Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
tags 214694 + unreproducible thanks unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? xiphmont writes: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5 > Severity: grave > Tags: sid > Justification: renders package unusable > > I apologize for originally filing this against libc6-dev; I see > this is actually gcc-3.3. > > Summary: G++ is not finding any of its own include files. > > Sample ./configure output: > checking for ANSI C header files... no > checking for sys/types.h... no > checking for sys/stat.h... no > checking for stdlib.h... no > checking for string.h... no > checking for memory.h... no > checking for strings.h... no > checking for inttypes.h... no > checking for stdint.h... no > checking for unistd.h... no > checking for size_t... no > > configure.log command line for the failed ANSI headers check: > configure:4364: checking for ANSI C header files > configure:4378: g++ -E -I../lib-src/libid3tag -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk-2.4 > -DG > TK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES > conftest.cc > In file included from configure:4371: > /usr/include/stdlib.h:33:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:31, > from /usr/include/stdlib.h:416, > from configure:4371: > /usr/include/bits/types.h:31:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:416, > from configure:4371: > /usr/include/sys/types.h:147:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:578, > from configure:4371: > /usr/include/alloca.h:25:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory > configure:4372:20: stdarg.h: No such file or directory > In file included from configure:4373: > /usr/include/string.h:33:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory > configure:4374:19: float.h: No such file or directory > configure:4384: $? = 1 > configure: failed program was: > #line 4370 "configure" > #include "confdefs.h" > #include > #include > #include > #include > > configure:4492: result: no > > Obviously this affects any attempt to use g++. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Architecture: i386 > Kernel: Linux Snotfish 2.4.21+preempt+lowlat #12 SMP Mon Aug 18 19:56:50 EDT > 2003 i686 > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C > > Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on: > ii binutils 2.14.90.0.4-0.1 The GNU assembler, linker and > bina > ii cpp-3.3 1:3.3.2-0pre5 The GNU C preprocessor > ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.2-0pre5 The GNU Compiler Collection > (base > ii libc62.3.2-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries > an > ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-0pre1 GCC support library > > -- no debconf information > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 214694 + unreproducible > thanks > > unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had removed/moved them). I'd have thought the wrappers would prevent this problem, but perhaps not and this is a simple missed dependency problem. apt-get install g++-3.3 brought things inline and g++ works now so I can no longer offer what was in confdefs.h :-( In any case, this is now very clearly not a grave bug. Monty
Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote: > I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew > problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the > problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had > removed/moved them). I'd have thought the wrappers would prevent this > problem, but perhaps not and this is a simple missed dependency problem. The wrappers neither contain nor generate the default include paths. -- Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. - Brian W. Kernighan
Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > reassign 214692 g++-3.3 > reassign 214694 g++-3.3 > severity 214692 normal > severity 214694 normal > merge 214692 214694 > retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2) > thanks ...is there any way to cause a gcc 3.3.2 upgrade to force a g++ 3.3.2 upgrade as well (but only if g++ 3.3 is installed) as that is what actually bit me? (ie, upgrading gcc did not upgrade g++, and thus g++ broke) Monty
Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
reassign 214692 g++-3.3 reassign 214694 g++-3.3 severity 214692 normal severity 214694 normal merge 214692 214694 retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2) thanks xiphmont writes: > > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > tags 214694 + unreproducible > > thanks > > > > unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? > > I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew > problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the > problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had > removed/moved them). I'd have thought the wrappers would prevent this > problem, but perhaps not and this is a simple missed dependency problem. > > apt-get install g++-3.3 brought things inline and g++ works now so I > can no longer offer what was in confdefs.h :-( > > In any case, this is now very clearly not a grave bug. > > Monty
Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
xiphmont writes: > ...is there any way to cause a gcc 3.3.2 upgrade to force a g++ 3.3.2 > upgrade as well (but only if g++ 3.3 is installed) as that is what > actually bit me? (ie, upgrading gcc did not upgrade g++, and thus g++ broke) g++-3.3 depends on gcc-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.2), so apt-get should already handle this.
Processed: Re: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 214692 g++-3.3 Bug#214692: libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to moved/non-existent headers Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 214694 g++-3.3 Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `g++-3.3'. > severity 214692 normal Bug#214692: libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to moved/non-existent headers Severity set to `normal'. > severity 214694 normal Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes Severity set to `normal'. > merge 214692 214694 Bug#214692: libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to moved/non-existent headers Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `done mark' don't match: #214692 has `done'; #214694 has `open' > retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2) Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
[Bug fortran/11522] [3.3/3.4 Regression] g77 dwarf-2 ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11522 --- Additional Comments From arobb at mva dot co dot uk 2003-10-08 08:20 --- I do not understand what this has to do with STRING(K:K) not being recognized as a single character for assignment [Bug fortran/12456] --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Bug#214694: gcc-3.3 should conflict with g++-3.3 (<< 3.3.2)
Unless I'm totally misreading the bug, the problem is gcc needs to conflict with g++ versions that are incompatable with it. Shouldn't this be reopened and reassigned to gcc? -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
[Bug fortran/11522] [3.3/3.4 Regression] g77 dwarf-2 ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11522 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-08 15:12 --- Just a note that the bug which had been marked as dup of this one which dealt with STRING(K:K) was not a dup of this bug but a user error of marking as a dup, it has now been reopened already. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Results for 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 5 17:32:22 UTC 2003 Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: calls run FAIL: cxxtest run FAIL: field run FAIL: final_method run FAIL: findclass run FAIL: invoke run FAIL: martin run FAIL: noclass run FAIL: overload run FAIL: register run FAIL: simple_int run FAIL: throwit run FAIL: virtual run FAIL: InvokeReturn output - source compiled test FAIL: InvokeReturn output - bytecode->native test FAIL: InvokeReturn -O output - source compiled test FAIL: InvokeReturn -O output - bytecode->native test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest -O execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: TestProxy execution - source compiled test FAIL: TestProxy execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: TestProxy -O execution - source compiled test FAIL: TestProxy -O execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: Thread_Interrupt -O output - bytecode->native test FAIL: /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestEarlyGC.exe output - /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestEarlyGC.exe FAIL: /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestLeak.exe execution - /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestLeak.exe FAIL: /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestMultiple.exe execution - /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestMultiple.exe FAIL: /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestParent.exe execution - /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/arm-linux/libjava/testsuite/TestParent.exe === libjava Summary === # of expected passes2414 # of unexpected failures28 # of expected failures 16 # of untested testcases 34 === libstdc++-v3 tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_wchar_t.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/members.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/messages_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/messages_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: thread/pthread2.cc execution test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: thread/pthread5.cc execution test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: thread/pthread6.cc execution test === libstdc++-v3 Summary === # of expected passes450 # of unexpected failures3 # of unexpected successes 14 # of expected failures 14 === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6) FAIL: g++.dg/abi/vbase10.C (test for warnings, line 6) XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test FAIL: 258: expected branch percentages not found: 25 FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 0 failures in line counts, 1 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8074 # of unexpected failures4 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 94 # of untested testcases 23 # of unsupported tests 28 /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian prerelease) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1686 # of unsupported tests 8 /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.2ds3/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian prerelease) === gcc tests === Running target unix WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O1 WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O2 WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -g XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation, -O1 XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation, -O2 XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation, -O3 -g XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c compilation, -Os FAIL: gcc.dg/20021014-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/duff-2.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/nest.c exe
[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-09 01:41 --- Does this still happen with lastest compilers? --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.4 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug target/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.4 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
