Bug#774841: qtbase-opensource-src: Please provide qtconfig-qt5

2015-01-08 Thread Jonathan Ballet
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

the Qt4 source package provides a qt4-qtconfig package to configure
various aspects of Qt4 applications.

Qt5 in Debian currently doesn't ship with this application, although
it seems to be part of the Qt5 repository. There's no way to configure
Qt5 application, except by hand-editing the appropriate settings in the
appropriate files (I guess?), which is sub-optimal.

Can you please provide the qtconfig application for the Qt5 plateform?

Thanks,

 Jonathan


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150108102504.29762.29921.report...@danio.home



Bug#774841: qtbase-opensource-src: Please provide qtconfig-qt5

2015-01-08 Thread Pino Toscano

reassign 774841 src:qttools-opensource-src
severity 774841 wishlist
close 774841
thanks

Hi,

On 2015-01-08 11:25, Jonathan Ballet wrote:

Qt5 in Debian currently doesn't ship with this application, although
it seems to be part of the Qt5 repository. There's no way to 
configure
Qt5 application, except by hand-editing the appropriate settings in 
the

appropriate files (I guess?), which is sub-optimal.

Can you please provide the qtconfig application for the Qt5 
plateform?


qtconfig there is not built by default, and I'm not sure whether it
would even compile OOTB.  It has been even removed upstream [1][2][3],
so it makes no sense to provide a dead tool in Debian.

[1] 
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-December/019544.html

[2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/102626/
[3] 
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qttools/commit/9eb989dee3b7add23d83f2d0c40b2843f6a832a7


Thanks for your report,
--
Pino Toscano


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/22a8f8c8f6acf4c2f4da4c4c9dd5d...@pino.toscano.name



Processed: Re: Bug#774841: qtbase-opensource-src: Please provide qtconfig-qt5

2015-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 774841 src:qttools-opensource-src
Bug #774841 [src:qtbase-opensource-src] qtbase-opensource-src: Please provide 
qtconfig-qt5
Bug reassigned from package 'src:qtbase-opensource-src' to 
'src:qttools-opensource-src'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #774841 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #774841 to the same values 
previously set
> severity 774841 wishlist
Bug #774841 [src:qttools-opensource-src] qtbase-opensource-src: Please provide 
qtconfig-qt5
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> close 774841
Bug #774841 [src:qttools-opensource-src] qtbase-opensource-src: Please provide 
qtconfig-qt5
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
774841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142071546012146.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#766349: marked as done (Kmail: Some times sign with S/MIME failed)

2015-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:14:41 -0300
with message-id <3589668.7htoikuX1d@luna>
and subject line Unreproducible and lack of more info
has caused the Debian Bug report #766349,
regarding Kmail: Some times sign with S/MIME failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
766349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kmail
Version: 4:4.14.1-1
Severity: critical




-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii  kde-runtime   4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  kdepim-runtime4:4.14.1-1
ii  kdepimlibs-kio-plugins4:4.14.1-1
ii  libakonadi-calendar4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libakonadi-contact4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libakonadi-kde4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libakonadi-kmime4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libakonadiprotocolinternals1  1.13.0-2
ii  libc6 2.19-11
ii  libcalendarsupport4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libfollowupreminder4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libgcc1   1:4.9.1-16
ii  libgpgme++2   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libgrantlee-core0 0.4.0-2
ii  libincidenceeditorsng44:4.14.1-1
ii  libkabc4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkalarmcal2 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkcalcore4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkcalutils4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkcmutils4  4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libkdecore5   4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libkdepim44:4.14.1-1
ii  libkdeui5 4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libkio5   4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libkleo4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkmanagesieve4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkmime4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libknewstuff3-4   4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libknotifyconfig4 4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libkontactinterface4a 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkparts44:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libkpgp4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkpimidentities44:4.14.1-1
ii  libkpimtextedit4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkpimutils4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkprintutils4   4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libksieveui4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libktnef4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmailcommon44:4.14.1-1
ii  libmailimporter4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmailtransport4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessagecomposer4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessagecore4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessagelist4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessageviewer4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libpimcommon4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libqt4-dbus   4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqt4-network4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqtcore44:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqtwebkit4  2.3.4.dfsg-2
ii  libsendlater4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libsolid4 4:4.14.1-1+b1
ii  libstdc++64.9.1-16
ii  libtemplateparser44:4.14.1-1
ii  perl  5.20.1-1

Versions of packages kmail recommends:
ii  gnupg-agent   2.0.26-3
ii  gnupg22.0.26-3
ii  pinentry-gtk2 [pinentry-x11]  0.8.3-2

Versions of packages kmail suggests:
ii  bogofilter 1.2.4+dfsg1-3
pn  clamav | f-prot-installer  
ii  kaddressbook   4:4.14.1-1
ii  kleopatra  4:4.14.1-1
ii  procmail   3.22-22

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi! Diane has asked if you could reproduce this bug on November, and as no 
reply has arrived and we can't reproduce the bug anymore, I'm closing this 
bug.

Of course if you can still reproduce it and can give us the data Diane asked 
for then do not heasitate to reopen this bug attaching the necessary info.

Thanks, Lisandro.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---


Bug#763365: marked as done (qtcreator and qbs: error when trying to install together)

2015-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:51:53 -
with message-id <20150108135153.4369.38...@mitya57.me>
and subject line Re: qtcreator and qbs: error when trying to install together
has caused the Debian Bug report #763365,
regarding qtcreator and qbs: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qbs,qtcreator
Version: qbs/1.2.2+dfsg-1
Version: qtcreator/3.2.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2014-09-29
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:



Extracting templates from packages: 20%
Extracting templates from packages: 41%
Extracting templates from packages: 62%
Extracting templates from packages: 82%
Extracting templates from packages: 100%
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously unselected package gcc-4.9-base:amd64.
(Reading database ... 10878 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../gcc-4.9-base_4.9.1-15_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking gcc-4.9-base:amd64 (4.9.1-15) ...
Setting up gcc-4.9-base:amd64 (4.9.1-15) ...
(Reading database ... 10885 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libstdc++6_4.9.1-15_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libstdc++6:amd64 (4.9.1-15) over (4.8.2-19) ...
Setting up libstdc++6:amd64 (4.9.1-15) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-11) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgcrypt20:amd64.
(Reading database ... 10898 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libgcrypt20_1.6.2-4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgcrypt20:amd64 (1.6.2-4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgmp10:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libgmp10_2%3a6.0.0+dfsg-6_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgmp10:amd64 (2:6.0.0+dfsg-6) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnettle4:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libnettle4_2.7.1-3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnettle4:amd64 (2.7.1-3) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libhogweed2:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libhogweed2_2.7.1-3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libhogweed2:amd64 (2.7.1-3) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libffi6:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libffi6_3.1-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libffi6:amd64 (3.1-2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libp11-kit0_0.20.7-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libp11-kit0:amd64 (0.20.7-1) over (0.18.5-3) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libtasn1-6:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libtasn1-6_4.2-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libtasn1-6:amd64 (4.2-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libgnutls-deb0-28_3.3.8-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgnutls-deb0-28:amd64 (3.3.8-2) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libkeyutils1:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libkeyutils1_1.5.9-5_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libkeyutils1:amd64 (1.5.9-5) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5support0:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libkrb5support0_1.12.1+dfsg-10_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libkrb5support0:amd64 (1.12.1+dfsg-10) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libk5crypto3:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libk5crypto3_1.12.1+dfsg-10_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libk5crypto3:amd64 (1.12.1+dfsg-10) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5-3:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libkrb5-3_1.12.1+dfsg-10_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libkrb5-3:amd64 (1.12.1+dfsg-10) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libgssapi-krb5-2_1.12.1+dfsg-10_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64 (1.12.1+dfsg-10) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libxml2:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libxml2_2.9.1+dfsg1-4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libxml2:amd64 (2.9.1+dfsg1-4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libglib2.0-0:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libglib2.0-0_2.42.0-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.42.0-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libatk1.0-data.
Preparing to unpack .../libatk1.0-data_2.14.0-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking libatk1.0-data (2.14.0-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libatk1.0-0:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libatk1.0-0_2.14.0-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libatk1.0-0:amd64 (2.14.0-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libavahi-common-data:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../libavahi-common-data_0.6

Processed: [bts-link] source package kmix

2015-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kmix
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #772318 (http://bugs.debian.org/772318)
> # Bug title: kmix: bashism in /bin/sh script
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341640
> #  * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 772318 + fixed-upstream
Bug #772318 [kmix] kmix: bashism in /bin/sh script
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 772318 - status-UNCONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-UNCONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 772318 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
772318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14207361572472.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#774884: kmail: Cannot choose my smime cert in KMail

2015-01-08 Thread Kai Michael Hamich
Package: kmail
Version: 4:4.14.1-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

I imported my certs and could not choose it for signing my emails.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?

I tried to choose a cert and then i choosed a key in the dialog

   * What was the outcome of this action?

The key-icon in front of the line got a red-cross and the "OK"-Button is grey
and disabled

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

the cert should be useable, as in evolution where it works like a charm

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii  kde-runtime   4:4.14.2-2
ii  kdepim-runtime4:4.14.2-2
ii  kdepimlibs-kio-plugins4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libakonadi-calendar4  4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libakonadi-contact4   4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libakonadi-kde4   4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libakonadi-kmime4 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libakonadiprotocolinternals1  1.13.0-2
ii  libc6 2.19-13
ii  libcalendarsupport4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libfollowupreminder4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libgcc1   1:4.9.1-19
ii  libgpgme++2   4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libgrantlee-core0 0.4.0-2
ii  libincidenceeditorsng44:4.14.1-1
ii  libkabc4  4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkalarmcal2 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkcalcore4  4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkcalutils4 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkcmutils4  4:4.14.2-4
ii  libkdecore5   4:4.14.2-4
ii  libkdepim44:4.14.1-1
ii  libkdeui5 4:4.14.2-4
ii  libkio5   4:4.14.2-4
ii  libkleo4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkmanagesieve4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkmime4 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libknewstuff3-4   4:4.14.2-4
ii  libknotifyconfig4 4:4.14.2-4
ii  libkontactinterface4a 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkparts44:4.14.2-4
ii  libkpgp4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libkpimidentities44:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkpimtextedit4  4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkpimutils4 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libkprintutils4   4:4.14.2-4
ii  libksieveui4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libktnef4 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libmailcommon44:4.14.1-1
ii  libmailimporter4  4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmailtransport4 4:4.14.2-2+b1
ii  libmessagecomposer4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessagecore4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessagelist4   4:4.14.1-1
ii  libmessageviewer4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libpimcommon4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libqt4-dbus   4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqt4-network4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqtcore44:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-2+b1
ii  libqtwebkit4  2.3.4.dfsg-3
ii  libsendlater4 4:4.14.1-1
ii  libsolid4 4:4.14.2-4
ii  libstdc++64.9.1-19
ii  libtemplateparser44:4.14.1-1
ii  perl  5.20.1-4

Versions of packages kmail recommends:
ii  gnupg-agent   2.0.26-3
ii  gnupg22.0.26-3
ii  pinentry-gtk2 [pinentry-x11]  0.8.3-2

Versions of packages kmail suggests:
ii  bogofilter 1.2.4+dfsg1-3
pn  clamav | f-prot-installer  
ii  kaddressbook   4:4.14.1-1
ii  kleopatra  4:4.14.1-1
ii  procmail   3.22-22

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150108164421.18775.42456.report...@toaster.home.hamich.net



Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread Francesco Muzio

I have done a test with a new installation of Debian.
Yesterday I have created a minimal installation of Debian for i386 
architecture with qemu.


I have downloaded the latest weekly build of 
debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso image and I have installed it on a qcow2 
image of 4GB


I have installed kde-plasma-desktop and kdm.
I have put the correct kdm.service in the /lib/systemd/system/ directory

I have rebooted the system and the result is the same as on my real 
machines. kdm it's not executed.

If I delete kdm.service file at the next reboot kdm works as expected.


You can download the disk image of my VM from this link
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nrcwkmbbbqlf5em/HDD4GB.7z?dl=0

I have run it with this command
qemu-system-i386 -m 512 -enable-kvm -cpu athlon -hda HDD4GB.qcow2

I hope it helps you to understand where is the problem.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54aef5df.1030...@gmail.com



Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 01/08/2015 10:25 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> I have downloaded the latest weekly build of
> debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso image and I have installed it on a qcow2
> image of 4GB
> 
> I have installed kde-plasma-desktop and kdm.
> I have put the correct kdm.service in the /lib/systemd/system/ directory

Why did you copy the extra kdm.service file into the systemd directory?
This file isn't actually necessary as the systemd generator for the
display-manager unit takes care of that. It creates a unit file
on-the-fly and puts it into /run/systemd/generator/kdm.service.d.

> I have rebooted the system and the result is the same as on my real
> machines. kdm it's not executed.
> If I delete kdm.service file at the next reboot kdm works as expected.

It works for me. I did an absolute clean installation with the netinst
image (beta2). I chose KDE during the desktop installation dialog and
got a working KDE with KDM setup right away, no additional work
necessary.

There is something that you are fundamentally doing wrong. I assume you
do a minimal installation without using tasksel during the installation
and then install the packages manually instead of using meta packages
and apparently some essential package is missing?

> I have run it with this command
> qemu-system-i386 -m 512 -enable-kvm -cpu athlon -hda HDD4GB.qcow2

Thanks, I will look into it when I find the time.

Here is a summary how I installed Debian Jessie and got a working
system:

1. Download Debian Jessie Netinst Beta 2 ISO (amd64)
2. Create a new VMWare Virtual Machine and mount the Netinst ISO
3. Install everything with the defaults
4. At the tasksel selection screen, select "Desktop->KDE" plus
   "SSH server" and "base system"
5. Finish installation and reboot
6. Upon reboot, my system boots right into KDM; no strings attached

So, the only difference I see is that you are using i386 (as opposed
to amd64 here) and you apparently don't use tasksel.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54aef83a.9030...@physik.fu-berlin.de



Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread Francesco Muzio




Why did you copy the extra kdm.service file into the systemd directory?


Because you have told me to do it.
see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755359#10


There is something that you are fundamentally doing wrong. I assume you
do a minimal installation without using tasksel during the installation
and then install the packages manually instead of using meta packages
and apparently some essential package is missing?


Because I had to recreate my problem with an image as small as possible.


But don't digress anymore. I have explained my problem in the first message


In journald log I see this message

systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit display-manager.service,
ignoring: Unit display-manager.service failed to load: No such file or
directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status
display-manager.service' for details.



And your proposed solution was


you could add the attached kdm.service
file and add it to /lib/systemd/system and see if that fixes your
problem.



this test hasn't solved my problem has caused me a fail of KDM to start 
at the reboot.


probably you have missed my premise at the top of the first message


Dear maintainers,
My machine (updated debian testing) has only KDM as display manager, it
starts without problem after upgrading/trasition to systemd.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54af025e.4080...@gmail.com



Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 01/08/2015 11:19 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> Because I had to recreate my problem with an image as small as possible.

It was a suggestion, a guess out of the dark. I didn't tell you to do
it, I merely asked whether this might help in this case. I didn't know
about the systemd generators at the time then.

> But don't digress anymore. I have explained my problem in the first message
> 
>> In journald log I see this message
>>
>> systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit display-manager.service,
>> ignoring: Unit display-manager.service failed to load: No such file or
>> directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status
>> display-manager.service' for details.
> 
> 
> And your proposed solution was
> 
>> you could add the attached kdm.service
>> file and add it to /lib/systemd/system and see if that fixes your
>> problem.

I am not denying that. But that applied to the case of your installed
system, not for a fresh installation. As I pointed out earlier, I did
a clean and fresh unmodified installation and used the defaults and
KDM worked out-of-the-box. Again, either the image you are using
is broken or you are doing something fundamentally wrong as it worked
for me.

> this test hasn't solved my problem has caused me a fail of KDM to start
> at the reboot.

It was a _suggestion_, I was not saying _at all_ that this was the
guaranteed solution. And, if you read further, I did my own experiments
and could not reproduce your problem on a clean installation.

> probably you have missed my premise at the top of the first message

No, I did not miss anything at all since I said previously that
I did a fresh and clean install with just KDM installed using
tasksel and it worked.

I can, btw, not examine your qemu image since you did not provide
me with any passwords. I would have mount it manually now and modify
the passwd database but you could have just told me the password.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54af043b.10...@physik.fu-berlin.de



Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread Francesco Muzio


Il 08/01/2015 23:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:

I can, btw, not examine your qemu image since you did not provide
me with any passwords. I would have mount it manually now and modify
the passwd database but you could have just told me the password.


Oops... I have forget to tell you the credentials

user: root
pass: password

user: debian
pass: password

in the image you have downloaded the kdm.service is stored in 
/lib/systemd/system/ directory


if you delete it and reboot you can expirienced the error in journalctl log

systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit display-manager.service,
ignoring: Unit display-manager.service failed to load: No such file or
directory.

I think it's a normal behaviour if kdm does not provide service file as 
do other Display Manager like GDM3 and SLIM



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54af0975.8030...@gmail.com