Has anyone else perceived this email as spam?
Good Morning, Your email [debian-devel@lists.debian.org] has exceeded its quota limit. We are currently terminating an unused account to increase your email quota and thus serve you better. To prevent your account from being terminated, you must update this email by providing the information requested below: Please fill in the information below. Email: debian-devel@lists.debian.org User: Password : Date of birth : __ Account owners who refuse to comply, as stated above, may lose their account permanently. Thank you, Email support team. Server Security Message.
4GB address space
Hi, i'm interested in whether it is possible to modify the Linux kernel so that user applications can use the whole 4GB of virtual address space while the kernel runs it's own AS. If yes, how complicated would that be ?? Thanks, Thomas -- DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert: GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4GB address space
> Why not just buy a amd64/em64t cpu and run a 64bit kernel with 32bit > userland? > > Gives you all of the 4GB (minus a few pages) without hacks or extra > patches and without slowdowns. > > MfG > Goswin The 4GB Address Space thing is one of the topics proposed as thesis at my university. They need it for Virtual Machines or something. I have to do one and thought this might be quite interesting. I have some experience with kernel programming but not with Linux - and I don't know much about Linux internals as yet. So what I need to know is whether those modifications are rather comprehensive/complicated or not and whether it is feasible to get finished within 4 month... Cheers, Thomas -- Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer! Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [users] Re: Where's lame
hi developers, this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized? thanks, martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- humpty was pushed.
lame
hi developers, this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized? thanks, martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- humpty was pushed.
Re: [users] Re: Where's lame
also sprach David Whedon (on Mon, 07 May 2001 01:10:02PM -0700): > Lame cannot be included in Debian, please see: > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package thanks for the reply(ies). i hope i didn't inconvenience anyone with my ignorant post. i'll be better in the future, promise! martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- echo Prpv a\'rfg cnf har cvcr | tr Pacfghnrvp Cnpstuaeic
GPL
Good evening to all. Guys, I'm studying packaging. Because I am learning. I am trying to package it (Pulseaudio-version-12.99.2). In the COPYRIGTH version is as follows. Copyrigth 2018-2019 Pali Rohár PulseAudio is free software; you can redistribute it and / or modify under the terms of the GNU Minor General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2.1 of Lice nse, or (at your discretion) any later version. [ your choice - I can put the version I want myself. Type: or version 2.1 of License 3 ] ?
Re: GPL
Em sáb, 2019-08-17 às 07:24 +0200, Geert Stappers escreveu: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:14:12AM -0300, Anderson Ribeiro [ MAD ] > wrote: > > Good evening to all. > > Guys, I'm studying packaging. > > Because I am learning. > > > > I am trying to package it (Pulseaudio-version-12.99.2). > > In the COPYRIGTH > > version is as follows. > > > > Copyrigth 2018-2019 Pali Rohár > > > > > > PulseAudio is free software; you can redistribute > > it and / or modify > > under the terms of the GNU Minor General Public > > License as > > published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2.1 of > > License, or (at your discretion) any later version. > > > > [ your choice - I can > > put the version I want myself. Type: or version 2.1 of License 3 ] > > ? > > > > My advice: Stay close to original. > > In this case: 2.1 > > > > Groeten > Geert Stappers Thank you for the tip. I will keep the original.
