Processing of gcc-defaults_1.118_amd64.changes

2012-05-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-defaults_1.118_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-defaults_1.118.dsc
  gcc-defaults_1.118.tar.gz
  libgcj-common_4.6.3-6_all.deb
  cpp_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gcc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gcc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gdc_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb
  gdc-v1_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb
  g++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  g++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gobjc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gobjc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gobjc++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gobjc++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gfortran_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gfortran-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gccgo_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gccgo-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  libgcj-bc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gcj-jre-headless_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gcj-jre_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  gcj-jdk_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1srqo0-0002g1...@franck.debian.org



gcc-defaults_1.118_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-05-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
cpp_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
g++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
g++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gcc-defaults_1.118.dsc
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_1.118.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.118.tar.gz
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_1.118.tar.gz
gcc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gcc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gccgo-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gccgo-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gccgo_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gccgo_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gcj-jdk_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj-jdk_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gcj-jre-headless_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj-jre-headless_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gcj-jre_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj-jre_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gdc-v1_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gdc-v1_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb
gdc_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gdc_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb
gfortran-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gfortran-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gfortran_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gfortran_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gobjc++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gobjc++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gobjc++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gobjc++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gobjc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gobjc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
gobjc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/gobjc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
libgcj-bc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/libgcj-bc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb
libgcj-common_4.6.3-6_all.deb
  to main/g/gcc-defaults/libgcj-common_4.6.3-6_all.deb


Changes:
gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.


Override entries for your package:
cpp_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional interpreters
g++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
g++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gcc-defaults_1.118.dsc - source devel
gcc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gcc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gccgo-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gccgo_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gcj-jdk_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional java
gcj-jre-headless_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional java
gcj-jre_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional java
gdc-v1_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gdc_4.6.3-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gfortran-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gfortran_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gobjc++-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gobjc++_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gobjc-multilib_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
gobjc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional devel
libgcj-bc_4.7.0-6_amd64.deb - optional java
libgcj-common_4.6.3-6_all.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1srqek-0004d2...@franck.debian.org



Processed: GCC-4.7 now the default for x86 archs, raising severity of GCC 4.7 related build failures

2012-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 667373 serious
Bug #667373 [simgear] simgear: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 667373 to the same value.
> severity 671438 serious
Bug #671438 [insighttoolkit] insighttoolkit headers cause build failures with 
GCC 4.7
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 671438 to the same value.
> severity 671475 serious
Bug #671475 [libclaw] libclaw headers ftbfs with gcc-4.7
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 671475 to the same value.
> severity 667094 serious
Bug #667094 [adanaxisgpl] adanaxisgpl: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667101 serious
Bug #667101 [ardour] ardour: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667105 serious
Bug #667105 [audex] audex: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667109 serious
Bug #667109 [barry] barry: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667111 serious
Bug #667111 [bcov] bcov: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667114 serious
Bug #667114 [bitcoin] bitcoin: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667118 serious
Bug #667118 [blockattack] blockattack: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667127 serious
Bug #667127 [cantor] cantor: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667129 serious
Bug #667129 [cb2bib] cb2bib: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667131 serious
Bug #667131 [cbmc] cbmc: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667135 serious
Bug #667135 [chasen] chasen: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667136 serious
Bug #667136 [clam] clam: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667137 serious
Bug #667137 [clam-networkeditor] clam-networkeditor: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667138 serious
Bug #667138 [codeblocks] codeblocks: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667139 serious
Bug #667139 [coin3] coin3: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667141 serious
Bug #667141 [config-manager] config-manager: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667143 serious
Bug #667143 [critterding] critterding: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667145 serious
Bug #667145 [ctemplate] ctemplate: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667151 serious
Bug #667151 [digikam] digikam: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667152 serious
Bug #667152 [dmtcp] dmtcp: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667158 serious
Bug #667158 [esys-particle] esys-particle: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667160 serious
Bug #667160 [fakeroot-ng] fakeroot-ng: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667168 serious
Bug #667168 [fparser] fparser: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667169 serious
Bug #667169 [fqterm] fqterm: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667171 serious
Bug #667171 [ftpgrab] ftpgrab: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667195 serious
Bug #667195 [gtkmathview] gtkmathview: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667202 serious
Bug #667202 [hoichess] hoichess: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667203 serious
Bug #667203 [hydrogen] hydrogen: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667204 serious
Bug #667204 [ibam] ibam: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667215 serious
Bug #667215 [jffi] jffi: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667218 serious
Bug #667218 [kaffeine] kaffeine: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667220 serious
Bug #667220 [kdepimlibs] kdepimlibs: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667230 serious
Bug #667230 [kredentials] kredentials: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667239 serious
Bug #667239 [libapache2-mod-encoding] libapache2-mod-encoding: ftbfs with 
GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667244 serious
Bug #667244 [libevocosm] libevocosm: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667247 serious
Bug #667247 [libkml] libkml: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 667249 serious
Bug #667249 [libmsn] libmsn: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Severity set 

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May  7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:

>  gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
>  kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.

Please revert this change.  There are still too many open bugs on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7,
and it's too late in the release cycle, to change this, IMO.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures

2012-05-07 Thread Matthias Klose
GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures for all frontends except the D
frontends, including KFreeBSD and the Hurd.

There are still some build failures which need to be addressed. Out of the ~350
bugs filed, more than the half are fixed, another quarter has patches available,
and the remaining quarter isn't blocking any other 4.7 build failures. Many
thanks to the patch submitters and NMUers, including Cyril Brulebois, Gregor
Herrmann, Paul Tagliamonte for the fixes.

This will add one more transition for x86 (libobjc3 -> libobjc4), which needs
starting with uploads of some GNUstep base packages.

The D v2 frontend is likely to be updated to 4.7 before the freeze (no build
dependencies).

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa7ffd8.9010...@debian.org



Re: GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures

2012-05-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 07.05.2012 19:35, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Matthias Klose dixit:
> 
>> GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures for all frontends except 
>> the D
>> frontends, including KFreeBSD and the Hurd.
> 
> How are the plans for other architectures?

I don't have plans to change any other architectures. If a port is not a release
architectures (and port maintainers don't plan to make it a release
architecture), people can change the default at any time from my point of view.

> As for gcc-4.7 in general: a friend (authoring an ObjC framework _and_
> runtime) told me that it dropped support for an old method of doing
> things while not fulfilling the promise to get the new method of doing
> it (don’t exactly remember what it was, /msg js on freenode for details)
> fixed, with the effect that gobjc-4.7 is virtually useless/broken.
> 
> This is hearsay, but ask him for details, and check them against
> reality.

I didn't rely on hearsay, but did ask the GNUstep maintainers for feedback.
Please join the Debian GNUstep package maintainers ML if you want to add
something, or review the past discussion.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa80a89.8070...@debian.org



Re: GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures

2012-05-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Matthias Klose dixit:

>GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures for all frontends except the D
>frontends, including KFreeBSD and the Hurd.

How are the plans for other architectures?

The m68k status (which obviously can’t influence the release decisions)
is as follows: gcc-4.7 builds, last time I looked gcj-4.7 didn’t but it
is currently building again (so let’s see whether it does this time);
gcc-4.6 and gnat-4.6 are getting development and bugfixes (I’ve queued
up some patches, but am not entirely ready with all of them, plus some
for binutils and gdb), and I’ve asked for help re. the gcj-4.4/gcj-4.6
recent problems. But nothing has tested gcj-4.7, and I fear of new and
old bugs… so I’d rather not switch default compiler to it anytime soon.

As for gcc-4.7 in general: a friend (authoring an ObjC framework _and_
runtime) told me that it dropped support for an old method of doing
things while not fulfilling the promise to get the new method of doing
it (don’t exactly remember what it was, /msg js on freenode for details)
fixed, with the effect that gobjc-4.7 is virtually useless/broken.

This is hearsay, but ask him for details, and check them against
reality.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Yay for having to rewrite other people's Bash scripts because bash
suddenly stopped supporting the bash extensions they make use of
-- Tonnerre Lombard in #nosec


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1205071730550.28...@herc.mirbsd.org



Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Julien Cristau  (07/05/2012):
> On Mon, May  7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
> >  gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> >  .
> >* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> >  kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.
> 
> Please revert this change.  There are still too many open bugs on
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7,
> […]

Seconded. Furthermore, doing so without an ACK from the release team
isn't very nice. Too many transitions going on/to do already, we don't
need that kind of fun. Why do we need to take that extra blast?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 07.05.2012 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau  (07/05/2012):
>> On Mon, May  7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> 
>>> gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low . * Default to GCC 4.7 for
>>> gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and
>>> hurd-i386.
>> 
>> Please revert this change.  There are still too many open bugs on 
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7,
>>
>> 
[…]
> 
> Seconded. Furthermore, doing so without an ACK from the release team isn't
> very nice. Too many transitions going on/to do already, we don't need that
> kind of fun. Why do we need to take that extra blast?

see my email to -release. It's ahead of the freeze, and the fix rate for the
build failures shows that all these issues can be fixed even before the
freeze. It is not a transition which requires binNMU's itself (except for the
libobjc stuff), and shouldn't affect other ongoing transitions.  If there are
fixes needed for an ongoing transition, please bring these to my attention.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa81b6a.8000...@debian.org