murphy
Ashley,{
Lowest Interest Rates Ever!%
Bad Credit? No Credit? Bankrupsy? NO PROBLEM!&
We Have Programs To Suit Everyones Needs!
http://www.8006hosting.com/mort/form3.php
determinate,savage fury distorted.
Processed: reassign reports from gcc-3.2 (to be removed) to gcc-3.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 193787 gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.3-doc Bug#193787: gcc-3.2-doc,gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.2-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.2-doc,g77-3.3-doc: GCC documentation is non-free Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2-doc,gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.2-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.2-doc,g77-3.3-doc' to `gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.3-doc'. > reassign 179018 gcc-3.3 Bug#179018: gcc-3.2: [m68k] segfaults when building xemacs21 Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 176101 g++-3.3 Bug#176101: [fixed in 3.4] broken c++ code causes g++-3.2 and older to segfault Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 180486 gcc-3.3 Bug#180486: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 176064 gcc-3.3 Bug#176064: gcc-3.2: Provide a way to build cpu-specific versions Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 169862 g++-3.3 Bug#169862: [fixed in 3.4, optimization/1823] -ftrapv aborts with pointer difference due to division optimization Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 175478 g77-3.3 Bug#175478: [PR target/9201] [fixed in 3.4, 3.2/3.3 regression] ICE compiling octave-2.1 on m68k-linux Bug reassigned from package `g77-3.2' to `g77-3.3'. > reassign 185604 g++-3.3 Bug#185604: [PR c++/10199, fixed in 3.4] method parametrized by template does not work everywhere Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 192568 gcc-3.3 Bug#192568: [c++/10695] 2.95/3.2/3.3: ICE on alpha while building agistudio Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 153472 g++-3.3 Bug#153472: [fixed in 3.4, PR c/4106] i386 -fPIC asm ebx clobber no error Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 159838 gcc-3.3 Bug#159838: [PR c/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 166940 gcc-3.3 Bug#166940: [PR 10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 172090 gcc-3.3 Bug#172090: [PR target/9074] [alpha] gcc fails to compile kernel on wildfire Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 177303 gcc-3.3 Bug#177303: [fixed in 3.4] [PR 11943] Accepts invalid declaration "int x[2, 3];" in C99 mode Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 187091 gcc-3.3 Bug#187091: [fixed in 3.4] [PR 11942] restrict keyword broken in C99 mode Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 188943 g++-3.3 Bug#188943: [PR 10891] code using dynamic_cast causes segfaults when -fno-rtti is used Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 95318 gcc-3.3 Bug#95318: [fixed in 3.4: PR optimization/2962] unnecessary cwtl Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 161432 gcc-3.3 Bug#161432: [PR target/8603] Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't work Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 217360 gcc-3.3 Bug#217360: [PR 12867] incorrect warning message (void format, should be void* format) Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 94701 gcc-3.3 Bug#94701: [PR optimization/2960] Duplicate loop conditions even with -Os Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 105309 gcc-3.3 Bug#105309: [fixed in 3.3/HEAD: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation: joining tests Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > retitle 105309 [fixed in 3.4: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation: > joining tests Bug#105309: [fixed in 3.3/HEAD: PR optimization/3995] i386 optimisation: joining tests Changed Bug title. > reassign 106866 gcc-3.3 Bug#106866: [PR 5720] [i386] useless jump to call instruction Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 122103 gcc-3.3 Bug#122103: [PR other/9071] Warning for blocks not closed in same file as opened in Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 128950 gcc-3.3 Bug#128950: [PR c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 128993 gcc-3.3 Bug#128993: [PR9073, fixed in 3.4] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope? Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 173513 gcc-3.3 Bug#173513: [PR optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > reassign 181096 gcc-3.3 Bug#181096: [PR optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#239173: marked as done (gcc-2.95: Cannot build executables)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:21:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing report, unreproducible has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2004 10:24:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 21 02:24:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 4demon.com (pro-linux.de) [217.160.186.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B507s-0001Ie-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 02:24:17 -0800 Received: from grumbeer.hjbaader.home (pD904030A.dip.t-dialin.net [217.4.3.10]) by pro-linux.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F9C140006; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:24:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from grumbeer.hjbaader.home (grumbeer.hjbaader.home [172.30.4.1]) by grumbeer.hjbaader.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id E341C405C; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:24:11 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hans-Joachim Baader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-2.95: Cannot build executables X-Mailer: reportbug 2.43 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:24:11 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-22 Severity: normal Hi, gcc-2.95 -O2 test.c gives the following output /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0xc): In function `_start': .../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:92: undefined reference to `__libc_csu_fini' /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x11):../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:93: undefined reference to `__libc_csu_init' It seems unrelated to the actual contents of test.c. Building with gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3 works. /usr/lib/crt* are probably versions for later gcc? -rw-r--r--1 root root 8242 Nov 5 20:08 /usr/lib/crt1.o -rw-r--r--1 root root 2264 Nov 5 20:08 /usr/lib/crti.o -rw-r--r--1 root root 1836 Nov 5 20:08 /usr/lib/crtn.o -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages gcc-2.95 depends on: ii binutils 2.14.90.0.6-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.4-22 The GNU C preprocessor ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 239173-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 08:22:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 01:22:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEl5t-00027o-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 01:22:33 -0700 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27607 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:21:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3H8LN0D019614; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:21:23 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:21:23 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing report, unreproducible X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 closing the report in agreement with the bug submitter, unreproducible for me anyway (and for him on another machine as well).
Bug#216105: fixed in g++-3.4
reassign 216105 libstdc++5 retitle 216105 [fixed in 3.4] Using streambuf / iostream to read from a named pipe tags 216105 +upstream +fixed-upstream thanks output, built with g++-3.3: Child 1: Message sent at 1082192166: This is a message from child 1 Child 2: Message sent at 1082192166: This is a message from child 2 Child 1: closing pipe Child 1: pipe closed Child 2: closing pipe Child 2: pipe closed Parent: Message received at 1082192168: This is a message from child 1 Parent: Message received at 1082192168: This is a message from child 2 output, built with g++-3.4: Child 1: Message sent at 1082192042: This is a message from child 1 Child 2: Message sent at 1082192042: This is a message from child 2 Parent: Message received at 1082192042: This is a message from child 1 Parent: Message received at 1082192042: This is a message from child 2 Child 1: closing pipe Child 1: pipe closed Child 2: closing pipe Child 2: pipe closed
Processed: fixed in g++-3.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 216105 libstdc++5 Bug#216105: Using streambuf / iostream to read from a named pipe Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `libstdc++5'. > retitle 216105 [fixed in 3.4] Using streambuf / iostream to read from a named > pipe Bug#216105: Using streambuf / iostream to read from a named pipe Changed Bug title. > tags 216105 +upstream +fixed-upstream Unknown tag/s: +fixed-upstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n. Bug#216105: [fixed in 3.4] Using streambuf / iostream to read from a named pipe There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
RE: Private document (verification)
The person you've emailed, Michael ginn, is using Copytalk's spam blocking service to keep from receiving junk mail. To verify that you are a real person and not a spam program please follow the link below. Your original email will be delivered to Michael ginn, and you will automatically be added to the recipient's valid sender list. You will only have to do this once; your future email will be delivered to Michael ginn without interruption. Validate: http://www.copytalk.com/challengeresponse.po?mid=11616086&rid=3403 This is an automatically generated email. Please do not reply to it. This is a service of Copytalk, the world's first mobile voice email system. In addition to helping customers block spam, Copytalk also provides them with the ability to receive their emails over the phone and dictate responses to them. To see what it's all about try out Copytalk free for two weeks. http://www.copytalk.com
Bug#237968: marked as done (InoculateIT needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:40:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#237968: InoculateIT needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2004 16:25:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 14 08:25:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.0.152] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B2YQl-0001xt-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:25:39 -0800 Received: from floeff1 (pD9EBBEC4.dip.t-dialin.net [217.235.190.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id i2EGPako013462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:25:37 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Florian Effenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: InoculateIT needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:25:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Version: 2.95.4-20 My virus scanner - InoculateIT from CAI - needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 which was included with a Debian 3.0 package. In 3.1, I only get libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. I have to do ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 I don't know if this is still needed by anyone else, but maybe you should provide an information or a symlink in the package. --- Received: (at 237968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 09:42:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 02:42:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEmL2-0006tK-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:42:16 -0700 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07823; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:40:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3H9erFw006997; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:40:53 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:40:53 +0200 To: "Florian Effenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#237968: InoculateIT needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Florian Effenberger writes: > Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 > Version: 2.95.4-20 > > My virus scanner - InoculateIT from CAI - needs libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > which was included with a Debian 3.0 package. In 3.1, I only get > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. I have to do > > ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > > I don't know if this is still needed by anyone else, but maybe you should > provide an information or a symlink in the package. It's ok, if it works for you, else install: http://packages.debian.org/stable/oldlibs/libstdc++2.10
Bug#181660: marked as done ([PR ada/5679] ICE compiling libgtkada1)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:22:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning unconstrained type conversion has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2003 18:10:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 19 12:10:26 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp.permonline.ru [212.120.160.134] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18lYfp-0003ch-00; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:10:26 -0600 Received: from porton.narod.ru ([:::212.120.171.218]) by smtp.permonline.ru with esmtp; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:10:20 +0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=porton) by porton.narod.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18lYeM-0003Yh-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:08:54 +0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 (debian 2.5-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnat-3.2: internal compiler error Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_smtp.permonline.ru-28480-1045678226-0001-2" Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:08:53 +0500 From: Victor Porton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_smtp.permonline.ru-28480-1045678226-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Package: gnat-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre1 3.2.3 20030210 (prerelease) (i386-pc-linux-gnu) libgtkada1-dev version 1.2.12-7 (note that installed libgtkada1-dev version is inconsistent with the version of Gnat, no other package version inconsistencies on my Debian), backstore_area.ad[bs] attached. $ gcc-3.2 -c -O3 -gnatN -gnatp -gnatf -I/usr/include/gtkada -I/usr/lib/gtkada backstore_area.adb +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 3.2.3 20030210 (prerelease) (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure atree.adb:2571| | Error detected at /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.3/adainclude/i-cpoint.adb:4 1:1 [/usr/include/gtkada/gdk-even | Please submit a bug report, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.| | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report. | | Include the exact gcc-3.2 or gnatmake command that you entered. | | Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format | | (concatenated together with no headers between files). | +==+ --=_smtp.permonline.ru-28480-1045678226-0001-2 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="backstore_area.ads" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: backstore_area.ads Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="backstore_area.ads" d2l0aCBHbGliOyAgICAgICAgICAgICB1c2UgR2xpYjsKd2l0aCBHZGs7CndpdGggR2RrLlBp eG1hcDsKd2l0aCBHdGsuV2lkZ2V0Owp3aXRoIEd0ay5EcmF3aW5nX0FyZWE7CgpwYWNrYWdl IEJhY2tzdG9yZV9BcmVhIGlzCiAgIC0tIEFuIGFyZWFkIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBkcmF3 biBvbiB3aGljaCBpcyBub3QgZGVzdHJveWVkIGlmIGEgcGFydCBvZiB3aW5kb3cgaXMgY292 ZXJlZC4KICAgCiAgIHByYWdtYSBFbGFib3JhdGVfQm9keTsKCiAgIHR5cGUgQmFja3N0b3Jl X0FyZWFfUmVjb3JkIGlzIG5ldyBHdGsuV2lkZ2V0Lkd0a19XaWRnZXRfUmVjb3JkIHdpdGgg cHJpdmF0ZTsKCiAgIHR5cGUgQmFja3N0b3JlX0FyZWFfVHlwZSBpcyBhY2Nlc3MgYWxsIEJh Y2tzdG9yZV9BcmVhX1JlY29yZCdDbGFzczsKCiAgIHByb2NlZHVyZSBHdGtfTmV3KEFyZWE6 IG91dCBCYWNrc3RvcmVfQXJlYV9UeXBlOyBXaWR0aCwgSGVpZ2h0OiBHaW50KTsKCiAgIHBy b2NlZHVyZSBJbml0aWFsaXplKEFyZWE6IGFjY2VzcyBCYWNrc3RvcmVfQXJlYV9SZWNvcmQn Q2xhc3M7IFdpZHRoLCBIZWlnaHQ6IEdpbnQpOwoKICAgZnVuY3Rpb24gR2V0X0RyYXdhYmxl KEFyZWE6IEJhY2tzdG9yZV9BcmVhX1R5cGUpIHJldHVybiBHZGsuR2RrX0RyYXdhYmxlOwoK cHJpdmF0ZQoKICAgdHlwZSBCYWNrc3RvcmVfQXJlYV9SZWNvcmQgaXMKICAgICAgbmV3IEd0 ay5EcmF3aW5nX0FyZWEuR3RrX0RyYXdpbmdfQXJlYV9SZWNvcmQgd2l0aAogICAgICAgICBy ZWNvcmQKICAgICAgICAgICAgQmFja3N0b3JlOiBHZGsuR2RrX1BpeG1hcDsKICAgICAgICAg ZW5kIHJlY29yZDsKCmVuZCBCYWNrc3RvcmVfQXJlYTsK --=_smtp.permonline.ru-28480-1045678226-0001-2 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="backstore_area.adb" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: backstore_area.adb Content-Disposition: a
Bug#147864: marked as done ([PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning unconstrained type conversion)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:22:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning unconstrained type conversion has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2002 07:40:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 23 02:40:32 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cert.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.16.17] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17AnD5-0003IY-00; Thu, 23 May 2002 02:40:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 23529 invoked by uid 1000); 23 May 2002 07:38:31 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnat-3.1 does not provide gnat From: "Florian Weimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.21 Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:38:31 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gnat-3.1 Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-23 Severity: normal "gnat-3.1" does not fulfill build dependencies on "gnat". On the one hand, it does not provide the "gnatgcc" binary (which is hardwired into some Debian build scripts), on the other, there are known compiler bugs which prevent packages from building (e.g. libgtkada). -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux CERT 2.4.14-xfs #1 SMP Fri Nov 23 21:34:33 CET 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 147864-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 10:27:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 03:27:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEn2V-T1-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 03:27:11 -0700 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA12648 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:22:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3HAMNBv018453; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:22:23 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:22:23 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning unconstrained type conversion X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 bug closed upstream, resolution: original (GtkAda) code was wrong see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5679
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #36600 to gcc-gnats as PR 14990
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #36600 to gcc-gnats as PR 14990 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14990 > forwarded 36600 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14990 Bug#36600: [C++ standard issue] multiset forward iterator is const Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14990. > retitle 36600 [PR 14990] [C++ standard issue] multiset forward iterator is > const Bug#36600: [C++ standard issue] multiset forward iterator is const Changed Bug title. > tags 36600 + upstream Bug#36600: [PR 14990] [C++ standard issue] multiset forward iterator is const Tags were: upstream Tags added: upstream > reassign 36600 libstdc++5 Bug#36600: [PR 14990] [C++ standard issue] multiset forward iterator is const Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `libstdc++5'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#148529: marked as done ([PR ada/6911] gnat-3.1: sin broken)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:29:22 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gnat-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2002 05:58:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 30 00:58:52 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.97] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17DIxX-0006Ep-00; Thu, 30 May 2002 00:58:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCAD3319F; Thu, 30 May 2002 15:58:47 +1000 (EST) Received: from scrooge.chocbit.org.au (scrooge.apana.org.au [203.12.237.100]) by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D2A3319A; Thu, 30 May 2002 15:58:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C3AAFAA; Thu, 30 May 2002 15:58:43 +1000 (EST) Received: by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6548E3D38; Thu, 30 May 2002 15:58:39 +1000 (EST) From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnat-3.1: sin broken X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 15:58:39 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020316 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020316 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gnat-3.1 Version: 1:3.1-2 Severity: normal With the following code: ---CUT--- with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Numerics; use Ada.Numerics; with Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions; procedure TestBug2 is type F is new Float; subtype Radians is F; package Maths is new Generic_Elementary_Functions(F); use Maths; begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(F'Image(Sin(5.49779))); Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(F'Image(Sin(0.0))); Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(F'Image(Sin(5.49779))); end TestBug2; ---CUT--- It returns: 0.E+05 -0.0E+00 0.0E+00 I think the first number is NaN (at least according to the patched gdb 5.0 it was), not sure why the last one is different. According to Gnome Calculator, sin(5.49779)==0.707, and sin(0)==0. I never had any problems with sin/cos/arcsin using the old version of gnat (but didn't run this test program). -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux scrooge 2.4.18 #1 Wed Apr 3 13:18:14 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= Versions of packages gnat-3.1 depends on: ii gcc-3.1 1:3.1-2The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.1-base 1:3.1-2The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgnat3.15a 1:3.1-2Runtime library for GNU Ada applic --- Received: (at 148529-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 10:32:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 03:32:15 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEn7O-mc-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 03:32:14 -0700 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA13325 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:29:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3HATM1V021219; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:29:22 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:29:22 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gnat-3.3 X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 according to the bug trail this is fixed in gnat-3.3
Processed: reassign gcc report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 126703 g++-3.3 Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0 Bug#164872: g++-3.2: Defines _GNU_SOURCE Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `g++-3.3'. > retitle 126703 defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.x Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0 Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#226459: marked as done (gcc returns "... might be used uninitialized in this function" where it shouldn't)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unreproducible report, no feedback from bug submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2004 22:17:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 06 16:17:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.9]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AdyTh-0001aq-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:11:05 -0600
Received: (qmail 93628 invoked by uid 88); 6 Jan 2004 21:11:04 -
Received: from pd9e961b4.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO ?192.168.123.111?)
(217.233.97.180)
by mail.bytecamp.net with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 21:11:04 -
Subject: gcc returns "... might be used uninitialized in this function"
where it shouldn't
From: Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:03:27 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2.3-9
Severity: minor
Tags: sid
Unfortunately I wasn't able to track down this issue.
The code snippet in question is from the nautilus package:
=== beginning ===
static gboolean
select_range (NautilusIconContainer *container,
NautilusIcon *icon1,
NautilusIcon *icon2)
{
gboolean selection_changed;
GList *p;
NautilusIcon *icon;
NautilusIcon *unmatched_icon;
gboolean select;
selection_changed = FALSE;
unmatched_icon = NULL;
select = FALSE;
for (p = container->details->icons; p != NULL; p = p->next) {
icon = p->data;
if (unmatched_icon == NULL) {
if (icon == icon1) {
unmatched_icon = icon2;
select = TRUE;
} else if (icon == icon2) {
unmatched_icon = icon1;
select = TRUE;
}
}
selection_changed |= icon_set_selected
(container, icon, select);
if (unmatched_icon != NULL && icon == unmatched_icon) {
select = FALSE;
}
}
=== (...) snap ===
}
=== end ===
gcc returns:
nautilus-icon-container.c: In function `handle_icon_button_press':
nautilus-icon-container.c:1768: warning: `selection_changed' might be used
uninitialized in this function
obviously it actually IS always initialized
the whole file can be found under:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S40724BF6
Do you need any additional information?
regs,
Chris
---
Received: (at 226459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 10:52:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 03:52:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BEnQf-0003c0-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 03:52:10 -0700
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16136
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3HAmKZk025348;
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:48:20 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #178561 to gcc-gnats as PR 14991
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #178561 to gcc-gnats as PR 14991 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14991 > forwarded 178561 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14991 Bug#178561: gcc-3.2-doc: stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14991. > retitle 178561 [PR 14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date Bug#178561: gcc-3.2-doc: stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date Changed Bug title. > tags 178561 + upstream Bug#178561: [PR 14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date Tags were: upstream Tags added: upstream > reassign 178561 libstdc++5-doc Bug#178561: [PR 14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2-doc' to `libstdc++5-doc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#135730: marked as done (writeln radix control)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:18:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line writeln radix control has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2002 20:18:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 25 14:18:52 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu [129.63.8.2] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16fRaG-0003Ri-00; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:18:52 -0600 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by saturn.cs.uml.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1PKIkA311554; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:18:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:18:46 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: writeln radix control Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gpc Version: 2:2.95.4-9 The "pc" compiler on Tru64 (formerly OSF/1 or Digital UNIX) has radix control. NOTE: it is typed and works for negative values. I get stuff like "-FFF" from -4095 but "EE6CD998" from 4000111000. I've no idea how to get leading zeros on these. PROGRAM radix ( input,output ) ; begin writeln(, 4095:2:16, ); writeln(, 4095:3:16, ); writeln(, 4095:8:16, ); writeln(, 4095:9:16, ); writeln(, 4095:2:8, ); writeln(, 4095:4:8, ); writeln(, 4095:11:8, ); writeln(, 4095:12:8, ); writeln(, 4095:2:2, ); writeln(, 4095:6:2, ); writeln(, 4095:32:2, ); writeln(, 4095:36:2, ); writeln(, 4095:2:32, ); writeln(, 4095:3:32, ); writeln(, 4095:7:32, ); writeln(, 4095:8:32, ); writeln(, 4095:2:10, ); writeln(, 4095:4:10, ); writeln(, 4095:10:10, ); writeln(, 4095:12:10, ); writeln(, 4095:2, ); writeln(, 4095:4, ); writeln(, 4095:10, ); writeln(, 4095:12, ); writeln end. @ SAMPLE OUTPUT 'FFF' 'FFF' ' FFF' ' FFF' '' '' ' ' '' '' '' '' '' '3VV' '3VV' '3VV' ' 3VV' '4095' '4095' ' 4095' '4095' '4095' '4095' ' 4095' '4095' --- Received: (at 135730-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 11:22:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 04:22:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEntk-0006NP-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 04:22:12 -0700 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18975; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:18:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i3HBI0Pl000207; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:18:00 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:18:00 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: writeln radix control X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 closing this report as wontfix.
Bug#244233: libstdc++6-doc: a doxygen tag file would be nice
Package: libstdc++6-doc Severity: wishlist It would be nice if libstdc++*-doc generated a doxygen tag file and installed it. This would allow other doxygen-using packages to generate proper cross-references to the libstdc++ documentation. [Set GENERATE_TAGFILE in src/libstdc++-v3/docs/doxygen/user.cfg.in to a suitable output filename, and install the generated file] -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[Bug libstdc++/14990] [C++ standard issue] multiset forward iterator is const
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-17 15:06 --- Confirming to suspend as this a defect that was not been filled yet. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-04-17 15:06:19 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14990 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug libstdc++/14990] multiset forward iterator is const
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED Summary|[C++ standard issue]|multiset forward iterator is |multiset forward iterator is|const |const | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14990 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug libstdc++/14991] stream::attach(int fd) porting entry out-of-date
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-17 15:07 --- Confirming. -- What|Removed |Added CC||pme at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||documentation Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-04-17 15:07:33 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14991 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Bug#244233: libstdc++6-doc: a doxygen tag file would be nice
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Package: libstdc++6-doc > Severity: wishlist > > It would be nice if libstdc++*-doc generated a doxygen tag file and > installed it. This would allow other doxygen-using packages to > generate proper cross-references to the libstdc++ documentation. I believe we do for 3.4. -- Behind everything some further thing is found, forever; thus the tree behind the bird, stone beneath soil, the sun behind Urth. Behind our efforts, let there be found our efforts. - Ascian saying, as related by Loyal to the Group of Seventeen
Bug#244233: libstdc++6-doc: a doxygen tag file would be nice
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:37:50PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Package: libstdc++6-doc > > Severity: wishlist > > > > It would be nice if libstdc++*-doc generated a doxygen tag file and > > installed it. This would allow other doxygen-using packages to > > generate proper cross-references to the libstdc++ documentation. > > I believe we do for 3.4. Ah, if I look in experimental I find /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base/libstdc++/html_user/libstdc++.tag.gz Unfortunately it's not very much use gzipped, as doxygen can't read it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#244233: libstdc++6-doc: a doxygen tag file would be nice
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:37:50PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > Package: libstdc++6-doc > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > It would be nice if libstdc++*-doc generated a doxygen tag file and > > > installed it. This would allow other doxygen-using packages to > > > generate proper cross-references to the libstdc++ documentation. > > > > I believe we do for 3.4. > > Ah, if I look in experimental I find > /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base/libstdc++/html_user/libstdc++.tag.gz > > Unfortunately it's not very much use gzipped, as doxygen can't read it. Looks like it's getting mistaken for a regular HTML file. We don't have any install rules for the documentation, so we're not the ones gzipping it. -- Behind everything some further thing is found, forever; thus the tree behind the bird, stone beneath soil, the sun behind Urth. Behind our efforts, let there be found our efforts. - Ascian saying, as related by Loyal to the Group of Seventeen
Bug#244233: libstdc++6-doc: a doxygen tag file would be nice
Phil Edwards writes: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:37:50PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > Package: libstdc++6-doc > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > It would be nice if libstdc++*-doc generated a doxygen tag file and > > > > installed it. This would allow other doxygen-using packages to > > > > generate proper cross-references to the libstdc++ documentation. > > > > > > I believe we do for 3.4. > > > > Ah, if I look in experimental I find > > /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4-base/libstdc++/html_user/libstdc++.tag.gz > > > > Unfortunately it's not very much use gzipped, as doxygen can't read it. > > Looks like it's getting mistaken for a regular HTML file. We don't have > any install rules for the documentation, so we're not the ones gzipping it. All packaging bugs are mine. Fixed in svn. Matthias
aries
Trisha / The cablefilterz will allow you to receive all the channels that you order with your remote control,& payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events'; http://www.aol43566.com/cable/ red ,clan .
Fantastic News 34367
Page loading Image not showing? See message here.Discon zQxx1.V0vmm/iBvwC.HwF6r13WevH.A6G8V/mMPR2/csARe. fbugdn ndk, fwhj, jcedp . yugsq pxl yfb, sztx, qfkx . ajqgo eoclg pwr, qphtv, uoyggd . ers kadsht uao, yflq, smrtg . tooxgu ajado khq, jgp, laak . mdp lij fpvw, eyv, thb . nnseuf uragv bixk, fbed, kbsewz . koucur anbawy xgrjrw, xbi, ccpb . wlstp mynz qvxj, fcf, yuxze . egv kusd jsbhha, zygj, mlamm . knaqt oat uyxdq, lza, zaaiv . vxb tlxvdq rtwbnu, tmygm, albcvy . svucqf lktr mnfck, vyedk, fxlhuj . pfurv sjolaq pxczd, akck, jkcq . mtvtp qrgzf bxurw, sazsk, fdmrgc . uxtp ffeohl ike, gewi, qsgx . soe mau phmunc, ymmk, psu . bzevfb xsxw zqlox, lkaokm, wfuob . rbnn rigji nhuyy, xjdz, pocntw . wfvx kgks tasik, giffr, fqb . uoosrk oktyq teyvyg, konrtg, azet . sjoj maehy ktckp, swmgk, bsge . mzpejd frplyq kjjual, xxujc, dibx . bmamr rihc zls, uolfc, eyt . vyq vkchmo dhiml, nwi, qylxa . byqj ozv lxvxn, cwe, hvedfe . epug xfegb fyhqxc, kyrifi, apuh . rnjluv bcq xxcgn, ielj, togk . vez vnz jxs, zkqyh, ewtma . xxbld dard osqy, nqpoch, jbq . wfhecg omqtmj dxouv, jniypr, aud . siqwkw aitu cqazhw, aij, iacs . xxjpf oqypqg kfndgp, elm, xxw . araz jquje huc, fpvuud, ejxq . wqw qnvpcf yqkkzg, qnd, hxstde . wco ahcof smys, kcd, qtfuj . rbix atjo kxja, cuqcm, pox . etpace dop qkug, gfai, ccagq . vesfll lpyft wge, akx, pxrzbw . imx rrkefe uexp, tvycy, zhc . adaw kjeq wcidj, xpwp, ski . kvttx
