[Bug tree-optimization/26763] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong final value of induction variable calculated

2006-04-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-05 08:16 
---
Subject: Bug 26763

Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr  5 08:16:38 2006
New Revision: 112697

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112697
Log:
2006-04-05  Richard Guenther  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR tree-optimization/26763
* fold-const.c (fold_comparison): Move folding of
PTR + CST CMP PTR + CST ...
(fold_binary): ... here.  Fold only for EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR.

* gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-1.c: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-2.c: Likewise.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug tree-optimization/26763] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong final value of induction variable calculated

2006-04-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-05 08:20 
---
Subject: Bug 26763

Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr  5 08:20:21 2006
New Revision: 112698

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112698
Log:
2006-04-05  Richard Guenther  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR tree-optimization/26763
* fold-const.c (fold_binary): Fold PTR + CST CMP PTR + CST
only for EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR.

* gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-1.c: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-2.c: Likewise.

Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-1.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr26763-2.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug tree-optimization/26763] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong final value of induction variable calculated

2006-04-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-05 08:22 
---
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging gcc reports

2006-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 356896 + fixed-upstream pending
Bug#356896: [PR 26763, 4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 miscompiles apcalc
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream, pending

> tags 360498 + pending
Bug#360498: gcc-4.1: FTBFS (ppc64): ppc64-biarch.dpatch does not apply cleanly
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 360466 + pending
Bug#360466: libffi4: purging removes some of gcc-4.1-base's doc files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1_sparc.changes

2006-04-05 Thread Archive Administrator
java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.54-1_sparc.deb
  java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1_sparc.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2006-04-05 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.54-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.54-1_sparc.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1_sparc.deb


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#361024: libstdc++6: cannot handle TLS data

2006-04-05 Thread Gordon Haverland
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: normal

When running apt-get to do upgrades, I am seeing the following:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 30, in ?
  import apt_pkg
ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libstdc++6 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.1-base  4.1.0-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6 2.3.6-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.0-1  GCC support library

libstdc++6 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#361024: Simple test case [Was: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data]

2006-04-05 Thread Sheplyakov Alexei
Hello!

On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:41:05 -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 30, in ?
>   import apt_pkg
> ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data

I've seen many similar errors on my system too (I've got a bunch of
home-brew Guile[1] modules written in C++). Such an error appears whenever
a thread created by C code tries to dlopen(3) C++ shared library.
I've managed to create (hopefully) simple test case (based on
C++ dlopen mini-HOWTO), see the attached tarball (unpack and run
`make'). I did not reported this before since I thought that's /me doing
something wrong...

Best regards,
  Alexei

[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/guile
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/guile-1.6

-- 
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.



dlopen_cpp_fail_example.tar.gz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature