[Bug middle-end/37815] [4.4 Regression] ICE in vt_add_function_parameters (bootstrap error)
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37815 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug other/38732] [4.4 Regression] Openoffice.org segfaults with runtime libs built from GCC trunk
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-05 22:51 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> There is padding between adjustedPtr and unwindHeader because the latter is
> forced to be maximally aligned. Due to the additional member the padding was
> reduced. Also, the alignment of _Unwind_Exception depends on -mavx.
>
I don't see any need for extra alignment on _Unwind_Exception:
struct _Unwind_Exception
{
_Unwind_Exception_Class exception_class;
_Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn exception_cleanup;
_Unwind_Word private_1;
_Unwind_Word private_2;
/* @@@ The IA-64 ABI says that this structure must be double-word aligned.
Taking that literally does not make much sense generically. Instead we
provide the maximum alignment required by any type for the machine. */
} __attribute__((__aligned__));
I think it should have a fixed alignment for a given target.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC| |hjl dot tools at gmail dot
| |com, Joey dot ye at intel
||dot com, xuepeng dot guo at
||intel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/38732] [4.4 Regression] Openoffice.org segfaults with runtime libs built from GCC trunk
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-05 22:53 --- There are i386/i386.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_AVX ? 256: 128) m68k/m68k.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ALIGN_INT ? 32 : 16) mcore/mcore.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_8ALIGN ? 64 : 32) sh/sh.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ALIGN_DOUBLE ? 64 : 32) sparc/sparc.h:#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ARCH64 ? 128 : 64) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/38737] [4.4 Regression] __alignof__ (_Unwind_Exception) depends on -mavx
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|38732 | nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38737 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/38732] [4.4 Regression] Openoffice.org segfaults with runtime libs built from GCC trunk
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-05 23:08
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > There is padding between adjustedPtr and unwindHeader because the latter is
> > forced to be maximally aligned. Due to the additional member the padding
> > was
> > reduced. Also, the alignment of _Unwind_Exception depends on -mavx.
> >
>
> I don't see any need for extra alignment on _Unwind_Exception:
>
> struct _Unwind_Exception
> {
> _Unwind_Exception_Class exception_class;
> _Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn exception_cleanup;
> _Unwind_Word private_1;
> _Unwind_Word private_2;
>
> /* @@@ The IA-64 ABI says that this structure must be double-word aligned.
> Taking that literally does not make much sense generically. Instead we
> provide the maximum alignment required by any type for the machine. */
> } __attribute__((__aligned__));
>
> I think it should have a fixed alignment for a given target.
>
The ia64 psABI says _Unwind_Exception should be aligned at
double-word. But it isn't very clear what is the size of
double-word. It does say "long long" is 8 byte doubleword.
We have
[...@gnu-6 config]$ grep BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT ia64/ia64.h
#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT 128
[...@gnu-6 config]$
We can't change it now no matter what the size of
double-word is.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|38737 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/38899] pessimizes function without SSE intrinsics
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com, Joey dot ye at intel ||dot com, xuepeng dot guo at ||intel dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38899 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c/42538] ICE on illegal-code: tree check: expected function_decl, have var_decl in start_function, at c-decl.c:7369
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 17:23 ---
A simple testcase:
[...@gnu-26 rrs]$ cat pr42538.i
void Saisie()[3]{
}
[...@gnu-26 rrs]$ ./143523/usr/bin/gcc -S pr42538.i
pr42538.i:1: error: declaration of Saisie as array of voids
pr42538.i:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_decl, have
var_decl in start_function, at c-decl.c:6113
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[...@gnu-26 rrs]$
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-29 17:23:40
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42538
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42542] g++ -O3 produces incorrect results for less-than operator
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:41 --- With -Wall, icc 11.1 complains: pr42542.cc(10): remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order return (a < b) ? b : a; ^ detected during instantiation of "_Tp std::accumulate(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, _Tp, _BinaryOperation) [with _InputIterator=unsigned int *, _Tp=unsigned int, _BinaryOperation=maximum]" at line 25 Add "-fno-tree-vectorize" generates the correct result. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-29 19:41:02 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42542] g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" produces incorrect results for less-than operator
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:44 --- Add "-ftree-vectorize" will cause it to fail. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|g++ -O3 produces incorrect |g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" |results for less-than |produces incorrect results |operator|for less-than operator http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42542] g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" produces incorrect results for less-than operator
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:45 --- It could be a target issue. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42542] g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" produces incorrect results for less-than operator
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:51 --- There are no unsigned integer vector compare insns on x86. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42542] g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" produces incorrect results for less-than operator
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 20:48 --- "-ftree-vectorize -msse4" works fine since it generates pmaxud in SSE4.1. It seems that gcc doesn't properly emulate pmaxud. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" produces incorrect results for less-than operator
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 20:52 --- The bug may be in "umaxv4si3" pattern. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max of signed intergers
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 21:40 ---
Here is a testcase in C:
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat y.c
unsigned int foo[] __attribute__ ((aligned(16))) =
{
0x8000, 1, 0xa000, 2,
3, 0xd000, 0xf000, 0xe000
};
unsigned int bar[] __attribute__ ((aligned(16))) =
{
4, 0xb000, 5, 0xc000,
0xd000, 6, 7, 8
};
unsigned int val[] =
{
0x8000, 0xb000, 0xa000, 0xc000,
0xd000, 0xd000, 0xf000, 0xe000
};
extern void abort ();
void
()
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
foo[i] = foo[i] < bar [i] ? bar [i] : foo[i];
}
int
main ()
{
int i;
();
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
if (val[i] != foo[i])
abort ();
return 0;
}
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ gcc /tmp/y.c -O2 -ftree-vectorize
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||x86
Summary|g++ "-O -ftree-vectorize" |Vectorizer produces
|produces incorrect results |incorrect results on max of
|for less-than operator |signed intergers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max of signed intergers
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 23:50 --- Created an attachment (id=19420) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19420&action=view) A patch I don't see how we can easily check unsigned underflow in vector integer subtraction. This patch simply disables it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max of signed intergers
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 04:47 --- Hi Richard, the code in question is added by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02185.html I don't quite understand how it can properly handle unsigned V4SI underflow in V4SI vector subtraction. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max of signed intergers
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 04:49 --- Created an attachment (id=19422) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19422&action=view) An updated patch I am testing this patch now. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #19420|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max of signed intergers
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max of signed intergers
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 15:50 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01208.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2009- ||12/msg01208.html http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Vectorizer produces |Vectorizer produces |incorrect results on max of |incorrect results on max/min |signed intergers|of unsigned intergers http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 18:10 --- It is caused by revision 144914: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-03/msg00421.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42611 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42611] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:5014
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 18:26 --- Gcc 3.4 gave: r42611.c: In function `foo': pr42611.c:6: error: size of variable 's' is too large -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.2 4.2.4 4.3.4 4.4.3 ||4.5.0 Known to work||3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42611 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-06 14:59 --- (In reply to comment #15) > Can we expect a 4.4 backport for this, at least in the ix86/4.4 branch if not > in the main 4.4 branch? > It will be backported to 4.3/4.4 in a few days. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6 Version|4.5.0 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers
--- Comment #19 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-07 20:00 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 16:23 --- libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected has --- --format=gnu-v3 --no-params _GLOBAL__I__Z2fnv global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv --- Shouldn't it be global constructors keyed to fn() -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | Summary|c++filt/nm --demangle |demangler doesn't completely |doesn't completely demangle |demangle a global |a global constructors symbol|constructors symbol http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructor symbol
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 18:43 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00446.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2010- ||01/msg00446.html Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-09 18:43:39 date|| Summary|demangler doesn't completely|demangler doesn't completely |demangle a global |demangle a global |constructors symbol |constructor symbol http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42670 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers
--- Comment #23 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 00:41 --- (In reply to comment #22) > I am looking at this on IA64 and fixing it for V2SI seems simple enough. > I will attach a patch. But I am not sure what to do for V4HI and V8QI. > The current code uses an 'unsigned saturating subtraction' and that > seems to be what x86 is using for V16QI and V8HI. But when I run > pr42542-2.c and pr42542-3.c (short and char) on IA64 they fail. My > patch does make pr42542-1.c (int) work. I tried handling V4HI and V8QI > in the same way as V2SI but that didn't seem to work either. > What was the problem with V4HI and V8QI? The existing code works OK on pr42542-2.c and pr42542-3.c for me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42715] [4.5 Regression] output_operand: invalid expression as operand
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 23:34 --- This is caused by revision 151917: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00665.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-12 23:34:54 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42715 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42713] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in tsubst
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 05:17 --- It is caused by revision 145440: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg00060.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dseketel at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-13 05:17:30 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42713 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug other/42713] [4.5 Regression] ICE - segfault in tsubst
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.5.0 Known to work||4.4.2 Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42713 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42725] ICE on error recovery (segfault in build_over_call in gcc/cp/call.c:5653)
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 15:07 --- It is caused by revision 155347: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00491.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42725 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 17:43 --- This is caused by revision 155347: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00491.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42725] ICE on error recovery (segfault in build_over_call in gcc/cp/call.c:5653)
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 17:44 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42701 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42725 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42701] [4.5 Regression] ICE on error recovery
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 17:44 --- *** Bug 42725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42731] terminates with "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory" in error recovery
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 17:47 --- I think this is a dup for PR 42701. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42731 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42542] Vectorizer produces incorrect results on max/min of unsigned intergers
--- Comment #28 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 19:00 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug target/42774] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in get_aligned_mem, at config/alpha/alpha.c:1484
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 19:57 --- Is this related to PR 39954? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug c++/42634] ICE with -g -O2 -std=c++0x in copy_fn_p, at cp/decl.c:9973
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42634 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp)
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||17464 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28242 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100521015144.18986.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp)
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-21 01:53 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32064 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28242 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100521015321.19964.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-21 01:53 --- *** Bug 28242 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100521015321.19976.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-21 21:16 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Still an issue, e.g. on Solaris 11. > You can try my patches from 2007 to see if they work for you. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100521211623.19834.qm...@sourceware.org
