Bug#564984: marked as done (fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:46:40 +0200
with message-id <4c20a2a0.3020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#564984: fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #564984,
regarding fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
564984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564984
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fauhdlc
Version: 20091119-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
User: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.5

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4.
For the compiler version used, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/01/msg00230.html

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/01/08b/fauhdlc_20091119-1_lsid64b.buildlog
The last lines of the build log are cwat the end of this report.

The reason of the build failure is likely in the package (compiler or
linker message found in the build log), if this turns out as a gcc bug,
please reassign to the gcc-4.5 package. If the build ends with a
message "confused by earlier errors, bailing out", please
ignore it for now; these compiler errors are filed separately.


[...]
g++ -Wall -Wextra -Wendif-labels -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual 
-Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-aliasing -Wsign-compare -Wconversion 
-Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused-parameter -Wold-style-cast -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE 
-Werror -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"fauhdlc\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"20091119\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"fauhdlc\ 20091119\" 
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DVERSION=\"20091119\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 
-DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_GC_GC_CPP_H=1 -I. -g -O2 -MT RegisterBuiltins.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/RegisterBuiltins.Tpo -c -o RegisterBuiltins.o `test -f 
'frontend/misc/RegisterBuiltins.cpp' || echo 
'./'`frontend/misc/RegisterBuiltins.cpp
g++ -Wall -Wextra -Wendif-labels -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual 
-Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-aliasing -Wsign-compare -Wconversion 
-Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused-parameter -Wold-style-cast -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE 
-Werror -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"fauhdlc\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"20091119\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"fauhdlc\ 20091119\" 
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DVERSION=\"20091119\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 
-DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_GC_GC_CPP_H=1 -I. -g -O2 -MT RangeSet.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/RangeSet.Tpo -c -o RangeSet.o `test -f 'frontend/misc/RangeSet.cpp' || 
echo './'`frontend/misc/RangeSet.cpp
mv -f .deps/ValDeclaration.Tpo .deps/ValDeclaration.Po
mv -f .deps/Driver.Tpo .deps/Driver.Po
g++ -Wall -Wextra -Wendif-labels -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual 
-Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-aliasing -Wsign-compare -Wconversion 
-Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused-parameter -Wold-style-cast -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE 
-Werror -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"fauhdlc\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"20091119\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"fauhdlc\ 20091119\" 
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DVERSION=\"20091119\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 
-DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_GC_GC_CPP_H=1 -I. -g -O2 -MT ErrorRegistry.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/ErrorRegistry.Tpo -c -o ErrorRegistry.o `test -f 
'frontend/reporting/ErrorRegistry.cpp' || echo 
'./'`frontend/reporting/ErrorRegistry.cpp
g++ -Wall -Wextra -Wendif-labels -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual 
-Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-aliasing -Wsign-compare -Wconversion 
-Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused-parameter -Wold-style-cast -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE 
-Werror -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"fauhdlc\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"20091119\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"fauhdlc\ 20091119\" 
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"fauhdlc\" 
-DVERSION=\"20091119\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 
-DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_GC_GC_CPP_H=1 -I. -g -O2 -MT C

Bug#534193: marked as done (libstdc++6: calling erase() on a new empty string will cause a helgrind error report)

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:33:27 +0200
with message-id <4c20ad97.5080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#534193: libstdc++6: calling erase() on a new empty 
string will cause a helgrind error report
has caused the Debian Bug report #534193,
regarding libstdc++6: calling erase() on a new empty string will cause a 
helgrind error report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
534193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: important

http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/06/22/valgrindhelgrind-and-stl-string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40518

The above GCC bug report which was created by Jonathan Wakely after reading my
blog concerns a case where calling empty() on an empty string will be regarded
as not being thread-safe by helgrind.

I am not sure if this is a real problem (IE something that can corrupt memory)
or whether it's a cosmetic error (something that just causes helgrind
warnings).  Due to this being the main error that helgrind flags on a program
that later has an assertion from free() I suspect that it may actually
corrupt memory.  But if however it happens to not corrupt memory I still think
that it is important enough to justify an update to Lenny to fix this.

Allowing debugging tools such as helgrind to work to their maximum potential
is quite important to improve the overall quality of the code.

I have reproduced this bug in version 4.3.3-12 in Unstable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) 
(ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libstdc++6 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.3-base 4.3.2-1.1   The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc62.7-18  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.3.2-1.1 GCC support library

libstdc++6 recommends no packages.

libstdc++6 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Version: 4.4.4-1

On 22.06.2009 13:59, Russell Coker wrote:

Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: important

http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/06/22/valgrindhelgrind-and-stl-string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40518

The above GCC bug report which was created by Jonathan Wakely after reading my
blog concerns a case where calling empty() on an empty string will be regarded
as not being thread-safe by helgrind.

I am not sure if this is a real problem (IE something that can corrupt memory)
or whether it's a cosmetic error (something that just causes helgrind
warnings).  Due to this being the main error that helgrind flags on a program
that later has an assertion from free() I suspect that it may actually
corrupt memory.  But if however it happens to not corrupt memory I still think
that it is important enough to justify an update to Lenny to fix this.

Allowing debugging tools such as helgrind to work to their maximum potential
is quite important to improve the overall quality of the code.


--- End Message ---


Bug#577961: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.5-dev: Using some part of the STL increase the linkage requirement)

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:49:01 +0200
with message-id <4c20b13d.3050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#577961: libstdc++6-4.5-dev: Using some part of the STL 
increase the linkage requirement
has caused the Debian Bug report #577961,
regarding libstdc++6-4.5-dev: Using some part of the STL increase the linkage 
requirement
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
577961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6-4.5-dev
Version: 4.5.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental

  Hi,

  I'm not sure if this bug behave to libstdc++6-4.5-dev or g++-4.5 or if this 
is really a bug.

  Here is what I observed: when
* a non-threaded application uses some part of the STL (such as )
and
* the application links to a library itself linked to libpthread
and
* the linker is g++-4.5 (not g++-4.4 or previous)
then
the application itself must be linked with libpthread.

Example:
vdanj...@eyak:/tmp/test$ cat Makefile 
CXXLD=$(CXX)
CXXFLAGS=-Wall -fPIC -std=gnu++0x
CPPFLAGS=-I.
all: mymain2 mymain libkapi.so.0
mymain: mymain.o libkapi.so
$(CXXLD) -o $@ $(CXXFLAGS) mymain.o -L. -lkapi
mymain2: mymain.o
$(CXXLD) -o $@ $(CXXFLAGS) mymain.o
libkapi.so: libkapi.so.0
ln -fs $...@.0 $@
kapi.cc:
touch $@
kapi.o: kapi.cc
libkapi.so.0: kapi.o
$(CXXLD) $(CXXFLAGS) -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,$@ -o $@ $^ -pthread
clean:
$(RM) *.o libkapi.so.0 mymain kapi.cc libkapi.so mymain2
# mymain.cc is the example from 
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/std/memory/uninitialized_copy/
vdanj...@eyak:/tmp/test$ cat mymain.cc 
#include 
#include 
#include 
using namespace std;

int main () {
  string numbers[] ={"one","two","three"};

  // get block of uninitialized memory:
  pair  result = get_temporary_buffer(3);

  if (result.second>0) {
uninitialized_copy ( numbers, numbers+result.second, result.first );

for (int i=0; i (no description available)

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

On 15.04.2010 17:04, Vincent Danjean wrote:

   I'm not sure if this bug behave to libstdc++6-4.5-dev or g++-4.5 or if this 
is really a bug.

   Here is what I observed: when
* a non-threaded application uses some part of the STL (such as)
and
* the application links to a library itself linked to libpthread
and
* the linker is g++-4.5 (not g++-4.4 or previous)
then
the application itself must be linked with libpthread.


I can't reproduce this with current unstable and current g++-4.5 from 
experimental.  Please reopen if appropriate.


--- End Message ---


Bug#578831: link failure with LTO: “invalid DSO for symbol `pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.0' definition”

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose

On 28.04.2010 10:37, Vincent Danjean wrote:

On 27/04/2010 01:26, Matthias Klose wrote:

On 23.04.2010 10:22, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:41:53AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:

Please, look at #577961. It seems to me that this is the same bug (and
now, I think the bug belong to gcc-4.5)


OK, adding -lpthread makes the error go away.


please make sure that *all* flags (except preprocessor flags) passed to
cc1 are also passed to lto1. For common build systems, this does mean
passing $(CFLAGS) to the link command.


I do not know for #578831 but, for #577961 the application must not be
required to link to -lpthread (and lto1 is not used).


please recheck with the current g++-4.5 in experimental.  -lpthread shouldn't be 
used directly, but pass -pthread to both CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c20b244.5050...@debian.org



Processed: forwarded gcc report

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 577458 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR44630
Bug #577458 [libstdc++6-4.5-dev] libstdc++6-4.5-dev: profiler_trace.h defines 
functions __max and __min which causes portability problems
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR44630'.
> tag 577458 + upstream
Bug #577458 [libstdc++6-4.5-dev] libstdc++6-4.5-dev: profiler_trace.h defines 
functions __max and __min which causes portability problems
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
577458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12772114322240.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#577961: libstdc++6-4.5-dev: Using some part of the STL increase the linkage requirement

2010-06-22 Thread Vincent Danjean
fixed 577961 4.5.0-6

On 22/06/2010 14:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I can't reproduce this with current unstable and current g++-4.5 from
> experimental.  Please reopen if appropriate.

  I just checked and can confirm that  the current experimental version
is ok. Adding this info to the BTS.

  Regards,
Vincent

-- 
Vincent Danjean Adresse: Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble
Téléphone:  +33 4 76 61 20 11ENSIMAG - antenne de Montbonnot
Fax:+33 4 76 61 20 99ZIRST 51, avenue Jean Kuntzmann
Email: vincent.danj...@imag.fr   38330 Montbonnot Saint Martin



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c20bb6f.7090...@debian.org



Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#577961: libstdc++6-4.5-dev: Using some part of the STL increase the linkage requirement

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 577961 4.5.0-6
Bug #577961 {Done: Matthias Klose } [libstdc++6-4.5-dev] 
libstdc++6-4.5-dev: Using some part of the STL increase the linkage requirement
Bug Marked as fixed in versions gcc-4.5/4.5.0-6.
> On 22/06/2010 14:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > I can't reproduce this with current unstable and current g++-4.5 from
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > experimental.  Please reopen if appropriate.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

>   I just checked and can confirm that  the current experimental version
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> is ok. Adding this info to the BTS.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
577961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127721356019470.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#581571: [sparc] long long to double conversion error

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 581571 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR44631
Bug #581571 [gcc-4.4] [sparc] long long to double conversion error
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR44631'.
> tag 581571 + upstream
Bug #581571 [gcc-4.4] [sparc] long long to double conversion error
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
581571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127721353019288.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#585925: g++-4.4: bogus results of complex division

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 585925 http://gcc.gnu.org/44632
Bug #585925 [g++-4.4] g++-4.4: bogus results of complex division
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/44632'.
> tag 585925 + upstream
Bug #585925 [g++-4.4] g++-4.4: bogus results of complex division
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
585925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127721521530963.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#567695: smaller test case enclosed

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose

On 23.02.2010 23:47, Falk Hueffner wrote:

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:55:42AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:

This test program will segfault at -O2 on the affected machines:


Can you please repost the attachment? It is not retrievable from the
BTS at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567695 ...


the attachments are retrievable, but don't build



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c20c7d1.1090...@debian.org



Processed: forwarded gcc report

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 566242 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR44634
Bug #566242 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: 
in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/PR44634'.
> tag 566242 + upstream
Bug #566242 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: 
in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
566242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127721786425091.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#566242: gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose

tag 566242 + wontfix
tag 566242 + upstream
tag 566242 + fixed-upstream

fixed in 4.5.  won't fix in 4.4.  Use -mcpu=v9 as a workaround for gcc-4.4.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c20cf3d.9040...@debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#566242: gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 566242 + wontfix
Bug #566242 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: 
in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> tag 566242 + upstream
Bug #566242 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: 
in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #566242 to the same tags previously set
> tag 566242 + fixed-upstream
Bug #566242 [gcc-4.4] gcc-4.4: ICE when building polybori 0.5~rc1-2.1 on sparc: 
in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> fixed in 4.5.  won't fix in 4.4.  Use -mcpu=v9 as a workaround for gcc-4.4.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
566242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127721863030883.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: forwarded gcc report

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 582085 http://gcc.gnu.org/44636
Bug #582085 [gfortran-4.4] gfortran-4.4 regression: the -i4 option is not 
supported anymore
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/44636'.
> tags 582085 + upstream
Bug #582085 [gfortran-4.4] gfortran-4.4 regression: the -i4 option is not 
supported anymore
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
582085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12772218654012.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Results for 4.4.4 (Debian 4.4.4-6) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_4_release revision 158895

Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.4 (Debian 4.4.4-6) 
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix

=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes19943
# of expected failures  157
# of unsupported tests  253

Running target unix/-fstack-protector

=== g++ Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes19943
# of expected failures  157
# of unsupported tests  253

Running target unix/-m32

=== g++ Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes20262
# of expected failures  157
# of unsupported tests  101

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes60148
# of expected failures  471
# of unsupported tests  607
/scratch/packages/gcc/4.4/gcc-4.4-4.4.4/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++  
version 4.4.4 (Debian 4.4.4-6) 

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c execution,-fprofile-use 
-D_PROFILE_USE
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c execution,-fprofile-use 
-D_PROFILE_USE

=== gcc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes57922
# of unexpected failures2
# of expected failures  192
# of unresolved testcases   2
# of unsupported tests  735

Running target unix/-fstack-protector
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-blockid.c  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c execution,-fprofile-use 
-D_PROFILE_USE
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c execution,-fprofile-use 
-D_PROFILE_USE

=== gcc Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes57921
# of unexpected failures3
# of expected failures  192
# of unresolved testcases   2
# of unsupported tests  735

Running target unix/-m32

=== gcc Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes58282
# of expected failures  193
# of unsupported tests  446

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes174125
# of unexpected failures5
# of expected failures  577
# of unresolved testcases   4
# of unsupported tests  1916
/scratch/packages/gcc/4.4/gcc-4.4-4.4.4/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.4.4 (Debian 
4.4.4-6) 

=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix

=== gfortran Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes30365
# of expected failures  13
# of unsupported tests  44

Running target unix/-fstack-protector

=== gfortran Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes30365
# of expected failures  13
# of unsupported tests  44

Running target unix/-m32

=== gfortran Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes30236
# of expected failures  13
# of unsupported tests  105

=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes90966
# of expected failures  39
# of unsupported tests  193
/scratch/packages/gcc/4.4/gcc-4.4-4.4.4/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
  version 4.4.4 (Debian 4.4.4-6) 

=== obj-c++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-9.mm compilation failed to produce executable

=== obj-c++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes425
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  20
# of unresolved testcases   3
# of unsupported tests  13

Running target unix/-fstack-protector
XPASS: obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-9.mm compilation failed to produce executable

=== obj-c++ Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes425
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  20
# of unresolved testcases   3
# of unsupported tests  13

Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm (test for excess errors)
UNR

Results for 4.5.1 20100621 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-7) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_0_release revision 158339

Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.5.1 20100621 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-7) 
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix

=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes22826
# of expected failures  151
# of unsupported tests  303

Running target unix/-fstack-protector

=== g++ Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes22826
# of expected failures  151
# of unsupported tests  303

Running target unix/-m32

=== g++ Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes23223
# of expected failures  151
# of unsupported tests  113

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes68875
# of expected failures  453
# of unsupported tests  719
/scratch/packages/gcc/4.5/gcc-4.5-4.5.0/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++  
version 4.5.1 20100621 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-7) 

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O1  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O2 -flto  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O1  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O3 -g  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -Os  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O2 -flto  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O0  line 28 j == 28 + 37
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O1  line 28 j == 28 + 37
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2  line 28 j == 28 + 37
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  line 28 j == 28 + 
37
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O3 -g  line 28 j == 28 + 37
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -Os  line 28 j == 28 + 37
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2 -flto  line 28 i == 37
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2 -flto  line 28 i1 == 2 * 37
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2 -flto  line 28 i2 == 3 * 37
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2 -fwhopr  line 28 i == 37
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2 -fwhopr  line 28 i1 == 2 * 37
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c  -O2 -fwhopr  line 28 i2 == 3 * 37
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -O1  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -Os  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -O2 -flto  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O0  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O0  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O1  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O1  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O2  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O2  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  line 24 sizeof (a) == 
17 * sizeof (short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O3 -g  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O3 -g  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -Os  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -Os  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O2 -flto  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O2 -flto  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof 
(short)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O2 -fwhopr  line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c  -O2 -fwhopr  line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof 
(short)

=== gcc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes72641
# of unexpected failures24
# of unexpected successes   26
# of expected failures  199
# of unsupported tests  964

Running target unix/-fstack-protector
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O1  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O2 -flto  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test
XPASS: gcc.

Results for 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 20100621-1) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jun 21 08:53:49 UTC 2010 (revision 161065)

Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 
20100621-1) 

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   c94008d

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081109 cp_lto_20081109_0.o-cp_lto_20081109_1.o execute -O2 
-fwhopr

=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes23923
# of unexpected failures1
# of expected failures  148
# of unsupported tests  118

Running target unix/-m64

=== g++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes24145
# of expected failures  148
# of unsupported tests  321

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes48068
# of unexpected failures1
# of expected failures  296
# of unsupported tests  439
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100621-1-i386-Me6kjJ/gcc-snapshot-20100621/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
  version 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 
20100621-1) 

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2 -flto 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2 -fwhopr 
FAIL: gcc.dg/cproj-fails-with-broken-glibc.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0

=== gcc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes73064
# of unexpected failures8
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  179
# of unsupported tests  598

Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: gcc.dg/cproj-fails-with-broken-glibc.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0

=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes73179
# of unexpected failures3
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  178
# of unsupported tests  983

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes146243
# of unexpected failures11
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  357
# of unsupported tests  1581
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100621-1-i386-Me6kjJ/gcc-snapshot-20100621/build/gcc/xgcc
  version 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 
20100621-1) 

=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix

=== gfortran Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes34738
# of expected failures  33
# of unsupported tests  145

Running target unix/-m64

=== gfortran Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes34897
# of expected failures  33
# of unsupported tests  71

=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes69635
# of expected failures  66
# of unsupported tests  216
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100621-1-i386-Me6kjJ/gcc-snapshot-20100621/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
  version 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 
20100621-1) 

=== gnat tests ===


Running target unix

=== gnat Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes805
# of expected failures  10
# of unsupported tests  1

Running target unix/-m64
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/abstract_with_anonymous_result.adb compilation failed to 
produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/access4.adb compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/access_discr2.adb compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/access_test.adb compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/addr2.adb compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/address_conversion.adb compilation failed to produce 
executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/aggr1.adb compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gnat.dg/aggr12.adb scan-tree-dump-not original "{.i1=0, .i2=2}": dump 
file does not exist
FAIL: gnat.dg/aggr13.adb scan-tree-dump-not gimple "= {}": dump file does not 
exist
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/aggr14.adb compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/aggr3.adb compilation failed to produce executable
UNRESOLVED: gnat.dg/aliased_prefix_accessibility.adb compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: gn

Results for 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 20100621-1) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jun 21 08:53:49 UTC 2010 (revision 161065)

Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 
20100621-1) 

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2321
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.dg/bprob/g++-bprob-2.C execution,-Os  -fprofile-use
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C  (test for errors, line 15)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081109 cp_lto_20081109_0.o-cp_lto_20081109_1.o execute -O2 
-fwhopr

=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes23226
# of unexpected failures5
# of expected failures  148
# of unsupported tests  159

Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C  (test for errors, line 15)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081109 cp_lto_20081109_0.o-cp_lto_20081109_1.o execute -O2 
-fwhopr

=== g++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes23838
# of unexpected failures4
# of expected failures  148
# of unsupported tests  157

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes47064
# of unexpected failures9
# of expected failures  296
# of unsupported tests  316
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100621-1-powerpc-CVl0jk/gcc-snapshot-20100621/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
  version 4.6.0 20100621 (experimental) [trunk revision 161065] (Debian 
20100621-1) 

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2 -flto 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution,  -O2 -fwhopr 
FAIL: gcc.dg/and-1.c scan-assembler-not nand
FAIL: gcc.dg/cproj-fails-with-broken-glibc.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-2.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-4.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-6.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-7.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 3
FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-8.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 24)
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o link -O0 
-fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o execute 
-O0 -fwhopr
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o assemble, -O2 -fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o link -O2 
-fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o execute 
-O2 -fwhopr
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o link -O0 
-flto
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o execute 
-O0 -flto
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o link -O2 
-flto
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o-c_lto_20100518_0.o execute 
-O2 -flto
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "struct _fat_ptr 
_ans" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "struct _fat_ptr 
_T2" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 "[xy][^ ]* !=" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 "x[^ ]* & y" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31d.c scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorization not profitable" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-68d.c scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorization not profitable" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorization not profitable" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr35821-altivec.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 
loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-109.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/405-dlmzb-strlen-1.c scan-assembler dlmzb. 
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/440-dlmzb-strlen-1.c scan-assembler dlmzb. 
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-volatile.c  (test for warnings, line

Bug#578831: link failure with LTO: “invalid DSO for symbol `pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.0' definition”

2010-06-22 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please recheck with the current g++-4.5 in experimental.  -lpthread
> shouldn't be used directly, but pass -pthread to both CXXFLAGS and
> LDFLAGS.

Pretty much no change. With CXXFLAGS including -pthread and LDFLAGS including
-pthread -flto -fwhole-program:

  script/script.a(curve.o): In function `_ZN6script5Curve13make_tangentsEv':
  curve.cpp:(.text._ZN6script5Curve13make_tangentsEv+0x3f2): undefined 
reference to `_ZN6script6engine13get_num_paramENS_5Curve8knottypeE'
  script/script.a(curve.o): In function `_ZN6script5Curve9get_valueEfPf':
  curve.cpp:(.text._ZN6script5Curve9get_valueEfPf+0x226): undefined reference 
to `_ZN6script6engine7targetsE'
  curve.cpp:(.text._ZN6script5Curve9get_valueEfPf+0x236): undefined reference 
to `_ZN6script6engine8texturesE'
  curve.cpp:(.text._ZN6script5Curve9get_valueEfPf+0x262): undefined reference 
to `_ZN6script6engine6meshesE'
  curve.cpp:(.text._ZN6script5Curve9get_valueEfPf+0x28b): undefined reference 
to `_ZN6script6engine9materialsE'
  curve.cpp:(.text._ZN6script5Curve9get_valueEfPf+0x2a1): undefined reference 
to `_ZN6script6engine13get_num_paramENS_5Curve8knottypeE'
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
  make: *** [intro] Error 1

Without -fwhole-program in LDFLAGS it links, as before. With -frepo in the mix,
it's chaos as usual, with tons and tons of messages like

  script/parser.o: In function 
`_ZNSt8_Rb_treeISsSt4pairIKSsN6script6parser4meshEESt10_Select1stIS5_ESt4lessISsESaIS5_EE4findERS1_.clone.30':
 
parser.cpp:(.text._ZNSt8_Rb_treeISsSt4pairIKSsN6script6parser4meshEESt10_Select1stIS5_ESt4lessISsESaIS5_EE4findERS1_.clone.30+0x38):
 undefined reference to `bool std::operator< , 
std::allocator >(std::basic_string, 
std::allocator > const&, std::basic_string, 
std::allocator > const&)'

and other mising templates.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100622174315.ga3...@uio.no



Bug#585730: please build insighttoolkit for ia64 on mundy.debian.org

2010-06-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:19:43PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to request that mundy.debian.org try building insighttoolkit
> version 3.18.0-3.  Mundy succesfully built the previous three versions,
> but the latest build was executed on caballero and failed.  I'd like
> to try with mundy to see whether there's a machine-specific problem
> with caballero (as happened with kfreebsd-amd64 [1]).
> 
> gb insighttoolkit_3.18.0-3 . ia64 . -m 'Rebuild on mundy.'

I've given it back, but I can't select the buildd that will
try it.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100622184753.gc15...@roeckx.be



Bug#585730: please build insighttoolkit for ia64 on mundy.debian.org

2010-06-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:19:43PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> gb insighttoolkit_3.18.0-3 . ia64 . -m 'Rebuild on mundy.'

This was probably #576198, it's atleast a simular error message.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100622185129.ge15...@roeckx.be



Bug#582085: marked as done (gfortran-4.4 regression: the -i4 option is not supported anymore)

2010-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:06:08 +0200
with message-id <4c2141e0.5070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#582085: gfortran-4.4 regression: the -i4 option is not 
 supported anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #582085,
regarding gfortran-4.4 regression: the -i4 option is not supported anymore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
582085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gfortran-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: normal

  Hello,

  gfortran-4.4 does not support anymore the -i4 option, while
gfortran-4.3 does. This is necessary for me to compile gildas (see
http://www.iram.fr/~gildas/dist/index.html).

  Is there any specific reason why support for this flag was dropped from 4.4 ?

  Cheers,

  Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages gfortran-4.4 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.4   4.4.4-1The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.4-base  4.4.4-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii  libc6 2.10.2-8   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libc6-dev 2.10.2-8   Embedded GNU C Library: Developmen
ii  libgfortran3  4.4.4-1Runtime library for GNU Fortran ap
ii  libgmp3c2 2:4.3.2+dfsg-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libmpfr1ldbl  2.4.2-3multiple precision floating-point

gfortran-4.4 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages gfortran-4.4 suggests:
pn  gfortran-4.4-doc   (no description available)
pn  gfortran-4.4-multilib  (no description available)
pn  libgfortran3-dbg   (no description available)

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

closing (invalid).  -i4 was never supported.  See the upstream report for 
comments.

On 18.05.2010 10:56, Vincent Fourmond wrote:

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Matthias Klose  wrote:

On 18.05.2010 10:19, Vincent Fourmond wrote:


Package: gfortran-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: normal

   Hello,

   gfortran-4.4 does not support anymore the -i4 option, while
gfortran-4.3 does. This is necessary for me to compile gildas (see
http://www.iram.fr/~gildas/dist/index.html).

   Is there any specific reason why support for this flag was dropped from
4.4 ?


didn't check. is this seen with 4.5/snapshot as well?


   Yes:

10:55 fourm...@zorglub ~/Prog/Soas/source gfortran-4.3 -c -i4 soas_misc.f
10:55 fourm...@zorglub ~/Prog/Soas/source gfortran-4.4 -c -i4 soas_misc.f
f951: error: unrecognized command line option "-i4"
10:55 fourm...@zorglub ~/Prog/Soas/source gfortran-4.5 -c -i4 soas_misc.f
f951: error: unrecognized command line option "-i4"

   Cheers,

   Vincent

(although it seems it isn't the reason why my crash happened in the first place)






--- End Message ---