3.0 and warning!?
Hi Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about it. I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect shouldn't *automatically* upgrade if it is this dangerous?! (Using woody) -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
Bug#95318: gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
Severity: minor
gcc-3.0 wastes a byte in the following code on i386:
a:
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
movl8(%ebp), %eax
andl$1, %eax
cwtl
popl%ebp
ret
The cwtl is unnecessary since %eax has just been anded with 1.
The source is:
int a(short i) {
return i & 1;
}
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux gondolin 2.4.3-686-smp #1 SMP Sun Apr 22 13:43:38 EST
2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages gcc-3.0 depends on:
ii binutils 2.11.90.0.1-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
ii cpp-3.03.0-0pre010403 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0-0pre010403 The GNU compiler collection (base package).
ii libc6 2.2.2-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libgcc300 3.0-0pre010403 Shared libgcc.
Re: 3.0 and warning!?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > Hi > > Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to > upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about > it. > > I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect > shouldn't *automatically* upgrade if it is this dangerous?! Which architecture? -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
gcc´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?
¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ¢Å ¡á°ú½Ã¿åA girl got an engagement ring, and would seize every opportunity for calling attention to it. In a group with girl friends no one noticed it. Finally when herfriends were sitting around talking, she got up suddenly and said, "It's awfully hot in here. I think I'll take my ring off." ¡Þseize every opportunity for ~ ing : ±âȸ¸¸ ÀÖÀ¸¸é ~ ÇÏ´Ù.¡Þcall attention to : ~ ¿¡ ÁÖÀǸ¦ ȯ±â½ÃÅ°´Ù. ¡Þawfully : very ¾àÈ¥¹ÝÁö¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ¾Æ°¡¾¾´Â ±âȸ¸¸ ÀÖÀ¸¸é »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô ±× ¹ÝÁö¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ·Á°í µé¾ú´Ù ÇѹøÀº ¿©ÀÚÄ£±¸µé°ú ¾î¿ï·È´Âµ¥ ¾Æ¹«µµ ±× ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ´«¿©°Ü ºÁÁÖÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù¸¶Ä§³» ¾Æ°¡¾¾´Â ´Ùµé µÑ·¯¾É¾Æ À̾߱⸦ ³ª´©°í ÀÖ´Â ÆÇ¿¡ ¹ú¶± ÀÏ¾î¼¸é¼ ¸»Çß´Ù."¾îÈÞ, ´õ¿ö¼ ¸ø °ßµð°Ú³×. ³ª ¹ÝÁö¸¦ »©¾ß ÇÒ±îºÁ!" ¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ ¿µ¾î ÇѸ¶µð ¢Å ¢Ã °¨»çÀÇ ¸»À» ÇÒ ¶§¿Ü±¹ÀεéÀº ³²¿¡°Ô ¾ÆÁÖ ÀÛÀº µµ¿òÀ» ¹Þ¾Æµµ "Thank you.(°¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù.)"¶ó°í ¸»ÇØ¿ä. ÀÌ°ÍÀº ¾î·ÈÀ» ¶§ºÎÅÍ ±×·± ±³À°À» ¹ÞÀ¸¸é¼ ÀÚ¶ó ¿Ô±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ¸ö¿¡ º£¾î ÀÖ¾î »ó´ë¹æÀÇ »ç¼ÒÇÑ µµ¿òÀ̳ª Ä£Àý¿¡µµ "Thank you."¶ó°í ¸»ÇÏ´Â ½À°üÀ» °®°Ô µÈ°Å °°¾Æ¿ä. ¹°·Ð, ¿ì¸®µµ ¸¶Âù°¡ÁöÁö¸¸¿ä."Thank you."¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÀ´äÀº "õ¸¸¿¡¿ä."¶ó´Â ¶æÀ¸·Î "You are welcome. /Don't mention it. /Not at all."µîÀÇ Ç¥ÇöÀ» ¾²ÁÒ. A: It was very kind of you to go to that trouble for me.B: It was no trouble at all. It was my pleasure.A: It's very kind of you to say so. A: Àú¸¦ À§Çؼ ±×·± ¼ö°í¸¦ ÇØ ÁÖ½Ã´Ï Á¤¸» °í¸¿½À´Ï´Ù.B: ¹¹ ¼ö°í¶ö °ÍÀÌ ÀÖ³ª¿ä. Á¦°¡ ÁÁ¾Æ¼ ÇÑ ÀÏÀä.A: ±×·¸°Ô ¸»¾¸ÇØ ÁÖ½Ã´Ï Á¤¸» °í¸¿½À´Ï´Ù. ¡á°¨»çÀÇ ±âº» Ç¥Çö¢Â Thank you. /Thanks. ¢¹°¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù.¢Â Thanks a lot. /Thank you very much. /Thank you so much. ¢¹´ë´ÜÈ÷ °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù.¢Â I'd appreciate it. ¢¹±×·¸°Ô ÇØ ÁÖ½Ã¸é °¨»çÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.¢Â I appreciate it very much. ¢¹±× Á¡ Á¤¸» °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù.¢Â On behalf of our employees I'd like to thank you. ¢¹ÀúÈñ ȸ»ç¿øµéÀ» ´ëÇ¥Çؼ ´ç½Å¿¡°Ô °¨»ç µå¸®°í ½Í½À´Ï´Ù. ¢Ä À߸ø ¾²ÀÏ ¼ö Àִ ǥÇö ¢Å ¢Ã ¿©±â¼ 1È£¼±À¸·Î °¥¾ÆŸ¼Å¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù ¡áYou have to shift to the No.1 Line.¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡í(X)¡áYou'll have to transfer to the No.1 Line from here.¡ë¡ë¡ë¡í(O) ¢Áshift´Â ´ë°³ °ÅÁÖÁö³ª »ý°¢À» ¹Ù²Û´Ù´Â ¶æÀ̹ǷΠ¿©±â¼´Â ¸ÂÁö ¾Ê¾Æ¿ä. ±³ÅëÆíÀ» °¥¾ÆŸ´Â °ÍÀº º¸Åë transfer¶ó°í ÇØ¿ä. ±×¸®°í ³ë¼±À» °¥¾ÆŸ´Â ȯ½Â¿ªµµ transfer¶ó°í Çϴµ¥, À̶§´Â ¸í»çÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ºñÇà±â ¿©Çà Áß¿¡ °¥¾ÆŸ´Â ±âÂøÁö´Â stopover¶ó°í ÇØ¿ä. ¡ÞNow you have to switch to the No.1 Line.(¿©±â¼ 1È£¼±À¸·Î °¥¾ÆŸ¼¼¿ä.)¡ÞYou have to get over to the No.1 Line.(1È£¼± ÂÊÀ¸·Î °¡¼Å¼ Ÿ¼¼¿ä.) ¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ ÀϾî ÇѸ¶µð ¢Å ¢ÂÀϺ»¾îµµ ¿µ¾î¿Í °°Àº ÇüÅ·Π±¸¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ë¡ëgcc´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä? ÀúÈñ´Â Àüȸ¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇؼ °»ç¿Í 1 : 1 ·Î ¿Ü±¹¾î ÇнÀÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¢Ä Online Korea ¢Å ¶ó°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.¹Ì¸® Çã¶ô¹ÞÁö ¾Ê°í ÆíÁö µå·Á Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ºÎµð ³Ê±×·¯¿ì½Å ¿ë¼¸¦.. ÀúÈñ ȸ»ç¿¡¼´Â ¿Ü±¹¾î(¿µ¾î,ÀϾî)¿¡ °ü½É ÀÖ´Â ¸¹Àº ºÐµé²² ¸ÅÀÏ(¿ù-±Ý), ¿µ¾îÀ¯¸Ó¿Í »ýÈ°¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ È¸È ÇÑ ¹®À徿À» ¹«·á·Î º¸³» µå¸®°í ÀÖ¾î¿ä. À§¿Í °°Àº ³»¿ëÀÇ ¼ºñ½º¸¦ ¹Þ¾Æº¸±â ¿øÇÏ½Ã¸é ¡ì [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¡í·Î "yes"¶ó´Â ³»¿ëÀÇ ´äÀåÀ» Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù. ±×¸®°í, ÀúÈñ ÀüÈ ¿Ü±¹¾î °ÀÇ°¡ ±Ã±ÝÇϽŠºÐµéÀ» À§ÇØ, 1ȸ¿¡ ÇÑÇؼ¢Â ¹«·á ½Ã¹ü°ÀÇ ¢Âµµ ½Ç½ÃÇØ µå¸®°í ÀÖÀ¸´Ï Çѹø µé¾îº¸°í ½ÍÀ¸½Ã¸é Áö±Ý ½ÅûÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ¹«·á ½Ã¹ü°ÀÇ ½Åû ¹æ¹ýÀº ¢º ÀÌ°÷ ¢¸ À» Ŭ¸¯ÇϽŠÈÄ °ÀÇ ½Åû¶õ¿¡ Àִ½ùü°ÀÇ ½Åû ÆûÀ» ÀÛ¼ºÇϼż º¸³» ÁÖ½Ã¸é µË´Ï´Ù.¹°·Ð, ÀüÈ 02-588-0510 À¸·Îµµ ½ÅûÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ±¸¿ä. ¾Æ¹«ÂÉ·Ï ÀÌ ÇнÀ¹ýÀÌ gcc´ÔÀÇ È¸È ½Ç·Â Çâ»ó¿¡ ÀÛÀº º¸ÅÆÀÌ µÇ¾úÀ¸¸é ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. gcc´Ô²²´Â http://www.debian.or.kr/Packages/unstable-kr/doc/cpp-2.95-doc.html¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ º¸°í ¸ÞÀÏ µå·È´Âµ¥¿ä,ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸¿´´Ù¸é Á¤¸» Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù.¾ÕÀ¸·Î Çã¶ô¾ø´Â ¸ÞÀÏÀº µå¸®Áö ¾Êµµ·Ï ÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.±×·³, ¾È³çÈ÷ °è¼¼¿ä.
Re: 3.0 and warning!?
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 26 16:22:56 2001 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:08:14 -0400 From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3.0 and warning!? References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200 Sender: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-RBL-Warning: (rbl.uib.no) Mail refused, see http://www.uib.no/it/rbl/ X-UIDL: IN>!!6PK"!~f`"!C:c!! On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > Hi > > Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to > upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about > it. > > I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect > shouldn't *automatically* upgrade if it is this dangerous?! Which architecture? -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---' i386 I think both my woody and sid machines got it. -kzm
Re: 3.0 and warning!?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:03:32PM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > I think both my woody and sid machines got it. > Ah, so it didn't just install it, you had it installed already, and it got upgraded. FYI, gcc-3.0 is not used by default. Calling "gcc" or "cc" will use gcc-2.95. You need to set CC=gcc-3.0 to actually use the new compiler. So the warning is pretty accurate. However, after the next upgrade, it wont give a warning any longer. Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Bug#95358: gpc-2.95 error in prerm
Package: gpc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010424 Severity: normal Hi, here is the error : # apt-get install --reinstall gpc-2.95 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded. 2 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/1256kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 289066 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace gpc-2.95 1:2.95.4-0.010424 (using .../gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010424_i386.deb) ... rm: `/usr/share/doc/gpc-2.95' is a directory Unpacking replacement gpc-2.95 ... Curiously, /var/lib/dpkg/info/gpc-2.95.prerm contains twice the same chunk of code and rm lacks the -r option : # Automatically added by dh_installdocs if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) -a -L /usr/doc/gpc-2.95 ]; then rm -f /usr/doc/gpc-2.95 fi # End automatically added section # Automatically added by dh_installdocs if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) -a -L /usr/doc/gpc-2.95 ]; then rm -f /usr/doc/gpc-2.95 fi # End automatically added section -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pc-dg-116-1 2.4.3-pentiumiii #1 Mon Apr 16 12:47:25 EST 2001 i686 Versions of packages gpc-2.95 depends on: ii gcc-2.95 1:2.95.4-0.010424 The GNU C compiler. ii gpc1:2.95.3-7The GNU Pascal compiler. ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
Bug#95358: gpc-2.95 error in prerm
Hi, sorry I made a mistake in my original report because I found another bug while writing the report. The missing -r option is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/gpc-2.95.preinst : # dpkg cannot handle transistions from symlinks to directories rm -f /usr/share/doc/gpc-2.95 || true The prerm script still looks strange :>. -- Laurent.
