
> 
> So I can't install ppp and so I won't be able to connect to internet.

David Wright  writes:

> Quoting Brian (a...@cityscape.co.uk):
>> On Fri 30 Jan 2015 at 15:00:17 -0600, David Wright wrote:
>> 
>> > Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
>> > > 
>> > > So I can't install ppp and so I won't be able to connect to internet.
>> > 
>> > Insert the pendrive, and see where it's mounted (from the logs, console
>> > etc.)
>> > 
>> > mount -t auto /dev/sdZ1 /mnt
>> > 
>> > where Z is b, c, d as appropriate
>> > 
>> > apt-cdrom -d=/mnt add
>> 
>> About a year ago I spent an afternoon investigating why this didn't work
>> for me. Locating the notes I made would take time.
>
> Ditto. Yes, you also need to stop it unmounting and so on. Thus
>
> apt-cdrom -d /mnt --no-auto-detect -m add
>
> will do it, where "it" is to stick
>
> deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Jessie_ - Official Snapshot i386 NETINST 
> Binary-1 ]/ jessie main
>
> in /etc/apt/sources.list and check the contents.


Nothing, and nothing.  I also tried with Jessie, testing, but it seems there's
no way to make Debian add pendrive sticks as installation media.  sources.lists
is not at all modified, and the pendrive stick is not accepted as installation
media: the system insists on requiring a CD-ROM.

Rodolfo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/878ugisxlf@gmail.com



Re: Can't add pendrive stick as installation media (was: Network install)

2015-01-31 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Saturday 31 January 2015 16:49:46 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Brian  writes:
> > On Fri 30 Jan 2015 at 19:36:03 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >> Brian  writes:
> >> > By "install Debian" do you mean you go all the way through the
> >> > installer menu and then finish the install by booting into the new
> >> > system?
> >>
> >> I'll try to explain better (strange, it seems so clear to me).
> >
> > Your explanation was full and understandable, apart from the lack of
> > clarity about booting into the new system before using aptitude. A "yes"
> > or "no" was all that was required in answer to my query.
>
> Sorry, Brian: it was not to you in particular, but that I felt as I didn't
> manage to have the listers understand what I meant.  My fault, of course.
> Thank you indeed for your help, and all the listers.

You still haven't answered the question!

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201501311703.42474.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: Upgrade wheezy->jessie: Network interface: eth0 (atl1c) shows excessive power consumption

2015-01-31 Thread Reco
 Hi.

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:07:58 +0100
Rainer Dorsch  wrote:

> it uses after the upgrade to jessie an excessive amount of power
> 
> The battery reports a discharge rate of 9.75 W
> The estimated remaining time is 2 hours, 10 minutes
> 
> Summary: 585.9 wakeups/second,  50.0 GPU ops/seconds, 0.0 VFS ops/sec and 
> 22.6% CPU use
> 
> Power est.  Usage   Events/sCategory   Description
>   4.91 W  0.0 pkts/sDevice Network interface: 
> eth0 
> (atl1c)
… 
> Does anybody have an idea, how to debug this issue?


Try disabling wake-on-lan on this interface, i.e.

ethtool -s eth0 wol d

Reco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150131204035.74256efe054e7d3abf395...@gmail.com



Re: Glibc 2.15 not found?

2015-01-31 Thread Reco
 Hi.

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:35:54 +0100
Håkon Alstadheim  wrote:

> On 29. jan. 2015 20:12, Stephen wrote:
> > On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> >> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
> >> with.
> >>
> >> Grüße,
> >> Sven.
> >>
> > Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite 
> > adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Jessie releases 
> > if that is the case.
> >
> >
> 
> How would lxc be in this use-case? Specifically how would a container 
> access a graphics display ?

1) Running VV via 'ssh -X'. Straightforward, and requires doing
something else with the sound.

2) Running a VNC server inside the container. Unsuitable for games
IMO, but straightforward.

3) Running a separate X server inside the container. Requires allowing
the container to use at least /dev/input/*, /dev/dri/*, and, of
course, a tty (see [1] as an example). Leaves the sound question open
too.

[1] http://mraw.org/blog/2011/04/05/Running_X_from_LXC

Reco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150131204920.dc2c5c564a6ce13ebc570...@gmail.com



nullmailer, cron email & email provider requiring appropriate "From" field

2015-01-31 Thread Johannes Graumann
Hello,

I have setup nullmailer on a debian stable system of mine to forward email 
to the smtp server of my mykolab.com account. That account requires that 
"From" in the header matches the account email.
Cron on my system insists to send email (as e.g. produced by a logcheck cron 
job) using "From" as derived from the user the executed script runs under 
("logcheck", in this case) and the provider accordingly refuses the email.

Googling leeds to the conclusion, that while cron on debian (stable) is 
accepting "MAILTO" in crontab, it doesn't accept "MAILFROM", which other 
distributions (Centos?) seem to have ...

Can anyone propose an elegant way to solve this issue?

Thank you for your consideration,

Sincerely, Joh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/maj5cp$a7k$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: Re: Ctrl-Alt-Del in systemd

2015-01-31 Thread Ray Andrews

>
> Change that symlink to point to poweroff.target:
>
> # ln -s 
/lib/systemd/system/poweroff.target/etc/systemd/system/ctrl-alt-del.target


That worked fine to change ctrl-alt-del to 'poweroff' butis it possible 
to return to the old 'cold reboot' behavior? I like to go right back to 
the bootloader like it used to be previously.


Re: Can't add pendrive stick as installation media (was: Network install)

2015-01-31 Thread Brian
On Sat 31 Jan 2015 at 16:50:52 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:

> Nothing, and nothing.  I also tried with Jessie, testing, but it seems there's
> no way to make Debian add pendrive sticks as installation media.  
> sources.lists
> is not at all modified, and the pendrive stick is not accepted as installation
> media: the system insists on requiring a CD-ROM.

You have been given another method using dpkg but let us stick with
David Wright's suggestion and get this cleared up.

1. Boot into your Wheezy install and login as root.

2. Insert the USB stick. There should be a message on the screen giving
   you a device name. I get sdg.

3. The netinst is on the first partition, sdg1. Use dmesg to check. I
   have 'sdg: sdg1'.

4. I'll mount my partition:

 mount /dev/sdg1 /mnt

   I'm told it is mounted read-only.

5. Now I'll add the USB stick to /etc/apt/sources.list.

 apt-cdrom -m --no-auto-detect -d /mnt add

   I'm told the disc is scanned for index files and a new source list is
   written. I can check by looking at /etc/apt/sources.list. Edit the
   file to comment out all lines apart from this one.

6. apt-get update

7. apt-get install ppp

8. Tell us where you went wrong before. :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131181453.ge14...@copernicus.demon.co.uk



Re: nullmailer, cron email & email provider requiring appropriate "From" field

2015-01-31 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 09:03:44PM +0300, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have setup nullmailer on a debian stable system of mine to forward email 
> to the smtp server of my mykolab.com account. That account requires that 
> "From" in the header matches the account email.
> Cron on my system insists to send email (as e.g. produced by a logcheck cron 
> job) using "From" as derived from the user the executed script runs under 
> ("logcheck", in this case) and the provider accordingly refuses the email.
> 
> Googling leeds to the conclusion, that while cron on debian (stable) is 
> accepting "MAILTO" in crontab, it doesn't accept "MAILFROM", which other 
> distributions (Centos?) seem to have ...
> 
> Can anyone propose an elegant way to solve this issue?
> 
> Thank you for your consideration,

Does this help:
http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/logcheck.htm

First hit on google searching for 'logcheck email from'

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131190123.GA17896@tal



Re: nullmailer, cron email & email provider requiring appropriate "From" field

2015-01-31 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:01:23AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 09:03:44PM +0300, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have setup nullmailer on a debian stable system of mine to forward email 
> > to the smtp server of my mykolab.com account. That account requires that 
> > "From" in the header matches the account email.
> > Cron on my system insists to send email (as e.g. produced by a logcheck 
> > cron 
> > job) using "From" as derived from the user the executed script runs under 
> > ("logcheck", in this case) and the provider accordingly refuses the email.
> > 
> > Googling leeds to the conclusion, that while cron on debian (stable) is 
> > accepting "MAILTO" in crontab, it doesn't accept "MAILFROM", which other 
> > distributions (Centos?) seem to have ...
> > 
> > Can anyone propose an elegant way to solve this issue?
> > 
> > Thank you for your consideration,
> 
> Does this help:
> http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/logcheck.htm
> 
> First hit on google searching for 'logcheck email from'

Oooops, I should have checked that page more carefully, doesn't mention
setting the from.

Might be easier just to install postfix :)

But saw this:
http://opensourcehacker.com/2013/01/02/sendmail-using-nullmailer-and-gmail-account-on-linux-server/

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131191449.GA18392@tal



Re: nullmailer, cron email & email provider requiring appropriate "From" field

2015-01-31 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 09:03:44PM +0300, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have setup nullmailer on a debian stable system of mine to forward email 
> to the smtp server of my mykolab.com account. That account requires that 
> "From" in the header matches the account email.
> Cron on my system insists to send email (as e.g. produced by a logcheck cron 
> job) using "From" as derived from the user the executed script runs under 
> ("logcheck", in this case) and the provider accordingly refuses the email.
> 
> Googling leeds to the conclusion, that while cron on debian (stable) is 
> accepting "MAILTO" in crontab, it doesn't accept "MAILFROM", which other 
> distributions (Centos?) seem to have ...
> 
> Can anyone propose an elegant way to solve this issue?

This looks more promising than my other previous suggestions.
http://raspberry.znix.com/2013/03/nullmailer-on-raspberry-pi.html

esp.
/etc/nullmailer/helohost
"You only need this file if you are relaying through an smtp smarthost
that won't accept your default domain as a valid mail server. By
default, nullmailer uses the value from /etc/mailname for the HELO
message in the smtp protocol. Any domain set in this file will be used
in the HELO message instead."

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150131193005.GB18392@tal



Not sure which package to report problem under

2015-01-31 Thread Jim Cobley
I think that the problem I have is in the Kernel - but it affects CUPS 
1.7.5 - running on Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie) 64-bit with all updates 
installed.
If my memory serves me correctly I did some testing around 3 months ago 
on the same system and had no problem with the same printer - but this 
may be a red herring although I think the kernel was updated in the 
meantime.


Basically Point Of Sale printer delays before printing. Sometime 29 
seconds, has been several minutes.
The CUPS drivers have been reloaded several times and the PPD file 
re-installed. (Epson TM-U220 on USB)

Network printers appear to work OK

Today kern.log shows:-
Jan 31 10:21:21 MOSQ-POS kernel: [  910.794419] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 10:21:38 MOSQ-POS kernel: [  927.318209] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: 
USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202


Jan 31 10:56:20 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3010.446535] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 10:56:41 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3031.665222] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: 
USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202


Jan 31 11:06:46 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3636.521992] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 11:07:09 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3659.035275] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: 
USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202


Jan 31 12:24:28 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 8299.879895] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 12:25:05 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 8336.693772] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: 
USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202


Jan 31 12:49:10 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 9781.723667] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 12:49:49 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 9820.691729] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: 
USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202


The usblp0 is removed when the print is initiated and printout only 
starts again when the printer is found again (I guess that's what it means)


It appears that many people have reported this issue - or very very 
similar - with several distributions.


Many thanks

Jim Cobley


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54cd2916.4030...@priorycomputers.com



Re: nullmailer, cron email & email provider requiring appropriate "From" field

2015-01-31 Thread Johannes Graumann
Chris Bannister wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:01:23AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 09:03:44PM +0300, Johannes Graumann wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > 
>> > I have setup nullmailer on a debian stable system of mine to forward
>> > email to the smtp server of my mykolab.com account. That account
>> > requires that "From" in the header matches the account email.
>> > Cron on my system insists to send email (as e.g. produced by a logcheck
>> > cron job) using "From" as derived from the user the executed script
>> > runs under ("logcheck", in this case) and the provider accordingly
>> > refuses the email.
>> > 
>> > Googling leeds to the conclusion, that while cron on debian (stable) is
>> > accepting "MAILTO" in crontab, it doesn't accept "MAILFROM", which
>> > other distributions (Centos?) seem to have ...
>> > 
>> > Can anyone propose an elegant way to solve this issue?
>> > 
>> > Thank you for your consideration,
>> 
>> Does this help:
>> http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/logcheck.htm
>> 
>> First hit on google searching for 'logcheck email from'
> 
> Oooops, I should have checked that page more carefully, doesn't mention
> setting the from.
> 
> Might be easier just to install postfix :)
> 
> But saw this:
> http://opensourcehacker.com/2013/01/02/sendmail-using-nullmailer-and-gmail-account-on-linux-server/
> 

Switched to postfix and with the help of canonical_maps got it to work: 
postfix is now rewriting from in all outgoing headers ...

Joh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/majhhv$683$1...@ger.gmane.org



sendmail on debian testing

2015-01-31 Thread Michael Grant
Today I upgraded a test machine from wheezy to testing.

It seemed to install systemd, I'm not sure if it's using it or not.

One thing I noticed though was that sendmail no longer starts at boot. Even
if I run:

/etc/init.d/sendmail start

or if I cd to /etc/mail and run:

make restart

or if I do this:


nothing except running 'sendmail -bd' will start sendmail.

In syslog I see this:

Jan 31 18:53:43 blah systemd[1]: Started LSB: powerful, efficient, and
scalable Mail Transport Agent.

in mail.log I don't see anything when I try to start sendmail via
/etc/init.d/sendmail.

I do not have the lsb-invalid-mta package installed.  I have tried
reinstalling the sendmail package.  I have tried the testing and unstable
versions of sendmail.

Any ideas where I should look next to figure out what's going on?

Michael Grant


Nvidia Geforce 2 legacy driver vs OpenGL/Nouveau drivers?

2015-01-31 Thread Stephen
Okay, so I just installed the propietary Nvidia drivers for my computer. 
I have an older Pentium 4 tower (oooh yeah) with a Geforce MX200 in it. 
Since it's an older card I have to use the Nvidia 96.43.23 legacy 
drivers. I followed the instructions here for the install: 
https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#wheezy-173xx


After installing the driver it seems like my system has taken a bit of a 
CPU performance hit. Things just seem a bit laggier, but I'm not 
entirely sure. Is it possible that the Nvidia legacy driver is slowing 
down things? I was going to install the Open GL driver for this computer 
but figured the Nvidia driver would net better results. Is there a good 
way to test the performance of the driver versus the open driver? Should 
I purge the Nvidia driver and just go back to the nouveau driver? (btw, 
is nouveau the same driver as the Open GL driver set?)


I was just trying to improve performance/compatibility with games but it 
seems that things are slower than they were (Mozilla for example 
fluctuates from low to high CPU usage much more than it seemed before). 
Any ideas?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54cd84b6.5090...@gmail.com



Re: Glibc 2.15 not found?

2015-01-31 Thread Cindy-Sue Causey
On 1/29/15, Ric Moore  wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 02:08 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Stephen  wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't mind building it by hand, I'm trying to get more 'hands on'
>>> (pun completely intended) with Debian. I am just a novice user though
>>> so I have a very faint clue what your talking about...
>>
>> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
>> with.
>
> Jessie is completely stable, according to my experience. You will be
> better off just doing a fresh install, after backing up personal files.


I was thinking the exact same thing, that Jessie has proved stable
*for me*. That's a disclaimer intended to mean everyone's own
experience can and will vary.. Jessie's in fact *so stable* for me,
I'm actually bored. I debootstrapped Sid couple hours ago and am
just running through my inbox before attempting to set Sid up tonight.

After years of doing these kinds of things every possible way wrong,
my most likely path now in a situation like this would be to go the
route of installing the whole new newer release (upgrade) if that is
the only place the desired package is found. With installing a whole
new unified release, everything is intended to work together rather
than, for example, us users trying to shove one of Jessie's new square
pegs into a potentially non-existent old round hole in Wheezy.

And I would be doing the above *KNOWING* Jessie is still labeled as
*testing* which means not guaranteed stable even though many of us are
finding it works well right now.

Good luck whichever route you go!

Cindy :)

-- 
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA

* Installing Sid?! Got a fire extinguisher handy just in case? CHECK! *


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cao1p-kag47t8abswgsowpx1x4af8vzb--zgbnqektegqxyx...@mail.gmail.com



Sound in Jessie

2015-01-31 Thread Paul E Condon
Today, for the first time in many weeks, my computer, running Jessie,
started to have sound. It must have something to do with last night
install of updates of .deb packages. But there are problems.
I have no software control over the volume. Only way to turn done the
volume is to turn anti-clockwist the physical knob on the loud speaker
box. And, the audio mixer, which has been installed during the many weeks,
has developed a new curious symptom: Instead of doing nothing, it now
displays a message that GStreamer was unable to find any sound devices.
Of course there are working sound devices, its just that Jessie sound
software is not yet working. I'd welcome tips on how to make it fully
functional faster than just waiting for the full release of Jessie

Note: some of you may remember my asking for help getting my sound to
work. I got some help. I got help. I spent hours trying different things
and suddenly it started working, but a few hours later, it stopped working
again. I don't understand software sound. I think loading and removing
various packages with various conflicting bugs somehow made it work for
awhile, and decided to let it lie fallow. I noticed that there are two
packages on the Xfce4 desktop that I don't believe were there the last
time I paid attention to computer sound: Ex Falso and Quod Libet. I
have never felt the need for computer mediated music, so that fact that
there is broken sound now, rather than no sound might be related to
these packages.

Anyway, it would be nice to have fully functional sound. My compute is
a HP Pentium desktop several years old, nothing special, but it is the
best computer I have ever had, so I expect to be keeping it thru the
life of Jessie, and beyond.

For now, I can, with adequate guidance, do testing of the new sound for
today. Is there anything of interest to the developers who are working
the sound system issues?

The GStreamer message goes on to suggest:
Some sound system specific GStreamer packages may be missing. It may
also be a permissions problem.

What is the package set that should be installed in Jessie? Maybe now
is a good time to find out. Where should I look?

Cheers.
-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150201020304.ga25...@big.lan.gnu



Re: Linux based cellphones?

2015-01-31 Thread deloptes
Karen Lewellen wrote:

> hi All,
> If this is not the best place for such a question, direct me elsewhere.
> Still I am wondering if there are open source /Linux based mobile 
> devices? If so who manufactures them?
> thanks,
> Karen

Since Nokia dropped their N9 series and was sold to MS the only one left on
the market is Jolla.
We (me and my wife) both use the N9 for couple of years now and it is really
a great phone. It depends what you want to do with it ofcourse, but for us
it is more than sufficient. Firefox, Skype and E-Mail, Video, Music,
Pictures and a lot of useful apps.

I think next year I go for Jolla and check how far they have come.
I follow up their progress and the phone looks very very nice, however there
is still life in my N9, which I got very used to.

I think there are still N9s on the market that cost about €150 and Jolla
costs €400.

As it was mentioned they are not true open source for different reasons, but
still compared to Android and given that they run debian (or kind of debian
derivate) I like them much more then Android phones.
There are however SDKs for developers and building apps or compiling for the
phone is painful but still possible.
On Jolla you can run also Android apps as well (I heard)

I can only recommend the N9 - there was never a better smart phone on the
market (in my opinion)

regards 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/maka2u$49e$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: Not sure which package to report problem under

2015-01-31 Thread deloptes
Jim Cobley wrote:

> I think that the problem I have is in the Kernel - but it affects CUPS
> 1.7.5 - running on Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie) 64-bit with all updates
> installed.

In the specs it says

INTERFACES
Interfaces RS-232, Drawer kick-out, Bidirectional parallel

so I would tipp on the driver and the chipset used in the printer +
kernel/driver and the cups printer.

I had a lot of trouble with cups between 1.4 and 1.5 with parallel <-> usb
cable, which now recently solved in wheezy. Debugging took me long time and
fixing much longer. However it was couple of years ago on a syssetm that is
not in my custody.

check kernel/driver + cups + udev versions

CC me as I don't read the debian user list on daily basis

regards


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/makbmk$rou$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: list non auto packages

2015-01-31 Thread Bob Proulx
Doug wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Rusi Mody wrote:
> > > Is there a way to get the packages the user has installed?
> >
> > Try:
> >
> >   apt-mark showmanual
> >
> > That will show any package that was explicitly installed.  That is,
> > not pulled in automatically as a dependency.  The command is new for
> > Wheezy and later.  Older systems do not have that feature.
>
> If you downloaded the package from somewhere, the original file may
> still be in your Downloads directory.

Sure.  The deb files for both manually installed and automatically
installed dependencies will both be in /var/cache/apt/archives until
the admin issues 'apt-get clean'.  But that wasn't the question. :-)

At least not the way I read it.  I read it as they want to know the
names of the packages they would need to install in order to reproduce
the currently installed system.  Which is actually not a trivial
exercise on Debian systems, unfortunately.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: list non auto packages

2015-01-31 Thread Bob Proulx
Rusi Mody wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Rusi Mody wrote:
> > > Is there a way to get the  packages the user has installed?
> > 
> > Try:
> > 
> >   apt-mark showmanual
> 
> Thanks
> I think this will be very useful
> [have yet to check - need to replicate some machines]

Ah!  You are trying to replicate an existing system and want to know
what to install.  That question gets asked periodically and there is
always discussion but across many years I have yet to see a completely
satisfactory way to do this easily.  For me it is one of those tasks
that doesn't have a good answer.  There are many ways to get close but
no perfect answers.  At one time that was what dpkg --get-selections
was used for.  No matter what is done today it will need some tinkering.

Instead when I need to do this I simply work the problem from a
pristine machine and make it do what I want it to do by installing
whatever.  But when setting it up I carefully document the packages I
install.  I actually script it.  I can then set up replicated systems
using the script and it will be exactly repeatable.  The history of
the script in version control shows my changes to it over time.  YMMV.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


GPG error: http://approx wheezy/updates Release

2015-01-31 Thread David Christensen

debian-user:

I seem to be having trouble getting security updates.  Is this a problem 
with my client system, my Approx server, the Release file on the Debian 
servers, or something else?



David



2015-01-31 22:44:57 root@cd2533 ~
# apt-get update
Hit http://approx wheezy Release.gpg
Get:1 http://approx wheezy/updates Release.gpg [836 B]
Hit http://approx wheezy Release
Get:2 http://approx wheezy/updates Release [102 kB]
Err http://approx wheezy/updates Release

Hit http://approx wheezy/main Translation-en
Hit http://approx wheezy/main Sources
Hit http://approx wheezy/main amd64 Packages
Fetched 103 kB in 3s (26.3 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is 
not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: 
http://approx wheezy/updates Release: The following signatures were 
invalid: BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(7.0/wheezy) 


W: Failed to fetch 
http://approx:/security/dists/wheezy/updates/Release


W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old 
ones used instead.


2015-01-31 22:48:34 root@cd2533 ~
# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://approx:/debian/   wheezy main
deb-src http://approx:/debian/   wheezy main
deb http://approx:/security/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://approx:/security/ wheezy/updates main

2015-01-31 22:50:15 root@cd2533 ~
# cat /etc/approx/approx.conf | egrep '^[a-z]'
debian  http://ftp.debian.org/debian
securityhttp://security.debian.org/debian-security


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54cdcf00.70...@holgerdanske.com



Re: list non auto packages

2015-01-31 Thread Ric Moore

On 02/01/2015 12:09 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:

Doug wrote:

Bob Proulx wrote:

Rusi Mody wrote:

Is there a way to get the packages the user has installed?


Try:

   apt-mark showmanual

That will show any package that was explicitly installed.  That is,
not pulled in automatically as a dependency.  The command is new for
Wheezy and later.  Older systems do not have that feature.


If you downloaded the package from somewhere, the original file may
still be in your Downloads directory.


Sure.  The deb files for both manually installed and automatically
installed dependencies will both be in /var/cache/apt/archives until
the admin issues 'apt-get clean'.  But that wasn't the question. :-)

At least not the way I read it.  I read it as they want to know the
names of the packages they would need to install in order to reproduce
the currently installed system.  Which is actually not a trivial
exercise on Debian systems, unfortunately.


Synaptic will be a list for that purpose. Ric


--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54cdda6d.1000...@gmail.com