Bug#196505: g++-3.2: /usr/share/man/man1/i386-linux-g++-3.2.1 is a dangling symlink
Package: g++-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-4 Severity: minor Tags: sid After deleting the g++-3.3 dangling symlink, I'm getting: /etc/cron.daily/man-db: mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/i386-linux-g++-3.2.1 is a dangling symlink -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux quaff 2.4.20q11 #1 Wed May 21 22:41:11 PDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages g++-3.2 depends on: ii gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3-4 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-4 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++5-dev1:3.2.3-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d -- no debconf information
Bug#159838: [Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-07 23:21 --- The debug info contains x at line 1 so it looks like it is a ld (binutils bug) misreading the debug info: <1><78>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_variable) DW_AT_name: x DW_AT_decl_file : 1 DW_AT_decl_line : 1 DW_AT_type: <88> DW_AT_external: 1 DW_AT_location: 5 byte block: 3 0 0 0 0(DW_OP_addr: 0) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] GCC build triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-08 03:02 --- Jim, thanks for looking at this. Just one quick question, when compiling the testcase without optimization, gcc gives the following error: junk.i: In function `schedule': junk.i:77: error: can't find a register in class `GENERAL_REGS' while reloading `asm' Is this a bug in the testcase or gcc? Thanks, Dara --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
