[Bug libstdc++/14990] multiset forward iterator is const
--- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-22 14:38 --- See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103 "For associative containers where the value type is the same as the key type, both iterator and const_iterator are constant iterators. It is unspecified whether or not iterator and const_iterator are the same type." Also, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#322 The libstdc++ behaviour is correct -- jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC| |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot | |com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14990 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug libstdc++/14990] multiset forward iterator is const
--- Comment #4 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-22 14:49 --- bug 14410 and also bug 5583 :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14990 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/5458] address of overloaded template function as argument for template
-- jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot ||com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug driver/13071] no easy way to exclude backward C++ headers from include path
--- Comment #6 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-23 18:32 --- This seems to be fixed in all open branches (4.3+) -- jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot ||com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/35989] code rejected in template specialization (4.2 did accept)
--- Comment #4 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 10:12
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Simple case :
>
>
> template struct A {};
> template struct B { struct Inner {}; };
>
> template
> struct A::Inner> {};
>
>
> 4.1.2/VS2005 compile quietly. 4.3.2 (g++ -c test.cpp) gives :
>
> kk.cpp:5: error: template parameters not used in partial specialization:
> kk.cpp:5: error: K
>
I think this is invalid because K is used in a non-deduced context
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35989
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/35989] code rejected in template specialization (4.2 did accept)
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 10:29 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I think this is invalid because K is used in a non-deduced context Which is the same problem as with the original testcase - this is not a bug in gcc. According to 14.5.4.1 [temp.class.spec.match] paragraph 2 the template arguments of the partial specialisation must be deduced, but in the testcases they appear in non-deduced contexts as defined by 14.8.2.4 [temp.deduct] paragraph 4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35989 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42540] c++ error message [vtable undefined] is unhelpful
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-06 10:42 --- The linker error alone doesn't make the root cause obvious, but it's a fairly well known and well documented problem: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/strange-inheritance.html#faq-23.10 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/5458] address of overloaded template function as argument for template
--- Comment #16 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-21 19:00
---
Shouldn't it get the same error as for this case?
template
T foo() { return T(); }
int main()
{
&foo;
}
That example can be made valid like so:
int (*pf)() = &foo;
Which demonstrates that the angle brackets are not necessary, *if* the compiler
can determine which specialisation is intended. So the "cannot resolve address
of overloaded function" error is arguably correct.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5458
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
