[Bug optimization/12158] [3.3 regression] [hppa] compilation does not terminate at -O1

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12158

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug c++/13070] [3.3/3.4 regression] -Wformat option ignored in g++

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-26 
05:48 ---
Patch here: .

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch
   Last reconfirmed|2003-11-16 15:19:25 |2003-12-26 05:48:55
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug optimization/11350] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined labels with -Os -fPIC

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-26 
05:41 ---
The reduced case does not fail on the mainline any more but the non reduced 
case does 
at -O1 -fPIC.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




[Bug optimization/11635] [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnecessary store onto stack

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ABI
Summary|[3.3/3.4 regression] [ABI?] |[3.3/3.4 regression]
   |Unnecessary store onto stack|Unnecessary store onto stack


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11635

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Bug#175478: [Bug target/9201] [3.3 regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1 compiling octave-2.1 on m68k-linux

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in |[3.3 regression] ICE in
   |instantiate_virtual_regs_1  |instantiate_virtual_regs_1
   |compiling octave-2.1 on |compiling octave-2.1 on
   |m68k-linux  |m68k-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9201

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Bug#175478: [Bug target/9201] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1 compiling octave-2.1 on m68k-linux

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-26 
05:17 ---
This does not happen on the mainline.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9201

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Bug#224945: marked as done (g++-3.3: there is a problem with sort() algorithm)

2003-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 26 Dec 2003 18:30:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224945: g++-3.3: there is a problem with sort() algorithm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2003 22:45:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 23 16:45:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep02fe.ttnet.net.tr (fep02.ttnet.net.tr) [212.156.4.132] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AYuSf-0003mH-00; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:53:05 -0600
Received: from orion ([195.174.173.82]) by fep02.ttnet.net.tr
  (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
  Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:51:01 +0200
Received: from exa by orion with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AYuSb-0001kI-00; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:53:01 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.3: there is a problem with sort() algorithm
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:53:01 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal

orion:c++$ cat stl4.cxx 
#include 
#include 
using namespace std;
int main()
{
   list a;
   sort(a.begin(), a.end());
  
   return 0;
}

This doesn't compile, it looks like valid C++ code.

There is either a bug in the std lib or the compiler
I don't have the time to figure it out.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux orion 2.4.21-xfs #2 Tue Nov 11 22:28:38 EET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2-4The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base1:3.3.2-4The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++5-3.3-dev  1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 224945-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2003 20:55:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 26 14:55:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZvng-0003Zh-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 11:31:00 -0600
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72063128
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:30:55 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 14564-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:30:53 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from juist (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61776117
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:30:53 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AZvnY-0001ck-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:30:52 +0100
X-Face: "iUeUu$b*W_"w?tV83Y3*r:`rh&dRv}$YnZ3,LVeCZSYVuf[Gpo*5%_=/\_!gc_,SS}[~xZ
 wY77I-M)xHIx:2f56g%/`SOw"Dx%4Xq0&f\Tj~>|QR|vGlU}TBYhiG(K:2
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 Dec 2003 18:30:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.5 (cabbage)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at 
informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master

Bug#152501: [Bug java/7304] gcj ICE on non-public class

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-26 
23:36 ---
*** Bug 12307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||suckfish at ihug dot co dot
   ||nz


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7304

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Bug#152501: [Bug java/7304] gcj ICE on non-public class

2003-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|ice-on-valid-code   |ice-on-invalid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7304

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




Bug#225186: g++-3.3: error compiling max value for a long long

2003-12-26 Thread Jim Watson
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux sun 2.4.18 #1 SMP Mon Jan 27 14:07:39 EST 2003 sparc64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2-4The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base1:3.3.2-4The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++5-3.3-dev  1:3.3.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d

-- no debconf information
This gives an error on g++-3.3 
and warnings on gcc-3.3 or g++ with -fpermissive.

I think the max value is correct because max + 1 --> negative max.

The program output:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ ./type_test
max + 1  =  -9223372036854775808
max - 1  =   9223372036854775806
max  =   9223372036854775807, size = 8

The compiler messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ g++  -o type_test type_test.c
type_test.c: In functionnt main()':
type_test.c:7: error: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:8: error: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:9: error: integer constant is too large for "long" type

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ g++  -fpermissive -o type_test type_test.c
type_test.c: In functionnt main()':
type_test.c:7: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:8: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:9: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type

The code:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ cat type_test.c
#include 
typedef long long sal_Int64;
sal_Int64 bit64;
#define SAL_MAX_INT64 ((sal_Int64) 0x7FFF)
int main(void)
{
bit64 = SAL_MAX_INT64 ;
printf("max + 1\t =\t%lld\n", SAL_MAX_INT64 + 1);
printf("max - 1\t =\t %lld\n", SAL_MAX_INT64 - 1);
printf("max\t =\t %lld, size = %d\n", bit64, sizeof(sal_Int64));
return(0);
}