Processed (with 1 errors): retitle 797971

2015-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 797971 bump mips O32 to mips32r2 ISA, enable --with-mips-plt,
Bug #797971 [src:gcc-5] gcc-5: -mfix-loongson2f-nop not needed on mips64el
Changed Bug title to 'bump mips O32 to mips32r2 ISA, enable --with-mips-plt,' 
from 'gcc-5: -mfix-loongson2f-nop not needed on mips64el'
> drop loongson 2f workaround
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
797971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: retitle 797971

2015-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 797971 bump mips O32 to mips32r2 ISA, enable --with-mips-plt, drop 
> loongson 2f workaround
Bug #797971 [src:gcc-5] bump mips O32 to mips32r2 ISA, enable --with-mips-plt,
Changed Bug title to 'bump mips O32 to mips32r2 ISA, enable --with-mips-plt, 
drop loongson 2f workaround' from 'bump mips O32 to mips32r2 ISA, enable 
--with-mips-plt,'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
797971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#797971: gcc-5: -mfix-loongson2f-nop not needed on mips64el

2015-09-05 Thread YunQiang Su 
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:50:58 +0800 YunQiang Su  wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:39:03 +0800 Aron Xu  wrote:
> > Package: src:gcc-5
> > Version: 5.2.1-16
> >
> > It looks -mfix-loongson2f-nop is enabled in config/mips/mips.h by a
> > Debian patch, which makes it applied to everything mips*. This is not
> > needed for either mips64el or mips (be) though.
>
> We are working on upgrade mips{,el} to mips32r2.
> Now rebuild for FPXX is in the progress.
>
> Once FPXX rebuild is ready, we will upgrade them to mips32r2.
>
> So drop this patch will be OK for now.

We are talking about remove the old machines and add a new porterbox.
So when they are ready, I will submit a patch.

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aron
> >
> >
>
>