Processed: Re: Bug#1053405: darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:gcc-13 Bug #1053405 [src:darktable] darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?) Bug reassigned from package 'src:darktable' to 'src:gcc-13'. No longer marked as found in versions darktable/4.4.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1053405 to the same values previously set > found -1 13.2.0-4 Bug #1053405 [src:gcc-13] darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?) Marked as found in versions gcc-13/13.2.0-4. > affects -1 src:darktable. Bug #1053405 [src:gcc-13] darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?) Added indication that 1053405 affects src:darktable. -- 1053405: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): notfound 1042082 in 3.08-1, reassign 1052260 to libtorch-dev,libtorch-cuda-dev ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1042082 3.08-1
Bug #1042082 {Done: Mark Hindley } [initscripts] Please take
over udev SysV init script
Bug #1052116 {Done: Mark Hindley } [initscripts] Removing
the udev init script breaks sysv bootup.
No longer marked as found in versions sysvinit/3.08-1.
No longer marked as found in versions sysvinit/3.08-1.
> reassign 1052260 libtorch-dev,libtorch-cuda-dev 2.0.1+dfsg-4
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> fixed 1052260 2.0.1+dfsg-5
Bug #1052260 {Done: Mo Zhou }
[libcpuinfo-dev,libtorch-cuda-dev,libtorch-dev]
libcpuinfo-dev,libtorch-cuda-dev,libtorch-dev: all ship /usr/include/clog.h
There is no source info for the package 'libcpuinfo-dev' at version
'2.0.1+dfsg-5' with architecture ''
There is no source info for the package 'libtorch-cuda-dev' at version
'2.0.1+dfsg-5' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1052260 to the same values
previously set
> reassign 1042482 src:gcc-13 13.1.0-9
Bug #1042482 [lib32lsan0,libx32lsan0] multilib lsan packages: dysfunctional?
Bug reassigned from package 'lib32lsan0,libx32lsan0' to 'src:gcc-13'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-13/13.1.0-9.
No longer marked as fixed in versions gcc-13/13.2.0-2.
Bug #1042482 [src:gcc-13] multilib lsan packages: dysfunctional?
Marked as found in versions gcc-13/13.1.0-9.
> fixed 1042482 13.2.0-2
Bug #1042482 [src:gcc-13] multilib lsan packages: dysfunctional?
Marked as fixed in versions gcc-13/13.2.0-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1042082: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042082
1042482: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042482
1052116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052116
1052260: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: gcc-12: ICE when compiling ghdl 3.0.0 on arm64
Processing control commands: > affects -1 = ghdl Bug #1053519 [gcc-12] gcc-12: ICE when compiling ghdl 3.0.0 on arm64 Added indication that 1053519 affects ghdl -- 1053519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053519 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1053519: gcc-12: ICE when compiling ghdl 3.0.0 on arm64
Package: gcc-12 Version: 12.3.0-9 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Forwarded: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111704 X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@debian.org Control: affects -1 = ghdl -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, GHDL steps on an ICE while compiling GHDL 3.0.0 on arm64: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-12 -c -I./ -I../../src -I../../src/vhdl -I../../src/synth -I../../src/grt -I../../src/psl -I../../src/vhdl/translate -I../../src/ghdldrv -I../../src/ortho -I../../src/ortho/llvm6 -I../../src/synth -I../../src/ghdldrv -gnat12 -gnaty3befhkmr -g -gnatwa -gnatwC -gnatf -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -mbranch-protection=standard -gno-record-gcc-switches -gnata -I- /<>/src/synth/synth-disp_vhdl.adb /<>/src/ghdldrv/ghdldrv.adb: In function ‘Ghdldrv.Gen_Makefile’: /<>/src/ghdldrv/ghdldrv.adb:2022:8: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 1387 147 204 13 (parallel [ (set (mem/c:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 29 x29) (const_int -260 [0xfefc])) [36 files_it+4 S4 A32]) (reg:SI 2 x2 [244])) (set (mem/c:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 29 x29) (const_int -256 [0xff00])) [36 files_it+8 S4 A64]) (reg:SI 1 x1 [604])) ]) "/<>/src/ghdldrv/ghdldrv.adb":1926:19 -1 (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 2 x2 [244]) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 1 x1 [604]) (nil during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg Full build log is at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ghdl&arch=arm64&ver=3.0.0%2Bdfsg2-1&stamp=1696130520&raw=0 I have already reported this to the GCC Bugzilla. Simon - -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable') merged-usr: no Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-12-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages gcc-12 depends on: ii binutils 2.40-2 ii cpp-12 12.2.0-14 ii gcc-12-base12.2.0-14 ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u3 ii libcc1-0 12.2.0-14 ii libgcc-12-dev 12.2.0-14 ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14 ii libgmp10 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1 ii libisl23 0.25-1 ii libmpc31.3.1-1 ii libmpfr6 4.2.0-1 ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14 ii libzstd1 1.5.4+dfsg2-5 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 Versions of packages gcc-12 recommends: ii libc6-dev 2.36-9+deb12u3 Versions of packages gcc-12 suggests: pn gcc-12-doc pn gcc-12-locales pn gcc-12-multilib - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEtjuqOJSXmNjSiX3Tfr04e7CZCBEFAmUexsEACgkQfr04e7CZ CBHkYggArUJUHU/RlpTocoJ13EqLsENnfQGVlLuwcyX1lSEZRA06WGZk4HXa8Q85 V6TZNDtY1wjUdMQq/AWGPxyXJH/KqZRXHyx95L1fh7LY6BiI52/uajkzTQm0+V9M HgUMDM2XrH23ocFNU/91vNmH4RH0bjYaV215ES4XHt+RV+YJpjjo9zFmjCYy99O/ PYFdq3XkIDKgNrFc7aN4hdPf94Xx0dFRZQ0JUA9X+y3Bzx5OIH7yUZkGEP4zrhv5 twIKAN0rdI6t89CCW/WhtIDaP2CYfraiB+vdMBtGdaOKCE09D8dVjpHB85CFqYyy /MD/PclgY7KNaQvGj4fdk6AgWEIFPg== =ijpm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#1050933:
Control: tags -1 wontfix GCC-13 works as expected. Turns out to be a UB case in highway source code. Closing
Processed:
Processing control commands: > tags -1 wontfix Bug #1050933 [g++-13] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working) Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 1050933: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050933 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1050933: marked as done (aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working))
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2023 17:12:22 +0200 with message-id and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #1050933, regarding aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1050933: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050933 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: g++-13 Version: 13.2.0-2 Forwarded: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 Affects: src:highway I am getting some odd behavior for unit test of highway. I believe there is some wrong-code generation using g++ + -O1. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Control: tags -1 wontfix GCC-13 works as expected. Turns out to be a UB case in highway source code. Closing--- End Message ---
Bug#1053543: libdw-dev: Poor package description
Package: libdw-dev Version: 0.189-4 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: witold.bary...@gmail.com libdw-dev: Description: libdw1 development libraries and header files This is really poor choice of a description. It does not provide any actual information. Like what libdw1 is? Usually Description will be more informative, similar to how non-dev packages are described. Maybe: library that provides access to the DWARF debug information (development files) which would align with libdw1 package description. However, ultimately this would be better (and shorter): Library to access DWARF debugging information (development files) and for libdw1: Library to access DWARF debugging information (with possible (shared libraries) suffix, but preferably without) Similarliy for libelf-dev: Description: libelf1 development libraries and header files => Description: Library to read and write ELF files (developement files) Cheers, Witold -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/32 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE, TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libdw-dev depends on: ii libdw1 0.189-4 ii libelf-dev 0.189-4 ii liblzma-dev 5.4.4-0.1 ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.13.dfsg-3 libdw-dev recommends no packages. libdw-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
