Bug#358459: Send emails directly to dentists
Are you still looking for directories of US doctors or dentists? I have lots of US medical lists, let me know what you need and I will get you some more info, samples and a good price. you can reach me at: tren...@expertdatasystems.co.cc For your subscription status modification please contact rem...@expertdatasystems.co.cc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554694: FTBFS with binutils-gold
Hello, 6 листопада 2009 о 09:32 +0300 Dmitry E. Oboukhov написав(-ла): > Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report > about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake > generates linker call command. I think that it is the same as packages > which are under automake/autoconf. It looks like your package uses Xlib directly and does not links with it. IMHO it is not qmakes fault, it cannot know what libraries your package needs, its work is to link with Qt. Other libraries should be specified additionaly. > > You buried me with the same bugs, but only one really touched my > package. I think You should find out which specific a package has a bug > before submit bugreports. > > For example: fluxbox is built with autotools. goldendict is built with > qt4-qmake. Do You suggest me to patch all these packages? IMHO that is the right thing to do. Regards, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#554694: FTBFS with binutils-gold
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > reassign 554694 qt4-qmake > retitle 554694 qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with > binutils-gold > thanks > > Hi, Peter. > > Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report > about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake > generates linker call command. I think that it is the same as packages > which are under automake/autoconf. > > You buried me with the same bugs, but only one really touched my > package. I think You should find out which specific a package has a bug > before submit bugreports. > > For example: fluxbox is built with autotools. goldendict is built with > qt4-qmake. Do You suggest me to patch all these packages? The bugs reported for GNOME packages were right, and the packages use autoconf, so your argument doesn't sound right. If you're missing -l options for the linker, that's not something autofoo will put in the Makefile if you don't tell it first. Cheers, Emilio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#554694: FTBFS with binutils-gold
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #reassigning and retitling back > reassign 554694 src:goldendict Bug #554694 [qt4-qmake] qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with binutils-gold Bug reassigned from package 'qt4-qmake' to 'src:goldendict'. > found 554694 0.9.0+svn404-1 Bug #554694 [src:goldendict] qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with binutils-gold Bug Marked as found in versions goldendict/0.9.0+svn404-1. > retitle 554694 FTBFS with binutils-gold Bug #554694 [src:goldendict] qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with binutils-gold Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS with binutils-gold' from 'qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with binutils-gold' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554694: FTBFS with binutils-gold
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report
> about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake
> generates linker call command. I think that it is the same as packages
> which are under automake/autoconf.
As others have said it before: these tools don't magically find dependencies.
So it is a user who specified it and in most cases not in auto* or *make, but
in a external script/config file. This means either the package author of the
broken package or the author of the (for example) pkg-config file has to
correct it. So it is correct that not always the broken package is the reason
for that problem.
> You buried me with the same bugs, but only one really touched my
> package. I think You should find out which specific a package has a bug
> before submit bugreports.
I expect ~600 broken packages. I don't have really time to check in detail
what is broken. I do a quick check if it looks like this is the fault of the
package and not the build system, but I cannot create patches for every
problem. I am really sorry if I submit a wrong bug.
To show you that this is probably real a broken config file I attached you a
patch which fixes this packages. I would feel better if it would use pkg-
config or something similar, but I don't know qmake4 good enough to find how
to use it correctly.
And the problem is only that it uses for example XKeysymToKeycode in
hotkeywrapper.cc:305 which is defined by libX11.so `readelf -s
/usr/lib/libX11.so|grep XKeysymToKeycode` - but doesn't link to it correctly.
> For example: fluxbox is built with autotools. goldendict is built with
> qt4-qmake. Do You suggest me to patch all these packages?
You don't have to fix these things. A report back to the upstream author would
be everything I expect from a maintainer. If he real fixes it by himself -
wow, that's wonderful, but I don't force anybody to do that.
Best regards,
Peter
--- a/goldendict.pro 2009-11-06 10:49:10.196891227 +0100
+++ b/goldendict.pro 2009-11-06 10:44:34.852891885 +0100
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
LIBS += -Lwinlibs/lib
}
unix {
-LIBS += -lXtst
+LIBS += -lXtst -lX11
PREFIX = $$(PREFIX)
isEmpty( PREFIX ):PREFIX = /usr
DEFINES += PROGRAM_DATA_DIR=\\\"$$PREFIX/share/apps/goldendict/\\\"
