Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-05-31 Thread Nikolas Kallis

Hello,



I am just checking out Debian 7.0 for the first time and so far I 
overall like it. Among other things, its sleek, I like the colour 
scheme, its completely open source, stable, and I have so far not been 
effected by a bug.


There are a few things I don't like about it though, that I want to 
share in hope the future Debian won't suffer things I found as a problem.



The first issue I had was finding the system requirements for it. I 
eventually found the information, but is was burred deep in a technical 
manual. The information should have been around when I was on route 
obtaining Debian 7.0.


Also. searching 'System requirements' in the search box on Debian 
website return nothing. I've never had success using the search feature.



Another problem is that Debian 7.0's documentation does not correlate 
with Debian 7.0. At no time was I informed that Debian 7.0 is code named 
'Wheezy', and because of this, it was a head fuck for me when I 
approached the documentation, because I didn't know if I was reading the 
correct documentation as I am not in the development circle and as so, 
don't know the code name for Debian 7.0.


This made me especially mad, because Debian 6.0 suffered the same 
problem, and I reported it, yet the problem still exists.


Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is my primary operating system. There are more things I 
dislike about Ubuntu 12.04 LTS than I do Debian 7.0, but its 
documentation is far superior, which is the second reason why I will 
continue using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS because Debian 7.0 requires more time 
than I have on hand to use.


Shitty documentation is one of the biggest killers when it comes to 
software. Its extremely important software developers know this, because 
not everyone is computer literate, and or has enough time to handle 
problems/learn how to do things.



Another thing I am pissed off about is the lack of a graphical 
text-editor being included in Debian 7.0. The last time I checked, my 
calendar said 2013, and as so, would not expect a text-editor not being 
included in a desktop-environment based operating system.


I know there is the 'nano' command line based text-editor included in 
Debian 7.0, but I, along with 99.999% of the world uses their computer 
in a desktop environment, so a text-editor should be included.



Another thing that pisses me off is IceWeasel.
I have read upon the Mozilla-Debian situation, and from what I 
understand Mozilla were not happy that Debian wes tampering with the 
Firefox logo or branding.


I don't know if the person or persons responsible for doing it in the 
past still develop Debian, but Mozilla's flagship suite being barred 
from inclusion is for this reason is immature.


There is nothing wrong with Firefox's logo. I find the reasoning for its 
exclusion freakish and borderline bizarre. If I were to use Debian 7.0 
as my primary operating system I'd be really annoyed that Mozilla 
software is not included. I don't think 99% of Debian uses would mind 
using Firefox with its official branding, and I think the decision made 
was self-centred and selfish, and not in line with what the overall 
user-base wants.
It is unlikely most people use Debian because of deep ideological 
reasons, and I think the decision to bar Mozilla products from Debian 
has done way more harm than good.



There is something else I didn't like, but I can't remember what it was 
and I am out of time.



I look forward to Debian 8.0.



Regards,

Nikolas Kallis


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a9816d.1030...@nikolaskallis.com



Debian naming scheme

2013-06-17 Thread Nikolas Kallis

Hello,



I think Debian should stop releasing products as I.E 'Debian 7.0', and 
instead release them simply as I.E 'Debian 7', where its Debian version 
would be 7.0.


It makes it hard for me writing documentation for applications that run 
on Debian when I have to write it supports I.E 'Debian (7.0, 7.1)'.


Debian 7.0 and Debian 7.1 are the same operating system in essence 
anyhow. As is Windows 'XP BUILD 1XXX' and 'Windows XP BUILD 2XXX'.




Regards,

Nikolas Kallis


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51bf4e8b.5030...@nikolaskallis.com



Feedback regarding Debian 7.1's handling of services

2013-06-18 Thread Nikolas Kallis

Hello,



When I install software designed to be ran as a service in Debian 7.1 
using dpkg, its gets started automatically. This is dangerous and I 
think this behaviour should be changed to not start the service 
automatically.


Some default settings in software is not suitable for some environments 
software gets installed into I.E: Tor; Postfix.


Also, I think most people generally don't use default settings when 
installing software that runs as a service, so they would need to 
restart the service after configuring it anyway.




Regards,

Nikolas Kallis


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51c05156.1080...@nikolaskallis.com



Bridge burning

2013-07-27 Thread Nikolas Kallis

Hello,



I just spotted this on the Debian forum:

http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=105456


As you can see, someone (who is obviously new to Linux) came and asked a 
perfectly valid question, and had their thread locked despite them not 
breaking any rules.


This shouldn't have happened. Debian is a community driven operating 
system and the more people that use/contribute to it, the better it will 
become.


Shooting down peoples posts because *oh this question is always asked* 
should not happen. Whilst others may have participated in many similar 
topics, the 'noob' question is always going to be asked - its a natural 
question, especially in a distro-world.


Shooting down someone who is showing interest in Debian is a great way 
to burn bridges and prevent Debian from prospering. This arrogance needs 
to stop.




Regards,

Nikolas Kallis


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51f486b2.6080...@nikolaskallis.com