Bug#191684: libstdc++5 3.3 breaks optimized binaries compiled with g++ 3.2
Michael Babcock writes: > After upgrading libstdc++5 from the 3.2 version to the 3.3 version, my > c++ binaries started to segfault. I traced the problem to this test > case: [...] > Compile this with g++-3.2 -O3 -finline-limit=1000 and running it will > segfault. The same binary will work using the 3.2 > libstdc++5. Compiling without optimization also works, as does > compiling with g++-3.3. However I believe it is important to maintain > binary compatibility in libstdc++5 with all the c++ code compiled with > g++ 3.2. Please can you recheck with the package from http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3/ "It works for me"... Matthias
gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2_hppa.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb libstdc++5-dbg_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-dbg_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb libstdc++5-dev_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-dev_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb libstdc++5-pic_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-pic_3.2.3-2_hppa.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libgcj3-dev_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3-dev_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libgcj3_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libstdc++5-dbg_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-dbg_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libstdc++5-dev_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-dev_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libstdc++5-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb libstdc++5-pic_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libstdc++5-pic_3.2.3-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 186233 190964 191008 191607 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#191607: marked as done (libstdc++5-dbg: Actual library missing from package)
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191607: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2003 06:12:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 02 01:12:42 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ns.hegbloom.net (bittersweet.hegbloom.net) [63.105.27.231] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19BTmj-0008Ka-00; Fri, 02 May 2003 01:12:41 -0500 Received: from journeyhawk (journeyhawk.intra.hegbloom.net [192.168.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by bittersweet.hegbloom.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) with ESMTP id h426Cewn026714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 1 May 2003 23:12:40 -0700 Received: from karlheg by journeyhawk with local (Exim 4.14) id 19BTmh-Tg-FT; Thu, 01 May 2003 23:12:39 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libstdc++5-dbg: Actual library missing from package X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 23:12:39 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libstdc++5-dbg Version: 1:3.2.3-1 Severity: normal The actual debugging library seems to be missing from this package. dpkg --listfiles libstdc++5-dbg /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/lintian /usr/share/lintian/overrides /usr/share/lintian/overrides/libstdc++5-dbg /usr/lib /usr/lib/debug /usr/share/doc/libstdc++5-dbg -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux journeyhawk 2.4.20 #1 Sat Apr 26 23:25:30 PDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set) Versions of packages libstdc++5-dbg depends on: ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libstdc++5 1:3.3-0pre5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstdc++5-dev 1:3.2.3-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 191607-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2003 20:08:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 03 15:08:26 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19C3J4-0001n1-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 15:08:26 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19C3GR-0007yd-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#191607: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gobjc
Bug#191008: marked as done (hurd-i386 should use /usr/include, not /include)
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191008: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2003 23:32:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 27 18:32:42 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from delta.nisa.net [207.194.212.31] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 199vdR-0001fM-00; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:32:42 -0500 Received: from delta.nisa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by delta.nisa.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) with ESMTP id h3RNWcYB022142 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:38 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by delta.nisa.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) id h3RNWc7f022140 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:38 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: delta.nisa.net: jbailey set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:38 -0700 From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hurd-i386 should use /usr/include, not /include Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-20.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,USER_AGENT_MUTT, X_AUTH_WARNING autolearn=ham version=2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc-3.2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Traditional GNU systems don't have a /usr directory. However, Debian systems do, and we support both having a /usr -> . symlink, and having a /usr directory like the other ports. So this patch should NOT go upstream. --- gcc/config/t-gnu.old2003-04-27 15:01:15.0 -0400 +++ gcc/config/t-gnu2003-04-27 15:01:48.0 -0400 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ # In GNU, "/usr" is a four-letter word. -SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR = /include +# Overridden for Debian GNU/Hurd (hurd-i386) +SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR = /usr/include -- You said homosexuals form a small percentage of the population. So do Jews. Is that a reason to deny someone equality? - Richard Marceau --- Received: (at 191008-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2003 20:09:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 03 15:09:08 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19C3Jk-0001xv-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 15:09:08 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19C3GR-0007yb-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#191008: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gnat-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gobjc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libgcj3-dev_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/libgcj3-dev_3.2.3-2_i386.deb libgcj3_3.2.3-2_i38
Bug#190964: marked as done (gcc-3.2: No .mo files included in the package?)
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#190964: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2003 15:09:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 27 10:09:50 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp030.tiscali.dk [212.54.64.105] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 199nmm-0005bN-00; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:09:48 -0500 Received: from bach.composers (68.ppp1-6.hob.worldonline.dk [212.54.87.196] (may be forged)) by smtp030.tiscali.dk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3RF9bsv006831; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:09:44 +0200 (MEST) Received: from ole by bach.composers with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 199k6K-Ox-00; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:13:44 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ole Laursen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.2: No .mo files included in the package? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:13:42 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ole Laursen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp030.tiscali.dk id h3RF9bsv006831 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9 Severity: normal Some people have spent quite a lot of time translating GCC messages into other languages (yeah, I happen to be one of them). But these translation .mo files don't seem to be included in any of the Debian packages. I don't know if that is a problem with upstream not including them, but anyway the latest files are available here: http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard/po/registry.cgi?domain=3Dgcc =20 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bach 2.4.20 #2 s=F8n mar 9 13:04:42 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=3Dda_DK.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=3Dda_DK.ISO-8859-1 Versions of packages gcc-3.2 depends on: ii binutils2.13.90.0.18-1.7 The GNU assembler, linker an= d bina ii cpp-3.2 1:3.2.3-0pre9The GNU C preprocessor ii gcc-3.2-base1:3.2.3-0pre9The GNU Compiler Collection = (base=20 ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared librar= ies an ii libgcc1 1:3.3-0pre5 GCC support library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 190964-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2003 20:08:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 03 15:08:28 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19C3J4-0001nE-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 15:08:26 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19C3GR-0007yZ-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#190964: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.diff.gz gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-2.dsc gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcj-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gij-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386
Bug#186233: marked as done (gcc-3.2: Internal error: Killed (program gnat1) when compiling an ada file)
Your message dated Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186233: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2003 13:31:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 07:31:14 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.41] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18xoWG-0007ln-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:31:12 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223F14B549; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:30:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from crassus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (crassus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.63]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73404B542; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:30:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from hades (hades.kotnet.org [10.4.15.235]) by crassus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4DF13EC08; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:30:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from pieter by hades with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18xoVp-dD-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:30:45 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Pieter Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.2: Internal error: Killed (program gnat1) when compiling an ada file X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:30:44 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Pieter Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 Severity: normal When building the file trans_parser.adb (found in the following zip : ftp://ftp.usafa.af.mil/pub/dfcs/fagin/AdaMindstormsSource.zip)with the command: gnat compile trans_parser.adb I get the following output gcc-3.2: Internal error: Killed (program gnat1) Please submit a full bug report. See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bugs, please see /usr/share/doc/debian/bug-reporting.txt. ftp://ftp.usafa.af.mil/pub/dfcs/fagin/AdaMindstormsSource.zip -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux hades 2.4.20 #1 Sat Dec 28 17:02:29 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcc-3.2 depends on: ii binutils 2.13.90.0.10-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-3.2 1:3.2.3-0pre6 The GNU C preprocessor ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-0pre6 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.2.3-0pre6 GCC support library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 186233-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2003 20:08:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 03 15:08:29 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19C3J7-0001nQ-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 15:08:29 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19C3GR-0007yX-00; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#186233: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gcc-3.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-2_i386.deb gcc-3.2-doc_3.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/gcc-
Results for 3.2.3 testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes7345 # of unexpected successes 5 # of expected failures 88 # of untested testcases 23 # of unsupported tests 6 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.2.3 === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1458 # of unsupported tests 8 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.2.3 === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O0 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O1 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O2 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -O3 -g UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c compilation, -Os UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c execution, -Os FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand.c execution, -Os FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c execution, -Os FAIL: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-names.c (test for excess errors) === gcc Summary === # of expected passes18805 # of unexpected failures26 # of expected failures 74 # of unresolved testcases 8 # of unsupported tests 128 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.2.3 === objc tests === Running target unix === objc Summary === # of expected passes1035 # of expected failures 6 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.2.3 === libstdc++-v3 tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/ctype_is_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/members.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/messages_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/messages_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_char.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test FAIL: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) === libstdc++-v3 Summary === # of expected passes432 # of unexpected failures1 # of un
Results for 3.2.3 testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes7378 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 88 # of untested testcases 9 # of unsupported tests 3 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.2.3 === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1458 # of unsupported tests 8 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.2.3 === gcc tests === Running target unix === gcc Summary === # of expected passes19029 # of expected failures 68 # of unsupported tests 48 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.2.3 === objc tests === Running target unix === objc Summary === # of expected passes1035 # of expected failures 6 /build/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/xgcc version 3.2.3 === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: ArrayClass compilation from source FAIL: ArrayClass compilation from bytecode FAIL: ArrayClass -O compilation from source FAIL: ArrayClass -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: Case compilation from source FAIL: Case compilation from bytecode FAIL: Case -O compilation from source FAIL: Case -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990210_1 compilation from source FAIL: G19990210_1 compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990210_1 -O compilation from source FAIL: G19990210_1 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990210_2 compilation from source FAIL: G19990210_2 compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990210_2 -O compilation from source FAIL: G19990210_2 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990210_3 compilation from source FAIL: G19990210_3 compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990210_3 -O compilation from source FAIL: G19990210_3 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990217_01 compilation from source FAIL: G19990217_01 compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990217_01 -O compilation from source FAIL: G19990217_01 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990217_02 compilation from source FAIL: G19990217_02 compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990217_02 -O compilation from source FAIL: G19990217_02 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990225_01 compilation from source FAIL: G19990225_01 compilation from bytecode FAIL: G19990225_01 -O compilation from source FAIL: G19990225_01 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: N19990310_01 compilation from source FAIL: N19990310_01 compilation from bytecode FAIL: N19990310_01 -O compilation from source FAIL: N19990310_01 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: N19990317 compilation from source FAIL: N19990317 compilation from bytecode FAIL: N19990317 -O compilation from source FAIL: N19990317 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: OperatorBenchmark compilation from source FAIL: OperatorBenchmark compilation from bytecode FAIL: OperatorBenchmark -O compilation from source FAIL: OperatorBenchmark -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR129_B compilation from source FAIL: PR129_B compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR129_B -O compilation from source FAIL: PR129_B -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR206 compilation from source FAIL: PR206 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR206 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR206 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR207 compilation from source FAIL: PR207 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR207 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR207 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR208 compilation from source FAIL: PR208 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR208 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR208 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR209 compilation from source FAIL: PR209 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR209 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR209 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR232 compilation from source FAIL: PR232 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR232 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR232 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR232B compilation from source FAIL: PR232B compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR232B -O compilation from source FAIL: PR232B -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR234 compilation from source FAIL: PR234 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR234 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR234 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR235 compilation from source FAIL: PR235 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR235 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR235 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR238 compilation from source FAIL: PR238 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR238 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR238 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR295 compilation from source FAIL: PR295 compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR295 -O compilation from source FAIL: PR295 -O compilation from bytecode FAIL: PR374 compilation from source FAIL: PR374 compilation from
