Bug#159395: FTBFS with MAKEFLAGS="-j2"
Joel Baker writes: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 > Severity: normal > > Trying to build GCC 3.2 (using GCC 3.0.4 experimental) on the NetBSD/i386 > port with MAKEFLAGS="-j2" set (the -d flag is used to cope with the fact FYI: - building Ada with -j is currenty not supported upstream. - libjava is built sequentially upstream (at least for 3.2).
Bug#159620: Patch for __cxa_atexit
cxa_atexit is on by default. Modified to: ifneq ($(with_cxa_atexit),yes) CONFARGS += --disable-__cxa_atexit endif Joel Baker writes: > tag 159620 +patch > > diff -urN debian.orig/rules.defs debian/rules.defs > --- debian.orig/rules.defs Wed Sep 4 16:39:06 2002 > +++ debian/rules.defs Wed Sep 4 16:45:59 2002 > @@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ >enabled_languages += c++ > endif > > +# __cxa_atexit - > +# The __cxa_atexit API does not exist in some libc version (NetBSD) > +with_cxa_atexit := yes > +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),netbsd)) > + with_cxa_atexit := disabled for architecture $(DEB_HOST_ARCH) > +endif > + > # Java > # java converted for V3 C++ ABI for some archs > with_java := yes > diff -urN debian.orig/rules2 debian/rules2 > --- debian.orig/rules2 Wed Sep 4 16:39:02 2002 > +++ debian/rules2 Wed Sep 4 16:41:18 2002 > @@ -62,8 +62,11 @@ > --enable-shared \ > --with-system-zlib \ > --enable-nls \ > - --without-included-gettext \ > - --enable-__cxa_atexit > + --without-included-gettext > + > +ifeq ($(with_cxa_atexit),yes) > + CONFARGS += --enable-__cxa_atexit > +endif > > ifeq ($(with_java),yes) >CONFARGS += --enable-java-gc=boehm > -- > *** > Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: c
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.2.1 CVS (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environment:
System: Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
Architecture: i686
>Description:
[ Reported to the Debian BTS as report #159838.
Please CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] on replies.
Log of report can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/159838 ]
Andrew Suffield writes:
(I am not sure whether this is a bug in gcc or binutils)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ cat foo.c
int x = 0;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ cat bar.c
int x = 0;
void foo(void) {}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ gcc -shared -g -o foo.so foo.c bar.c
/tmp/cc0wTF8S.o: In function `foo':
^^^
/home/aps100/tmp/bar.c:3: multiple definition of `x'
^
/tmp/ccpK9pwb.o(.data+0x0):/home/aps100/tmp/foo.c: first defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ gcc-3.2 -shared -g -o foo.so foo.c bar.c
/tmp/ccBwlA8f.o: In function `foo':
^^^
/home/aps100/tmp/bar.c:3: multiple definition of `x'
^
/tmp/cckwx9Kb.o(.data+0x0): first defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Note the indicated parts. Function 'foo' has got nothing to do with
the problem, and that's the wrong place to be highlighting the error.
More generally, it appears that symbol conflicts in the global scope
will always be reported as being in the first function in the
compilation unit (not thoroughly tested, but that's what I
noticed). This means the error message might not even be pointing at
the correct file, let alone the right line.
(Needless to say, this is quite irritating).
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Bug#159838: c/7853: gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c/7853'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: c >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line >Arrival-Date: Sun Sep 08 00:06:00 PDT 2002
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #159838 to gcc-gnats as PR c/7853
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 159838 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#159838: gcc-3.2: reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 159838 [PR c/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the > wrong line Bug#159838: gcc-3.2: reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: forwarded gcc report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 157416 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#157416: cpp-3.2: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 157416 [fixed in 3.3] cpp: _Pragma within macros is improperly > expanded Bug#157416: cpp-3.2: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#116145: libgcj/7854: fastjar update (-u) should be implemented
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `libgcj/7854'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: libgcj >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: fastjar update (-u) should be implemented >Arrival-Date: Sun Sep 08 00:36:01 PDT 2002
Processed: reassign bugs for packages not beeing built from gcc-3.1 source anymore
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 151886 gcc-3.2 Bug#151886: maxima_5.6a-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs porting work for hppa? Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `gcc-3.2'. > reassign 151182 g++-3.2 Bug#151182: g++-3.1: struct problems Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.1' to `g++-3.2'. > reassign 153965 gcc-3.2 Bug#153965: gcc-3.1: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `gcc-3.2'. > reassign 150357 gcc-3.2-doc Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1-doc' to `gcc-3.2-doc'. > reassign 147864 gnat-3.2 Bug#147864: [PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning unconstrained type conversion Bug reassigned from package `gnat-3.1' to `gnat-3.2'. > reassign 148529 gnat-3.2 Bug#148529: [PR ada/6911] gnat-3.1: sin broken Bug reassigned from package `gnat-3.1' to `gnat-3.2'. > reassign 152501 gcj-3.2 Bug#152501: [PR java/7304] gcj-3.1 ICE Bug reassigned from package `gcj-3.1' to `gcj-3.2'. > reassign 153472 g++-3.2 Bug#153472: [PR c/4106] i386 -fPIC asm ebx clobber no error Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.1' to `g++-3.2'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #116145 to gcc-gnats as PR libgcj/7854
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 116145 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#116145: update (-u) should be implemented Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 116145 [PR libgcj/7854] fastjar update (-u) should be implemented Bug#116145: update (-u) should be implemented Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#160093: conflicting file ownership in libstdc++4 and gcc-3.2-nof
Package: libstdc++4 Version: 3.1.1-3 This newest version conflicts with the current gcc-3.2-nof as follows.. Unpacking replacement libstdc++4 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libstdc++4_1%3a3.1.1-3_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/nof/libsupc++.la', which is also in package gcc-3.2-nof dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) I had to remove gcc-3.2-nof for libstdc++4 to install.
Bug#160175: gcc-3.2: missing message catalogs
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1 Severity: normal gcc-3.1 package included message catalogs. But gcc-3.2 package seems to miss them. gcc-3.2 is built with `-enable-nls' configure option, so I think this is bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux fine 2.4.19 #1 Mon Aug 5 15:23:44 JST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP Versions of packages gcc-3.2 depends on: ii binutils 2.13.90.0.4-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-3.21:3.2.1-0pre1 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.1-0pre1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.2.5-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc11:3.2.1-0pre1 GCC support library. -- no debconf information
