Bug#377310: gcc: [inaccurate] warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

[Jari Aalto]

Package: gcc
Version: 4:4.1.1-3
Severity: normal

While compiling binutils-2.17 from (Debian) sources, gcc reports following:

bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname':
/usr/src/net/deb/src/binutils-2.17/binutils/bucomm.c:426: warning: the use 
of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'


The proper fix is to use `mkdtemp' in the code, but the error message
does not tell this. The developers may mistakenly disregard this
message when they think "Oh, I create directories and `mkstemp' cannot
create directories, so the warning does not apply to this code".

SUGGESTION

a) Add to the manual page, mkstemp.1, that this function works for files 
   only. Add Crosss reference to mkdtemp and vice versa 
   (from mkdtemp => mkstemp.1)

b) Implement better checking in gcc to differtiate directories from files
   when displaying warning about use of mktemp function.

   OR

   mention both mkstemp and mkdtemp in the warning message if the 
   parser cannot know which is the case


This message has been submitted to GCC bugzilla as well:

   http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28310+

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

Versions of packages gcc depends on:
ii  cpp   4:4.1.1-3  The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii  gcc-4.1   4.1.1-7The GNU C compiler

Versions of packages gcc recommends:
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]  2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Development Librari

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_multi.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
g77-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
g77-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
g77-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
gcc-3.4-base_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4-base_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
gcc-3.4-base_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4-base_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
gcc-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.diff.gz
gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.dsc
gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
gpc-2.1-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gpc-2.1-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
lib64g2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/lib64g2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
lib64g2c0_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/lib64g2c0_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
libg2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libg2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
libg2c0_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libg2c0_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_multi.changes

[Archive Administrator]

gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.dsc
  libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  libg2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  g77-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  libg2c0-dev_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  lib64g2c0_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  g77-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  gcc-3.4-base_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  gcc-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  libg2c0_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  lib64g2c0_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  gcc-3.4_3.4.6-3.diff.gz
  libstdc++6-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb
  cpp-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  g77-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  libstdc++6-dev_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  gcc-3.4-base_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  g++-3.4_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-3_i386.deb
  libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.6-3_powerpc.deb
  gpc-2.1-3.4-doc_3.4.6-3_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c/28280] [4.2 regression] bogus "statement with no effect" warning with VLA and typeof

[mrs at apple dot com]

--- Comment #4 from mrs at apple dot com  2006-07-08 10:10 ---
Fix submitted.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377310: gcc: [inaccurate] warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

[Thiemo Seufer]

Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 4:4.1.1-3
> Severity: normal
> 
> While compiling binutils-2.17 from (Debian) sources, gcc reports following:
> 
> bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname':
> /usr/src/net/deb/src/binutils-2.17/binutils/bucomm.c:426: warning: the 
> use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
> 
> 
> The proper fix is to use `mkdtemp' in the code, but the error message
> does not tell this.

FYI, in the case of binutils mkdtemp is not the proper fix, because
it has to be bootstrappable on machines without mkdtemp support.

In the general case it might be still no good idea, the manpage for
mkdtemp claims it is non-standard (glibc/OpenBSD only).


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

debian gcc bug #226952 is a duplicate of #128950

[Manuel López-Ibáñez]

Hi,

bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=226952 is 
either a duplicate of 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128950 or it is invalid.


Although the corresponding upstream bug for bug #226952 has been closed 
as invalid since GCC behaves as it is intended, the request for 
splitting the behaviour of Wconversion is reported in debian as bug 
#128950 . Please, take the appropriate action.


My excuses if this is not the appropriate way to report this. I was 
unable to find a better way to do it.


Best regards,

Manuel.


__ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341882: binutils fix

[Matthias Klose]

I'm closing this report as won't fix for 4.0. Please update a patch
for 4.1, which should be well prepared. The tedious work will be to
add something like a triarchsubdir and have additional multilib files
installed into the packages.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376096: marked as done (free(): invalid pointer on hppa)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:41:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376096: free(): invalid pointer on hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: g++-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-5
Severity: important

Hi,

the build of qt4-x11 fails on hppa with:
| g++ -c -pipe -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/freetype2 
-I/usr/include/postgresql -g -D_REENTRANT -fvisibility=hidden 
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -fPIC  -DQDESIGNER_SDK_LIBRARY 
-DQDESIGNER_EXTENSION_LIBRARY -DQDESIGNER_UILIB_LIBRARY 
-DQDESIGNER_SHARED_LIBRARY -DQT_DESIGNER -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB 
-DQT_CORE_LIB -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_SHARED 
-I../../../../mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I../../../../include/QtCore 
-I../../../../include/QtGui -I../../../../include/QtXml -I../../../../include 
-Iextension -Isdk -Iuilib -Ishared -I.moc/debug-shared -Ishared -o 
.obj/debug-shared/extrainfo.o sdk/extrainfo.cpp
| *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x00142838 ***

This sounds to me like a bug in g++. The full build log is available on
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=qt4-x11&ver=4.1.3-3&arch=hppa&stamp=1151288526&file=log&as=raw


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-30 10:53]:
> > the build of qt4-x11 fails on hppa with:
> > | g++ -c -pipe -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/freetype2 
> > -I/usr/include/postgresql -g -D_REENTRANT -fvisibility=hidden 
> > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -fPIC  -DQDESIGNER_SDK_LIBRARY 
> > -DQDESIGNER_EXTENSION_LIBRARY -DQDESIGNER_UILIB_LIBRARY 
> > -DQDESIGNER_SHARED_LIBRARY -DQT_DESIGNER -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB 
> > -DQT_CORE_LIB -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_SHARED 
> > -I../../../../mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I../../../../include/QtCore 
> > -I../../../../include/QtGui -I../../../../include/QtXml 
> > -I../../../../include -Iextension -Isdk -Iuilib -Ishared 
> > -I.moc/debug-shared -Ishared -o .obj/debug-shared/extrainfo.o 
> > sdk/extrainfo.cpp
> > | *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x00142838 ***
> > 
> > This sounds to me like a bug in g++. The full build log is available on
> 
> I've just built this in the chroot on paer and it seems this file got
> compiled correctly.  Can it be tried on the builddd again?

closing the report. we don't have a pseudo package for buildd
problems.

  Matthias
--- End Message ---

Bug#366873: marked as done (gcc-4.1-source: patch for cross compiler doesn't apply)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:36:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366873: These patches aren't needed anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.1-source
Severity: normal


cross-configure.dpatch doesn't apply when following the instructions in 
README.cross.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.1-7

Removed at least in version 4.1.1-7

Bas Wijnen writes:
> Package: gcc-4.1
> Followup-For: Bug #366873
> 
> Indeed building according to README.cross doesn't work, because those
> patches don't apply.  However, when simply skipping them, the build
> seems to succeed (and the resulting compiler works).  So I suggest to
> remove them completely (cross-includes and cross-configure).
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---

Processed: merge gcc reports

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 364907 normal
Bug#364907: libstdc++6: application crash on throwing/catching exceptions
Severity set to `normal' from `important'

> merge 364907 365245
Bug#364907: libstdc++6: application crash on throwing/catching exceptions
Bug#365245: strange crash when linked with nvidia GL libraries
Merged 364907 365245.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tag gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 360504 + wontfix
Bug#360504: libmudflap0-dev: Broken symlink in /usr/lib64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#368569: marked as done (debian-testing - fastjar - error when installing the package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:35:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fastjar - error when installing the package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: fastjar
Version: 1:4.1.0-4

Hello,
when I upgraded some days ago my system (debian-testing) apt-get reported an 
error while installing the package fastjar. 

Here is the installation report:

johnny-mobile:/home/johnny# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  fastjar
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
22 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/136kB of archives.
After unpacking 4096B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
(Reading database ... 115406 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace fastjar 1:4.1.0-1+b1 
(using .../fastjar_1%3a4.1.0-4_i386.deb) ...
install-info: No dir file specified; try --help for more information.
dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
install-info: No dir file specified; try --help for more information.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fastjar_1%3a4.1.0-4_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
install-info: No such file or directory for Development
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/fastjar_1%3a4.1.0-4_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
johnny-mobile:/home/johnny#  

Kernel:
Linux johnny-mobile 2.6.16-johnny #2 PREEMPT Fri Apr 28 22:31:59 CEST 2006 
i686 GNU/Linux

glibc:
dpkg -s libc6 | grep ^Version
Version: 2.3.6-7

dpkg -s perl | grep ^Version
Version: 5.8.8-4

/etc/sources.list:
deb file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build main
#deb http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian stable main
deb-src http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian testing main
deb http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian testing main
deb http://www.kadu.net/download/binary/debian/repo testing main
deb http://deb.opera.com/opera testing non-free
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ etch main
deb http://debian.speedblue.org/ ./
deb-src http://debian.speedblue.org/ ./
deb-src http://debian.severin.olloz.net/ ./

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
works for me, no further feedback from the bug submitter.
--- End Message ---

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 358235 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28313
Bug#358235: Please recognize mips64
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28313.

> tags 358235 + upstream
Bug#358235: Please recognize mips64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> retitle 358235 [PR28213] Please recognize mips64
Bug#358235: Please recognize mips64
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug libffi/28313] libffi has not been ported to mips64-linux-gnu

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 14:28 ---
mips64*-*);;
mips-sgi-irix5.* | mips-sgi-irix6.*) TARGET=MIPS_IRIX; TARGETDIR=mips;;
mips*-*-linux*) TARGET=MIPS_LINUX; TARGETDIR=mips;;


So yes.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-08 14:28:04
   date||
Summary|libffi doesn't support  |libffi has not been ported
   |mips64-linux|to mips64-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28313

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: temprarily reassign to caudium

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 358261 caudium
Bug#358261: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `caudium'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358261: temprarily reassign to caudium

[Matthias Klose]

reassign 358261 caudium
thanks

currently FTBFS:

*** Found 4 potential problems.
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/src'
( cd cmods && /usr/bin/make )
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/src/cmods'
Making Mhash
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/src/cmods/Mhash'
make[4]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/src/cmods/Mhash'
make[3]: *** [Mhash] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/src/cmods'
make[2]: *** [cmods] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7/src'
make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/packages/tmp/caudium-1.4.7'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#372778: marked as done ([PR27884] invalid use of 'register' in linkage specification)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:22:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #372778 fixed in gcc-4.1.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: g++-4.1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Version: 4.1.1-2

Forwarded as http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27884

Brendan O'Dea writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >Brendan, could we add this workaround, before we upload the next gcc-4.1
> >(currently not planned that urgently).
> 
> Uploaded as perl-5.8.8-6 .
> 
> Please let me know when I can revert the change (a bug on gcc perhaps
> which you can reassign at the appropriate time?).
> 
> --bod

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.1-7

... but that version is not yet built on m68k.

  Matthias
--- End Message ---

Bug#337861: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed

[Matthias Klose]

tags 337861 + needsinfo
tags 337861 + needinfo
thanks

please recheck with gcc-4.1.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325739: Segfault with gcc4 (and above) when using LD_PRELOAD

[Matthias Klose]

tags 325739 + needsinfo
thanks

- please recheck with gcc-4.1
- are the non-free nvidia drivers installed?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: gcc-4.0 segfaults with -O2 dealing with long doubles

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 323426 + needsinfo
Unknown tag/s: needsinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore.

Bug#323426: [m68k] ICE: gcc-4.0 segfaults with -O2 dealing with long doubles
There were no tags set.
Tags added: 

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 337861 + moreinfo
Bug#337861: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 342121 + moreinfo
Bug#342121: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342267: gcc-4.0: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."

[Matthias Klose]

tags 342267 + moreinfo
thanks

please recheck with current gcc-4.1 and gcc-snapshot packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 337861 + needsinfo
Unknown tag/s: needsinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore.

Bug#337861: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: 

> tags 337861 + needinfo
Unknown tag/s: needinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore.

Bug#337861: fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: 

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342121: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault

[Matthias Klose]

tags 342121 + moreinfo
thanks

please recheck with 4.1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323426: gcc-4.0 segfaults with -O2 dealing with long doubles

[Matthias Klose]

tags 323426 + needsinfo
thanks

please recheck with gcc-4.1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Segfault with gcc4 (and above) when using LD_PRELOAD

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 325739 + needsinfo
Unknown tag/s: needsinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore.

Bug#325739: gcc-4.0: Segfault with gcc4 (and above) when using LD_PRELOAD
There were no tags set.
Tags added: 

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [m68k] ICE when trying to build boost

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 321486 + moreinfo
Bug#321486: [m68k] ICE when trying to build boost
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322766: marked as done (jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:08:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322766: jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental

When trying to compile jjtag, an ejtag program, the following happens
on two different systems both running this version of GCC.

version 4.0.2 20050806 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-4)
 /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/jc1
 ./bin/ca/ioware/devint/devices/BCM6348GPIOPort2.class
 -fhash-synchronization -fno-use-divide-subroutine -fuse-boehm-gc
 -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fkeep-inline-functions
 -quiet -dumpbase BCM6348GPIOPort2.class -mtune=i486 -auxbase-strip
 ./nlib/ca/ioware/devint/devices/BCM6348GPIOPort2.o -g1 -version
 -fclasspath=./bin:./src:./nsrc -o BCM6348GPIOPort2.s
 GNU Java version 4.0.2 20050806 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-4)
 (i486-linux-gnu)
  compiled by GNU C version 4.0.2 20050806 (prerelease) (Debian4.0.1-4).
 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=64 --param
 ggc-min-heapsize=64489
 Class path starts here:
 ./bin/
 ./src/
 ./nsrc/
 /usr/share/java/libgcj-4.0.2.jar/ (system) (zip)
 jc1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii  binutils  2.16.1-2   The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.0   4.0.1-4The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.1-4The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-4  GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn  libmudflap0-dev(no description available)

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
closing the report, jjtag 1.2 uses generics, which are not yet
supported in gcj-4.1.

Andrew Potter writes:
> The latest version of jjtag is available from
> http://www.ioware.ca/projects/ejtag/jjtag.tgz
> 
> Its written by Brett Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and he appears to get
> it to compile cleanly.
> 
> Regards
> 
>   AndyP
> 
> On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 08:23 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tags 322766 - experimental
> > thanks
> > 
> > andyp writes:
> > > Package: gcc-4.0
> > > Version: 4.0.1-4
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Tags: experimental
> > > 
> > > When trying to compile jjtag, an ejtag program, the following happens
> > > on two different systems both running this version of GCC.
> > 
> > which version of jjtag, where can I find it?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---

Bug#343692: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression

[Matthias Klose]

tags 343692 + moreinfo
thanks

please recheck with current gcc-4.1 and gcc-snapshot packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 343692 + moreinfo
Bug#343692: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max

[Matthias Klose]

will you update the patch?

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321486: [m68k] ICE when trying to build boost

[Matthias Klose]

tags 321486 + moreinfo
thanks

Please recheck with gcc-4.1 / gcc-snapshot


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376427: gcc-4.0: arm-linux cross build mistakenly invokes native assembler

[Matthias Klose]

Bill Gatliff writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.3-3
> Severity: important
> 
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> 
> When using dpkg-cross to construct an arm-linux cross compiler,
> the gcc build dies as shown below.  The error message suggests
> that xgcc is invoking the native assembler when it runs "as",
> rather than the cross assembler.  If I manually invoke xgcc with the
> cross assembler appearing first in the path (and with -v for the added
> information), the compilation succeeds:
> 
> # PATH=/usr/arm-linux/bin:$PATH /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/xgcc \
>  -B/arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/bin/ \
>  -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/include \
>  -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE \
>  -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes \
>  -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include  -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc \
>  -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include 
> -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include \
>  -g0 -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions \
>  -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-unit-at-a-time -Dinhibit_libc \
>  -c ../../src/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN  -o crtbegin.o -v
> Reading specs from /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/specs
> Target: arm-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ 
> --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib 
> --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls 
> --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/arm-linux-gnu/include/c++/4.0.4 
> --program-suffix=-4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu 
> --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-checking=release 
> --program-prefix=arm-linux-gnu- --includedir=/usr/arm-linux-gnu/include 
> --build=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu --target=arm-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3)
>  /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/cc1 -quiet -v -I. -I. 
> -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include 
> -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include -iprefix 
> /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.0.4/ 
> -isystem /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/include -DIN_GCC 
> -DCROSS_COMPILE -Dinhibit_libc -DCRT_BEGIN -isystem 
> /usr/arm-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/sys-include 
> -isystem ./include ../../src/gcc/crtstuff.c -quiet -dumpbase crtstuff.c 
> -auxbase-strip crtbegin.o -g0 -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings 
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -version 
> -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions 
> -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-unit-at-a-time -o /tmp/cc2sPenc.s
> ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/arm-linux-gnu/sys-include"
> ignoring duplicate directory "./include"
> ignoring nonexistent directory 
> "/arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include"
> ignoring nonexistent directory 
> "/arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../arm-linux-gnu/include"
> ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include"
> ignoring duplicate directory "/usr/arm-linux-gnu/include"
> ignoring duplicate directory "/usr/lib/gcc/../../arm-linux-gnu/include"
> ignoring duplicate directory "."
> ignoring duplicate directory "../../src/gcc/."
> #include "..." search starts here:
> #include <...> search starts here:
>  .
>  ../../src/gcc
>  ../../src/gcc/../include
>  ../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include
>  /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/include
>  /usr/arm-linux-gnu/include
> End of search list.
> GNU C version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3) (arm-linux-gnu)
> compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 
> 4.0.3-3).
> GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=99 --param ggc-min-heapsize=129570
>  as -o crtbegin.o /tmp/cc2sPenc.s
> #
> 
> 
> 
> The build failure:
> 
> ...
> /bin/sh ../../src/gcc/mkconfig.sh tconfig.h
> /arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/xgcc 
> -B/arm-cross/gcc-4.0-4.0.3/build/gcc/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/bin/ 
> -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnu/include -isystem 
> /usr/arm-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE   -W -Wall 
> -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
> -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include  -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc 
> -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include 
> -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include   -g0 -finhibit-size-directive 
> -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss 
> -fno-unit-at-a-time  \
>   -Dinhibit_libc -c ../../src/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN \
>   -o crtbegin.o
> /tmp/ccfmiUCp.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccfmiUCp.s:36: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized 
> character is `@'
> /tmp/ccfmiUCp.s:37: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized 
> character is `@'
> /tmp/ccfmiUCp.s:38: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{r4,r5,lr}'
> /tmp/ccfmi

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 345587 + upstream
Bug#345587: cpp-4.0: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> forwarded 28314 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28314
Bug number 28314 not found.

> retitle 345587 [PR28314] cpp: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro
Bug#345587: cpp-4.0: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging GCC reprot

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 328421 + upstream
Bug#328421: Complex gcc3.3/gcc4 interaction causes applications to segfault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> forwarded 328421 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24660
Bug#328421: Complex gcc3.3/gcc4 interaction causes applications to segfault
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24660.

> retitle 328421 [PR24660] Complex gcc3.3/gcc4 interaction causes applications 
> to segfault
Bug#328421: Complex gcc3.3/gcc4 interaction causes applications to segfault
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#330521: marked as done (different results for different parameters order)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:30:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line different results for different parameters order
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-9
Severity: normal

Hi

while compiling with different parameters order you get different
results:

$ gcc -g -L/usr/X11R6/lib/ -lGL -lglut -lGLU -pthread -Wall configure.c -o 
configure.bin 
configure.c: In function ‘main’:
configure.c:11: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
$ ./configure.bin 
$ gcc -g configure.c -L/usr/X11R6/lib/ -lGL -lglut -lGLU -pthread -Wall -o 
configure.bin 
configure.c: In function ‘main’:
configure.c:11: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
$ ./configure.bin 
Segmentation fault

Note that only source filename has moved from end to beginning and
program runs differently (segfault is a code problem). This is taken
from configure of Raydium engine [1], problematic file attached to bug
report.

1. http://raydium.cqfd-corp.org/

Preprocessed files (*.i) and assembly (*.s) are same in both cases, 
only difference is how collect2 is called, once (in failing case)
resulting object is before GL libs, second time after then. But order 
should not matter, or am I wrong?

I hope I provided enough information.

Michal

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii  binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.0  4.0.1-9 The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.0-base 4.0.1-9 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.1-9   GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libmudflap0-dev   4.0.1-9GCC mudflap support libraries (dev

-- no debconf information

#include 
#include 
#include 
int main(int argc, char **argv) { 
char *r;
glutInit(&argc,argv);
glutInitDisplayMode(GLUT_DOUBLE | GLUT_RGB | GLUT_DEPTH);
glutInitWindowSize(320,240);
glutCreateWindow("Test window");
r=glGetString(GL_RENDERER);
if(!strcmp(r,"Mesa GLX Indirect"))
{
fprintf(stderr,"WARNING ! Mesa Software renderer detected !");
fprintf(stdout,"WARNING ! Mesa Software renderer detected !");
}
return 0; }

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
unreproducible, please see the previous comment in the report.
--- End Message ---

Bug#330595: Reassign to atlas3, please add feedback, close or reassign

[Matthias Klose]

tags 330595 + moreinfo
reassign 330595 atlas3
thanks

Camm, please recheck with the current compiler version.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Reassign to atlas3, please add feedback, close or reassign

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 330595 + moreinfo
Bug#330595: Miscompilation with -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -funroll-all-loops
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo

> reassign 330595 atlas3
Bug#330595: Miscompilation with -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -funroll-all-loops
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `atlas3'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug target/28314] cpp: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|preprocessor|target


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28314

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 355621 + moreinfo
Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357062: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:33:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no 
/u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-dev
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: normal

/usr/include/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu seems to have gone missing,
breaking g++ -m32 (which zeroc-ice inappropriately uses, but that's a
separate bug).

Could you please restore it?

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libstdc++6-4.0-dev depends on:
ii  g++-4.0   4.0.3-1The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.3-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6-dev 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libstdc++64.0.3-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

libstdc++6-4.0-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.0.3-4

at least they are present in this version.
--- End Message ---

Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

[Matthias Klose]

tags 355621 + moreinfo
thanks

please recheck with gcc-4.1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347808: marked as done (please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:50:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347808: please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with 
--with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.0

Hi.

Today defaults on ix86 are a little bit different:

gcc-3.3 -march=i486 -mtune=i686
gcc-3.4 -march=i486 -mtune=i486
gcc-4.0 -march=i386 -mtune=i686 

Please, could you synchronize it. 

Thanks

Petr



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.0.3-4

that's reenabled again, but apparently missing a changelog entry.
--- End Message ---

Processed: forwarded GCC report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 355909 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28316
Bug#355909: g++-4.0: Internal compiler error in instantiate_decl, at 
cp/pt.c:11539
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28316.

> tags 355909 + upstream
Bug#355909: g++-4.0: Internal compiler error in instantiate_decl, at 
cp/pt.c:11539
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> retitle 355909 [PR28316] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11539
Bug#355909: g++-4.0: Internal compiler error in instantiate_decl, at 
cp/pt.c:11539
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 352790 + upstream
Bug#352790: gcc-4.0: gcc doesn't use locale for default input charset
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: upstream

> forwarded 352790 http://bugs.debian.org/PR28315
Bug#352790: gcc-4.0: gcc doesn't use locale for default input charset
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://bugs.debian.org/PR28315.

> retitle 352790 [PR28315] gcc doesn't use locale for default input charset
Bug#352790: gcc-4.0: gcc doesn't use locale for default input charset
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/28316] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11645

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 17:34 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail|4.0.3 4.1.2 |4.0.3 4.1.2 4.2.0
  Known to work||3.4.6
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-08 17:34:08
   date||
Summary|ICE in in instantiate_decl, |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE
   |at cp/pt.c:11645|in in instantiate_decl, at
   ||cp/pt.c:11645
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28316

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug libgcj/28312] peer libraries are installed into gcjversionedlibdir, not into nativeexeclib

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 17:37 ---
Confirmed.  (And things keep changing...)


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-08 17:37:54
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28312

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tag gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 367799 + pending
Bug#367799: gcc-4.0:Duplicate patch for 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/switch-1.c
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 367709 tech-ctte
Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images 
based on d-i technology (but not d-i).
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0,tech-ctte' to `tech-ctte'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

[Matthias Klose]

tags 347697 + moreinfo
thanks

please recheck with gcc-4.1 (from unstable)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tag gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 358076 + wontfix
Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo)
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 373909 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23817
Bug#373909: g++-4.0: template function returning nested class fails to compile 
when defined outside of its class
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23817.

> tags 373909 + upstream
Bug#373909: g++-4.0: template function returning nested class fails to compile 
when defined outside of its class
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> retitle [PR23817] template function returning nested class fails to compile 
> when defined outside of its class
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 347697 + moreinfo
Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).

[Matthias Klose]

reassign 367709 tech-ctte
thanks

> After some more discussion on IRC, we noticed that there are different
> interpretations of what the gcc maintainers supposed to have said. For
> this reason, I'm re-assigning this bug report to also gcc-4.0.
> 
> Matthias, is there any decision from you whether to add an libstdc++
> udeb or not, and if so, which? Please reassign this bug report back to
> the tech ctte until there happens to be a decision everyone is happy
> with. Sorry for troubling you, and thanks for your help.

I would like to avoid building libgcc1, libgcc2, libgcc4, libstdc++6
packages if possible. An alternative possibility to build these could
be a separate source package b-d on gcc-4.1-source, as currently done
by gcj-4.1 and several cross compiler setups.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks

[Matthias Klose]

tags 366204 + wontfix
thanks

Florian Schlichting writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.3-1
> Severity: minor
> 
> gcc-4.0 puts three dangling symlinks on my system - is that meant to be
> the case?

yes, these are resolved by the lib64stdc++6 package; we do not depend
on that package by default, because not everybody needs the 64bit compiler.

> /bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libstdc++.so: No such file or 
> directory
> /bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libgcc_s.so: No such file or 
> directory
> /bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libgcc_s_64.so: No such file or 
> directory
> 
> Also, now-purged gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 have left the following two symlinks:
> /bin/ls: /usr/share/modass/gcc-3.4/gcc: No such file or directory
> /bin/ls: /usr/share/modass/gcc-3.3/gcc: No such file or directory
> 
> this is tigercron's output and I hope I'm not wrong in assuming that
> none of this should be there?

these files were never part of the gcc packages. that's maybe a local
installation or installation from other sources.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 342126 + upstream
Bug#342126: Function names starting with $ make assembler barf
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> forwarded 342126 http://bugs.debian.org/PR28318
Bug#342126: Function names starting with $ make assembler barf
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://bugs.debian.org/PR28318.

> retitle 342126 [PR28318] Function names starting with $ make assembler barf
Bug#342126: Function names starting with $ make assembler barf
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376412: gcc-4.0-doc: s/DegaGnu/DejaGnu/; s/incorrekt/incorrect/; gccint.html

[Matthias Klose]

Justin Pryzby writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0-doc
> Version: 4.0.3-3
> Severity: minor
> 
> s/DegaGnu/DejaGnu/; s/incorrekt/incorrect/; gccint.html

incorrekt is correct (same as incomplet).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339495: marked as done (cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:04:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339495: cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not 
documented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cpp-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0.2-3
Severity: minor

Hello,

you can see[1] that cpp support -O, -O[1-9], -Os options, and these
options are meanful. but this is not documented in man page[2] and
info[3].

man page belongs to cpp-4.0, need I clone this bug?

[1]
$ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep OPT
$ cpp -dM -O /dev/null | grep OPT
#define __OPTIMIZE__ 1
$ cpp -dM -Os /dev/null | grep OPT
#define __OPTIMIZE__ 1
#define __OPTIMIZE_SIZE__ 1
$ cpp -dM -O2 /dev/null | grep OPT
#define __OPTIMIZE__ 1

[2] /usr/share/man/man1/cpp-4.0.1.gz
[3] /usr/share/info/cpp-4.0.info.gz



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cpp-4.0-doc depends on:
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.2-3The GNU Compiler Collection (base 

cpp-4.0-doc recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Falk wrote:
> I don't think these options are meaningful or should be documented.
> Why would you want to use them?

four months without feedback; closing the report.
--- End Message ---

[Bug c++/28317] template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:20 ---
You are missing a 'typename'.  Inner is a dependent type, so it needs to read

template 
typename Outer::Inner
Outer::get() const
{
return Inner();
}


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28317

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 366204 + wontfix
Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:40 ---
I don't think '$' is a valid identifier, though it is been treated as such.

But I confirm the problem.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||accepts-invalid
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-08 18:40:04
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28318

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:41 ---
/tmp/ccX1KBFb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccX1KBFb.s:9: Error: missing or invalid immediate expression `' taken as 0


Shouldn't this be filed against binutils and not GCC?  $ is a valid indentifier
in GNU C (GNU C allows $ as part of indentifies).


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|accepts-invalid |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28318

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:43 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Implementation_002ddefined-behavior.html#Implementation_002ddefined-behavior

GCC allows the `$' character in identifiers as an extension for most targets.
This is true regardless of the std= switch, since this extension cannot
conflict with standards-conforming programs. When preprocessing assembler,
however, dollars are not identifier characters by default.

Currently the targets that by default do not permit `$' are AVR, IP2K, MMIX,
MIPS Irix 3, ARM aout, and PowerPC targets for the AIX and BeOS operating
systems.

You can override the default with -fdollars-in-identifiers or
fno-dollars-in-identifiers. See fdollars-in-identifiers.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28318

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c/28318] error message could be better

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:46 ---
That page is linked from
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Identifiers-implementation.html#Identifiers-implementation
Which is in turned linked from the full implementation defined page.

So this is a binutils issue rather than a GCC one.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28318

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c/28319] sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:50 ---
The only time I can think this comes up is that the sentinel is -1.  But
sentinels are really there so you don't just pass 0 to the function which will
fail on some 64bit targets.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28319

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376468: Should use xargs --no-run-if-empty

[Matthias Klose]

> $ fakeroot debian/rules clean
> [...]
> find debian/patches -name '*.dpatch' -type f ! -perm 644 | xargs chmod 644
> chmod: missing operand after `644'
> Try `chmod --help' for more information.
> make: [clean] Error 123 (ignored)
> 
> This command line should use xargs --no-run-if-empty to avoid the error.

sure, but it's ignored anyway. do you want to file bugs on every xargs
invocation where make ignores the return value?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357900: gcc-4.0: Please detect and warn about 2 argument mode() called with O_CREAT

[Matthias Klose]

Justin Pryzby writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.3-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: upstream
> 
> mode(2) reads:
> 
>mode  must  be  specified  when O_CREAT is in the flags, and is
>ignored otherwise.
> 
> I straced the result of
> 
>   open(buf, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL);
> 
> and the effective value of the third parameter was garbage (this open
> was in a loop, and the third parameter was equal to my loop variable).
> I wonder if gcc could detect this error.

I doubt that would be something to be considerd. Would you mind
forwarding that upstream?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 337340 http://bugs.debian.org/PR28319
Bug#337340: sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://bugs.debian.org/PR28319.

> retitle 337340 [PR28319] sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels
Bug#337340: sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312367: Re: Bug#312367: gcc-3.3: D support

[Matthias Klose]

Please have a look at the gcj-4.1 source package, how java is now
built. The same thing could be done with D.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/28316] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11645

[fang at csl dot cornell dot edu]

-- 

fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
   ||edu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28316

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#226952: [PR 13945] -Wconversion behaviour

[Matthias Klose]

Upstream wrote:

I think we may close this bug report since either:

* The solution is to split the functionality of Wconversion as conceived by the
Wcoercion project http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion#Background. In that case,
this is a duplicate of bug 9072.

* The message is misleading. Maybe it should say: passing arg 1 of 'func' as
short instead of 'int' due to prototype. If you agree, I can generate a patch
in no time.

* This is not a bug. As said in comment 5, Wconversion is meant to warn about
conversions that would be different in the absence of prototypes. So we may
just close the bug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#373909: marked as done (g++-4.0: template function returning nested class fails to compile when defined outside of its class)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:30:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug c++/28317] template function returning nested class fails 
to compile when defined outside of its class (forwarded from rguenth at gcc dot 
gnu dot org)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-3
Severity: normal


Dear maintainer,

The following code generates the g++ compiler error:

14: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type  conversion
before Outer

template 
class Outer
{
public:
class Inner
{
};

Inner get() const;
};

template 
Outer::Inner
Outer::get() const   // <-- this is line 14
{
return Inner();
}

If the function get() is placed inside the template class Outer, no error is
reported. E.g.,

template 
class Outer
{
public:
class Inner
{
};

Inner get() const
{
return Inner();
}
};

An external definition compiles well if the class Inner is explicitly defined
as a template class (even though no template parameters are required). E.g., 

template 
class Outer
{
public:
template 
class Inner
{
};

Inner get() const;
};


template 
Outer::Inner
Outer::get() const
{
return Inner();
}


Moreover, the first source, producing a compilation error with g++ was also
offered to the intel C++ compiler, where it compiled flawlessly. Here is a
transcript of the issued commands, illustrating the difference:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/programming/C++$ g++ -c -Wall demo1.cxx
demo1.cxx:14: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type
conversion before ?Outer?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/programming/C++$ icc -c -Wall demo1.cxx
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/programming/C++$


My considerations for filing a bug report were:
* g++ produces a compilation error where icc doesn't;
* g++'s compilation error is only produced when the template function is
defined outside of its template class;
* the reported error message is rather cryptic, given the nature of the
source, suggesting confusion on the part of the compiler.

Of course, g++ might offer a more rigid implementation of the C++ standard at
this point. However, I couldn't find a clear indication that the external
function implementation violates the standard. Hence the bug report.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.0   4.0.3-3The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.0-base  4.0.3-3The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6 2.3.6-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libstdc++6-4.0-dev4.0.3-3The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

g++-4.0 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- Begin Message ---


--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-08 18:20 ---
You are missing a 'typename'.  Inner is a dependent type, so it needs to read

template 
typename Outer::Inner
Outer::get() const
{
return Inner();
}


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28317

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---

Processed: fixed gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 278310 [fixed in 4.2] g++-3.3: external linkage of functions declared 
> in an anonymous namespace
Bug#278310: g++-3.3: external linkage of functions declared in an anonymous 
namespace
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gnat-doc REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the gnat-doc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.15p-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343692: [m68k] ICEs while building gst-ffmpeg -- regression

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 17:50]:
> tags 343692 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> please recheck with current gcc-4.1 and gcc-snapshot packages.

Works with 4.1.2 20060613.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342121: [m68k] gcc-4.0 leads to segfault

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 17:44]:
> tags 342121 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> please recheck with 4.1

Works with 4.1.2 20060613.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 354700 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28321
Bug#354700: gcc 4 does not notice C syntax error
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28321.

> tags 354700 + upstream
Bug#354700: gcc 4 does not notice C syntax error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> retitle 354700 [PR28321] gcc 4 does not notice C syntax error
Bug#354700: gcc 4 does not notice C syntax error
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: FTBFS for cross compilation

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 341331 + wontfix
Bug#341331: FTBFS for cross compilation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign gnat report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 329693 gnat
Bug#329693: gnat: Run-time error not detected, RM 9.4(20)
Bug reassigned from package `gnat-3.4' to `gnat'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 342245 + wontfix
Bug#342245: gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle 
R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcc report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 367657 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28322
Bug#367657: GCC new warnings and compatibility
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28322.

> tags 367657 + upstream
Bug#367657: GCC new warnings and compatibility
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> retitle 367657 [PR28322] GCC new warnings and compatibility
Bug#367657: GCC new warnings and compatibility
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341331: marked as done (FTBFS for cross compilation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:19:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS for cross compilation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.4-9

When trying to build an IA64 cross-compiler from the gcc-3.4 source
package on AMD64, I get, during the packaging stage...


$ GCC_TARGET=ia64 fakeroot debian/rules binary
...
dh_installdeb -plibstdc++6-ia64-cross
dh_md5sums -plibstdc++6-ia64-cross
dh_builddeb -plibstdc++6-ia64-cross
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/libstdc++6-ia64-cross/DEBIAN/control' 
near line 6 package `libstdc++6-ia64-cross':
 `Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code 512
make[1]: *** [stamps/08-binary-stamp-libstdcxx] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/peterc/toolchain/gcc-3.4-3.4.4'
make: *** [binary] Error 2


$ cat debian/shlibs.local 
libgcc_s 1  (>= 3.4.4)
   ^ note missing field here.

This is because when debian/shlibs,local is built, p_lgcc isn't
defined -- it's defined in debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc-cross.mk which
isn't included unless with_gcc is 'yes' -- and debian/rules.defs
defines with_gcc as 'built from gcc-4.0 sources'



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 341331 + wontfix
thanks

closing as wontfix for gcc-3.4. please recheck with gcc-4.1.
--- End Message ---

Bug#342245: marked as done (gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F...")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:14:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle 
R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.4-10
Severity: important

hi,

starting with version 3.4.4-10, gcc-3.4 makes boost 1.33.x FTBFS.

/usr/bin/ld: 
bin/boost/libs/serialization/build/libboost_serialization.so/gcc/debug/shared-linkable-true/basic_iarchive.o(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZSt24__uninitialized_copy_auxIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPN5boost7archive6detail19basic_iarchive_impl7aobjectESt6vectorIS6_SaIS6_SB_ET0_T_SD_SC_12__false_type+0xa0):
 cannot reach 
0aae__ZSt10_ConstructIN5boost7archive6detail19basic_iarchive_impl7aobjectES4_EvPT_RKT0_+0,
 recompile with -ffunction-sections
/usr/bin/ld: 
bin/boost/libs/serialization/build/libboost_serialization.so/gcc/debug/shared-linkable-true/basic_iarchive.o(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZSt24__uninitialized_copy_auxIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPN5boost7archive6detail19basic_iarchive_impl7aobjectESt6vectorIS6_SaIS6_SB_ET0_T_SD_SC_12__false_type+0xa0):
 cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F for void 
std::_Construct(boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive_impl::aobject*,
 boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive_impl::aobject const&)
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


the full log is available at 
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=boost&ver=1.33.0-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1132750731&file=log&as=raw.

please let me know how to provide more details. unfortunately i'm
currently not a toolchain expert.

regards
domenico

-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 342245 + wontfix
thanks

closing the report, g++-3.4 isn't built anymore on hppa.
--- End Message ---

Bug#337861: marked as done (fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 02:27:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fakeroot: [m68k] FTBFS with 1 of 7 tests failed 
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: fakeroot
Version: 1.5.5
Severity: important

Automatic build of fakeroot_1.5.5 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 69
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: sharutils, libc6-dev-s390x [s390], libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], 
ia32-libs-dev [amd64], amd64-libs-dev [i386] | lib6-dev-amd64 [i386], 
libc6-dev-ppc64 [powerpc], libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64], lib64gcc1 [i386]
[...]
/usr/bin/make  check-TESTS
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/fakeroot-1.5.5/obj-sysv/test'
RET=b
PASS: t.echoarg
brw-r--r--  1 root root 3, 1 Nov  6 02:32 hda3
PASS: t.mknod
tartest:
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/1': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/1289': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/2': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/3': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/4': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/5': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/6': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/fjsdk': Permission denied
chmod: changing permissions of `hello/vn.34.654l.': Permission denied
FAIL: t.tar
PASS: t.truereturn
PASS: t.falsereturn
-1 -2
PASS: t.option
mkdir: cannot create directory `tmp': File exists
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 Nov  6 02:32 tmp/iamnotuser
rm: cannot chdir from `tmp/tar' to `hello': Permission denied
PASS: t.touchinstall
==
1 of 7 tests failed
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1

I first tried building the package on my Mac, running a 2.2 kernel. Then I
tried on my Amiga, running a 2.6 kernel, which usually helps with a problem
we are having with debhelper, but this seems to be a different issue, since
fakeroot compiled fine on all other arches. I have no idea what is wrong
here... anything I could test?

Christian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1.1-5

according to
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=fakeroot&ver=1.5.9&arch=m68k&stamp=1152382743&file=log&as=raw
the build did succeed.
--- End Message ---

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

[munir]

The removal of the email address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>From the mailing list: 

Al-Manahel Newsletter List 

is all set.

Date of this removal: Sat Jul  8 18:26:19 2006

Please save this email message for future reference.

---

You may automatically subscribe from this list at any time by 
visiting the following URL:



If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the 
entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break
this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. 

You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen: 



If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at: 



The following physical address is associated with this mailing list: 



- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357062: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu))

[Aaron M. Ucko]

retitle 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no 
/u/i/c++/4.1/i486-linux-gnu)
reassign 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev 4.1.1-7
reopen 357062
thanks

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

> Version: 4.0.3-4
>
> at least they are present in this version.

So they are; thanks.  However, in the meantime, gcc-4.1 seems to have
developed an identical bug, hence the reassignment and reopening. :-/

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#357062 closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no /u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no 
> /u/i/c++/4.1/i486-linux-gnu)
Bug#357062: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no 
/u/i/c++/4.0/i486-linux-gnu)
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> reassign 357062 libstdc++6-4.1-dev 4.1.1-7
Bug#357062: libstdc++6-4.1-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no 
/u/i/c++/4.1/i486-linux-gnu)
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++6-4.0-dev' to `libstdc++6-4.1-dev'.

> reopen 357062
Bug#357062: libstdc++6-4.1-dev: 32-bit includes missing on amd64 (no 
/u/i/c++/4.1/i486-linux-gnu)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]