Re: new gcc-2.95 packages
Ben Collins writes: > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Ben Collins writes: > > > Which version of dpkg-dev do you have installed? > > > > $ dpkg -l dpkg-dev > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > | > > Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > uppercase=bad) > > ||/ Name VersionDescription > > +++-==-==- > > ii dpkg-dev 1.9.4 Package building tools for Debian > > Does the generated debian/control contain the Arch field? If so, does > the debian//DEBIAN/control also contain any Arch field? If not, I > suggest it is a dpkg-gencontrol (or dh_gencontrol) bug, or a bug in how > you are calling it. debian/control contains Architecture: any fileds for all arch-dep packages. the debian//DEBIAN/control files do not contain any Architecture fields. I didn't change this part of the rules file. dh_gencontrol gets called as: dh_gencontrol -a -u-v1:2.95.4-0.010502 which calls: dpkg-gencontrol -ldebian/changelog -isp -pgcc-2.95 -Tdebian/substvars -Pdebian/gcc-2.95 -v1:2.95.4-0.010502 chmod 644 debian/gcc-2.95/DEBIAN/control chown 0.0 debian/gcc-2.95/DEBIAN/control dpkg-gencontrol -ldebian/changelog -isp -pcpp-2.95 -Tdebian/cpp-2.95.substvars -Pdebian/cpp-2.95 -v1:2.95.4-0.010502 chmod 644 debian/cpp-2.95/DEBIAN/control chown 0.0 debian/cpp-2.95/DEBIAN/control it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend on some environment?
Re: new gcc-2.95 packages
Previously Matthias Klose wrote: > it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates > the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend > on some environment? dpkg-gencontrol does not. Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Re: new gcc-2.95 packages
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates > the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend > on some environment? > Try setting DH_COMPAT and see if that changes calling it manually. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Bug#96348: libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2
Package: libgcj2-dev Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427 Severity: grave libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2. Without libgcj2 installed e.g. all /usr/lib/lib*.so links are dangling symlinks. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de 2.4.4 #1 Sat Apr 28 12:12:20 CEST 2001 i586 Versions of packages libgcj2-dev depends on: ii gcj-3.0 1:3.0-0pre010427 The GNU compiler for Java(TM). ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libc6-dev 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-15 compression library - runtime ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.1.3-15 compression library - development
Re: new gcc-2.95 packages
Ben Collins writes: > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > it's strange that calling dh_gencontrol directly, correctly generates > > the Architecture fields. Does dh_gencontrol / dpkg-gencontrol depend > > on some environment? > > > > Try setting DH_COMPAT and see if that changes calling it manually. calling directly DH_COMPAT=2 fakeroot -- dh_gencontrol -a -v [...] succeeds I replaced dpkg-1.9.4 and dpkg-dev-1.9.4 with dpkg-1.8.3.1 and dpkg-dev-1.8.3.1 and the package builds again. So there must be some kind of incompatibility or a bug or undocumented new feature in the new dpkg version. Any enlightment? I uploaded the package to incoming to see if all goes well on other architectures.
missing tarball
Is there a particular reason why the tarball for building gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds1-0.010502 was not uploaded to incoming.debian.org? Could someone please get it up there with the rest of the files for that version of the package? Thanks. Jack
missing tarball
Jack Howarth writes: >Is there a particular reason why the tarball for building gcc-2.95 > 2.95.4.ds1-0.010502 was not uploaded to incoming.debian.org? Could > someone please get it up there with the rest of the files for that > version of the package? Thanks. It didn't change, so it wasn't uploaded. Please get the tarball from the archive (apt-get source gcc-2.95).
