Bug#283031: marked as done (libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:24:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 03:49:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 25 19:49:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from caballero.debian.org [193.201.200.200] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXX6U-0001un-00; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:49:02 -0800 Received: from buildd by caballero.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXX6S-00033l-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:49:00 + From: Debian/IA64 non-US Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:49:00 + Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgcc1 Version: 1:3.0.4-7 Severity: grave After upgrading libgcc1 (to 3.4.3-1), apt fails to run, missing shared library libunwind.so.7. Installing libunwind7 fixes the problem. -- System Information Kernel Version: Linux caballero 2.4.25-dsa-mckinley-smp #1 SMP Fri May 7 21:26:19 MDT 2004 ia64 unknown --- Received: (at 283031-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2005 07:24:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 01 23:24:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cl068-0005O1-00; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 23:24:20 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E8AD51720C5; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:24:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:24:19 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libgcc1: Missing Depends: libunwind7 [ia64] breaks many things Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not sure this bug was ever actually present in sarge; in any case, it's definitely fixed now as the new versions of libunwind and gcc-3.4 have reached testing. =20 Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB16GgKN6ufymYLloRAs03AKCU1ioEQ7WfMTy7u7L1MNOswAXfCQCg0Gt5 zepH4C7zotwdhtlsgXh0nwU= =TlTc -END PGP SIGNATURE- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--
Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 287879 -1 Bug#287879: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged Bug 287879 cloned as bug 288191. > reassign -1 gcc-3.4 Bug#288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged Bug reassigned from package `toolchain-source' to `gcc-3.4'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#288191: marked as done (make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:46:15 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2004 18:54:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 10:54:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from korppi.suomicommunications.com [217.119.36.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ck5Rp-0008E8-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:54:57 -0800 Received: from route.intranet (gw-5.suomicom.fi [217.30.187.5]) by korppi.suomicommunications.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id iBUItRrL029858; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:55:27 +0200 Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk) by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ck5Rd-0003Vg-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:54:45 +0200 Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:54:44 +0200 From: "Martin-Eric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:54:43 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: toolchain-source Version: 3.4-3 Severity: normal As seen below, there is a typo which could impair package operation: 8X- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src>$ cd /usr/src/; tpkg-make hppa-linux Target: hppa-linux Maintainer: Martin-Eric Racine Email-Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Toolchain : 3.4-3 binutils: 2.15 gcc : 3.4.3 gdb : toolchain-source-gdb not installed : # unpack gcc tarball mkdir stamps if [ -d /usr/src/gcc-hppa-linux-3.4.3/src ]; then \ echo >&2 "Source directory /usr/src/gcc-hppa-linux-3.4.3/src exists. Delete by hand"; \ false; \ fi rm -rf gcc-3.4.3 case gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2 in \ *.bz2) tar -x --bzip2 -f gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2;; \ *.gz) tar -x --gzip -f gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2;; \ *) false; \ esac 8X- The case for *.gz should not just call --gzip, it should also wnat to unpack a filename ending in *.gz but here it tries to search for a possible *.bz2 even in this case. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-imac Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages toolchain-source depends on: ii devscripts2.8.5 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii dpkg-awk 1.0.1 Gawk script to parse /var/lib/dpkg ii dpkg-cross1.20 Tools for cross compiling Debian p ii m41.4.2-1a macro processing language ii wget 1.9.1-8retrieves files from the web -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 288191-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2005 20:46:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 02 12:46:22 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ClCcH-0008Nz-00; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:46:22 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA29711; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:46:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205B2F21D; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:46:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 27034-26; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:46:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:46:15 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.1
Processed: Re: Bug#288191 acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 288191 Bug#288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#288191: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well)
reopen 288191 thanks On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged, > which was filed against the gcc-3.4 package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well > > No, it doesn't. Matthias, this behavior is WAY out of line. The bug was filled against a package for which you are neither the maintainer or the bug submitter. -- Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
Bug#288191: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well)
before claiming such things, please recheck, and then close the report. Martin-Éric Racine writes: > reopen 288191 > thanks > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > #288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged, > > which was filed against the gcc-3.4 package. > > > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well > > > > No, it doesn't. > > Matthias, this behavior is WAY out of line. The bug was filled against a > package for which you are neither the maintainer or the bug submitter
Results for 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Dec 31 22:11:04 UTC 2004 Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/simd1.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attribute-test-1.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attribute-test-2.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attribute-test-3.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attribute-test-4.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-9.C (test for warnings, line 32) WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes10592 # of unexpected failures6 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 71 # of unsupported tests 76 /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die7.c scan-assembler 1.*DW_AT_inline FAIL: gcc.dg/20020103-1.c scan-assembler-not LC XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-82_64.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-83_64.c execution test === gcc Summary === # of expected passes33308 # of unexpected failures4 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 99 # of untested testcases 28 # of unsupported tests 409 /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/build/gcc/xgcc version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) === objc tests === Running target unix === objc Summary === # of expected passes1528 # of unsupported tests 10 /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/build/gcc/xgcc version 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes216 # of unsupported tests 2 === libjava tests === Running target unix WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: CompareNaN compilation from source XPASS: pr13107_3 compilation from bytecode XPASS: pr13107_3 -O3 compilation from bytecode === libjava Summary === # of expected passes3703 # of unexpected failures1 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 12 # of untested testcases 14 === libmudflap tests === Running target unix === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes1244 === libstdc++-v3 check-abi Summary === # of added symbols: 63 # of missing symbols:0 # of incompatible symbols: 0 using: /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20041231/src/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/powerpc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) FAIL: ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes3355 # of unexpected failures1 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 5 Compiler version: 4.0.0 20041231 (experimental) Platform: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu configure flags: -v --prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --enable-threads=posix --without-included-gettext --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk powerpc-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,java,objc BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 Build Dependencies: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea Patches that Debian applied in this version: boehm-gc-nocheck: Disable the boehm-gc testsuite. Hangs forever on this architecture amd64-specs: Use 64bits mode assembly except with -m32 libjava-mips: libjava-mips patch from Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pr19162: PR1962 boehm-gc-nocheck: Disable the boehm-gc testsuite. Hangs forever on this architecture
Bug#288191: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well)
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:28:00PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > reopen 288191 > thanks > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > #288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged, > > which was filed against the gcc-3.4 package. > > > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well > > > > No, it doesn't. > > Matthias, this behavior is WAY out of line. The bug was filled against a > package for which you are neither the maintainer or the bug submitter. And he only closed the copy cloned onto gcc-3.4, which he maintains. Your point is, what, exactly? -- Daniel Jacobowitz
Bug#288191: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well)
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:28:00PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > reopen 288191 > > thanks > > > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > > #288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged, > > > which was filed against the gcc-3.4 package. > > > > > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > > > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > > > Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well > > > > > > No, it doesn't. > > > > Matthias, this behavior is WAY out of line. The bug was filled against a > > package for which you are neither the maintainer or the bug submitter. > > And he only closed the copy cloned onto gcc-3.4, which he maintains. > Your point is, what, exactly? Just when did this clone come up, exactly? -- Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
Bug#288191: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well)
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:22:59AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:28:00PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > reopen 288191 > > > thanks > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > > > > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > > > #288191: make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged, > > > > which was filed against the gcc-3.4 package. > > > > > > > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > > > > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > > > > > Re: Processed: Applies to gcc source package as well > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't. > > > > > > Matthias, this behavior is WAY out of line. The bug was filled against a > > > package for which you are neither the maintainer or the bug submitter. > > > > And he only closed the copy cloned onto gcc-3.4, which he maintains. > > Your point is, what, exactly? > > Just when did this clone come up, exactly? You might want to take Matthias' suggestion and actually, like, read the bug log for the bug he closed. Debian Bug report logs - #288191 make-tpkg: source unpacking script bugged Package: gcc-3.4 -- Daniel Jacobowitz
