[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
--- Comment #73 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-24 09:14 --- (In reply to comment #72) > why is it pointless? just because it doesn't work on some target architectures > doesn't mean it doesn't work on most main archs. Are you really, really, sure that without patching the middle-end at all, only changing the libstdc++-v3 headers benefits some targets without any side effects? I'm not at all, given this tangle. Really, we want someone to work seriously on the various serious outstanding bugs of the machinery, please if you consider it useful in principle for your project ask the maintainers and the knowledgeable compiler people to work on it, I tried, but I failed, by and large. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335563: gcc-4.0: manpage escape problems
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-2 Severity: minor In $(man gcc), I the following two problems: -Wunused-function ... non\-inline static function is unused. This warning is enabled by ^^^ -M Instead of outputting the result of preprocessing, output a rule ... then the rule is split into several lines using \-newline. The -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335570: java-gcj-compat: Missing dependency - renders package unusable
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.41-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
trying /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java gives me:
error spawning gij
Running with strace shows that the java binary assumes an
unversioned gij binary in /usr/bin
execve("/usr/bin/gij", ["./java"], [/* 39 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
However java-gcj-compat only depends on gij-4.0 and not on the
/usr/bin/gij providing gij package.
Of course installing gij fixes the problem. So either the java
binary should be patched to look for /usr/bin/gij-4.0 or the
dependency should be updated to gij instead of gij-4.0
Regards,
Wolfgang
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages java-gcj-compat depends on:
ii fastjar 1:4.0.2-2 Jar creation utility
ii gij-4.0 4.0.2-2The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii libgcj6 4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use with
ii libgcj6-common4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use with
ii libjessie-java1.0.0-3free implementation of the Java Se
Versions of packages java-gcj-compat recommends:
pn libgcj6-src(no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327254: marked as done (gcc: manpages over-escapes hyphen)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327254: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2005 19:22:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 12:22:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDRyc-0002gr-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 12:22:26 -0700 Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j88JMN7Z007254 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:22:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EDRyY-0001Kb-Jm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:22:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:22:21 -0400 To: Debian BTS Submission <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc: manpages over-escapes hyphen Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 File: /usr/share/man/man1/gcc-4.0.1.gz I see: -Wunused-function Warn whenever a static function is declared but not defined or a non\-inline static function is unused. This warning is enabled by -Wall. --- Received: (at 327254-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:17:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:17:48 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUAdC-0006ZA-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327254: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: gcc-4.0 Source-Version: 4.0.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib
Bug#329108: marked as done (gcc-4.0 FTBFS on, uh, i386)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329108: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 16:12:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 09:12:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.97]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHOFj-0001f6-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:12:23 -0700
Received: from toronto-hse-ppp3930544.sympatico.ca ([70.49.5.88])
by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:12:21 -0400
From: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-4.0 FTBFS on, uh, i386
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:12:10 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart13136425.vzM4ZBCDmG";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart13136425.vzM4ZBCDmG
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-8
Severity: serious
Hello,
On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,=
=20
and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
Will not build the Pascal compiler: disabled for 4.0
Will build the Ada compiler.
Will build the shared Ada libraries.
Will build the Treelang compiler.
Will build the FFI library.
Will run the testsuite.
/bin/bash: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
make[1]: *** [stamps/04-configure-stamp] Error 2
Making bash sh solves this. Next up I get the following:
In file included from /usr/include/bits/mathinline.h:5,
from /usr/include/math.h:382,
from ../../../../src/libiberty/floatformat.c:27:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:45: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98{=E2=80=99 token
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98}=E2=80=99 token
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: field name not in=20
record or union initializer
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: (near initialization=
=20
for =E2=80=98__u=E2=80=99)
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: =E2=80=98__x=E2=80=
=99 undeclared here=20
(not in a function)
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:47: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98return=E2=80=99
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:51: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98{=E2=80=99 token
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:52: error: conflicting types fo=
r=20
=E2=80=98__i=E2=80=99
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: previous declaration=
=20
of =E2=80=98__i=E2=80=99 was here
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:52: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98}=E2=80=99 token
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:52: error: redefinition of =E2=
=80=98__u=E2=80=99
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: previous definition=
=20
of =E2=80=98__u=E2=80=99 was here
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:52: error: field name not in=20
record or union initializer
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:52: error: (near initialization=
=20
for =E2=80=98__u=E2=80=99)
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:53: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98return=E2=80=99
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:57: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98{=E2=80=99 token
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:58: error: conflicting types fo=
r=20
=E2=80=98__i=E2=80=99
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:46: error: previous declaration=
=20
of =E2=80=98__i=E2=80=99 was here
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.h:58: error: syntax error before=
=20
=E2=80=98}=E2=80=99 token
/usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/mathinline.
Bug#330800: marked as done (gij-4.0: doesn't remove /var/lib/gcj-4.0/classmap.db)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330800: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 19:42:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 12:42:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ip212-226-168-228.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (esme.liw.iki.fi) [212.226.168.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL4Ia-0005Br-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:42:32 -0700 Received: by esme.liw.iki.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A80A75C33B; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:41:46 +0300 (EEST) Subject: gij-4.0: doesn't remove /var/lib/gcj-4.0/classmap.db From: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:41:46 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gij-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 gij-4.0's postinst script creates /var/lib/gcj-4.0/classmap.db, but the prerm script does not remove it when the package is being removed, leaving a bit of cruft on the filesystem. --- Received: (at 330800-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:17:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:17:46 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUAdC-0006ZI-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330800: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: gcc-4.0 Source-Version: 4.0.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gc
Bug#333951: marked as done (with_libnof logic inverted for cross-compilation)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333951: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 15:53:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 08:53:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQRsO-h4-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:53:44 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([71.111.76.75]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:53:44 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:53:44 -0700 From: Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: with_libnof logic inverted for cross-compilation To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=enigFD8898D805E8404F168EA853 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050914 Debian/1.7.11-1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigFD8898D805E8404F168EA853 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="040604080406070304030208" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --040604080406070304030208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-2 Tags: patch The logic for disabling nof is inconsistent between regular builds and cross-compiler builds: ifndef DEB_CROSS ... ifeq ($(with_libnof),yes) ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),powerpc) include debian/rules.d/binary-nof.mk endif endif ... else ... ifneq ($(with_libnof),yes) ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),powerpc) include debian/rules.d/binary-nof-cross.mk endif endif ... endif Note that on powerpc-targetted cross-compiles, binary-nof-cross.mk is included if it is *not* the case that with_libnof is yes. This causes a build failure, since binary-nof-cross.mk attempts to construct a package from files that weren't built. The attached patch fixes this problem. - Josh Triplett --040604080406070304030208 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="gcc-cross-nof-fix.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="gcc-cross-nof-fix.patch" diff -Naur gcc-4.0-4.0.2.orig/debian/rules2 gcc-4.0-4.0.2/debian/rules2 --- gcc-4.0-4.0.2.orig/debian/rules22005-10-14 03:40:30.0 -0700 +++ gcc-4.0-4.0.2/debian/rules2 2005-10-14 04:09:40.0 -0700 @@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ include debian/rules.d/binary-libstdcxx-cross.mk endif -ifneq ($(with_libnof),yes) +ifeq ($(with_libnof),yes) ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU),powerpc) include debian/rules.d/binary-nof-cross.mk endif --040604080406070304030208-- --enigFD8898D805E8404F168EA853 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDT9SIGJuZRtD+evsRApXTAKCE0lLhvf6+RUKL/OQkhz5n4kdP2gCfWVet cwSoooJeU/gowynQ6gNkvyM= =eWoH -END PGP SIGNATURE- --enigFD8898D805E8404F168EA853-- --- Received: (at 333951-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:17:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:17:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUAdC-0006ZK-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#333951: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version
Bug#333954: marked as done (gcc-4.0: on alpha, gcc generated lituse_jsrdirect relocation tag is killing the assembler)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333954: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 16:18:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 09:18:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dcs-server2.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.3]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQSFr-0001Lv-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:17:59 -0700
Received: from narya.cs.uiuc.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [128.174.244.225])
by dcs-server2.cs.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j9EGHxxe016467;
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:17:59 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Lenharth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-4.0: on alpha,
gcc generated lituse_jsrdirect relocation tag is killing the assembler
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:17:58 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: important
When performing integer division, the following relocation is generated (to the
libc divide function)
jsr $23,($27),__divq!lituse_jsrdirect!79
the assembler does not understand this :
/tmp/ccFszcSs.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccFszcSs.s:26: Error: Unknown relocation operand: !lituse_jsrdirect
This is a valid relocation type that use to work.
This is a sufficient test case to trigger the problem:
long foo(long x, long y)
{
return x / y;
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii binutils 2.16.1-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-4.0 4.0.2-2The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0.2-2The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6.1 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii libc6.1-dev 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn libmudflap0-dev(no description available)
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 333954-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:17:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:17:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUAdC-0006ZO-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#333954: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: gcc-4.0
Source-Version: 4.0.2-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
gcc-4.0-l
Bug#333952: marked as done (Cross-compilers should not use biarch)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333952: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 16:06:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 09:06:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQS4f-0005xn-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:06:25 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([71.111.76.75]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:06:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:06:19 -0700 From: Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Cross-compilers should not use biarch To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=enig89A871A2BA754E947D8A06CC X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050914 Debian/1.7.11-1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enig89A871A2BA754E947D8A06CC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="040300030901020404040501" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --040300030901020404040501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-2 Tags: patch Currently, for platforms which natively build a biarch GCC, such as powerpc, the GCC package also attempts to build a biarch cross-compiler when targetting that platform. This would require the installation of cross-compilation libraries for two different cross-architectures, rather than just one, in order to build and use GCC; otherwise, the build fails when attempting to find a libc for the alternate target. In addition, dpkg-cross doesn't appear to support converting and installing library packages for the alternate architectures. It also seems far more likely that when setting up a cross-compilation environment, one would simply construct two cross-compilers, one for each of the two architectures, rather than one two-target compiler. The attached patch disables biarch when building a cross-compiler. Note that the logic assumes a 64-bit alternate platform; it may need to be made more sophisticated to work for 32-bit alternate platforms. I did not include such logic, because I was not targetting a platform with a 32-bit alternate, and thus would not test that code path in my GCC cross-compiler build. - Josh Triplett --040300030901020404040501 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="gcc-cross-disable-biarch.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="gcc-cross-disable-biarch.patch" diff -Naur gcc-4.0-4.0.2.orig/debian/rules.defs gcc-4.0-4.0.2/debian/rules.defs --- gcc-4.0-4.0.2.orig/debian/rules.defs2005-10-14 03:40:30.0 -0700 +++ gcc-4.0-4.0.2/debian/rules.defs 2005-10-14 03:44:05.0 -0700 @@ -670,6 +670,18 @@ endif endif +ifdef DEB_CROSS + with_lib64gcc:= no + with_lib64cxx:= no + with_lib64objc := no + with_lib64ffi:= no + with_lib64gcj:= no + with_lib64fortran:= no + + biarch := disabled for cross build + biarch32 := disabled for cross build +endif + ifeq ($(biarch32),yes) with_32bit_check := $(shell CC="gcc -m32" sh debian/runcheck.sh) endif --040300030901020404040501-- --enig89A871A2BA754E947D8A06CC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDT9d7GJuZRtD+evsRAml1AJ0VM62QIOc/QQvrHZDPI0AzlQfmOQCfR0IH 3NbUZCNqtEtxByYrsoQD76U= =nhNf -EN
Bug#334296: marked as done (/usr/lib/libgcj.a conflict with libgcj6-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334296: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 22:55:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 15:55:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from colo.khms.westfalen.de [213.239.196.208] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERHQ6-0003Xe-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:55:58 -0700 Received: from khms.vpn ([10.172.192.2]:32899 helo=khms.westfalen.de ident=Debian-exim) by colo.khms.westfalen.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (auth_id=khms) (Exim 4.50) id 1ERHQ4-0005MF-TJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:55:57 +0200 Received: from root by khms.westfalen.de with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ERFqY-0005fm-TM; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:15:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: /usr/lib/libgcj.a conflict with libgcj6-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:15:10 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libgcj2-dev,libgcj6-dev Version: 1:3.0.4-7,4.0.2-2 Severity: normal Subject says it all -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (996, 'oldstable'), (996, 'stable'), (995, 'testing'), (640, 'stable'), (550, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (550, 'stable updates'), (550, 'proposed-updates'), (550, 'oldstable'), (550, 'experimental'), (550, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2+kai.20050930 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libgcj2-dev depends on: ii gcj-3.01:3.0.4-7 The GNU compiler for Java(TM). ii libc6-dev 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libgcj21:3.0.4-7 Java runtime library for use with ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - development libgcj2-dev recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed --- Received: (at 334296-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:17:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:17:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUAdC-0006ZQ-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334296: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gcc-4.0 Source-Version: 4.0.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0
Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.changes
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb libgcj6-common_4.0.2-3_all.deb libgcj-common_4.0.2-3_all.deb libgcj6-src_4.0.2-3_all.deb libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb protoize_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libobjc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libffi4_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb treelang-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325545: marked as done (g++-4.0: ICE on simple (ill-formed) code)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325545: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 10:42:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 03:42:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep18.inet.fi [194.251.242.243]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9h67-0004Ra-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:42:39 -0700
Received: from hufflepuff.adrinael.ath.cx ([80.221.9.79]) by fep18.inet.fi
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:42:37 +0300
Received: from slytherin.adrinael.ath.cx ([192.168.0.2])
by hufflepuff.adrinael.ath.cx with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1E9h61-0008QY-69; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:42:35 +0300
Received: from adrinael by slytherin.adrinael.ath.cx with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 1E9h5x-0002Ss-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:42:29 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Petri Latvala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-4.0: ICE on simple (ill-formed) code
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:42:28 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petri Latvala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: minor
This ill-formed code makes g++ ICE:
#include
#include
template struct foo;
template<>
struct foo<0>
{
typedef int t;
};
int main()
{
std::cout<< typename foo<0>::t(42);
}
(The typename in the cout line should not be there)
Seems like an unhandled parse error.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii gcc-4.0 4.0.1-2 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.0-base4.0.1-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++6-4.0-dev 4.0.1-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
g++-4.0 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 325545-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:18:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:18:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUAdC-0006Z8-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325545: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10
Source: gcc-4.0
Source-Version: 4.0.2-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.
Bug#329840: marked as done ([PR 24284] [4.0 4.1 regression] [sparc] ICE (Segmentation fault) building zinc-compiler)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329840: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 19:06:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 12:06:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIssH-LU-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:06:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 5205A38060
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:06:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0856F38082
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:06:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id C7F4226136; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:06:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:06:19 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-4.0: ICE on sparc: error building zinc-compiler
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-8
Hi,
When building zinc-compiler on sparc, I'm get:
run.nw: In function 'do_run':
run.nw:212: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
It seems the following code is what is causing it:
void do_run(void *ip)
{
char dummy[8192];
__asm__("" : : "g"(dummy));
goto *ip;
}
A file with only that in will generate the ICE too.
It happens when using -O* and -g. -O0 or no -g makes it build.
Also, making the dummy buffer smaller than 8089 fixes it. 8089
still crashes, 8088 works without problems.
Compiling the same with gcc-3.3 or 3.4 works without problems.
Kurt
---
Received: (at 329840-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:18:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:18:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUAdC-0006ZE-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329840: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8
Source: gcc-4.0
Source-Version: 4.0.2-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb
gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb
Bug#330099: marked as done (gcc-3.0: manpage grammar -fwrapv)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330099: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 23:08:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 16:08:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJfbk-0002x8-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:08:32 -0700 Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8PN8TFe013223 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:08:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EJfbg-CP-Ty for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:08:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:08:28 -0400 To: Debian BTS Submission <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.0: manpage grammar -fwrapv Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 File: /usr/share/man/man1/gcc.1.gz Severity: minor The manpage section describing -fwrapv says: This flag enables some optimizations and disables other. Here, "other" should be pluaralized to "others". --- Received: (at 330099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:18:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:18:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUAdC-0006ZG-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330099: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 Source: gcc-4.0 Source-Version: 4.0.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-4.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64objc1_4.0.
Bug#318932: marked as done (g++-4.0: [PR 22551] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318932: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2005 18:12:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 11:12:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.200]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dua6q-0004U6-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:12:56 -0700
Received: (qmail 90885 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2005 18:12:22 -
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=LFGfZIkHl56R9Eh0l0RBvrEwnTApTJqIaNKHga10/DrnzHpqKWZL2HcCvcvh+QQbYPe/z27OYdDzqtO6QaYpvhMmEktrkzpUBQ1iLJ1aavxP4X7Ry8c9Wagpi9JznAujbW8pDX62MnFGYLjcz4lY9NS8AIe+p2IVXsXUqvwBeKw=
;
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.47.8?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@67.64.116.210
with plain)
by smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2005 18:12:21 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:12:20 -0500
From: Johnny Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050611)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: g++-4.0: [PR 22551] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important
See http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22551
I came across this while compiling pose on AMD64 (I am not sure it
will work eventually...). No problem with g++-3.4.
command line:
$ g++-4.0 -c testcase.cppoutput:
testcase.cpp: In function 'int main(value_type)':
testcase.cpp:12: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
testcase.cpp:13: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
testcase.cpp:14: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
testcase.cpp:15: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
testcase.cpp:16: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
testcase.cpp:10: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at
tree.c:3843
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see .
--testcase.cpp--
typedef int value_type;
const value_type b = 0x8000;
const value_type e1 = b + 1;
const value_type e2 = b + 2;
const value_type e3 = b + 3;
const value_type e4 = b + 4;
const value_type e5 = b + 5;
int main (value_type error)
{
switch (error)
{
case e1: return 0;
case e2: return 0;
case e3: return 0;
case e4: return 0;
case e5: return 0;
}
}
--testcase.cpp--
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2-skas3-v8-barsoom64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages g++-4.0 depends on:
ii gcc-4.0 4.0.1-2 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.0-base4.0.1-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++6-4.0-dev 4.0.1-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
g++-4.0 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 318932-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 22:18:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 15:18:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUAdC-0006Z6-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318932: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:17:26 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAss
Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.changes
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb protoize_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libobjc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libffi4_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgfortran0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb treelang-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_i386.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-locales_4.0.2-3_all.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.diff.gz gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libffi4_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj-common_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj-common_4.0.2-3_all.deb libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6-common_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-common_4.0.2-3_all.deb libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgcj6-src_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-src_4.0.2-3_all.deb libgcj6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libobjc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libobjc1_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.2-3_all.deb libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-3_i386.deb libstdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6_4.0.2-3_i386.deb protoize_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/protoize_4.0.2-3_i386.deb treelang-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/treelang-4.0_4.0.2-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 318932 325545 327254 329108 329840 330099 330800 333951 333952 333954 334296 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb fastjar_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gcj-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gfortran-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gij-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/gobjc-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gcc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64gfortran0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64objc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/lib64stdc++6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libffi4_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libffi4_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgcj6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgcj6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgfortran0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgfortran0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libgnat-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libmudflap0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libobjc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libobjc1_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6-4.0-pic_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb libstdc++6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/libstdc++6_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb protoize_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/protoize_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb treelang-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/treelang-4.0_4.0.2-3_powerpc.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335610: java-gcj-compat-dev: typo in the Recommends
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev Version: 1.0.41-1 Severity: important s/ecj-boostrap-gcj/ecj-bootstrap-gcj/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.changes
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335570: marked as done (java-gcj-compat: Missing dependency - renders package unusable)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335570: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.41-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 17:58:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 10:58:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EU6aU-0004YP-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:58:23 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2005 17:57:51 -
Received: from p54818720.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO ursus.igf.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE)
[84.129.135.32]
by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 24 Oct 2005 19:57:51 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1941950
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: java-gcj-compat: Missing dependency - renders package unusable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:00:36 +0200
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.41-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
trying /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java gives me:
error spawning gij
Running with strace shows that the java binary assumes an
unversioned gij binary in /usr/bin
execve("/usr/bin/gij", ["./java"], [/* 39 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
However java-gcj-compat only depends on gij-4.0 and not on the
/usr/bin/gij providing gij package.
Of course installing gij fixes the problem. So either the java
binary should be patched to look for /usr/bin/gij-4.0 or the
dependency should be updated to gij instead of gij-4.0
Regards,
Wolfgang
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages java-gcj-compat depends on:
ii fastjar 1:4.0.2-2 Jar creation utility
ii gij-4.0 4.0.2-2The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii libgcj6 4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use with
ii libgcj6-common4.0.2-2Java runtime library for use with
ii libjessie-java1.0.0-3free implementation of the Java Se
Versions of packages java-gcj-compat recommends:
pn libgcj6-src(no description available)
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 335570-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 00:09:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 17:09:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUCGV-0003eI-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:07 -0700
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#335570: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.41-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: java-gcj-compat
Source-Version: 1.0.41-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-gcj-compat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb
A summary of the change
Bug#335610: marked as done (java-gcj-compat-dev: typo in the Recommends)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335610: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.41-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 23:12:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 16:12:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUBUp-0006ZB-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:12:52 -0700 Received: (qmail 26048 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2005 23:12:18 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 24 Oct 2005 23:12:18 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B18FBB6DB; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:12:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: java-gcj-compat-dev: typo in the Recommends X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:12:17 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: java-gcj-compat-dev Version: 1.0.41-1 Severity: important s/ecj-boostrap-gcj/ecj-bootstrap-gcj/ --- Received: (at 335610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 00:08:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 17:08:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUCGV-0003eK-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:07 -0700 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#335610: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.41-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: java-gcj-compat Source-Version: 1.0.41-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-gcj-compat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated java-gcj-compat package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:32:33 + Source: java-gcj-compat Binary: java-gcj-compat-dev java-gcj-compat Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.41-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers Changed-By: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: java-gcj-compat - Java runtime environment using GIJ java-gcj-compat-dev - Java runtime environment with GCJ Closes: 335570 335610 Changes: java-gcj-compat (1.0.41-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Use gij-4.0, not gij (closes: #335570). * Fix typo in Recommends field (closes: #335610). Files: 36b85ef7c5db091ec755755c268dd789 776 interpreters optional java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc 115f3279f036d014231e1934b2a18f6b 10521 interpreters optional java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-2_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.diff.gz java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 335570 335610 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#238432: �y���E�l�������z�C���T�C�_�[�����E���b�y�v���
=?GB2312?B?qJZulXSCq4NUg0ODZ4F6?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset="EUC" Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:24:37 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] [PR] ¬ª±ª¡¢ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vo-ov.tv/ ¯ª³ª®¤£ [PR] uoï¢nTCgvÇlªvCx[gpÉg¤oï¢nTCgª éÆ¢¤ \ðLb`µ½B ^ðm©ßé×åèoï¢nh³hÇli34ÎFÆgjðËI ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc uLO`®ÌTCgÁÄÌÍ³É ñ¾æBv u´BÆÒªGÁĢȢTCgªzm¾BÈPÈb¾ëHv ³ÇlÍêéB ÉæêλÌwǪîñìÌsíêÄ¢é¨çµ¢B ÅÍA»ÌTCgͼÌTCgƽªá¤Ì¾ë¤©H uTCgÌÇlÆmè¢Èñ¾ªA±¢Âªoï¢n}jAÈñ¾æB ÀÛ¡ÅàÙÆñÇúoï¢nÅðòÁÄéçµ¢µÈB àÆàÆ©ªÌ×Énß½TCgçµÄAîñª³m¾©ç ´BàgÁÄéÁÄóiÎj v [EMAIL PROTECTED]@http://www.vo-ov.tv/ ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc uoï¢nÌÖWÒ¶áÈ¢êATN³µÅflÌðWßÄé TCgð©Â¯ñÌͳ¾æÈH ´ÍRTNJÌTCgÈñÄgíÈ¢ËB ´Bݽ¢È̪g¤ÌÍA ÜèmçêĢȢêIȳ¿TCgB jªÈĪ½¢TCgÍMdÈñ¾æBv [EMAIL PROTECTED]@http://www.vo-ov.tv/ ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc u»ÌÙ©É´ªgÁÄ¢éTCgÍÌïõªÙÆñÇá¢lÈÈñ¾æÈB lÈÍÔ¯mÅîñð·µÄé©çêÂÌTCgÉWÜèâ·¢ñ¾æB lÈÍAw~sÅZNXµÉÄéxÁÄp^[ª½¢©çA èÁæèb¿á¢½¢ÍlÈ_¢¾ËB ü±¤à»ÌÂàèÅo^µÄéñ¾©çB v [EMAIL PROTECTED]@http://www.vo-ov.tv/ ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc æÞãAX^btÅoï¢nðæg¤MNÉè`ÁÄàçÁÄA ÀÛ³¦ÄàçÁ½TCgÅï¦éèðTµÄݽB ÊÍEEE u±ñÈÉTNTNï¦éÌÍßÄIvÆ̱ÆB u³¦ÄàçÁ½TCgÍöJµÜ¹ñvÆ¢¤ñ©¾Á½ªAÈñÆ© ¨è¢µÄA¡ñÍ»ÌÅàDÇÈTCgðÊÉo·É¬÷µÜµ½I oï¢nTCgÍbèÉÈéÆlªWµÄµÜ¤ÌÅA OqÌTCgÍ ÜèmçêĢȢu¡vª_¢Å·B y²ÓIz lÎlÌâèÆèÅ·©çA}i[ðçÁijµVÑÜµå¤ ªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªª ËæÞÌSeÍR`©çËËË http://www.vo-ov.tv/ ªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªª -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
