Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc

[Matthias Klose]

reassign 153816 gcc
merge153816 112887
thanks

gcc-3.1 doesn't use alternatives to make sure that the preferred
system compiler is used when calling 'gcc'. If you want to test
gcc-3.1 for a particular package,

- use CC=gcc-3.1 CXX=g++-3.1 when configuring/compiling a package

- make ~/bin/gcc a symlink to gcc-3.1 and add it to your path

gcc-3.1/gcc-3.2 will become the default gcc soon.

xsdg writes:
> Package: gcc-3.1
> Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre3
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> 
> gcc-3.1 does not provide cc, which prevents it from being used by the 
> alternatives system.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 153816 gcc
Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `gcc'.

> merge153816 112887
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> merge 153816 112887
Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives?
Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc
Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism
Bug#119064: gcc-3.0: doesn't depend on gcc
Bug#119952: gcc-3.0: could gcc-3.0 be hooked into the alternatives system?
Bug#126675: gcc: please honor user's gcc symlink setting
Bug#148015: gcc-3.0: Use 'update-alternatives' to set default compiler
Merged 112887 115353 119064 119952 126675 148015 153816.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#150050: acknowledged by developer (fixed in gcc-2.95.3)

Hi,

Thanks for the reply.  I realize that as of the recent release of 3.0
stable, of course, this issue is less important, and as I was compiling
a program from the previous testing under the previous stable, the
reported bug was hardly critical.

However, as I understand it, the bug indicated a problem with the
compiler (an internal error), so other programs compiled with the
compiler would fail.  If I find a bug in the stable compiler for Debian,
I would regard it as important to report the bug.  Can you please let me
know if it would be important to report a similar type bug in the
future?  Thanks for your time.

Michael

> On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:48:25 -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

 > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
 > #150050: `cciss.c:705: internal error--unrecognizable insn' while compiling 
 > kernel-image-2.4.18 on debian-2.2r6,
 > which was filed against the gcc package.

 > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
 > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

 > Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
 > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
 > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

 > Debian bug tracking system administrator
 > (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

 > Received: (at 150050-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 15:39:25 +
 >> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 10:39:25 2002
 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
 >  by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
 >  id 17TlT3-0002S2-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:39:25 -0500
 > Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
 >  by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28012
 >  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:37:38 +0200 (MET DST)
 > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 >  by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6EFbb620519;
 >  Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:37:37 +0200 (MEST)
 > From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > MIME-Version: 1.0
 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:37:37 +0200
 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.3
 > X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
 > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 > the code compiles fine with gcc-2.95.3 (which is the default compiler
 > in the woody/testing distribution).



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]