Bug#192135: looking for someone?
Hello my dear fraiend I was looking through the web few weeks aago anbd found your profile. Nobw I decided to beamail you to get to know you better. I am coming to your country bin few weeks and thought may be we can meaet each other. I amb pretty looking girl.a I am 25. Do not reply to this address directly. Email me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/28062] [4.1 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-17 14:56 --- (In reply to comment #3) > It works in 4.2.0 for sure. I don't think that's correct. I can confirm that gcc 4.2 20060508 works, but 20060530 and 20060613 definitely fail here (both the C and Objective-C test cases). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/28062] [4.1 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 15:00 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #3) > > It works in 4.2.0 for sure. > > I don't think that's correct. I can confirm that gcc 4.2 20060508 works, but > 20060530 and 20060613 definitely fail here (both the C and Objective-C test > cases). I works with "4.2.0 20060617". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359281: [m68k] Error: value out of range
* Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 10:35]: > torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of > track.s: Assembler messages: > track.s:10716: Error: value out of range Would it be possible to get the pre-processed sources from grace and rscheme? (In particular grace) Only if it's easy, but it might be helpful. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/28062] [4.1 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-17 16:26 --- This ICE got introduced with: r113775 | sayle | 2006-05-15 06:43:05 +0200 (Mon, 15 May 2006) | 13 lines PR rtl-optimization/22563 Backports from mainline * expmed.c (store_fixed_bit_field): When using AND and IOR to store a fixed width bitfield, always force the intermediates into pseudos. Also check whether the bitsize is valid for the machine's "insv" instruction before moving the target into a pseudo for use with the insv. -- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at eyesopen dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Patch] #18: gnat-4.1: do not conflict with gnat (<= 4.1)
With this patch, the transition to gnat-4.1 as the default Ada
compiler will be complete; I will start uploading packages that
build-depend on gnat (>= 4.1) after both gcc-defaults (=1.37) and
gcc-4.1 (>= 4.1.1-6) are uploaded.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
[Ludovic Brenta]
* debian/control.m4, debian/control (gnat): conflict with gnat (<< 4.1),
not all versions of gnat, since gcc-defaults will now provide gnat (=4.1)
which depends on gnat-4.1.
--- control.m4 543b53c2f2db746f445a883678f1ee77dd5d6ec7
+++ control.m4 6bff7f2372e23374c0e77396f491e70d3f904354
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
Depends: BASEDEP, gcc`'PV (= ${gcc:Version}), ${dep:libgnat}, ${dep:libcdev},
${shlibs:Depends}
Suggests: gnat`'PV-doc, ada-reference-manual
Provides: ada-compiler, gnat
-Conflicts: gnat (<< 4.1), gnat-3.1, gnat-3.2, gnat-3.3, gnat-3.4, gnat-3.5,
gnat-4.0
+Conflicts: gnat, gnat-3.1, gnat-3.2, gnat-3.3, gnat-3.4, gnat-3.5, gnat-4.0
Description: The GNU Ada compiler
This is the GNU Ada compiler, which compiles Ada on platforms supported
by the gcc compiler. It uses the gcc backend to generate optimized code.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Patch] #18: gnat-4.1: do not conflict with gnat (<= 4.1)
checked in the changelog entry, the patch was already committed.
Matthias
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> With this patch, the transition to gnat-4.1 as the default Ada
> compiler will be complete; I will start uploading packages that
> build-depend on gnat (>= 4.1) after both gcc-defaults (=1.37) and
> gcc-4.1 (>= 4.1.1-6) are uploaded.
>
> --
> Ludovic Brenta.
>
>
> [Ludovic Brenta]
> * debian/control.m4, debian/control (gnat): conflict with gnat (<< 4.1),
> not all versions of gnat, since gcc-defaults will now provide gnat (=4.1)
> which depends on gnat-4.1.
>
> --- control.m4543b53c2f2db746f445a883678f1ee77dd5d6ec7
> +++ control.m46bff7f2372e23374c0e77396f491e70d3f904354
> @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
> Depends: BASEDEP, gcc`'PV (= ${gcc:Version}), ${dep:libgnat},
> ${dep:libcdev}, ${shlibs:Depends}
> Suggests: gnat`'PV-doc, ada-reference-manual
> Provides: ada-compiler, gnat
> -Conflicts: gnat (<< 4.1), gnat-3.1, gnat-3.2, gnat-3.3, gnat-3.4, gnat-3.5,
> gnat-4.0
> +Conflicts: gnat, gnat-3.1, gnat-3.2, gnat-3.3, gnat-3.4, gnat-3.5, gnat-4.0
> Description: The GNU Ada compiler
> This is the GNU Ada compiler, which compiles Ada on platforms supported
> by the gcc compiler. It uses the gcc backend to generate optimized code.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359281: [m68k] Error: value out of range
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 10:35]: > > torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of > > track.s: Assembler messages: > > track.s:10716: Error: value out of range > > Would it be possible to get the pre-processed sources from grace and > rscheme? (In particular grace) Only if it's easy, but it might be > helpful. I've attached the one for grace. This is gcc-4.1_4.1.1-2 grace: $ gcc-4.1 -save-temps -O2 -I.. -I. -I../Xbae -c -o pars.o pars.c pars.s: Assembler messages: pars.s:13278: Error: value out of range rscheme compiled fine for me this time, I guess it needs to be requeued. :) I can also produce preprocessed sources for krecipes and synfig if it would help (synfig just failed today, so I know it's current). Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gnat-4.2 in experimental?
Matthias Klose writes: > btw, what should be done for gnat-4.2, soon to appear in > experimental? My priority is to complete the transition of all Ada packages to 4.1 in time for Etch; I have a lot of work ahead of me, because I'mnot just going to recompile but also upload newer versions of most packages. Only after the transition will I work on 4.2. So in the mean time, I suggest you keep Ada disabled in 4.2. Does that sound reasonable to you? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/28062] [4.1 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-18 01:09 --- (In reply to comment #7) > It works with "4.2.0 20060617". Hmm. (sid)46:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp/gcc/4.2/gcc] ./cc1 -O2 ~/m.c NSMakePoint RelativePoint g Analyzing compilation unitPerforming intraprocedural optimizations Assembling functions: g /home/tbm/m.c: In function g: /home/tbm/m.c:24: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. zsh: exit 4 ./cc1 -O2 ~/m.c (sid)47:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp/gcc/4.2/gcc] ./xgcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.2/configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.0 20060617 (experimental) (sid)48:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/tmp/gcc/4.2/gcc] -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373937: Acknowledgement (libstdc++6: codecvt locale facet is broken)
Roger Leigh wrote: > I have attached two additional testcases to the upstream bug report. > The testcases are now: > > Testcase to show codecvt crash > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11679 (wide.cc) > > Use mbsnrtowcs directly. > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11682 (wide2.cc) > > C example using mbsnrtowcs > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11683 (wide3.c) > > > There isn't a clear pattern here. It's possible that the testcases > are buggy, but's it's odd how they work on one arch and not the other, > or vice versa. I tried wide3.c on mips and got a similiar failure pattern. However, passing NULL as state to mbsnrtowcs, or initialising the state with memset to zero made it work. The example in "info glibc" shows the memset line but doesn't explain it is required. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug rtl-optimization/28062] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:4466
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 02:58 --- You know what I have a fix for an inliner bug in my tree which also fixes this bug. I am going to test that patch fully and submit it for both 4.1.x and 4.2.x. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||28075 Known to fail|4.1.1 |4.1.1 4.2.0 Known to work|4.0.4 4.2.0 |4.0.4 Summary|[4.1 regression] ICE in |[4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in |simplify_subreg, at |simplify_subreg, at |simplify-rtx.c:4466 |simplify-rtx.c:4466 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
