Processing of gnat-4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.changes
gnat-4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnat-4.8_4.8.2-1.dsc gnat-4.8_4.8.2-1.tar.gz gnat-4.8-base_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnat-4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnat-4.8-dbg_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatvsn4.8-dev_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatvsn4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatvsn4.8-dbg_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatprj4.8-dev_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatprj4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb libgnatprj4.8-dbg_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb gnat-4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb gnat-4.8-sjlj_4.8.2-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vzft2-000551...@franck.debian.org
gnat-4.8_4.8.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:libgnat-4.8 is NEW. binary:libgnatprj4.8-dev is NEW. binary:gnat-4.8 is NEW. binary:gnat-4.8-base is NEW. binary:libgnat-4.8-dbg is NEW. binary:libgnatvsn4.8 is NEW. binary:libgnatprj4.8 is NEW. binary:libgnatvsn4.8-dev is NEW. binary:gnat-4.8-sjlj is NEW. binary:libgnatvsn4.8-dbg is NEW. binary:libgnatprj4.8-dbg is NEW. source:gnat-4.8 is NEW. Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vzh5b-000421...@franck.debian.org
Bug#727621: armel: std::future appears to be broken?
Package: g++-4.8 Version: 4.8.1-10 Severity: normal Hello, thank you for maintaining GCC. When I tried to compile cupt 2.6.x in unstable/experimental, an armel build (out of all) failed. This unfortunately blocks cupt's migration to testing. unstable, used g++ 4.8 - [1] unstable, used g++ 4.6 - [2] experimental, used g++ 4.6 - [3] Errors were a bit different between 4.6 and 4.8, but both didn't like something about std::future. Builds on other architectures, including armhf, went fine. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cupt&arch=armel&ver=2.6.3&stamp=1382566839 [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cupt&arch=armel&ver=2.6.2&stamp=1381599864 [3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cupt&arch=armel&ver=2.6.1&stamp=1381587241 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages g++-4.8 depends on: ii gcc-4.84.8.1-10 ii gcc-4.8-base 4.8.1-10 ii libc6 2.17-3 ii libcloog-isl4 0.18.0-2 ii libgmp10 2:5.0.5+dfsg-2 ii libisl10 0.11.2-1 ii libmpc31.0.1-1 ii libmpfr4 3.1.1-2 ii libstdc++-4.8-dev 4.8.1-10 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13 g++-4.8 recommends no packages. Versions of packages g++-4.8 suggests: pn g++-4.8-multilib pn gcc-4.8-doc pn libstdc++6-4.8-dbg -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024170324.11280.58676.reportbug@debian-w500.Elisa
Results for 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk revision 203899] (Debian 20131021-1) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 21 16:22:58 UTC 2013 (revision 203899) Target: s390x-linux-gnu gcc version 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk revision 203899] (Debian 20131021-1) === acats tests === FAIL: c52103x FAIL: c52104x FAIL: c52104y FAIL: cb1010a === acats Summary === # of expected passes2316 # of unexpected failures4 Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler-not rodata FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler-not rodata === g++ Summary === # of expected passes55898 # of unexpected failures2 # of expected failures 293 # of unsupported tests 1027 /build/gcc-snapshot-OMjEhG/gcc-snapshot-20131021/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ version 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk revision 203899] (Debian 20131021-1) === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapsi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapsi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapdi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapdi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapsi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapsi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-9.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapdi" FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-9.c scan-rtl-dump-not combine "bswapdi" FAIL: gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c scan-rtl-dump hoist "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" FAIL: gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c scan-rtl-dump hoist "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" FAIL: gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c scan-rtl-dump hoist "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" FAIL: gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c scan-rtl-dump hoist "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" FAIL: gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c scan-rtl-dump hoist "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" FAIL: gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c scan-rtl-dump hoist "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c unconditional (test for warnings, line 8) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c unconditional (test for warnings, line 8) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c (test for excess errors) XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0 XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c scan-tree-dump-times forwprop1 "Replaced" 8 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c scan-tree-dump-times forwprop1 "Replaced" 8 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-33.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 3 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-33.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 3 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-34.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-34.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-35.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-35.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-36.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-36.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp87.c scan-tree-dump vrp2 "Folded into: if.*" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp87.c scan-tree-dump cddce2 "Deleting.*_Bool.*;" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp87.c scan-tree-dump vrp2 "Folded into: if.*" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp87.c scan-tree-dump cddce2 "Deleting.*_Bool.*;" === gcc Summary === # of expected passes87360 # of unexpected failures16 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 114 # of unsupported tests 1202 /build/gcc-snapshot-OMjEhG/gcc-snapshot-20131021/build/gcc/xgcc version 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk revision 203899] (Debian 20131021-1) === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -Os execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: g
Results for 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-8) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 20 20:56:37 UTC 2013 (revision 203880) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix === boehm-gc Summary === # of expected passes12 # of unsupported tests 1 === libffi tests === Running target unix XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulong_va.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_ulong_va.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_1.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct1.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct1.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct2.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct2.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct3.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct3.c -O0 -W -Wall compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O2 execution test FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulong_va.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_ulong_va.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_1.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct1.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct2.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct2.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct3.c -O2 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct3.c -O2 compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O3 execution test FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ulong_va.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_ulong_va.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_1.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct1.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct1.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct2.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct2.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/va_struct3.c -O3 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/va_struct3.c -O3 compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -Os execution test FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -Os (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c -Os compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -Os (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -Os compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uint_va.c -Os (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVE
Results for 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-8) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 20 20:56:37 UTC 2013 (revision 203880) Target: s390x-linux-gnu gcc version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-8) Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler-not rodata === g++ Summary for unix === # of expected passes48553 # of unexpected failures2 # of expected failures 286 # of unsupported tests 669 Running target unix/-fstack-protector FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler-not rodata === g++ Summary for unix/-fstack-protector === # of expected passes48553 # of unexpected failures2 # of expected failures 286 # of unsupported tests 669 === g++ Summary === # of expected passes97106 # of unexpected failures4 # of expected failures 572 # of unsupported tests 1338 /build/gcc-4.7-3zv3m9/gcc-4.7-4.7.3/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-8) === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c unconditional (test for warnings, line 8) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c (test for excess errors) XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0 === gcc Summary for unix === # of expected passes75401 # of unexpected failures2 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 109 # of unsupported tests 1143 Running target unix/-fstack-protector FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c unconditional (test for warnings, line 8) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c (test for excess errors) XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0 === gcc Summary for unix/-fstack-protector === # of expected passes75401 # of unexpected failures2 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 109 # of unsupported tests 1143 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes150802 # of unexpected failures4 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 218 # of unsupported tests 2286 /build/gcc-4.7-3zv3m9/gcc-4.7-4.7.3/build/gcc/xgcc version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-8) === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -Os execution test === gfortran Summary for unix === # of expected passes40621 # of unexpected failures8 # of expected failures 42 # of unsupported tests 83 Running target unix/-fstack-protector FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 -Os execution test === gfortran Summary for unix/-fstack-protector === # of expected passes40621 # of unexpected failures8 # of expected failures 42 # of unsupported tests 83 === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes81242 # of unexpected failures16 # of expected failures 84 # of unsupported tests 166 /build/gcc-4.7-3zv3m9/gcc-4.7-4.7.3/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran version 4.7.3 (Debian 4.7.3-8) === go tests === Running target unix UNRESOLVED: go.test/test/235.go compilation, -O2 -g UNRESOLVED: go.test/test/64bit.go -O (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: go.test/test/chan/doubleselect.go compilation, -O2 -g FAIL: go.test/test/env.go execution, -O2 -g UNRESOLVED: go.test/test/if.go compilation, -O2 -g FAIL: go.test/test/nilptr.go execution, -O2 -g ERROR: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu: unhandled architecture ERROR: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu: unhandled architecture ERROR: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu: unhandled architecture ERROR: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu: unhandled architecture === go Summary for unix === # o
Bug#727621: armel: std::future appears to be broken?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:03:24PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > When I tried to compile cupt 2.6.x in unstable/experimental, an armel > build (out of all) failed. This unfortunately blocks cupt's migration to > testing. Please fix cupt to show the complete command-line. The build-logs are near to useless. Bastian -- I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life. -- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024194547.ga14...@mail.waldi.eu.org
Bug#727621: armel: std::future appears to be broken?
Hi, 2013-10-24 21:45, Bastian Blank: > Please fix cupt to show the complete command-line. The build-logs are > near to useless. In general, I tend to disagree, for noise-to-signal and readability ratio. Now if this particular report is near to useless given the information I provided, I would be happy to to dig and attach all what is needed. I apparently assumed wrong that reproducability would be enough. Would it be enough if I provide the complete compiler command line and preprocessed source for the failing case? -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++ GNU/Linux userspace developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024211259.GA16191@debian-w500.Elisa
Bug#727621: armel: std::future appears to be broken?
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:12:59AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > 2013-10-24 21:45, Bastian Blank: > > Please fix cupt to show the complete command-line. The build-logs are > > near to useless. > In general, I tend to disagree, for noise-to-signal and readability > ratio. Log from buildds are usually only inspected in the case of errors or by other automatic means, so there is no noise. As the errors sometimes are not really reproducible, it needs to provide all information needed to solve the problem. Some questions I would ask: - Does it use the same flags for all architectures? - What flags exactly? > Now if this particular report is near to useless given the information I > provided, I would be happy to to dig and attach all what is needed. I > apparently assumed wrong that reproducability would be enough. Well. Did you already try to reproduce it on the developer machine? Bastian -- War isn't a good life, but it's life. -- Kirk, "A Private Little War", stardate 4211.8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024215148.ga2...@mail.waldi.eu.org
Processing of gcc-doc-defaults_5_amd64.changes
gcc-doc-defaults_5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-doc-defaults_5.dsc gcc-doc-defaults_5.tar.gz gcc-doc-base_4.8.0-1_all.deb cpp-doc_4.8.0-1_amd64.deb gcc-doc_4.8.0-1_amd64.deb gfortran-doc_4.8.0-1_amd64.deb gnat-doc_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb gcj-doc_4.8.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vzvbo-0002nl...@franck.debian.org
gcc-doc-defaults_5_amd64.changes REJECTED
ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vzvo9-0004xr...@franck.debian.org
