[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-09-02 08:40 --- I can reproduce this with gcc-4.1 -c -mabi=64 -msym32 -mno-abicalls -O using Debian's gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:08 --- I can confirm this with FSF gcc 4.1.3 20070902 -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-09-02 09:08:07 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daney at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:26 --- This happens with 4.0 - 4.3. gcc 3.4 didn't have the -msym32 option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:27 --- Created an attachment (id=14149) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14149&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug target/33277] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 11:36 --- I saw this also asn asked about it on IRC. Note please don't CC anyone unless you know that they caused the bug. They don't want to be getting all bug reports. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dje at watson dot ibm dot | |com, debian-gcc at lists dot| |debian dot org, fxcoudert at| |gcc dot gnu dot org | Component|c |target GCC build triplet|rs600 | GCC host triplet|rs600 | GCC target triplet|rs600 |powerpc-linux-gnu Summary|[4.3.0 Regression] |[4.3 Regression] Bootstrap |Bootstrap check failures|check failures ICE's |ICE's | Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33277 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173513: [Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined
--- Comment #14 from guillaume dot melquiond at ens-lyon dot fr 2007-09-02
11:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=14150)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14150&action=view)
Implements folding of "(&function & 1)"
I encountered the same issue with some heavy template code: GCC was generating
some really awful code, while it should have been optimized to almost anything.
It basically comes down to this kind of C++ code:
struct A { void a(); };
template < void (A::*f)() >
void g(A *t) { (t->*f)(); }
void h(A *t) { g<&A::a>(t); }
After instantiation, it is somehow transformed to:
struct A { void a(); };
void h(A *t) { (t->*(&A::a))(); }
And GCC is unable to optimize it. So I played a bit with the attached patch,
which does fix the issue for my template code.
Note that GCC does inline the member function for my code (just add an empty
body to A::a to test it), but it doesn't inline it in Andrew Pinski's last
testcase. I have no idea why; perhaps because the address goes through a
variable. But at least the generated code no longer contain any crap and it
directly calls the correct function, even if it doesn't inline it.
(As for why the C++ front-end generates this code in the first place, it is
because the lower bit of the pointer indicates whether an extra indirection is
needed when calling the function through the pointer to member. The C++
front-end actually assumes that functions have an alignment of 2 at least, so
that this trick can work.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_multi.changes
gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.dsc gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.diff.gz gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_multi.changes ACCEPTED
Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb control file lists priority as `optional', but changes file has `standard'. Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb control file lists priority as `optional', but changes file has `standard'. Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb control file lists priority as `optional', but changes file has `standard'. Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb control file lists priority as `optional', but changes file has `standard'. Accepted: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.diff.gz gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.dsc to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.dsc gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb Override entries for your package: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.dsc - source devel gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb - optional devel gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb - optional devel gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb - optional devel gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb - optional devel Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gdc-4.1 override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440545: Miscompilation casting signed long to void* in 64bit system
Package: gcc
Version: 4:4.2.1-5
Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid
amd64
> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2 --program-suffix=-4.2
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr
--disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-4)
Output from attached program, if compiled with optimization level -O2:
>From 0 to 2:
0 - In: -1, -1 (0x), Out: -1
1 - In: 0, 0 (0x), Out: 0
2 - In: 1, 1 (0x), Out: 1
>From 1 to 3:
1 - In: 0, 0 ((nil)), Out: 0
2 - In: 1, 1 (0x1), Out: 1
3 - In: 2, 2 (0x2), Out: 2
Should be
>From 0 to 2:
0 - In: -1, -1 (0x), Out: -1
1 - In: 0, 0 ((nil)), Out: 0
2 - In: 1, 1 (0x1), Out: 1
>From 1 to 3:
1 - In: 0, 0 ((nil)), Out: 0
2 - In: 1, 1 (0x1), Out: 1
3 - In: 2, 2 (0x2), Out: 2
This problem hit me when glib GINT_TO_POINTER() returned wrong values.
- ML
#include
#include
int main()
{
int i = 0;
printf("From 0 to 2:\n");
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
int iin = i - 1;
signed long lin = iin;
void *pin = (void *) lin;
signed long iout = (signed long) pin;
printf(" %d - In: %d, %d (%p), Out: %d\n", i, iin, lin, pin, iout);
}
printf("From 1 to 3:\n");
for (i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
int iin = i - 1;
signed long lin = iin;
void *pin = (void *) lin;
signed long iout = (signed long) pin;
printf(" %d - In: %d, %d (%p), Out: %d\n", i, iin, lin, pin, iout);
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
Bug#440569: gappletviewer-4.2: package seems to be empty (libgcjwebplugin.so missing)
Package: gappletviewer-4.2 Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gappletviewer-4.2 depends on: ii gcj-4.2-base 4.2.1-3The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b ii gij-4.2 4.2.1-3The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii libgcj8-1-awt 4.2.1-3AWT peer runtime libraries for use gappletviewer-4.2 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 440545 to gcc-4.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > reassign 440545 gcc-4.2 4.2.1-4 Bug#440545: Miscompilation casting signed long to void* in 64bit system Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-4.2'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 414178 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27574
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > forwarded 414178 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27574 Bug#414178: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors. Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27574. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)
Hi,
Again, could you please apply the attached patch? Some of the
hurd-specific fixes got merged in the latest snapshot you took of gcc.
Samuel
Index: debian/patches/libjava-hurdfix.dpatch
===
--- debian/patches/libjava-hurdfix.dpatch (révision 2466)
+++ debian/patches/libjava-hurdfix.dpatch (copie de travail)
@@ -48,34 +48,6 @@
+#endif
caseSensitive = true;
}
gcc-4.1.1/libjava/java/net/natVMInetAddressPosix.cc.orig 2007-01-26
15:27:19.0 +
-+++ gcc-4.1.1/libjava/java/net/natVMInetAddressPosix.cc2007-01-26
15:45:53.0 +
-@@ -47,10 +47,25 @@
- {
- char *chars;
- #ifdef HAVE_GETHOSTNAME
-+#ifdef MAXHOSTNAMELEN
- char buffer[MAXHOSTNAMELEN];
- if (gethostname (buffer, MAXHOSTNAMELEN))
- return NULL;
- chars = buffer;
-+#else
-+ size_t size = 256;
-+ while (1) {
-+char buffer[size];
-+if (!gethostname (buffer, size-1))
-+ {
-+ buffer[size-1] = 0;
-+ return JvNewStringUTF (buffer);
-+ }
-+else if (errno != ENAMETOOLONG)
-+ return NULL;
-+size *= 2;
-+ }
-+#endif
- #elif HAVE_UNAME
- struct utsname stuff;
- if (uname (&stuff) != 0)
diff -ur gcj-4.1.1/libjava/libltdl/acinclude.m4
gcj-4.1.1/libjava/libltdl/acinclude.m4
--- gcj-4.1.1/libjava/libltdl/acinclude.m4 2006-05-12 13:35:07.0
+0200
+++ gcj-4.1.1/libjava/libltdl/acinclude.m4 2006-05-12 11:07:03.0
+0200
Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)
Samuel Thibault writes: > Hi, > > Again, could you please apply the attached patch? Some of the > hurd-specific fixes got merged in the latest snapshot you took of gcc. again, please follow the SVN. the patch is now applied for 4.1. please check the 4.2 and 4.3 branches as well. what is the upstream status of libjava-hurdfix.dpatch? I didn't see the libltdl changes forwarded upstream. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)
Matthias Klose, le Mon 03 Sep 2007 00:43:15 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault writes: > > Again, could you please apply the attached patch? Some of the > > hurd-specific fixes got merged in the latest snapshot you took of gcc. > > again, please follow the SVN. What do you mean? The previous submission of this patch was already against SVN. > the patch is now applied for 4.1. Thanks! > please check the 4.2 It is already fine. > and 4.3 branches as well. I'll have a look (I hadn't noticed that that branch got opened). > what is the upstream status of libjava-hurdfix.dpatch? I didn't see > the libltdl changes forwarded upstream. It looks like that one is not needed any more actually. I'll check that too. Samuel
Processed: retitle 440046 to optimization generates warning for casts
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > retitle 440046 optimization generates warning for casts Bug#440046: optmization generates warning for casts Changed Bug title to `optimization generates warning for casts' from `optmization generates warning for casts'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crt1.o & crti.o are missing in the gcc library
Hi, After I did install Debian using DVD set from CheapBytes, I found that the gcc is not installed. Looking around what's the best way to install gcc, I found the 'apt' and did install the gcc using 'apt-get install gcc', which asked to mount the DVD1 and then the gcc installation was completed. But then using the gcc complains that the loader cannot find the crt stuffs - particular, the crt1.o & crti.o in the gcc library. This is strange as the library contains crtStart.o & crtEnd.o, but no crt1.o (nor crt0.o either). The host/target is AMD64 and I wonder if the loader/gcc are not in sync or if the gcc installation was not done properly (somehow the required crt lib module were not installed). Debian is the latest version built on July and the gcc is 4.2.1 Any help will greatly be appreciated, Chan
