Italian Rolex order Bonnie

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Collins
REPLICASONLINE - WE NEVER COMPROMISE ON QUALITY

Rolex replica is our speciality
We guarantee lowest prices and highest quality
We are the Direct manufacturers.

For top quality rolex watchs pleas visit:

http://www.chooseyourwatch4u.com









quota cd so cd [2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Resell : Rolex or Cartier or Breitling

2005-06-12 Thread Octavio

Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
  
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move. 
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too. 
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars. 
We sell them for much less. 
  
- Replicated to the Smallest Detail
- 98% Perfectly Accurate Markings 
- Signature Green Sticker w/ Serial Number on Watch Back
- Magnified Quickset Date
- Includes all Proper Markings

http://www.chooseyourwatch4u.com/














you audrey me timeworn me  you buddhist me wilderness me  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Rolex Replica Sam

2005-06-12 Thread Wilda Oneal
REPLICASONLINE - WE NEVER COMPROMISE ON QUALITY

Rolex replica is our speciality
We guarantee lowest prices and highest quality
We are the Direct manufacturers.

For top quality rolex watchs pleas visit:

http://www.chooseyourwatch4u.com









you ghd true uo [2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313228: java-gcj-compat: lacks manpages, but tries to register them

2005-06-12 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.28-5
Severity: important

Despite not actually shipping a /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/man hierarchy,
java-gcj-compat attempts to register its would-be contents via the
alternatives system.  Please either supply actual man pages per Policy
12.1, or else stop registering them until you do.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages java-gcj-compat depends on:
ii  ecj-bootstrap [ecj]   3.0.1-5bootstrap version of the Eclipse J
ii  fastjar   1:4.0.0-9  Jar creation utility
ii  gij-4.0   4.0.0-9The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  gjdoc 0.7.4-1documentation generation framework
ii  libgcj6-dev   4.0.0-9Java development headers and stati

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



get me Rolex or Cartier or Breitling

2005-06-12 Thread Neil

Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
  
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move. 
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too. 
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars. 
We sell them for much less. 
  
- Replicated to the Smallest Detail
- 98% Perfectly Accurate Markings 
- Signature Green Sticker w/ Serial Number on Watch Back
- Magnified Quickset Date
- Includes all Proper Markings

http://www.chooseyourwatch4u.com/














you stereography me transfinite me  [2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



call me at Rolex time

2005-06-12 Thread Carmela

Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
  
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move. 
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too. 
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars. 
We sell them for much less. 
  
- Replicated to the Smallest Detail
- 98% Perfectly Accurate Markings 
- Signature Green Sticker w/ Serial Number on Watch Back
- Magnified Quickset Date
- Includes all Proper Markings

http://www.chooseyourwatch4u.com/














you stearic me footwork me  [2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297112: marked as done (g77 compiles program that segfaults before executing the Fortran code)

2005-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:45:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297112: g77 bug: fixed in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 06:20:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 22:20:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hilbert.sdsu.edu [130.191.225.137] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D5Hmi-0007aQ-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:20:08 -0800
Received: from aty by hilbert.sdsu.edu with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D5HmD-0008Ue-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:19:37 +
From: Andrew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g77 compiles program that segfaults before executing the Fortran code
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:19:37 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Andrew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: g77
Version: 2:2.95.4-14
Severity: normal

After making what I thought were minor changes to a working F77 program,
which g77 had been compiling correctly, I find the current version dies
with a segfault before executing any of the Fortran stuff.  The program
was compiled with the  -fbounds-check  option, which produced no output
(though it has in the past when I had indexing errors).

I tried compiling with -g -ggdb and ran the debugger:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x0805cf46 in f_setarg ()
#1  0x0805cab6 in main ()
#2  0x4005314f in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6

Looks as if the problem is in the g77 startup library somewhere.  I
checked the libc md5sum against a machine on which the *identical*
source code compiles and runs fine with g77; the only difference is that
the machine that works is an AMD Athlon, and the one that segfaults is a
Pentium III.  Both boxes run Debian stable.

Please reply to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  rather than this machine.

-- A. T. Young




-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hilbert 2.2.20 #1 Thu Feb 26 18:12:28 UTC 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages g77 depends on:
ii  cpp2:2.95.4-14   The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  g77-2.95   1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU Fortran 77 compiler.
ii  gcc-2.95   1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU C compiler.


---
Received: (at 297112-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 22:46:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 15:46:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhbDS-0006a6-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:46:06 -0700
Received: from [82.82.221.84] (helo=juist)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.105 #291)
id 1DhbCx-0005EK-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:45:35 +0200
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DhbCx-00045U-9C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:45:35 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#297112: g77 bug: fixed in sarge
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Face: "iUeUu$b*W_"w?tV83Y3*r:`rh&dRv}$YnZ3,LVeCZSYVuf[Gpo*5%_=/\_!gc_,SS}[~xZ
 wY77I-M)xHIx:2f56g%/`SOw"Dx%4Xq0&f\Tj~>|QR|vGlU}TBYhiG(K:2 (Andrew Young's
 message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (cilantro, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Andrew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I upgraded the P III box from woody to sarge, which changed the g77
> compiler version from 2.95 to 3.3 -- and the bug seems to be gone.

Well, let's just 

Processed: Bug#309193: at runtime, TLS does not work, but at compile time, __thread does not give an error

2005-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 309193 + moreinfo
Bug#309193: /usr/bin/gcc: at runtime, TLS does not work, but at compile time,   
__thread does not give an error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309193: at runtime, TLS does not work, but at compile time, __thread does not give an error

2005-06-12 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 309193 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

the documentation says:

  When the address-of operator is applied to a thread-local variable,
  it is evaluated at run-time and returns the address of the current
  thread's instance of that variable.

So all threads get the same instance of "local" in your test case.
Does that explain your problem?

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: gcc bugs

2005-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 283042 - unreproducible
Bug#283042: smilutils_0.3.0-5(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad hppa assembly
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible

> tags 283042 + moreinfo
Bug#283042: smilutils_0.3.0-5(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad hppa assembly
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tags 296047 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#296047: gcc-3.3: grammer confusing in gcc(1): -finline-limit=n
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream

> retitle 296047 [fixed in 4.1] gcc-3.3: grammer confusing in gcc(1): 
> -finline-limit=n
Bug#296047: gcc-3.3: grammer confusing in gcc(1): -finline-limit=n
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 296047 gcc-4.0
Bug#296047: [fixed in 4.1] gcc-3.3: grammer confusing in gcc(1): 
-finline-limit=n
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `gcc-4.0'.

> tags 312367 + moreinfo
Bug#312367: gcc-3.3: D support
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> reassign 301746 gcc-4.0
Bug#301746: gcc-3.4: Redundant reloading from stack frame
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.4' to `gcc-4.0'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Software should be easy to use!

2005-06-12 Thread Laurence

All main products from Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia, Corel, etc.
http://ikls.ova3r5oz3g6dl76.cahowci.com




If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.  
You never lose by loving. You always lose by holding back.  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]