Re: For those who care about stable updates
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 19:05 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Who are you going to lobby? The candidates who are playing an active > role in "the problem", or the ones who are just claiming there is no > problem and that we should all be friends? If I were a crazier man I would say something like: "The end is neigh!" It is a dark, dark day for Debian, indeed. -- Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
white listing spam en/on debian devel
Hola, Por favor, quiero que paré mandando mensajes para confirmação a los gentes que estan mandando a la lista. - Hi, Please, I would appreciate it if you would stop stop sending messages for confirmation to the people who are sending to the list. -- Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: For those who care about stable updates
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 20:49 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: > I think you'll find what they're saying is, 'don't be an idiot on > mailing lists'. And here you are, being an idiot on a mailing list, > which is pretty fitting, I guess. (But it is a problem.) -1 name calling -1 hyperbole +1 semi-on-topic -- -1 shouldn't have sent -- Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: apt-get wants to remove hotplug?
On Monday 10 October 2005 01:37 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > Hi, > > In Sid, apt-get wants to remove hotplug. > > Is udev replacing it for good or this is just b0rken? > > .Alejandro Don't do it. See the previous thread titled 'udev'. Your mouse will no longer work. There's a new version of udev coming soon which can safely replace hotplug. -- I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu key ID code: "0x8DB3BF09". F: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09 pgprtM1Yw4kMQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get wants to remove hotplug?
On Monday 10 October 2005 01:54 pm, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hm, doesn't just manually loading mousedev (and putting it in > /etc/modules) get things working again? That's not the only problem: [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332905 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332898 [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332946 -- I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu key ID code: "0x8DB3BF09". F: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09 pgpLITuOQQVV9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get wants to remove hotplug?
On Monday 10 October 2005 02:27 pm, you wrote: > Also, did anyone try a ipw2100 or ipw2200 with this? Will > /etc/hotplug/firmware agent still work by loading the firmwares with no > additional action from the driver code? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332946 -- I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu key ID code: "0x8DB3BF09". F: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09 pgpMf70AqNKht.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get wants to remove hotplug?
On Monday 10 October 2005 01:54 pm, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hm, doesn't just manually loading mousedev (and putting it in > /etc/modules) get things working again? Also note that libgphoto2-2 (upon which much of the desktop metapackages depend) will conflict with the new udev-0.070-3 until a NMU can be processed as the maintainer is on vacation. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332936 -- I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu key ID code: "0x8DB3BF09". F: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09 pgpfrNbjdnu4V.pgp Description: PGP signature
old question with new status? Sun-Java in Debian non-free?
According to various press releases [1], it seems that Sun is relaxing their redistribution license for Java. I know very little about the historical releases that the JRE has been kept out of Debian but wasn't it because the license was too restrictive? If so, does this mean that Java is now in "the same boat" as Macromedia Flash Player? If so, what can I do to take the initiative to package it up for Debian non-free? I apologize in advance if this brings up an old flame war... [1] http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2144710/sun-kicks-oem-programme-jds -- I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu 0x8DB3BF09 FP: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE - 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09 pgpiEbKidxhJc.pgp Description: PGP signature
