Bug#161238: marked as done (gcc-2.95-doc: links to gcc.info from gdb info page are broken)

2003-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:23:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed by the introduction of the gcc-doc package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2002 20:56:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 17 15:56:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from grande.dcc.unicamp.br [143.106.7.8] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17rPOP-0002xk-00; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:56:21 -0500
Received: from aracaju.ic.unicamp.br (aracaju.ic.unicamp.br [143.106.7.27])
by grande.dcc.unicamp.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06312
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:56:17 -0300 (EST)
Received: from pinheiros.dcc.unicamp.br (pinheiros.dcc.unicamp.br [143.106.7.3])
by aracaju.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HKtnj05408
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:55:49 -0300
Received: from localhost by pinheiros.dcc.unicamp.br (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP 
id g8HKu0K05406
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:56:00 -0300 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pinheiros.dcc.unicamp.br: massia owned process doing 
-bs
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:56:00 -0300 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-2.95-doc: links to gcc.info from gdb info page are broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gcc-2.95-doc
Version: 1:2.95.4-7
Severity: normal


Some gdb info pages refer to gcc. Info tries to find gcc.info.gz but the
files installed are gcc-2.95.info.gz.

For instance, try the gdb page that talks about the gcc support to gdb
(maybe a search for "gstabs" will show the page).

It's hard for me to figure out a solution. We need a solution that allows
many versions of gcc-xxx.info installed. The best way would be if info asked
about which version of gcc to show.

In my machine, I did symlinks from gcc to gcc-2.95 and "solved" the problem,
like this:

# cd /usr/share/info
# for i in gcc-2.95.* ; do ln -s $i `echo $i | sed 's/-2.95//g'` ; done


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux felipe 2.4.18-k6 #1 Sun Apr 14 12:43:22 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=



---
Received: (at 161238-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2003 08:24:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 05 03:24:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A64BM-0004oq-00; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 03:24:00 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA25808
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:23:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id h958N7e1025542;
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:23:07 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:23:07 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed by the introduction of the gcc-doc package
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

fixed by the introduction of the gcc-doc package




Processed: tagging gcc-2.95 reprot

2003-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 213497 [fixed in 3.x] kernel-source-2.4.22 does not build (configured 
> for CONFIG_OPTIMISE_SIZE)
Bug#213497: kernel-source-2.4.22: doesn't build on woody
Changed Bug title.

> tags 213497 + upstream
Bug#213497: [fixed in 3.x] kernel-source-2.4.22 does not build (configured for 
CONFIG_OPTIMISE_SIZE)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> tags 213497 + wontfix
Bug#213497: [fixed in 3.x] kernel-source-2.4.22 does not build (configured for 
CONFIG_OPTIMISE_SIZE)
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Bug#213618: marked as done (gcc-3.3-doc: "info gcc" brings up internals docs, not user docs)

2003-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:33:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213618: gcc-3.3-doc: "info gcc" brings up internals docs, 
not user docs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2003 15:20:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 01 10:20:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h00a0cc5ad757.ne.client2.attbi.com (techloaner2.idiomtech.com) 
[65.96.178.14] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A4im1-0002Sb-00; Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:20:17 -0500
Received: from pimlott by techloaner2.idiomtech.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1A4jdP-0006Wp-00; Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:15:27 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.3-doc: "info gcc" brings up internals docs, not user docs
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:15:26 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gcc-3.3-doc
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4
Severity: minor


It's intuitive for "info gcc" to document use of the compiler, but the
stand-along info reader finds gccint-3.3 in preference to gcc-3.3.  I
don't know what the rules are for finding info files, but it would be
nice to arrange for gcc-3.3 to take precedence.

Andrew

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux techloaner2 2.4.21-techloaner2+ipsec #1 Sun Jun 22 12:12:48 EDT 
2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages gcc-3.3-doc depends on:
ii  gcc-3.3-base   1:3.3.2-0pre4 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 213618-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2003 08:34:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 05 03:34:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A64L6-0006Fw-00; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 03:34:04 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26477;
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:33:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id h958XT5Q026349;
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:33:29 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:33:29 +0200
To: Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#213618: gcc-3.3-doc: "info gcc" brings up internals docs, not 
user docs
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Andrew Pimlott writes:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:26:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > or install the gcc-doc package.
> 
> Oh.  Oh.  I didn't realize that /usr/bin/gcc was managed by gcc
> instead of alternatives.  With this setup, I see that it is easy to
> solve the problem by installing gcc-doc.  However, if gcc were
> managed by alternatives, then this solution wouldn't be possible.
> Ie, info isn't compatible with alternatives.  Oh well.

the gcc link isn't managed by update-alternatives.




[Bug optimization/12223] [3.3.2 regression] Compiler generates infinite loop

2003-10-05 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12223


mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-05 
19:54 ---
Fixed in GCC 3.3.2.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




gcc-3.3_3.3.2ds3-0pre5_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-10-05 Thread Debian Installer

Rejected: gcc-3.3_3.3.2ds3-0pre5.dsc refers to gcc-3.3_3.3.2ds3.orig.tar.gz, 
but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool.


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.




gcc-snapshot_20031005-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-10-05 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20031005-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031005-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20031005-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031005-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20031005-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031005-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot_20031005.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20031005.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.