[Bug java/8923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when modifying a variable decleared "final static"

2006-05-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||27439
  nThis||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8923

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-05-05 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #361602
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25776
#  * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED
usertags 361602 - status-NEW
usertags 361602 + status-ASSIGNED

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug libgcj/27294] gij throws NullPointerException, when the interpreter is not enabled

2006-05-05 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-05 15:05 ---
Subject: Bug 27294

Author: tromey
Date: Fri May  5 15:05:20 2006
New Revision: 113554

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113554
Log:
PR libgcj/27294:
* java/lang/natVMClassLoader.cc (defineClass): Throw
VirtualMachineError if no interpreter configured.

Modified:
trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
trunk/libjava/java/lang/natVMClassLoader.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27294

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug libgcj/27294] gij throws NullPointerException, when the interpreter is not enabled

2006-05-05 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-05 15:06 ---
Now we print something nicer:

opsy. gij t
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.VirtualMachineError: found class file for
class t, but no interpreter configured in this libgcj


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27294

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Results for 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose 
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 28 16:10:47 UTC 2006 (revision 113350)

Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu

=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn3.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn4.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn5.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 3 4 3 4 255 
191 44: 130 124 0 194 48
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 128 9 68: 255 
129 69
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 3 4 5 9 3 4 
5 160 140: 136 123 5 8 164 145
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 128 128 32521 
112 140: 255 32641 113 12
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 3 4 5 6 128 
9 3 4 5 6 0: 255 129 4 7 9 11 6
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c output pattern test, is 12 4951 127 104 13 
212: 116 4964 83
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c output pattern test, is 12 4951 127 104 13 
176: 116 4964 47
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_double.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_float.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_multi_schar.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshort.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_multi_sshortchar.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_multi_uchar.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushort.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_multi_ushortchar.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_schar.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_sint.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_sshort.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_uchar.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_uint.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_ulonglong.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_ushort.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/nested_struct.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/problem1.c execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/struct3.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.special/unwindtest.cc  -shared-libgcc -lstdc++ execution test

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes158
# of unexpected failures8
# of unexpected successes   60
# of expected failures  1
# of unsupported tests  2
=== libmudflap tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c output pattern test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test

=== libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes1793
# of unexpected failures6
=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 
tr1/4_metaprogramming/other_transformations/aligned_storage/aligned_storage.cc 
execution test
FAIL: tr1/4_metaprogramming/type_proper

Results for 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2006-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose 
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 28 16:10:47 UTC 2006 (revision 113350)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes11972
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  66
# of unsupported tests  106
/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++  version 4.1.1 
20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2)

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/fold-cond-1.c scan-tree-dump-times \\(g \\| h\\) != 0 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes37190
# of unexpected failures1
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  76
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests  294
/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) 
(Debian 4.1.0-2)

=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix

=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes12262
# of expected failures  12
# of unsupported tests  82
/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran  
version 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2)

=== obj-c++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/cxx-ivars-2.mm execution test
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-8.mm execution test
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/isa-field-1.mm (test for excess errors)
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm (test for excess errors)
WARNING: obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-2.mm (test for excess errors)
WARNING: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-9.mm (test for excess errors)
WARNING: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-9.mm compilation failed to produce executable

=== obj-c++ Summary ===

# of expected passes423
# of unexpected failures6
# of unsupported tests  13
/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../g++  version 
4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2)

=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes1684
# of unsupported tests  22
/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) 
(Debian 4.1.0-2)

=== treelang tests ===


Running target unix

=== treelang Summary ===

# of expected passes50
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes228
# of unsupported tests  2
=== libmudflap tests ===


Running target unix

=== libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes1799
=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)

=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes3409
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  12
# of unsupported tests  315

Compiler version: 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2) 
Platform: s390-ibm-linux-gnu
configure flags: -v --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib 
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix 
--enable-nls --program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu 
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo 
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/jre --enable-mpfr 
--enable-checking=release s390-linux-gnu 
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++,treelang
BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2


Build Dependencies:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version Description
+++-==-===-==
ii  binutils   2.16.1cvs20060413-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary 
utilities


Patches that Debian applied in this version:

svn-updates:
  CVS updates from the 4.1 branch upto 20060428.

libjava-update:
  libjava awt & swing update, taken from trunk 2006-02-25

gcc-version:
  Add package identification to the gcc version string

gcc-textdomain:
  Set gettext's domain and textdomain to the versioned package name.

rename-info-files:
  Allow transformations on info file names. Reference the
  transformed info file names in

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-3.3

2006-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #169862
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 169862 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823
Bug#169862: [fixed in 3.4, optimization/1823] -ftrapv aborts with pointer 
difference due to division optimization
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9067 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 169862 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #200140
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 200140 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370
Bug#200140: [fixed in 3.4] [PR 11445] false positive warning with 
-Wunreachable-code
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11445 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 200140 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #212260
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11624
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 212260 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11624
Bug#212260: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 13518] "virtual functions but non-virtual 
destructor" warning incomplete
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13518 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11624.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 212260 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #223226
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12491
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 223226 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12491
Bug#223226: [fixed in 3.4] Segfault with C++ inheritance
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13340 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12491.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 223226 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #224413
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11295
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 224413 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11295
Bug#224413: [PR 13621] [3.3 regression, fixed in 3.4] cc1plus crashes when 
compiling a statement expression returning type string
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13621 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11295.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 224413 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #226148
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 226148 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793
Bug#226148: [fixed in 3.4] ICE building altivec code in ffmpeg
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13619 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 226148 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #242158
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9390
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 242158 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9390
Bug#242158: [fixed in 3.5] ICE with unsupported locale
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16025 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9390.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 242158 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #255801
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14279
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 255801 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14279
Bug#255801: [PR 16152, fixed in 3.4] perl-5.8.4 fails to build using gcc-3.3.4 
on {ia64,arm,m68k}-linux
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16152 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14279.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 255801 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

D

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-3.4

2006-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #217360
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 217360 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
Bug#217360: [PR12867, fixed in 3.5] incorrect warning message (void format, 
should be void* format)
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12867 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 217360 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #238432
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 238432 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801
Bug#238432: [fixed in 4.0] gcj fails to wait for its child processes on exec()
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14709 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 238432 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #254659
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 254659 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052
Bug#254659: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16066 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 254659 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #285692
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 285692 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384
Bug#285692: [fixed in 3.4/4.0] [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in 
tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3255
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19006 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 285692 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #286715
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 286715 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157
Bug#286715: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 19711] gcj segfaults instead of reporting the 
ambiguous expression
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19711 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 286715 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #293466
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 293466 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309
Bug#293466: [PR 19265] [fixed in 4.0] g++-3.4: mt_allocator + threads + dlclose 
= crash
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19265 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> usertags 293466 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #307993
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * upstream said bug is wontfix
> forwarded 307993 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676
Bug#307993: CE in gen_subprogram_die at dwarf2out.c:10913 building glibc 2.3.5 
with nptl
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21457 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> tags 307993 + upstream wontfix
Bug#307993: CE in gen_subprogram_die at dwarf2out.c:10913 building glibc 2.3.5 
with nptl
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Tags added: upstream, wontfix

> usertags 307993 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #331265
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * closed upstream
> forwarded 331265 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592
Bug#331265: [fixed in 4.0] ICE in resolve_overloaded_unification
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24171 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592.

> tags 331265 + fixed-upstr

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #85535
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 85535 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086
Bug#85535: builtin memcmp() could be optimised
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3508 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086.

> usertags 85535 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #222497
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5458
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 222497 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5458
Bug#222497: [PR 13947] ptr_fun doesn't recognise argument
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13947 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5458.

> usertags 222497 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #226952
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6614
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 226952 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6614
Bug#226952: [PR 13945] -Wconversion behaviour
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13945 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6614.

> usertags 226952 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #269513
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR4882
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 269513 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR4882
Bug#269513: [PR 18007] Template template specialization matching problem
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18007 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR4882.

> usertags 269513 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #276843
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13000
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 276843 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13000
Bug#276843: [fixed in 4.1] -O2 disables warning "control reaches end of 
non-void function"
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18588 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13000.

> usertags 276843 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #277845
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18122
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * closed upstream
> forwarded 277845 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18122
Bug#277845: [PR 18591] gfortran: internal error with namelist
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18591 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18122.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> tags 277845 + fixed-upstream
Bug#277845: [PR 18591] gfortran: internal error with namelist
Tags were: upstream experimental
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> usertags 277845 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #307207
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 307207 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664
Bug#307207: [PR 22587] shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden segfaults
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22587 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664.

> usertags 307207 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #309210
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25196
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * closed upstream
> forwarded 309210 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25196
Bug#309210: [PR 23453] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of PARI/GP on x86
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23453 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25196.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)

> tags 309210 + fixed-upstream
Bug#309210: [PR 23453] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of PARI/GP on x86
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> usertags 309210 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #323325
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8081
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 323325 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8081
Bug#323325: [PR 23456] [4.0 regression] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_typ (ObjC)
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23456 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8081.

> usertags 323325 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #327301
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22052
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> forwarded 327301 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22052
Bug#327301: [PR 24140] [4.0 regression] ICE on duplicate definitions of an 
inline func

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-05-05 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #140201
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 140201 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334
usertags 140201 + status-NEW

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[bts-link] source package gcj-4.0

2006-05-05 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #195344
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 195344 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427
usertags 195344 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #225434
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2499
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 225434 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2499
usertags 225434 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #340651
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1373
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 340651 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1373
usertags 340651 + status-NEW

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[bts-link] source package gcc-3.3

2006-05-05 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #169862
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 169862 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823
usertags 169862 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #200140
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 200140 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370
usertags 200140 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #212260
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11624
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 212260 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11624
usertags 212260 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #223226
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12491
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 223226 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12491
usertags 223226 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #224413
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11295
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 224413 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11295
usertags 224413 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #226148
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 226148 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793
usertags 226148 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #242158
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9390
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 242158 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9390
usertags 242158 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #255801
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14279
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 255801 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14279
usertags 255801 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[bts-link] source package gcc-3.4

2006-05-05 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #217360
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 217360 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
usertags 217360 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #238432
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 238432 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801
usertags 238432 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #254659
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 254659 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052
usertags 254659 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #285692
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 285692 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384
usertags 285692 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #286715
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 286715 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157
usertags 286715 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #293466
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 293466 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309
usertags 293466 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #307993
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * upstream said bug is wontfix
forwarded 307993 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676
tags 307993 + upstream wontfix
usertags 307993 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX

# remote status report for #331265
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * closed upstream
forwarded 331265 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592
tags 331265 + fixed-upstream
usertags 331265 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-05-05 Thread bts-link-upstream 
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# remote status report for #85535
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 85535 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086
usertags 85535 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #222497
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5458
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 222497 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5458
usertags 222497 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #226952
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6614
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 226952 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6614
usertags 226952 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #269513
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR4882
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 269513 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR4882
usertags 269513 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #276843
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13000
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 276843 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13000
usertags 276843 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #277845
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18122
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * closed upstream
forwarded 277845 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18122
tags 277845 + fixed-upstream
usertags 277845 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #307207
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 307207 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664
usertags 307207 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #309210
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25196
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * closed upstream
forwarded 309210 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25196
tags 309210 + fixed-upstream
usertags 309210 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #323325
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8081
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 323325 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8081
usertags 323325 + status-NEW

# remote status report for #327301
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22052
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
forwarded 327301 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22052
usertags 327301 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #335078
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14261
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 335078 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14261
usertags 335078 + status-NEW

thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

2006-05-05 Thread munir 

The removal of the email address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>From the mailing list: 

Al-Manahel Newsletter List 

is all set.

Date of this removal: Fri May  5 17:57:22 2006

Please save this email message for future reference.

---

You may automatically subscribe from this list at any time by 
visiting the following URL:



If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the 
entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break
this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. 

You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen: 



If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at: 



The following physical address is associated with this mailing list: 



- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #140201
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 140201 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334
Bug#140201: [PR libstdc++/9069] race condition in libstdc++3 (basic_string.tcc)
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9069 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334.

> usertags 140201 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.0

2006-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #195344
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 195344 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427
Bug#195344: [PR 11443] gdb does not show source of main() for java programs
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11443 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427.

> usertags 195344 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #225434
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2499
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 225434 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2499
Bug#225434: [PR 13513] problems with static inner classes of interfaces
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13513 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2499.

> usertags 225434 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #340651
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1373
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> forwarded 340651 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1373
Bug#340651: [PR java/27268] Dies with sigseg
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27268 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1373.

> usertags 340651 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

resetting forwarded addresses (Re: Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-3.4)

2006-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose 
Please STOP resetting the forwarded address and revert the changes you
already did. We do loose information in the upstream BTS: it becomes
more tedious to track the reverse direction (upstream -> Debian),
unless you add information to the upstream bug report as well.
I.e. you have to search now _every_ duplicate report to find the one
which was reported in Debian. That's insane when a report has a large
number of duplicates.

I don't mind adding information to the BTS, but removing information
from it is just insane.

Thanks, Matthias


Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> 
> > #
> > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4
> > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> > #
> > user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> > # remote status report for #217360
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > forwarded 217360 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
> Bug#217360: [PR12867, fixed in 3.5] incorrect warning message (void format, 
> should be void* format)
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12867 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027.
> (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> 
> > usertags 217360 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
> There were no usertags set.
> Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> > # remote status report for #238432
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > forwarded 238432 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801
> Bug#238432: [fixed in 4.0] gcj fails to wait for its child processes on exec()
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14709 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801.
> (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> 
> > usertags 238432 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
> There were no usertags set.
> Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> > # remote status report for #254659
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > forwarded 254659 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052
> Bug#254659: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16066 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052.
> (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> 
> > usertags 254659 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
> There were no usertags set.
> Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> > # remote status report for #285692
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > forwarded 285692 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384
> Bug#285692: [fixed in 3.4/4.0] [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in 
> tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3255
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19006 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384.
> (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> 
> > usertags 285692 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
> There were no usertags set.
> Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> > # remote status report for #286715
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > forwarded 286715 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157
> Bug#286715: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 19711] gcj segfaults instead of reporting the 
> ambiguous expression
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19711 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157.
> (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> 
> > usertags 286715 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
> There were no usertags set.
> Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> > # remote status report for #293466
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > forwarded 293466 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309
> Bug#293466: [PR 19265] [fixed in 4.0] g++-3.4: mt_allocator + threads + 
> dlclose = crash
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19265 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309.
> (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> 
> > usertags 293466 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
> There were no usertags set.
> Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> > # remote status report for #307993
> > #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676
> > #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> > #  * upstream said bug is wontfix
> > forwarded 307993 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676
> Bug#307993: CE in gen_subprogram_die at dwarf2out.c:10913 building glibc 
> 2.3.5 with nptl
> Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21457 to 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676.
> (By the way, this Bu

Processed: Re: Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1

2006-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 365900 -1
Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1
Bug 365900 cloned as bug 366196.

> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#366196: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1
Bug reassigned from package `libgnatprj4.1' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> retitle -1 libgnatprj4.1 needs prio optional in the override file
Bug#366196: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1
Changed Bug title.

> severity 365900 important
Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1

2006-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose 
clone 365900 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 libgnatprj4.1 needs prio optional in the override file
severity 365900 important
thanks

Make libgnatvsn4.1 and libgnatprj4.1 priority optional, changed in
svn, needs changes in the override file.

Blars Blarson writes:
> Package: libgnatprj4.1
> Version: 4.1.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.5
> 
> priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1.
> I don't think ada or ada libraries should be priority standard.
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
> 
> Versions of packages libgnatprj4.1 depends on:
> ii  gcc-4.1-base  4.1.0-2The GNU Compiler Collection 
> (base 
> ii  libgnat-4.1   4.1.0-2Runtime library for GNU Ada 
> applic
> ii  libgnatvsn4.1 4.1.0-2GNU Ada compiler version library
> 
> libgnatprj4.1 recommends no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks

2006-05-05 Thread Florian Schlichting 
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: minor

gcc-4.0 puts three dangling symlinks on my system - is that meant to be
the case?

/bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libstdc++.so: No such file or 
directory
/bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libgcc_s.so: No such file or 
directory
/bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libgcc_s_64.so: No such file or 
directory

Also, now-purged gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 have left the following two symlinks:
/bin/ls: /usr/share/modass/gcc-3.4/gcc: No such file or directory
/bin/ls: /usr/share/modass/gcc-3.3/gcc: No such file or directory

this is tigercron's output and I hope I'm not wrong in assuming that
none of this should be there?

best,
Florian


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-max
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii  binutils 2.16.1cvs20060413-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.0  4.0.3-1 The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.0-base 4.0.3-1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc62.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.0-1+b1GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libmudflap0-dev   4.1.0-1+b1 GCC mudflap support libraries (dev

-- no debconf information



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature