[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-09-15 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #378325
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28243
#  * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
#  * closed upstream
tags 378325 + fixed-upstream
usertags 378325 - status-ASSIGNED
usertags 378325 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks



[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-09-15 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #381384
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28591
#  * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
#  * closed upstream
tags 381384 + fixed-upstream
usertags 381384 - status-ASSIGNED
usertags 381384 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #387257
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 387257 + status-ASSIGNED

# remote status report for #387271
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29016
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 387271 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #387368
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
forwarded 387368 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29070, merged-upstream: 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059
usertags 387368 + status-ASSIGNED

thanks



Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #381384
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28591
> #  * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 381384 + fixed-upstream
Bug#381384: [gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> usertags 381384 - status-ASSIGNED
Bug#381384: [gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513
Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 381384 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#381384: [gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #387257
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
> usertags 387257 + status-ASSIGNED
Bug#387257: ICE: verify_stmts failed (invalid operand to unary operator ""[0];)
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED.
> # remote status report for #387271
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29016
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 387271 + status-NEW
Bug#387271: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' 
(baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #387368
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
> forwarded 387368 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29070, merged-upstream: 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059
Bug#387368: ICE: verify_stmts failed - invalid operand to unary operator 
OggFLAC__MAPPING_VERSION_MINORD.3161
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29070 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29070, merged-upstream: http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29059.

> usertags 387368 + status-ASSIGNED
Bug#387368: ICE: verify_stmts failed - invalid operand to unary operator 
OggFLAC__MAPPING_VERSION_MINORD.3161
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #378325
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28243
> #  * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 378325 + fixed-upstream
Bug#378325: 'internal consistency failure' on i386
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> usertags 378325 - status-ASSIGNED
Bug#378325: 'internal consistency failure' on i386
Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 378325 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#378325: 'internal consistency failure' on i386
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#386760: gcc-4.1: Please add big-endian arm (armeb) support

2006-09-15 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:42:20AM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:

> Attached is a patch that makes gcc default to big-endian in case
> of an arm*b-*-* target triple.  This allows a fully native gcc-4.1
> package build on a big-endian ARM platform.

Hmmm, the last hunk of that patch looks incorrect, you might want
to drop that part.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: libffi package is long since obsolete, but libffi4-dev could Conflict: with it

2006-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Reassigning this bug - see below
> reassign 387561 libffi4-dev
Bug#387561: gnucash/libffi: upgrade renders system non-functional
Bug reassigned from package `gnucash' to `libffi4-dev'.

> retitle 387561 libffi4-dev: Please also conflict with old libffi package
Bug#387561: gnucash/libffi: upgrade renders system non-functional
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> severity 387561 wishlist
Bug#387561: libffi4-dev: Please also conflict with old libffi package
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reopening 387561

2006-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 387561
Bug#387561: libffi4-dev: Please also conflict with old libffi package
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2006-09-15 Thread munir

The subscription of the email address: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To the mailing list: 

Al-Manahel Newsletter List

is all set. Thanks for subscribing! 

Date of this subscription: Fri Sep 15 13:15:37 2006

Please save this email message for future reference. 

---

You may automatically unsubscribe from this list at any time by 
visiting the following URL:



If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the 
entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break
this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. 

You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen: 



If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at: 



The following physical address is associated with this mailing list: 



- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/28490] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088

2006-09-15 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #17 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-15 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 28490

Author: wilson
Date: Fri Sep 15 23:05:40 2006
New Revision: 116983

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116983
Log:
Short term fix for PR 28490.
* config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_legitimate_constant_p, cast CONST):
Handle symbol offsets same as they are handled in ia64_expand_move
and move_operand.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#387561: libffi package is long since obsolete, but libffi4-dev could Conflict: with it

2006-09-15 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> ...note that 2001 was before the release of woody.  This package is so
> old that it shouldn't still be on anyone's system and Debian doesn't
> actually need to support it.  (The submitter may want to check for
> "Obsolete and locally created packages" in aptitude once in a while.)
> I'm guessing libffi4-dev maintainers will just close this bug.

This is incorrect reasoning.

Old packages do not get automatically deleted, and there's no reason
to think this one would have been.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/28490] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088

2006-09-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-16 02:46 
---
worked around for 4.2.0 so no longer a regression.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail|4.0.3 4.1.1 4.2.0   |4.0.3 4.1.1
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE|[4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in
   |in ia64_expand_move, at |ia64_expand_move, at
   |config/ia64/ia64.c:1088 |config/ia64/ia64.c:1088
   Target Milestone|4.2.0   |4.0.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]