[Bug java/32484] build of junit 4.3.1 native lib fails
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:13 --- Fixed in trunk. Tested: zorro:~ $ ~/gcc/trunk/install/bin/gcj -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -fPIC -findirect-dispatch -fjni -g0 -O0 -mtune=nocona -march=nocona -pipe -w -save-temps -o libjunit.jar.so junit.jar gcj: warning: -pipe ignored because -save-temps specified zorro:~ $ -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32484 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/32484] build of junit 4.3.1 native lib fails
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:32 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33639 *** -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32484 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/32484] build of junit 4.3.1 native lib fails
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:32 --- . -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32484 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug middle-end/42698] [4.5 Regression] jc1: ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2112
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-13 16:41:29 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42698 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug middle-end/42698] [4.5 Regression] jc1: ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2112
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42698 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 10:07 --- I can't duplicate this problem with gcc trunk and binutils 2.20-0ubuntu2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100228100720.23273.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/42676] [4.5 regression] javah doesn't generate the header files as checked in in the archive
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42676 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100312160107.22035.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100410145559.15858.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #35 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 16:36 ---
I've been trying this on gcc trunk, and it doesn't have the problem.
It seems that merging is not done.
I get
...
0x8684 : @0x8808
Compact model 1
0xb1 0x08 pop {r3}
0x84 0x00 pop {r14}
0xb0 finish
0xb0 finish
...
0x86b0 : @0x8820
Compact model 1
0xb1 0x08 pop {r3}
0x84 0x00 pop {r14}
0xb0 finish
0xb0 finish
Is it maybe the case that "Compact model 1" unwinder data isn't yet being
merged?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100413163643.17429.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #38 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 17:25 --- I think I can fairly easily add an option to the linker to suppress table merging when linking Java libraries, and that will completely solve the problem, at least from my point of view. To that end, it would not be at all helpful to make _Unwind_GetRegionStart on ARM return NULL. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100413172526.10590.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #39 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 16:34 --- Subject: Bug 40860 Author: aph Date: Wed Apr 21 16:34:01 2010 New Revision: 158611 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158611 Log: 2010-04-19 Andrew Haley PR libgcj/40860 * configure.ac: Handle --no-merge-exidx-entries. Modified: trunk/libjava/ChangeLog trunk/libjava/configure trunk/libjava/configure.ac -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100421163452.26913.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #40 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 17:05 --- Subject: Bug 40860 Author: aph Date: Wed Apr 21 17:04:42 2010 New Revision: 158614 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158614 Log: 2010-04-19 Andrew Haley PR libgcj/40860 * configure.ac: Handle --no-merge-exidx-entries. Modified: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libjava/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libjava/configure branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libjava/configure.ac -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100421170539.14177.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100421171532.17506.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #41 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 16:07 --- Subject: Bug 40860 Author: aph Date: Thu Apr 22 16:06:39 2010 New Revision: 158648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158648 Log: 2010-04-19 Andrew Haley PR libgcj/40860 * configure.ac: Handle --no-merge-exidx-entries. Modified: branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libjava/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libjava/configure branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libjava/configure.ac -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100422160712.23650.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux
--- Comment #42 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 16:08 --- Fixed. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100422160841.29947.qm...@sourceware.org
[Bug awt/16825] need to reimplement QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic
--- Comment #23 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 10:56 --- QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic already uses the algorithm in Numerical Recipes. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 *** -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at redhat dot com Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16825 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
--- Comment #83 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 10:56 --- *** Bug 16825 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/8923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when modifying a variable decleared "final static"
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:35 --- Subject: Bug 8923 Author: aph Date: Thu Aug 10 19:35:07 2006 New Revision: 116069 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116069 Log: 2006-08-10 Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR java/8923 * parse.y (build_incdec): Emit an error instead of an ICE if '++' or '--' is used with a constant operand. (java_complete_lhs): When processing a '++' or '--' expression, don't call java_complete_tree but java_complete_lhs, so that a static final variable operand is never replaced by its value. This avoids an ICE later on. (patch_unaryop): Fixed typo in comment. Modified: trunk/gcc/java/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/java/parse.y -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8923 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/28891] [4.2 regression] ICE, segmentation fault
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 13:58 --- -findirect-dispatch doesn't work with Java source. Compile to.class first. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28891 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/1427] gcj should generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 11:28 --- This bug seems to be moribund. There exists code in gcc (gen_entry_point_die) to do this, but it is ifdef'd out at the present time. We could uncomment it and call it; I don't imagine it would be hard. Anthony, do you think this bug should be fixed? What is the status of your gdb patch? -- What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-05-04 02:22:04 |2005-08-08 11:28:30 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1427 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/1427] gcj should generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 15:23 --- I think we have deadlock here! It's easy enough to fix this once the changes have been made to gdb but pretty pointless otherwise. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1427 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/10632] Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not supported
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org Summary|Numerical result differs|Numerical result differs |from Sun JDK|from Sun JDK -- strictfp not ||supported http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/10632] Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not supported
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||24454 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 15:58 --- Please try the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html. Let me know if it doesn't work. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC| |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24441 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 16:38 --- I just tried it with the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html. Works for me. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24441 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 15:45 --- A bit more explanation. The problem is caused by the fact that 9007199254740994.0 + 0.847412109375 is carried out in extended precision, and the result is rounded to 9007199254740995. In double precision, the result of this calculation is rounded to 9007199254740994. When the extended-precision value is rounded to double for storing, it is rounded (again) to 9007199254740996. So, double rounding leads gij to return a value of d that is 2.0, whereas it should be 0.0. Note however, that the true accurate value for d, calculated at infinite precision, is 1-(2^-16). So, the absolute error for gcj is 1+(2^-16) and the absolute error with correct rounding is 1-(2^-16). (I'm not surprised this hasn't been reported as a problem with any real applications!) It might be worth setting the floating-point precision of gcj to double, but that would only fix the double-precision case, and I presume we'd still have the same double rounding problem for floats. And in any case, I do not know if libcalls would be affected by being entered with the FPU in round-to-double mode. We might end up breaking things. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/24454] GCJ does not correctly support strictfp
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-30 13:36 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10632 *** -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24454 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/10632] Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not supported
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-30 13:36 --- *** Bug 24454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug java/1427] gcj should generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1427 aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jimb at zwingli dot cygnus | |dot com, green at cygnus dot| |com | --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Bug java/1427] gcj should generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1427 aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org AssignedTo|apbianco at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
