Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

[MaD dUCK]

hi developers,
this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going
on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the
package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian
package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized?

thanks,

martin;  (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
humpty was pushed.

lame

[MaD dUCK]

hi developers,
this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going
on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the
package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian
package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized?

thanks,

martin;  (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
humpty was pushed.

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

[MaD dUCK]

also sprach David Whedon (on Mon, 07 May 2001 01:10:02PM -0700):
> Lame cannot be included in Debian, please see:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package

thanks for the reply(ies). i hope i didn't inconvenience anyone with
my ignorant post. i'll be better in the future, promise!

martin;  (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
echo Prpv a\'rfg cnf har cvcr | tr Pacfghnrvp Cnpstuaeic