[Bug c++/11078] [ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't work
--- Comment #28 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 23:54 --- Changing the testcase to use decltype instead of typeof produces this error with current sources: wa.C:2: sorry, unimplemented: zero-operand casts cannot be mangled due to a defect in the C++ ABI Now that we have decltype, I think we don't need to worry about mangling typeof. I'm just going to add a sorry to suggest that people use decltype instead. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doug dot gregor at gmail dot ||com Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |rejects-valid Summary|[ABI] ICE in write_type with|[ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't |typeof and templates|work http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/26560] [4.1 regression] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|3.4.6 4.2.0 |3.4.6 4.2.0 4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/24791] ICE on invalid instantiation of template's static member
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-26 19:54 --- Subject: Bug 24791 Author: jason Date: Fri Oct 26 19:54:10 2007 New Revision: 129660 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129660 Log: PR c++/24791 * pt.c (get_template_info): New fn. (template_class_depth): Use it. (push_template_decl_real): Check that the template args of the definition match the args of the previous declaration. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error33.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash11.C -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24791 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug debug/35065] [4.3 Regression] infinite loop while compiling VLC media player in vt_find_locations
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||31412 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35065 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-02-12 23:13:53 |2008-02-19 20:17:21 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 21:21 --- The problem comes when we deal with templates from non-template code. In this case, we are substituting some parameters but not all into a function template declaration, so we end up building up new typename types with dependent scopes. Changing make_typename_type to call uses_template_parms fixes the testcase, but it seems that other similar issues may be hiding, and it may be better to bump processing_template_decl at a higher level, perhaps resolve_overloaded_unification. But that may also leave other similar problems elsewhere. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 21:45 ---
Incidentally, the error that 3.3 gave for the testcase in comment #8 seems to
be correct: after we substitute the explicit args into the two function
templates, we are left with one which still has an unbound argument, which I
believe makes it an undeduced context under [temp.deduct.type] paragraph 5
("the set of functions provided as an argument contains one or more function
templates"). The EDG compiler seems to disagree, so this should probably
become a core language issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 21:39 --- (In reply to comment #18) > it may be better to bump processing_template_decl at a higher level, perhaps > resolve_overloaded_unification. This seems to be the approach taken in the partial ordering code, so it seems like the right answer. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||35255 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 22:13 --- On second thought, the testcase seems to be well-formed; we should do partial ordering and determine that the second template is more specialized than the first. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 22:53 --- Subject: Bug 34950 Author: jason Date: Tue Feb 19 22:53:07 2008 New Revision: 132455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132455 Log: PR c++/34950 * pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unification): Set processing_template_decl while we look for possible bindings. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/explicit-args1.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #23 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 22:54 --- Subject: Bug 34950 Author: jason Date: Tue Feb 19 22:53:25 2008 New Revision: 132456 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132456 Log: PR c++/34950 * pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unification): Set processing_template_decl while we look for possible bindings. Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 --- Fixed in all open branches. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #26 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 --- Subject: Bug 34950 Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 20 04:47:47 2008 New Revision: 132470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132470 Log: PR c++/34950 * pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unification): Set processing_template_decl while we look for possible bindings. Modified: branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
--- Comment #25 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 --- Subject: Bug 34950 Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 20 04:47:28 2008 New Revision: 132469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132469 Log: PR c++/34950 * pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unification): Set processing_template_decl while we look for possible bindings. PR c++/34774 * pt.c (value_dependent_expression_p): Look into DECL_INITIAL of enumerators, too. Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug testsuite/33263] [4.3/4.4 regression] libjava testsuite failures on alpha-linux
-- Bug 33263 depends on bug 31488, which changed state. Bug 31488 Summary: [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33263 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/13549] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] Problem compiling Boost.Python test
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 20:02 --- I don't see a core issue about this question, but it seems pretty clear to me that since g is dependent, and [temp.arg.explicit]/8 says that we should do arg-dependent lookup for template-ids (which we don't seem to do currently; we get that example wrong), then we should do late lookup for g as well. We ought to accept this test. Unsuspending, re-marking as regression. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2005-12-18 20:25:55 |2009-03-03 20:02:52 date|| Summary|Problem compiling |[4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] |Boost.Python test |Problem compiling ||Boost.Python test http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13549 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 21:10 --- I don't see any open issues about DR 224 since it went into the WP. Unsuspending, P3. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Priority|P4 |P3 Last reconfirmed|2008-01-08 16:16:42 |2009-03-03 21:10:30 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 21:14 --- I don't see any justification for suspending DR 224 PRs when there isn't an open core issue about the alleged problems. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Priority|P4 |P3 Last reconfirmed|2008-01-08 16:17:08 |2009-03-03 21:14:04 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug tree-optimization/30132] [4.2 Regression] ICE in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:133
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu dot org| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30132 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2009-03-04 12:05:56 |2009-03-04 14:48:18 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2009-03-03 21:10:30 |2009-03-04 16:54:14 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 18:42 --- Subject: Bug 29607 Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 4 18:42:17 2009 New Revision: 144618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144618 Log: PR c++/9634 PR c++/29469 PR c++/29607 * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do look inside currently open classes. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Likewise. (cp_parser_template_name): Likewise. * pt.c (dependent_scope_p): New function. * cp-tree.h: Declare it. * class.c (currently_open_class): Return fast if T isn't a class. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/class.c trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 18:42 --- Subject: Bug 29469 Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 4 18:42:17 2009 New Revision: 144618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144618 Log: PR c++/9634 PR c++/29469 PR c++/29607 * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do look inside currently open classes. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Likewise. (cp_parser_template_name): Likewise. * pt.c (dependent_scope_p): New function. * cp-tree.h: Declare it. * class.c (currently_open_class): Return fast if T isn't a class. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/class.c trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 19:38 --- Subject: Bug 29469 Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 4 19:37:43 2009 New Revision: 144621 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144621 Log: PR c++/9634 PR c++/29469 PR c++/29607 Implement DR 224. * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do look inside currently open classes. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Likewise. (cp_parser_template_name): Likewise. * pt.c (dependent_scope_p): New function. * cp-tree.h: Declare it. * class.c (currently_open_class): Return fast if T isn't a class. Added: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C - copied unchanged from r144618, trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/class.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 19:38 --- Subject: Bug 29607 Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 4 19:37:43 2009 New Revision: 144621 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144621 Log: PR c++/9634 PR c++/29469 PR c++/29607 Implement DR 224. * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do look inside currently open classes. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Likewise. (cp_parser_template_name): Likewise. * pt.c (dependent_scope_p): New function. * cp-tree.h: Declare it. * class.c (currently_open_class): Return fast if T isn't a class. Added: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C - copied unchanged from r144618, trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/class.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
-- Bug 29607 depends on bug 29469, which changed state. Bug 29469 Summary: [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 19:40 --- Fixed for 4.3 and 4.4, not applying to 4.2. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-04 19:41 --- Fixed for 4.3 and 4.4, not applying to 4.2. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
-- Bug 29607 depends on bug 9634, which changed state. Bug 9634 Summary: [DR224] Injected class name as qualifier should not make the name dependent http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
-- Bug 29469 depends on bug 9634, which changed state. Bug 9634 Summary: [DR224] Injected class name as qualifier should not make the name dependent http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/13549] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] Problem compiling Boost.Python test
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 00:44 --- That is, even though g(j) does not have any dependent arguments, the call is dependent, so it should get arg-dependent lookup, which should find g(h) because it's in the associated namespace of j. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2009-03-03 20:02:52 |2009-03-05 00:44:57 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13549 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/13549] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] Problem compiling Boost.Python test
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 02:49 --- Subject: Bug 13549 Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 5 02:49:13 2009 New Revision: 144636 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144636 Log: PR c++/13549 * semantics.c (perform_koenig_lookup): Handle TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR. * parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Call it for TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR. * tree.c (is_overloaded_fn): Look through TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR. (get_first_fn): Likewise. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/koenig7.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c trunk/gcc/cp/tree.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13549 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/13549] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] Problem compiling Boost.Python test
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 02:51 --- Fixed for 4.4. I'm not comfortable applying this to older release branches. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13549 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29607] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dependent name with base classes
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-03 17:32 --- Subject: Bug 29607 Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 3 17:31:38 2009 New Revision: 145510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145510 Log: Revert: PR c++/9634 PR c++/29469 PR c++/29607 Implement DR 224. * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do look inside currently open classes. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Likewise. (cp_parser_template_name): Likewise. * pt.c (dependent_scope_p): New function. * cp-tree.h: Declare it. * class.c (currently_open_class): Return fast if T isn't a class. Removed: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/class.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-03 17:32 --- Subject: Bug 29469 Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 3 17:31:38 2009 New Revision: 145510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145510 Log: Revert: PR c++/9634 PR c++/29469 PR c++/29607 Implement DR 224. * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do look inside currently open classes. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Likewise. (cp_parser_template_name): Likewise. * pt.c (dependent_scope_p): New function. * cp-tree.h: Declare it. * class.c (currently_open_class): Return fast if T isn't a class. Removed: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name5.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/class.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/5458] address of overloaded template function as argument for template
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 02:55 --- I'm not sure the standard actually says that this is well-formed, though it seems reasonable to me. 13.4/2: If the name is a function template, template argument deduction is done (14.9.2.2), and if the argument deduction succeeds, the resulting template argument list is used to generate a single function template specialization, which is added to the set of overloaded functions considered. 14.9.2.2: The function templates function type and the specified type are used as the types of P and A, and the deduction is done as described in 14.9.2.5. It's not entirely clear that there is a "specified type" for this kind of two-way deduction. EDG also rejects this. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 22:32 --- Subject: Bug 42701 Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 14 22:32:24 2010 New Revision: 155916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155916 Log: PR c++/42701 * call.c (build_new_method_call): Don't free the vec here. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/error3.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/call.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 22:34 --- Fixed. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 06:18 --- *** Bug 42569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42569] [4.5 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list at cp/parser.c
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 06:18 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42701 *** -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42569 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/5458] address of overloaded template function as argument for template
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 19:09 --- We describe a template as overloading itself since it represents any number of actual functions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 20:38 --- This is intended behavior: a non-POD type which has been marked as packed can be used as a packed field. 13983 and 17519 are bugs in that feature. In this case, nonpod_pack::n is not packed, so it is safe to pack fields of nonpod_pack type. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
-- Bug 26670 depends on bug 13983, which changed state. Bug 13983 Summary: no warning on some non-POD struct with packed attribute http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
-- Bug 26670 depends on bug 17519, which changed state. Bug 17519 Summary: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Warning for array of packed non-POD in packed struct http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17519 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 03:48 --- Hmm, actually comment #2 does seem like a bug, both foos should compile cleanly. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-06 03:52:12 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 08:31 --- Or perhaps we should ignore the __attribute__ ((packed)) on nonpod_pack, since one of its fields isn't safe to pack. Yes, that seems like the right way to handle this testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 06:55 --- Subject: Bug 26670 Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 29 06:55:35 2006 New Revision: 116555 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116555 Log: PR c++/26670 * class.c (check_field_decls): Unset TYPE_PACKED (t) if one of the fields can't be packed. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/packed11.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/class.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 07:10 --- Subject: Bug 26670 Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 29 07:10:38 2006 New Revision: 116556 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116556 Log: PR c++/26670 * class.c (check_field_decls): Unset TYPE_PACKED (t) if one of the fields can't be packed. Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 15:51 --- Subject: Bug 26670 Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 30 15:51:17 2006 New Revision: 116591 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116591 Log: PR c++/26670 * class.c (check_field_decls): Don't unset TYPE_PACKED until all the fields have been processed. Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/class.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 15:52 --- fixed on 4.1 branch too. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 15:52 --- Subject: Bug 26670 Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 30 15:52:12 2006 New Revision: 116592 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116592 Log: PR c++/26670 * class.c (check_field_decls): Don't unset TYPE_PACKED until all the fields have been processed. PR c++/26670 * class.c (check_field_decls): Unset TYPE_PACKED (t) if one of the fields can't be packed. Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/class.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-04-29 13:12:21 |2005-11-07 18:10:08 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 19:35 --- This is a bug in the generic thunk support; it doesn't show up on x86 because it uses asm thunks. Continuing to investigate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #25 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 08:32 --- Subject: Bug 21123 Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 8 08:32:26 2005 New Revision: 106634 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106634 Log: PR c++/21123 * cp/method.c (use_thunk): Use build_cplus_new instead of force_target_expr. * tree.h (CALL_FROM_THUNK_P): Add CALL_EXPR_CHECK. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk4.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/method.c trunk/gcc/tree.h -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #27 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 16:58 --- Subject: Bug 21123 Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 9 16:58:52 2005 New Revision: 106698 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106698 Log: PR c++/21123 * method.c (use_thunk): Use build_cplus_new instead of force_target_expr. Added: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk4.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/method.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #32 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 23:56 ---
My earlier patch fixed all the reduced testcases, but not the unreduced one.
Here's a reduced testcase that still fails (adding a by-value parm to the
virtual function):
struct A
{
A(const A &a);
const A& operator=(const A& a);
};
struct B
{
virtual A f(A);
};
struct C : virtual B
{
virtual A f(A);
};
A C::f(A a)
{
return a;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #33 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 20:58 --- Subject: Bug 21123 Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 30 20:58:27 2005 New Revision: 107738 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107738 Log: PR c++/21123 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r): Don't dereference invisible reference parms in a thunk. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk5.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #34 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 21:08 --- Subject: Bug 21123 Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 30 21:08:39 2005 New Revision: 107740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107740 Log: PR c++/21123 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r): Don't dereference invisible reference parms in a thunk. Added: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk5.C - copied unchanged from r107738, trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk5.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
--- Comment #35 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 21:40 --- Subject: Bug 21123 Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 30 21:40:12 2005 New Revision: 107742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107742 Log: PR c++/21123 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r): Don't dereference invisible reference parms in a thunk. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk5.C - copied unchanged from r107738, trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/thunk5.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/29825] [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 18:21 --- (In reply to comment #15) > patch Please apply this patch to 4.2 and the trunk. I've reverted my patch on the 4.1 branch, as it seems to be too risky there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 15:08 --- Subject: Bug 7302 Author: jason Date: Mon Aug 20 15:08:24 2007 New Revision: 127649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127649 Log: PR c++/7302 * cp/class.c (finish_struct_1): Warn when a class has virtual functions and accessible non-virtual destructor. * doc/invoke.texi (-Wnon-virtual-dtor): Update documentation. * g++.dg/warn/Wnvdtor-2.C: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wnvdtor-2.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/class.c trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
