Bug#220000: libstdc++5: largefile support (LFS) missing
tags 22 + upstream tags 22 + fixed-upstream retitle 22 [fixed in 3.4] libstdc++: largefile support (LFS) missing thanks
Processed: Re: Bug#220000: libstdc++5: largefile support (LFS) missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 22 + upstream Bug#22: libstdc++5: largefile support (LFS) missing There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tags 22 + fixed-upstream Bug#22: libstdc++5: largefile support (LFS) missing Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 22 [fixed in 3.4] libstdc++: largefile support (LFS) missing Bug#22: libstdc++5: largefile support (LFS) missing Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#217793: gcc-3.3: SIGBUS when trying to profile
Daniel Bayer writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> I get a SIGBUS when I try to profile something:
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ cat a.c
> | void a() { }
> | int main() { a(); }
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ gcc-3.3 -m32 -p -pg -o a a.c
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ ./a
> | Bus-Zugriffsfehler
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $
>
> And the backtrace:
> #0 0x701110d8 in mcount () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1 0x00010568 in a ()
> #2 0x00010590 in main ()
I'm unable to reproduce this on a current unstable system. Please
recheck.
Bug#216849: marked as done (relocation overflow error)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:56:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 09:20:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 21 04:20:41 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0303.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.28] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ABsgz-0001tz-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:20:41 -0500 Received: from AToulouse-105-1-27-60.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr (AToulouse-105-1-27-60.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.5.60]) by mwinf0303.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3420E500097B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from julie.vipere.noire (julie.vipere.noire [192.168.6.6]) by AToulouse-105-1-27-60.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA32004 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by julie.vipere.noire (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id h9L9KJAM003403 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: relocation overflow error Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 3.3.2-0pre5 Severity: critical Hi ! I upgraded gcc yesterday : julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310201058.log | grep gcc Inst libgcc1 [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing) Inst gcc-3.3-base [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing) Inst gcc-3.3 [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing) I' using testing on a SS20 SMP : julie[gacc] uname -a Linux julie 2.4.21 #1 SMP Thu Aug 7 19:29:27 EDT 2003 sparc GNU/Linux Here is what I get now, as I compile my project : julie[gacc] make ==> Building gAcc for Linux/sparc... Making all in libgacc... make[1]: Entering directory `/home/thomas/devel/gacc/libgacc' gcc -c -g3 -I/usr/include -O2 -Wall -I. -I.. -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 accounts.c gcc -c -g3 -I/usr/include -O2 -Wall -I. -I.. -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 categories.c gcc -c -g3 -I/usr/include -O2 -Wall -I. -I.. -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 cfgmgt.c gcc -c -g3 -I/usr/include -O2 -Wall -I. -I.. -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 comms.c /tmp/ccRqQA9r.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccRqQA9r.s:6180: Error: relocation overflow make[1]: *** [comms.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/thomas/devel/gacc/libgacc' make: *** [all] Error 2 julie[gacc] gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.2/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --with-cpu=v7 --enable-objc-gc sparc-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian prerelease) The day before, the compilation was ok. Thomas -- > A l'heure actuelle, il s'est formé une sorte "d'aristocratie" de Linux > qui essaye de maintenir ses connaissances pour elles et d'en priver les > autres en innondant chaque débutant de documentations -+- EF in Guide du liuxien pervers : "Comprenne qui pourra..." -+- --- Received: (at 216849-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 13:01:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 07:01:39 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ALMX4-0002e2-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 07:01:38 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25002; Sun, 16 Nov 2003
Processed: tag gcc report as fixed upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 187091 + fixed-upstream Bug#187091: [PR 11942] restrict keyword broken in C99 mode Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 187091 [fixed in 3.4] [PR 11942] restrict keyword broken in C99 mode Bug#187091: [PR 11942] restrict keyword broken in C99 mode Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: tag gcc report as fixed upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 177303 + fixed-upstream Bug#177303: [PR 11943] Accepts invalid declaration "int x[2, 3];" in C99 mode Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 177303 [fixed in 3.4] [PR 11943] Accepts invalid declaration "int > x[2, 3];" in C99 mode Bug#177303: [PR 11943] Accepts invalid declaration "int x[2, 3];" in C99 mode Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#216473: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Transient compile error after long build (mozilla-thunderbird))
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:26:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216473: gcc-3.3: Transient compile error after long build
(mozilla-thunderbird)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2003 02:39:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 18 21:39:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.49]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AB3Ts-0001bk-00; Sat, 18 Oct 2003 21:39:44 -0500
Received: from swordfish.voxel.net (alb-24-195-233-147.nycap.rr.com
[24.195.233.147])
by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
h9J2dhYo028642;
Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:39:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Derrik Pates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.3: Transient compile error after long build (mozilla-thunderbird)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:39:06 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5
Severity: normal
For some reason, during the compilation of mozilla-thunderbird, I get
the following error from gcc:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:5454: Error: value of 3f91f4fc000840d8 too large for field of
4 bytes at 0020
It will fail to build, then when I start the build again, succeed at
building that module, and fail with a similar message (the line number,
and the two 16-digit hex values change). If there's any further info I
can provide that might be of use, let me know
--
Derrik Pates
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux swordfish.voxel.net 2.4.22-ben2 #1 Tue Sep 30 23:36:46 EDT 2003
ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.6-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.31:3.3.2-0pre5 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.2-0pre5 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc11:3.3.2-0pre5 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 216473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 13:31:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 07:31:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALN09-0005kT-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 07:31:41 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28597;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:26:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGDQYYr010394;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:26:34 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:26:34 +0100
To: Derrik Pates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#216473: gcc-3.3: Transient compile error after long build
(mozilla-thunderbird)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Falk Hueffner writes:
> Derrik Pates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For some reason, during the compilation of mozilla-thunderbird, I
> > get the following error from gcc:
> >
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:5454: Error: value of 3f91f4fc000840d8 too large for field
> >
Processed: tag gcc report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 215445 + upstream Bug#215445: gcj-3.3: no compila un archivo There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
[Bug c++/13070] [3.3/3.4 regression] -Wformat option ignored in g++
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 15:19 --- I can confirm this. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-11-16 15:19:25 date|| Summary|[3.3 / 3.4 regression] -|[3.3/3.4 regression] - |Wformat option ignored in |Wformat option ignored in |g++ |g++ Target Milestone|--- |3.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13070 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
gcc-snapshot_20031116-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20031116-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot_20031116.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 210328 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#210328: marked as done ([PR 12407] [3.4 regression] ICE with -pg)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:17:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210328: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20031116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2003 18:54:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 10 13:54:42 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cm-vina3-152-103.cm.vtr.net (fw.aplik) [200.104.152.103]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xA70-uU-00; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:54:42 -0500
Received: from pcdaniel.aplik ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.4])
by fw.aplik (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h8AIsvs30110;
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:54:57 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: by pcdaniel.aplik (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Sep 2003
14:54:38 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Daniel Serpell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-snapshot: SIGSEV in compiler with -pg flags
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:54:37 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20030909-1
Severity: normal
The following code causes the compiler to SIGSEV in x86:
tst.cpp /
#include
class A;
std::vector < A * > getA()
{
std::vector< A * > a;
return a;
}
//
Compiling with:
$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c -pg -c tst.cpp
tst.cpp: In function `std::vector > getA()':
tst.cpp:9: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Compiling without the "-pg" switch works.
Thanks,
Daniel.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pcdaniel 2.4.21-5-k7 #1 Mon Aug 25 08:09:01 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-1
Versions of some packages gcc-snapshot depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii libc62.3.2-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 210328-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 16:23:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 10:23:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALPgC-0005Ow-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:23:16 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALPad-0005xi-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:17:31 -0500
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#210328: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20031116-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:17:31 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Source: gcc-snapshot
Source-Version: 20031116-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-snapshot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20031116-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot_20031116.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031116.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gc
[Bug c++/13071] no way to exclude backward C++ headers from include path
--- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 17:29 --- "There is currently no way" seems to me way (punt intended :) too strong! What about: -nostdinc++ -I/usr/include/c++/3.3.2 -I/usr/include/c++/3.3.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu ?? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug c++/13071] no way to exclude backward C++ headers from include path
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-11-16 18:37 --- Subject: Re: no way to exclude backward C++ headers from include path paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > > --- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 > 17:29 --- > "There is currently no way" seems to me way (punt intended :) too strong! > What about: > > -nostdinc++ -I/usr/include/c++/3.3.2 > -I/usr/include/c++/3.3.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu maybe too strong, but not very portable or user friendly. the user needs at least to know the exact version of gcc he uses, if configured with --with-gxx-include-dir, the name of this directory and the system alias that gcc was configured for. something like -backwardstdcinc++ to explicitely enable the backward include dir would be useful. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug driver/13071] no way to exclude backward C++ headers from include path
-- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |driver http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Bug#202746: marked as done (gcc: -O2 causes bogutil to segfault)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:40:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line unreproducible with current g++ version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2003 20:44:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 24 15:44:13 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.142] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19fmwe-000756-00; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:44:12 -0500 Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C46F87001E; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:44:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:44:11 -0400 From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc: -O2 causes bogutil to segfault Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.19 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc Version: multiple Severity: normal The bogofilter test suite fails on m68k, hppa, mips, mipsel, and arm due to a segfault in bogoutil. On hppa, at least, compiling with -O0 or -O1 results in a working binary. Therefore I assume an optimization bug. (This was tested with gcc-3.3 3.3.1-0pre0) --- Received: (at 202746-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 19:42:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 13:41:50 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ALSmH-0003ep-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:41:45 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25505 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:40:52 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGJepvG010113; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:40:51 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:40:51 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unreproducible with current g++ version X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99 version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) this is unreproducible with current g++ version on all platforms. The build logs don't show any failing tests. Please reopen the report if I misintepreted something. Matthias
[Bug c/13072] Bogus warning with VLA in switch
-- What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13072 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Bug#217966: testsuite failures in the lapack testsuite on ia64, arm and m68k
[ see http://bugs.debian.org/217966 ] Camm, we won't get any further with the granularity of this report. Please could you investigate using gcc-3.4 (gcc-snapshot) and compare the test results? Thanks, Matthias
Bug#216225: marked as done (Bug in g++ 3.3.2)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:13:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216225: Bug in g++ 3.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2003 11:48:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 06:48:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 230.red-80-26-45.pooles.rima-tde.net (nerthus.mepreocupa.com)
[80.26.45.230]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AAT6E-0006fn-00; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:48:54 -0500
Received: from bs29.bluesock.net (30.Red-80-25-129.pooles.rima-tde.net
[80.25.129.30])
by nerthus.mepreocupa.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
h9HBnZ7h024442
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:49:37 +0200
Subject: Bug in g++ 3.3.2
From: Pablo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-xZxLMcn9BW2tgKbXz1nC"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0
Date: 17 Oct 2003 13:48:57 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,OFFERS_ETC
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--=-xZxLMcn9BW2tgKbXz1nC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by nerthus.mepreocupa.com
id h9HBnZ7h024442
Package: g++
Version: 3.3.2 20031005 Debian pre-release
We had a syntax error in a class definition in the .h which wasn't
reported by the GNU C++ compiler. I attach the header and the source
files.
Note line the header file, at line 45.
Thanks,
Pablo Fern=C3=A1ndez.
--=-xZxLMcn9BW2tgKbXz1nC
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bslproductinsertwidget.cpp
Content-Type: text/x-c++; name=bslproductinsertwidget.cpp; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by nerthus.mepreocupa.com
id h9HBnZ7h024442
/=
***
bslproductinsertwidget.cpp - description
---
begin: jue oct 16 2003
copyright: (C) 2003 by BSTeam
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
***/
/=
***
* =
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify=
*
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by=
*
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or =
*
* (at your option) any later version. =
*
* =
*
=
***/
#include "bslproductinsertwidget.h"
#include "../../productsmodule/productmodule.h"
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
namespace std{};
using namespace std;
//const QCString& FINGERPRINT_DCOP_MODULE =3D "dcopfx2000";
const int PRODUCT_PROPERTIES_STACK =3D 0;
const int PRODUCT_COMPOSTION_STACK =3D 1;
const int PRODUCT_OPTIONS_PAGE =3D 0;
const int PRODUCT_OFFERS_PAGE =3D 1;
const QString INSERT_PRODUCT =3D "A=F1adir Producto";
const QString INSERT_COMPOSITION =3D "A=F1adir Combinaci=F3n";
const QString UPDATE_PRODUCT =3D "Modificar Producto";
const QString UPDATE_COMPOSITION =3D "Modificar Combinaci=F3n";
const QString DELETE_PRODUCT =3D "Borrar Producto";
const QString DELETE_COMPOSITION =3D "Borrar Combinaci=F3n";
#define SIZE_ICON 32.00
const QString action =3D "A=F1adir Combinaci=F3n";
BslProductInsertWidget::BslProductInsertWidget(QString _action, ProductMo=
dule *_product_mod,
=
QWidget *parent, const char *name):
ProductInsertWidget(parent,name
Bug#192271: marked as done (gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2003 11:02:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 07 06:02:48 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p50831a97.dip.t-dialin.net (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org)
[80.131.26.151] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19DMhD-0004GE-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 06:02:48 -0500
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 94DD97423F; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:02:35 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.5
Severity: important
built packages versions are incorrect if gcc-defaults is built with nmu
versioning
| $ echo "Version: 1.5" | awk -F. '/^Version:/ {print $NF}'
| 5
| $ echo "Version: 1.5.1" | awk -F. '/^Version:/ {print $NF}'
| 1
bastian
--
What kind of love is that? Not to be loved; never to have shown love.
-- Commissioner Nancy Hedford, "Metamorphosis",
stardate 3219.8
---
Received: (at 192271-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 20:16:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 14:16:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALTK4-cG-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:16:40 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01430
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:46 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGKFjmo026789;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
won't fix this, there are plenty of gcc maintainers, who can do
regular uploads.
Bug#187599: marked as done (Cannot subtract from streampos)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:11:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug: Cannot subtract from streampos
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2003 15:15:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 04 09:15:29 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 191Sue-0005Io-00; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 09:15:29 -0600
Received: from liacs.nl ([132.229.137.201])
by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h34FFR4Y029399
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:15:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:15:22 +0200
From: Bart Samwel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327
Debian/1.3-4
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot subtract from streampos
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: g++
Version: 3.2.3-20030331
If I have the following code:
#include
int foo()
{
std::streampos pos;
pos - 1;
}
When I compile this with "g++ -Wall test.cc", this gives me:
test.cc: In function `int foo()':
test.cc:6: ISO C++ says that `std::fpos<_StateT>
std::fpos<_StateT>::operator-(long int) [with _StateT = mbstate_t]'
and `
operator-' are ambiguous even though the worst conversion for the
former is
better than the worst conversion for the latter
I think this means that there are both a global operator- and a member
operator- defined for std::fpos<_StateT>. I can work around this (I can
do pos -= 1 and afterwards pos += 1), but I'd much rather be able to
simply subtract from the streampos.
---
Received: (at 187599-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 20:17:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 14:17:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALTKs-cG-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:17:30 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA00554;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:11:41 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGKBeie026293;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:11:40 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:11:40 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug: Cannot subtract from streampos
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
[ok, re-found this (german) message in my mailbox, trying to translate
it ... and closing the report]
g++-3.4 reports:
bug-187599.cc: In function `int foo()':
bug-187599.cc:6: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator-' in 'pos - 1'=
/usr/include/c++/3.4/bits/postypes.h:236: note: candidates are: std::fp=
os<_StateT> std::fpos<_StateT>::operator-(const std::streamoff&) const =
[with _StateT =3D mbstate_t]
/usr/include/c++/3.4/bits/postypes.h:248: note: std::st=
reamoff std::fpos<_StateT>::operator-(const std::fpos<_StateT>&) const =
[with _StateT =3D mbstate_t]
There exists a conversion from streampos to streamoff, so that the
expression can be interpreted as
=09(streamoff)pos - 1
or
=09pos.operator-(1)
In both cases conversions are used (from streampos to streamoff, and
from int to long). The ambiguouity can be resolved be writing
=09pos - 1L
Martin wrote:
> Kein Bug (glaube ich). Ich glaube (ohne es noch mal kontrolliert
> zu haben), dass ISO C++ diese Operation tats=E4
Processed: tagging gcc report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 187564 + upstream Bug#187564: [PR 10692] [m68k] wrong code compiling perl_5.8.0-17 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: tagging g77 report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 217966 + upstream Bug#217966: lapack: Fails selftests and builds useless libs (it claims) There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: merge gcc reports (-mieee on alpha)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 210598 gcc-3.3 Bug#210598: libc6.1: Operations on subnormal floating-point numbers generate a floating point exception Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `gcc-3.3'. > merge 210598 212912 Bug#210598: libc6.1: Operations on subnormal floating-point numbers generate a floating point exception Bug#212912: gcc-3.3: [alpha] Linux linker/loader does not support -mieee-conformant Merged 210598 212912. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#216616: marked as done (gcc-3.2: floating point problem with athlon thunderbird)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:40:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216616: gcc-3.2: floating point problem with athlon
thunderbird
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2003 23:51:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 19 18:51:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.libertysurf.net [213.36.80.91]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ABNKK-000835-00; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:51:12 -0500
Received: from argos.server.maison (212.129.22.46) by mail.libertysurf.net
(6.5.026)
id 3F8D6D760075518B; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:49:59 +0200
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1ABNKS-000252-00; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:51:20 +0200
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:51:19 +0200
From: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.2: floating point problem with athlon thunderbird
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.34
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-8
Severity: normal
I am not used to go this deep in code, i would appreciate any critisicm
regarding this report and the time you use on it.i If you think this
have nothing to do with gcc , i d be happy with this being reassigned to
the proper maintenair.
Is it ok that double operators give diferents results with athlon
TB than with other processors ?
Following some mozilla debugging i ended on a "if (10*double)" test in a
while statement.
The test work with the same binary under Athlon XP/Pentium porcessors but not
with Athlon Thunderbird.
I isolated the whole conditional test in a file:
mozjstest.c: the bad behaviour appear for testlimit >=5
using print or a temporary variable round the d value correctly and
fix the problem, i found out the wrong values with gdb print.
to have the bug as in mozilla i multiplied d by 10 (as the mozilla
code do) , then even print is not able to round d value correctly
(why on athlon TB only ?).
extract from the real mozilla code (cf bug #203100):
d, ds are double; L a long
L = (Long) (d / ds);
d -= L*ds;
on athlon "d - d != 0" (especially d -= L*ds) though it is on other
processors (still same binary)
the loop is ended by:
if (!(d *= 10.))
break;
and d never equals 0
Alban
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux argos 2.6.0-test8 #12 Sun Oct 19 04:44:52 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages gcc-3.2 depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.6-3 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.21:3.2.3-8 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-8 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc11:3.3.2-0pre5 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: text/x-csrc; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mozjstest.c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
#include
// d is calculated through my use of he c temp double to fix the rounding=
error
// dold does exactly what the code in gecko does
// note that d/dold are tested in gecko as the breaking condition after b=
eing multiplied by ten.
// i set L as long (on my platform it s equal to uint32 whiwh is the Long=
type used by mozilla
int main(){
// those values are those i got from my instance of mozilla
double d=3D500034.;
double dold=3D500034.;
double ds=3D10.;
long L;
double c;
int testlimit =3D 6;
int i =3D 1;
=20
for(i=3D1;iFrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 15:41:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.14
Bug#216105: Bug #216105: Using streambuf / iostream to read from a named pipe
Please could you recheck with the current g++ (g++-3.3) from the testing/unstable distribution?
Bug#182795: marked as done (gcc-3.2: mpqc build fails on MIPS with 'Branch out of range' error)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:58:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed with current versions from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 23:01:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 27 17:01:13 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.65.60] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18oX1d-0006Ta-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:01:13 -0600 Received: (qmail 6025 invoked by uid 0); 27 Feb 2003 23:00:41 - Received: from v23.vpn.lrz-muenchen.de (HELO blackbird.oase.mhn.de) (129.187.48.23) by mail.gmx.net (mp004-rz3) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 23:00:41 - Received: from mbanck by blackbird.oase.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18oX11-0006q6-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:35 +0100 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:35 +0100 From: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.2: mpqc build fails on MIPS with 'Branch out of range' error Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre2 Severity: normal Hi, compiling mpqc on MIPS results in this error: /usr/bin/gcc-3.2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_REENTRANT -I../../../../../src/lib -I/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/include -I/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/src/lib -O0 -Wall -c /build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/src/lib/chemistry/qc/dft/lebedev.c -o lebedev.o /tmp/ccIsYgSV.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccIsYgSV.s:361: Error: Branch out of range /tmp/ccIsYgSV.s:366: Error: Branch out of range [...] /tmp/ccIsYgSV.s:19541: Error: Branch out of range /tmp/ccIsYgSV.s:22425: Error: Branch out of range make[6]: *** [lebedev.o] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/build-static/src/lib/chemistry/qc/dft' make[5]: *** [default] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/build-static/src/lib/chemistry/qc' make[4]: *** [default] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/build-static/src/lib/chemistry' make[3]: *** [default] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/build-static/src/lib' make[2]: *** [default] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/build-static/src' make[1]: *** [default] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mpqc-2.1.3/build-static' make: *** [build-static-stamp] Error 2 see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mpqc&ver=2.1.3-2&arch=mipsel&; \ stamp=104604&file=log&as=raw for the full buildd log. This error also occured on gcc-2.95, I did not file it earlier because I was hoping that it might be gone in gcc-3.2. The first builds in early 2002 were done with -O and then with -O0 afterwards. You can get the source file at http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/lebedev.c thanks, Michael --- Received: (at 182795-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 22:01:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 16:01:43 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ALUxi-0004xY-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:01:42 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA17085 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:58:03 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGLw2w2013992; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:58:02 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:58:02 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed with current versions from unstable X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none version=2
Bug#213497: marked as done ([fixed in 3.x] kernel-source-2.4.22 does not build (configured for CONFIG_OPTIMISE_SIZE))
Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:15:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2003 21:07:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 30 16:07:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ridcully.inittab.de [213.146.113.136]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A4RiR-0003uQ-00; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:07:27 -0500
Received: from rollcage.inittab.de (rollcage.inittab.de [192.168.1.2])
by ridcully.inittab.de (Postfix) with SMTP
id EF59E177CA; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:07:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 1944 invoked by uid 1000);
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:07:25 -
From: Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-source-2.4.22: doesn't build on woody
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:07:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kernel-source-2.4.22
Version: N/A; reported 2003-09-30
Severity: normal
I get the following error, maybe a gcc related problem:
gcc -D__KERNEL__
-I/home/tretkowski/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386-2.4.22/build-386/include
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Os
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -nostdinc
-iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=filemap -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c filemap.c
filemap.c: In function `sys_sendfile64':
filemap.c:1882: Internal compiler error:
filemap.c:1882: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
(insn 358 449 367 (set (reg/v:SI 5 %edi)
(asm_operands/v ("1:movl %%eax,0(%2)
2: movl %%edx,4(%2)
3:
.section .fixup,"ax"
4: movl %3,%0
jmp 3b
.previous
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,4b
.long 2b,4b
.previous") ("=r") 0[
(reg:DI 1 %edx)
(reg:SI 4 %esi)
(const_int -14 [0xfff2])
(reg/v:SI 5 %edi)
]
[
(asm_input:DI ("A"))
(asm_input:SI ("r"))
(asm_input:SI ("i"))
(asm_input:SI ("0"))
] ("filemap.c") 1880)) -1 (insn_list 333 (insn_list 357 (nil)))
(nil))
cpp0: output pipe has been closed
make[4]: *** [filemap.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/tretkowski/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386-2.4.22/build-386/mm'
make[3]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/tretkowski/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386-2.4.22/build-386/mm'
make[2]: *** [_dir_mm] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/tretkowski/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386-2.4.22/build-386'
make[1]: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/tretkowski/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386/kernel-image-2.4.22-i386-2.4.22/build-386'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rollcage 2.4.22-ac4 #3 Fri Sep 26 21:53:42 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
---
Received: (at 213497-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 22:16:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 16:16:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALVCE-0007iF-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:16:42 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA19416
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:15:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGMFCQB020481;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:15:12 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:15:12 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Results for 3.4 20031116 (experimental) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 16 11:24:54 UTC 2003 === acats tests === FAIL: c34005a FAIL: c34005d FAIL: c34005g FAIL: c34005j FAIL: cc3601a FAIL: cxb3010 FAIL: cxb3014 FAIL: cxb3015 === acats Summary === # of expected passes2314 # of unexpected failures8 Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/ext/lvalue1.C not an lvalue (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 13) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 14) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 22) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 23) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/template/ptrmem7.C (test for errors, line 38) FAIL: g++.dg/template/ptrmem7.C (test for errors, line 39) FAIL: g++.dg/template/ptrmem7.C (test for errors, line 43) FAIL: g++.dg/template/ptrmem7.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5) WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable === g++ Summary === # of expected passes9116 # of unexpected failures12 # of unexpected successes 3 # of expected failures 59 # of unsupported tests 29 /build/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20031116/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.4 20031116 (experimental) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1752 # of expected failures 1 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 6 /build/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20031116/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.4 20031116 (experimental) === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c execution, -O0 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c execution, -O1 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c execution, -O2 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c execution, -O3 -g UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/wchar_t-1.c execution, -Os FAIL: gcc.dg/2003-1.c (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: gcc.dg/2003-1.c (test for errors, line 12) FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c scan-assembler-not L\\\$?C[^A-Z] === gcc Summary === # of expected passes24600 # of unexpected failures14 # of expected failures 79 # of unresolved testcases 6 # of untested testcases 7 # of unsupported tests 158 /build/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20031116/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.4 20031116 (experimental) === objc tests === Running target unix === objc Summary === # of expected passes1337 # of unsupported tests 7 /build/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20031116/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.4 20031116 (experimental) === treelang tests === Running target unix === treelang Summary === # of expected passes1 === libffi tests === Running target unix FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c output pattern test, is 12 178: 190 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c output pattern test, is 12 127 1 13: 13 140 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c output pattern test, is 12 13 14 178 179 180: 190 192 194 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 128 9 184: 255 129 185 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c output pattern test, is 127 120 1 128 128 32521 184 122: 255 32641 185 250 === libffi Summary === # of expected passes159 # of unexpected failures5 # of unsupported tests 2 === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: linking simple FAIL: /build/packages/gcc
Processed: reassign: gcc-2.95-doc -> gcc-doc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 153478 gcc-doc Bug#153478: Document refered to in info should be distrubuted with package. Bug reassigned from package `gcc-2.95-doc' to `gcc-doc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
[Bug c++/13080] 3.3 / 3.4
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 23:09 --- Some at debian messed up because this is exact dup of bug 12567 and even the same debain bug number, 195468. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12567 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13080 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug c++/12567] g++ fails to recognize ill-formed-ness of initilaizers
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 23:09 --- *** Bug 13080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12567 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Bug#206281: marked as done (gcc-3.3: unknown package failure, compile quits, constant error msgs)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:10:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing report, no feedback provided has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2003 22:02:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 19 17:02:43 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.deerfield.edu (MAIL2K.da.edu) [12.148.2.67] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19pEYt-00020w-00; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:02:43 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([12.27.190.213]) by MAIL2K.da.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:04:04 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sean Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.3: unknown package failure, compile quits, constant error msgs Bcc: Sean Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:04:26 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Aug 2003 22:04:05. (UTC) FILETIME=[CE16B880:01C3669D] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1 Severity: normal Tags: sid I've tried older versions of gcc, tried reinstalling, etc., to now avail. Here is the complete error message I get when trying to compile a kernel. It's quite long, but I get almost the same exact thing regardless of what I try to compile. In file included from /usr/include/_G_config.h:44, from /usr/include/libio.h:32, from /usr/include/stdio.h:72, from conmakehash.c:17: /usr/include/gconv.h:72: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/gconv.h:88: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/gconv.h:97: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/gconv.h:174: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/gconv.h:177: error: syntax error before '}' token In file included from /usr/include/libio.h:32, from /usr/include/stdio.h:72, from conmakehash.c:17: /usr/include/_G_config.h:47: error: field `__cd' has incomplete type /usr/include/_G_config.h:50: error: field `__cd' has incomplete type In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:72, from conmakehash.c:17: /usr/include/libio.h:350: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/libio.h:359: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/libio.h:467: error: syntax error before "_IO_sgetn" /usr/include/libio.h:467: error: syntax error before "size_t" In file included from conmakehash.c:17: /usr/include/stdio.h:302: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:309: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:351: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:355: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:600: error: syntax error before "fread" /usr/include/stdio.h:600: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:606: error: syntax error before "fwrite" /usr/include/stdio.h:606: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:628: error: syntax error before "fread_unlocked" /usr/include/stdio.h:628: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/include/stdio.h:630: error: syntax error before "fwrite_unlocked" /usr/include/stdio.h:630: error: syntax error before "size_t" In file included from conmakehash.c:18: /usr/include/stdlib.h:137: error: syntax error before "__ctype_get_mb_cur_max" In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:133, from /usr/include/stdlib.h:416, from conmakehash.c:18: /usr/local/include/time.h:10: error: syntax error before "time_t" /usr/local/include/time.h:12: error: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/include/time.h:89: error: syntax error before "time_t" /usr/local/include/time.h:120: error: field `it_interval' has incomplete type /usr/local/include/time.h:121: error: field `it_value' has incomplete type /usr/local/include/time.h:125: error: field `it_interval' has incomplete type /usr/local/include/time.h:126: error: field `it_value' has incomplete type In file in
[Bug c++/13080] 3.3 / 3.4
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-11-16 23:57 --- Subject: Re: 3.3 / 3.4 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 > 23:09 --- > Some at debian messed up because this is exact dup of bug 12567 and even the > same debain bug > number, 195468. :-( my mistake ... didn't mark it as forwarded in the Debian BTS. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13080 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug c++/13081] [3.3/3.4 regression] forward template declarations in let inlining fail
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-17 00:52 --- The problem is somehow related to having this line: template T foo(T); Confirmed on the mainline and 3.3.2. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|libstdc++ |c++ Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||pessimizes-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-11-17 00:52:07 date|| Summary|[3.3 regression] forward|[3.3/3.4 regression] forward |template declarations in|template declarations in | let inlining fail | let inlining fail Target Milestone|--- |3.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13081 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
