Bug#346004: marked as done (iostream can't do files > 2GB)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:45:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346004: iostream can't do files > 2GB
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++5-3.3
Version: 3.3.5-13

When I run this program:

big.cc:
-
#include 
#include 

using namespace std;

int main()
{

  ofstream test("/scratch/bigfile.txt");
  for (long i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
test << i;
  }
  test.close();

  return 0;
}


$ ./big
Filesize limit exceeded
$ ls -l
total 2099204
-rw-r--r--  1 oetiker oep 2147483647 Jan  4 20:58 bigfile.txt

it ends after writing two GB ...

The bug is fixed in the gcc-3.4 distro ... details here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610

This is on debian sarge.

cheers
tobi

-- 
 ____   _
/_  __/_  / /  (_) Oetiker @ ISG.EE, ETL F24.2, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich
 / // _ \/ _ \/ /  System Manager, Time Lord, Coder, Designer, Coach
/_/ \.__/_.__/_/   http://people.ee.ethz.ch/oetiker +41(0)44-632-5286

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6-dev
Version: 3.4.5-2

This is fixed in 3.4.
-- 
Falk
--- End Message ---


Bug#334729: marked as done (strstream.h file missing)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:50:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334729: strstream.h file missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev
Version: 1:3.3.5-13
Severity: normal
File: /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/strstream.h

>From the looks of the directory, this does not seem to be intentional.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8+lisbeth.20050206
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libstdc++5-3.3-dev depends on:
ii  g++-3.3 1:3.3.5-13   The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base1:3.3.5-13   The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6-dev   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.5-13   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This is in fact intentional; see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12766
-- 
Falk
--- End Message ---


Bug#334339: mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an UltraSPARC client (bus error)

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
reassign 334339 mysql-client
thanks

The internal compiler error has been fixed long ago, so reassigning to
mysql-client.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Bug#334339: mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an UltraSPARC client (bus error)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 334339 mysql-client
Bug#334339: mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an 
UltraSPARC client (bus error)
Bug reassigned from package `g++-4.0' to `mysql-client'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#339495: cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Hi,

I don't think these options are meaningful or should be documented.
Why would you want to use them?

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: GCC 4.1 in experimental / GCC for etch

2006-03-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx

Matthias Klose wrote:
> The GCC (GNU compiler collection) 4.1 release candidate 1 can be found
> in experimental.  "Porters", please make sure that the package is
> built and uploaded (if it's not built by the experimental
> buildd). Please check that the symbols exported in the 4.1 libraries
> are a superset of those exported in the 4.0 libraries (these are
> libgcc1 (except m68k and hppa), libstdc++6, libffi4, libobjc1,
> libmudflap0).

This are the results for amd64:
I think the only library that could have problems is libmudflap0:
libmudflap.so has those changes:
-0011bc84 gDO .bss   0004  Base__mf_state
+0011b7c0 gDO .data  0004  Base__mf_state_1

It also dropped the following symbols:
-0011b038 ld  .data.rel.ro     
.data.rel.ro
-0011b868 gDO .data  0008  Basethreads_active_p

and libmudflapth.so:
New symbols:
+0011c000 ld  .tdata   .tdata
+ gD  .tdata 0004  Base__mf_state_1

Dropped symbols:
-0011cae0 ld  .data.rel.ro     
.data.rel.ro
-00017d50 gDF .text  0002  Base
__mf_0fn_pthread_exit
-00017c70 gDF .text  0006  Base
__mf_0fn_pthread_join
-000172b0 gDF .text  00ed  Base
__mf_allocate_blank_threadinfo
-000174e0 gDF .text  0040  Base
__mf_state_perthread
-00017d60 gDF .text  009a  Base
__real_pthread_exit
-00017c80 gDF .text  00d0  Base
__real_pthread_join
-00017d60 gDF .text  009a  Base
__wrap_pthread_exit
-00017c80 gDF .text  00d0  Base
__wrap_pthread_join
-00017d60 gDF .text  009a  Basepthread_exit
-00017c80 gDF .text  00d0  Basepthread_join
-0011d410 gDO .data  0008  Basethreads_active_p


libgcc1 4.0 has this symbol more:
-0010c980 ld  .data.rel.ro     
.data.rel.ro

libstdc++6 4.1 has 1 extra symbols:
+001e7650 ld  .tbss    .tbss

libffi4 is identical.

libobjc1 4.0 has this symbol more:
-00118048 ld  .data.rel.ro     
.data.rel.ro


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug rtl-optimization/23454] [4.0 regression] ICE in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2006-03-04 Thread falk at debian dot org


--- Comment #9 from falk at debian dot org  2006-03-04 14:35 ---
Is this really fixed? I can still reproduce it with the original testcase
(but not the reduced one) with
g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-9)


-- 

falk at debian dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23454

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 344041 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi Stephen,

in #344046, you mention upstream is working on this. Can you give more
details? Is there a PR? A fix?

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 344041 + moreinfo
Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: gcc stuff

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 343511 + upstream wontfix
Bug#343511: g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, wontfix

> forwarded 343511 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR17972
Bug#343511: g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR17972.

> retitle 244894 [fixed in 4.1] [C++ standard defect 280] 
> const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
Bug#244894: [C++ standard defect 280] const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
Changed Bug title.

> tags 244894 + fixed-upstream
Bug#244894: [fixed in 4.1] [C++ standard defect 280] const_reverse_iterators 
seem to be broken
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> severity 95318 wishlist
Bug#95318: inefficient code with and
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> severity 161432 wishlist
Bug#161432: [PR target/8603] Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> forwarded 336915 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24522
Bug#336915: [fixed in 4.1] Bogus warning "statement has no effect" with 
template and statement-expression
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/24522 to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24522.

> close 328939 4.0.2-3
Bug#328939: g++ does not inline static const doubles
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.0.2-3, send any further explanations to LI 
Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> retitle 276843 [fixed in 4.1] -O2 disables warning "control reaches end of 
> non-void function"
Bug#276843: [PR 18588] -O2 disables warning "control reaches end of non-void 
function"
Changed Bug title.

> tags 276843 + fixed-upstream
Bug#276843: [fixed in 4.1] -O2 disables warning "control reaches end of 
non-void function"
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> tags 312367 - moreinfo
Bug#312367: gcc-3.3: D support
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo

> severity 342126 minor
Bug#342126: gcc-4.0: gcc generates bad assembly code for simple code
Severity set to `minor'.

> retitle 342126 Function names starting with $ make assembler barf
Bug#342126: gcc-4.0: gcc generates bad assembly code for simple code
Changed Bug title.

> forwarded 335078 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26555
Bug#335078: gcc-4.0: [IA-64] ICE when building keynote
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26555.

> tags 335078 + upstream
Bug#335078: gcc-4.0: [IA-64] ICE when building keynote
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug rtl-optimization/23454] [4.0 regression] ICE in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.0.2   |4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23454

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug rtl-optimization/23454] [4.0 regression] ICE in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-  |
   |patches/2005-   |
   |09/msg00061.html|


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23454

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26555] unrecognizable insn on IA64

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 14:57 ---
I think this is a dup of bug 14261.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||14261
  Component|rtl-optimization|target
   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26555

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 347697 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes
it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind?
Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get
something smaller?

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 347697 + moreinfo
Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug middle-end/26557] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|c++ |middle-end


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26557

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
  GCC build triplet|i486-linux-gnu  |
   GCC host triplet|i486-linux-gnu  |
 GCC target triplet|i486-linux-gnu  |
   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|ICE in simplify_subreg  |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE
   ||in simplify_subreg
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26557

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 15:49 ---
Confirmed, a C testcase:
extern  const int struct_test[];
const int struct_test[] = {1};
void g();
void f() {
  switch(struct_test[0]) {
case 1: g();
  }
}


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-04 15:49:04
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26557

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail||4.0.3 4.0.2 4.1.0 4.2.0
  Known to work||3.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26557

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 15:53 ---
This is definitely a middle-end issue:
#0  fancy_abort (file=0xce9f78
"/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/simplify-rtx.c", line=4402, 
function=0xed4670 "simplify_subreg") at
/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:642
#1  0x009b119d in simplify_subreg (outermode=VOIDmode,
op=0x2afb1410, 
innermode=DImode, byte=0) at
/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:4402
#2  0x009b1de3 in simplify_gen_subreg (outermode=VOIDmode,
op=0x2afb1410, 
innermode=DImode, byte=0) at
/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:4679
#3  0x006bf81a in gen_lowpart_common (mode=VOIDmode, x=0x2afb1410)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/emit-rtl.c:1158
#4  0x00a366b3 in gen_lowpart_general (mode=VOIDmode, x=0x2afb1410)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/rtlhooks.c:43
#5  0x006ed801 in convert_modes (mode=VOIDmode, oldmode=SImode,
x=0x2afb1410, 
unsignedp=0) at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/expr.c:822
#6  0x009be5bb in emit_case_nodes (index=0x2afb1410,
node=0x2b10cf90, 
default_label=0x2afb2910, index_type=0x2afbb4d0)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/stmt.c:2949
#7  0x009bd129 in expand_case (exp=0x2afb24b0)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/stmt.c:2509
--
And has nothing to do with the array size not being defined at first.
Further reduced testcase:
const int struct_test[1] = {1};
void g();
void f() {
  switch(struct_test[0]) {
case 1: g();
  }
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26557

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/26558] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 15:55 ---
Hmm, works with 4.1.0 20060208 on x86_64.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/26558] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 15:55 ---
And "4.0.3 20051105" on x86_64.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/26558] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 15:56 ---
But not with "4.2.0 20060304" on x86_64:
t.cc: In member function ‘int C::fun2()’:
t.cc:4: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have
‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in cp_parser_class_name, at cp/parser.c:12746
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


Must had been a change between there and today that caused it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/26558] [4.2 Regression] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
  GCC build triplet|i486-linux-gnu  |
   GCC host triplet|i486-linux-gnu  |
 GCC target triplet|i486-linux-gnu  |
   Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
  Known to fail||4.2.0
  Known to work||4.0.2
Summary|segfault on syntax error|[4.2 Regression] segfault on
   ||syntax error


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: gcc stuff

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 349083 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26557
Bug#349083: g++: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26557.

> tags 349083 + upstream
Bug#349083: g++: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> forwarded 349087 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26558
Bug#349087: g++-4.0: [ICE] segmentation fault with this 6 line long code...
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26558.

> tags 349083 + upstream
Bug#349083: g++: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: upstream

> forwarded 353366 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26559
Bug#353366: g++-4.0: yet another ICE (with a simple source)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26559.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/26558] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 16:01 ---
Actually it fails with checking since 3.4.0 so confirmed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||ice-checking
  Known to fail|4.2.0   |4.2.0 4.0.0 4.1.0 3.4.0
  Known to work|4.0.2   |
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-04 16:01:24
   date||
Summary|[4.2 Regression] segfault on|[3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
   |syntax error|segfault on syntax error
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug c++/26559] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with __builtin_constant_p in template argument

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 16:19 ---
Confirmed.
Backtrace:
htab_find_with_hash (htab=0x0, element=0x2b15a320, hash=1432532068)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/libiberty/hashtab.c:269
269   const struct prime_ent *p = &prime_tab[htab->size_prime_index];
(gdb) up
#1  0x00434c9b in retrieve_local_specialization (tmpl=0x2b15a320)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:905
905   htab_hash_pointer (tmpl));
(gdb) 
#2  0x0044a2c8 in tsubst_copy (t=Variable "t" is not available.
) at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:7726
7726  r = retrieve_local_specialization (t);
(gdb) bt
#0  htab_find_with_hash (htab=0x0, element=0x2b15a320, hash=1432532068)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/libiberty/hashtab.c:269
#1  0x00434c9b in retrieve_local_specialization (tmpl=0x2b15a320)
at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:905
#2  0x0044a2c8 in tsubst_copy (t=Variable "t" is not available.
) at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:7726
#3  0x0044b79c in tsubst_copy_and_build (t=0x2b15a320, args=0x0,
complain=tf_error, 
in_decl=0x0, function_p=0 '\0') at
/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:8960
#4  0x0044c4c9 in tsubst_copy_and_build (t=0x2b0efd20, args=0x0,
complain=tf_error, 
in_decl=0x0, function_p=Variable "function_p" is not available.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-04 16:20:00
   date||
Summary|ICE with|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE
   |__builtin_constant_p in |with __builtin_constant_p in
   |template argument   |template argument
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26559

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Hi,

the standard says:

  A translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any
  macros that define names declared or defined in that header.

So it's not generally disallowed to #define min/max, but rather there
should be only exactly two places checking for this, namely 
and . The error message should be changed accordingly.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 323016 + moreinfo
thanks

Both tin and sharutils seem to build now on m68k. Is this fixed?
Otherwise, is there a test case?

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 323016 + moreinfo
Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_multi.changes

2006-03-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libgcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10.dsc
  libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  g++-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libgfortran0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  fixincludes_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libffi4_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libobjc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libffi4-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  fixincludes_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libstdc++6_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  libobjc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  protoize_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libmudflap0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libmudflap0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  lib64gcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  treelang-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  fastjar_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  g++-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  protoize_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  gnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libstdc++6_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libffi4_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libgcc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libgfortran0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  lib64gcc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libffi4-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  fastjar_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10.diff.gz
  lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  treelang-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
fastjar_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-10_all.deb
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10.diff.gz
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10.dsc
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb
gnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
gnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
lib64gcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
lib64gcc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libffi4-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libffi4-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libffi4_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libffi4_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libgcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libgcc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libgfortran0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libgfortran0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libmudflap0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libmudflap0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libobjc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libobjc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libobjc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libobjc1_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_powerpc

Bug#338501: marked as done ([i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:39:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: octave
Version: 2.1.71-7
Severity: normal

Summary:

octave dies with "illegal instruction" on a pentium MMX system but
works on an athlon system. Script to trigger the bug is available at
http://iki.fi/lindi/mycos.m

Transcript:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ octave
GNU Octave, version 2.1.71 (i486-pc-linux-gnu).
Copyright (C) 2005 John W. Eaton.
This is free software; see the source code for copying conditions.
There is ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; not even for MERCHANTIBILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  For details, type `warranty'.

Additional information about Octave is available at http://www.octave.org.

Please contribute if you find this software useful.
For more information, visit http://www.octave.org/help-wanted.html

Report bugs to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (but first, please read
http://www.octave.org/bugs.html to learn how to write a helpful report).

octave:1> x1 = mycos(3, 200, 0);
panic: Illegal instruction -- stopping myself...
attempting to save variables to `octave-core'...
save to `octave-core' complete
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 5
model   : 4
model name  : Pentium MMX
stepping: 4
cpu MHz : 199.682
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: yes
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 mmx
bogomips: 398.13

The athlon system where the package and script work without problems
has:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 6
model   : 4
model name  : AMD Athlon(tm) processor
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 701.604
cache size  : 256 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips: 1399.19


Backtrace:

#0  0x41709b50 in fftw_taint ()
   from /usr/lib/libfftw3.so.3
(gdb) bt
#0  0x41709b50 in fftw_taint () from /usr/lib/libfftw3.so.3
#1  0x40816e43 in octave_fftw_planner::create_plan () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctave.so
#2  0x40818043 in octave_fftw::fft () from /usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctave.so
#3  0x40abc722 in NDArray::fourier () from /usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctave.so
#4  0x41e0b915 in ?? () from 
/usr/lib/octave/2.1.71/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu/fft.oct
#5  0x41e0bced in Ffft () from 
/usr/lib/octave/2.1.71/oct/i486-pc-linux-gnu/fft.oct
#6  0x403611a7 in octave_builtin::do_multi_index_op () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#7  0x41df0775 in octave_dispatch::do_multi_index_op () from 
/usr/lib/octave/site/oct/api-v13/i486-pc-linux-gnu/octave-forge/dispatch.oct
#8  0x41df1e2f in octave_dispatch::subsref () from 
/usr/lib/octave/site/oct/api-v13/i486-pc-linux-gnu/octave-forge/dispatch.oct
#9  0x40342a09 in octave_value::subsref () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#10 0x40430b4d in tree_index_expression::rvalue () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#11 0x40430de6 in tree_index_expression::rvalue () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#12 0x4041a4af in tree_simple_assignment::rvalue () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#13 0x40419ebe in tree_simple_assignment::rvalue () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#14 0x4044f21b in tree_statement::eval () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#15 0x4044f7fa in tree_statement_list::eval () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#16 0x4036ce99 in octave_user_function::do_multi_index_op () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#17 0x4036bd52 in octave_user_function::subsref () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#18 0x40342a09 in octave_value::subsref () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#19 0x40430b4d in tree_index_expression::rvalue () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#20 0x40430de6 in tree_index_expression::rvalue () from 
/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71/liboctinterp.so
#21 0x4041a4af in tree_simple_assignment::rvalue () from 
/

[Bug target/26560] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26560] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #10968|application/octet-stream|text/plain
  mime type||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:23 ---
I thought I saw a related bug to this before.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
  GCC build triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu|
   GCC host triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu|
   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
  Known to fail||4.0.3
  Known to work||4.1.0 4.2.0
Summary|unrecognizable insn with|[4.0 Regression]
   |huge symbol offset  |unrecognizable insn with
   ||huge symbol offset
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[4.0 Regression]|[4.0 Regression]
   |unrecognizable insn with|unrecognizable insn with
   |huge symbol offset  |huge symbol offset with -
   ||fPIC


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:31 ---
And that was PR 24683.
Isn't this fixed in 4.0.3?


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||24683
  Known to fail|4.0.3   |4.0.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.changes

2006-03-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  protoize_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libssp0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libssp0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  gobjc++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  gobjc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libobjc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  fastjar_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libffi4_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libffi4-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libstdc++6_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libstdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libgfortran1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  gfortran-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  libgfortran1-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  gnat-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  treelang-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:36 ---
It still fails as of 20051209.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:37 ---
Confirmed, still fails as of 20060225.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-04 19:37:36
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:44 ---
Still fails as of today.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail|4.0.2   |4.0.2 4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26562] [3.4/4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail|4.0.2 4.0.3 |4.0.2 4.0.3 3.4.3
  Known to work|4.1.0 4.2.0 |4.1.0 4.2.0 3.3.6
Summary|[4.0 Regression]|[3.4/4.0 Regression]
   |unrecognizable insn with|unrecognizable insn with
   |huge symbol offset with -   |huge symbol offset with -
   |fPIC|fPIC


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug target/26555] unrecognizable insn on IA64

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:49 ---
Actually looking at the ICE which is produce by the testcase in PR 14261, I see
this is an exact dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14261 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26555

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Bug rtl-optimization/14261] ICE due to if-conversion

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-04 19:49 ---
*** Bug 26555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
   ||debian dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14261

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
fastjar_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
gfortran-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gfortran-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
gnat-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gnat-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
gobjc++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gobjc++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
gobjc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gobjc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libffi4-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libffi4-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libffi4_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libffi4_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libgfortran1-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libgfortran1-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libgfortran1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libgfortran1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libobjc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libobjc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libssp0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libssp0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libssp0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libssp0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
libstdc++6_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
protoize_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/protoize_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
treelang-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/treelang-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.changes

2006-03-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  protoize_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libssp0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libssp0-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  gobjc++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  gobjc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libobjc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  fastjar_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libffi4_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libffi4-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libstdc++6_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libstdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libgfortran1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  gfortran-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  libgfortran1-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  gnat-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  treelang-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: GCC 4.1 in experimental / GCC for etch

2006-03-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-04 00:43]:
> I'm going to build 4.1.0-0 now.

Both uploaded, logs available at
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0/
Matthias and Thiemo, can you look at the results from the test suite?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
reopen 338501
reassign 338501 octave
thanks

Timo Juhani Lindfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I just did apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade and octave seems
> to still die with illegal instruction
>
> so shouldn't but 338501 be reopened and assigned back to octave?

Oh, right. Let's do it.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 338501
Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> reassign 338501 octave
Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `octave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
fastjar_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
gfortran-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gfortran-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
gnat-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gnat-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
gobjc++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gobjc++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
gobjc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/gobjc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libffi4-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libffi4-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libffi4_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libffi4_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libgfortran1-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libgfortran1-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libgfortran1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libgfortran1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libobjc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libobjc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libssp0-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libssp0-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libssp0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libssp0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
libstdc++6_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/libstdc++6_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
protoize_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/protoize_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
treelang-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/treelang-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes
> it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind?
> Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get
> something smaller?

Then why does it work find with -finline-functions?  It seems very obvious
given the gdb output that somehow a constant function argument is being
changed.  What this has to do with glibc or memory management escapes me.

As far as the test case, I'm not sure what I can remove -- the program is a
fairly complete unit, and its size probably has something to do with the issue.

-- 
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d-(--) s:- a--->? C++(+++)$> UL P$ L+++> E---
W++ N o++ K? w--$ O M- V- PS--(---) PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5? X-
R(+)>- tv-(--) b- DI+> D++ G>+++ e>++ h(--)>--- !r>+++ y->+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes
> it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind?

I can see why you would think that now.  Let me explain why the free() call is
segfaulting:

#0  0xb7e6bab9 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x08056627 in StringSet (str=0xb7f37ff4, content=0x80686f0 "e", length=27)
at types.c:218
#2  0x080525ab in nreadutfString (dest=0x8068600) at network.c:291

Again if you look at the sources, it should be the case that str == dest.  But
it doesn't.  So when StringSet() does free(str->string) it looks at memory near
0xb7f37ff4 and pulls out a pointer, which could be any random data, and passes
it to free().  It's no wonder free() crashes.  It's more of a wonder that the
str->string dereference doesn't crash for str being out of the allocated memory
space.

If you throw a random number at free() of course it's going to crash there.

-- 
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d-(--) s:- a--->? C++(+++)$> UL P$ L+++> E---
W++ N o++ K? w--$ O M- V- PS--(---) PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5? X-
R(+)>- tv-(--) b- DI+> D++ G>+++ e>++ h(--)>--- !r>+++ y->+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2005-12-07 04:47:52 |2006-03-05 03:36:17
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6634

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Falk Hueffner wrote:
>> the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes
>> it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind?
>> Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get
>> something smaller?
>
> Then why does it work find with -finline-functions?

I don't know. However, it is not uncommon that bugs in programs change
with compiler options.

> It seems very obvious given the gdb output that somehow a constant
> function argument is being changed.

gdb isn't really reliable with high optimizations.

I just briefly tried to debug it, but apparently, it even wants a
Yahoo password or something. This is more effort than I want to spend
on something that I suspect isn't even a gcc bug (and frankly, I
wouldn't expect anybody else to jump in).

-- 
  Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]