Bug#122103: probably you
Do not ignore me pleaase, I faound your email somewhere and now decided to writeb you. I am coming to your place in few weeks and thought we can meet each othber. Let me know if you do bnot mind. I am a nice pretty girl. Don't breply to this email. Email me daireclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i said something
ATTENTION - Immediate Action Required This is your Third and Final Notification, there now are two potential deals for your review. Please note that past credit history is a non-factor as long as you (or your spouse) are still employed. Verify your information with our secure form to ensure our records are up to date. http://www.lending-tresm.net/index.php?refid=windsor We look forward to helping you reach your goals. --Doug Gage Senior Financial Analyst - LMR Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know so you won't recieve again: http://www.lending-tresm.net/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: important part throughout
Special Announcement: Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for you to consider. Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit situation is not an issue at this time. Confirm your details on our secure form to ensure our records are accurate and we will be in touch within a few days via the method of your choice. http://www.lendxu-now.net/index.php?refid=windsor --Doug Tackett Financial Advisor - eLMR Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know so you won't recieve again: http://www.lendxu-now.net/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#112237: can't link against /usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so
Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: oldlibs Installed-Size: 281 Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: egcs1.1 (1.1.2-4) Version: 2.91.66-4 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Description: The GNU stdc++ library (old egcs version) This package contains an additional runtime library for C++ programs built with the gnu/egcs compiler version 1.1.x. I have a project that ships binaries linked against libstdc++-2.9.0 in order to achieve the greatest binary compatibility across linux distributions. I was using a potato box to build these binaries and then upgraded to woody. Now I can't link (output follows). Note that I had the same packages installed on the potato box as on the woody box (i.e. libstdc++-2.10-dev as opposed to libstdc++-2.9-dev). compile command and link error: $ gcc -lstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0 -lpthread -lm -o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/export/ttserver /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/CEMailImport.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/CSPThread.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/CSPThreadMgr.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/CTTAdminSession.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/CTTSession.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/CTTUserSessionMgr.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/ErrorLogging.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/MaintenanceThread.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/SPServer.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/SeapineDbCache.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/SeapineServerDB.o /mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/server/TTMail.o -L/mnt/devel/TestTrack/server/test/export/lib -lcommon -lcbx -lPowerPlantWin -lDundas -lttxml /usr/bin/ld: BFD internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c line 1771 in elf_i386_relocate_section /usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug. collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Related packages: ii libstdc++2.10 2.95.2-14 The GNU stdc++ library ii libstdc++2.10-dev 2.95.4-0.010810 The GNU stdc++ library (development files) ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 2.95.4-0.010810 The GNU stdc++ library ii libstdc++2.82.90.29-2 The GNU stdc++ library (old egcs version) ii libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 2.91.66-4 The GNU stdc++ library (old egcs version) libstdc++-2.9-glibc2.1 depends on: ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data $ uname -a Linux balder 2.2.18pre21 #2 Thu Apr 19 13:05:01 EDT 2001 i686 unknown -- (__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lathi.net) oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7 450C B264 3E63 D543 |_/ If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait.
Bug#112237: forgot work-around
I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not '-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine.
Bug#112237: compiler versions.
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote: > > > > I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not > > '-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine. > > Wait a second. You didn't show how you were compiling the individual > objects. What version of g++ were you using for that? > GCC packages installed: ii gcc 2.95.4-6 The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.0 3.0-0pre010403The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0.1-0pre010811 The GNU Compiler Collection (base package). ii gcc-2.95 2.95.4-0.010810 The GNU C compiler. $ which gcc /usr/bin/gcc $ ls -l /usr/bin/gcc lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 8 Aug 27 16:56 /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-2.95* OK, there are three components to deal with here. Two are third party libraries that get compiled to .a libraries. Both use C++ and I explicitly compile them with g++ v2.95.4. On my previously listed link command those would be represendted with '-lttxml' and '-lcbx'. There are also three other .a libraries I build from our own source code. All of the code is C++, but I use gcc and not g++ (again version 2.95.4). And then there's all the actual .o files listed on the linking command that are built with gcc (again, the files are c++) version 2.95.4. > You can't mix and match! If you are going to use g++ 2.95 or 3.0 to > compile, and want the binary to be widely distributable, I recommend > just using -static. The only thing we are dynamically linking against is libstdc++, libpthread, and libm. I suppose we could statically link against libstdc++ and dynamic against the others (since libstdc++ is the most problematic). That would even allow us to go up to version 2.10. Any tips on what command line to use for doing some libraries static and others dynamic? Does the '-static' flag only affect the immediatly previous '-l...'? -- (__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lathi.net) oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7 450C B264 3E63 D543 |_/ If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait.
Bug#112237: compiler versions.
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > g++ 2.95.4 compiled code will NOT run if linked against libstdc++ > 2.9. It just won't happen. That's a bummer. > > Any tips on what command line to use for doing some libraries static > > and others dynamic? Does the '-static' flag only affect the > > immediatly previous '-l...'? > > No. But you can link to libstdc++.a explicitly. > I can't find a .a file for libstdc++ 2.9 in the debian packages. $ dpkg -l '*stdc*dev' Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++---=== un libstdc++-dev (no description available) ii libstdc++2.10-dev2.95.4-0.010810 The GNU stdc++ library (development files) un libstdc++2.8-dev(no description available) un libstdc++2.9-dev(no description available) un libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-de(no description available) un libstdc++3.0-dev(no description available) $ sudo apt-get install libstdc++2.9-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package libstdc++2.9-dev has no available version, but exists in the database. This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents of sources.list E: Package libstdc++2.9-dev has no installation candidate $ sudo apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev has no available version, but exists in the database. This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents of sources.list E: Package libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev has no installation candidate $ dpkg -L libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 | egrep '*\.a$' -- (__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lathi.net) oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7 450C B264 3E63 D543 |_/ If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait.
