Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore
Morning ..
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:04:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>And not only 80386 needs this - There is the Sparc64 port which would
>also benefit from this (http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/#64bit). If we
>had support for subarchtectures, not only would the ix86 mess be able to
>be split in many flavors (i.e. strict 386, 486 and up, 686, or whatever
>you fancy). And I am sure this can somehow help maintain the non-Linux
>ports - NetBSD gives us the potential to bring Debian to _many_ new
>platforms.
In my opinion, this would be the right way. Sure, this is a lot of work,
but we, if we splitt the arches up into suparches, we will be able to
use optimization for eg. 586/686 or on PowerPC altivec for G4 and so on.
And, of course, we can keep the support 80386.
Regards
Jan
--
.''`.Jan-Hendrik Palic |
: :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,..
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` `
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` `
pgpQvAYMV2GzT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: debian packages for openoffice 1.1beta?
Hi .. On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:02:46PM +0530, Guntupalli Karunakar wrote: > Are there any .debs available for openoffice 1.1 beta? Has nyone made >them? >package list in unstable/editors has openoffice 1.0.3 only. Have a look at experimantel ... ;) Jan -- .''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic | : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,.. `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` ` `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` ` pgpnQu5bPIUqG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bugs.debian.org: ChangeLog closes handling should be changed
Hi .. On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:45:29PM +1000, Brian May wrote: >On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable. >> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed >> by an upload to unstable. Not unconditionally, of course. The version >> of the bugreport should be compared with the version currently in >> testing. Some sort of algorithm not too complex but able to handle most >> of the cases shouldn't be too hard to do (yes, I volunteer to help >> there). >Then bugs will me marked as sarge, even though they might be bugs >specific to unstable. > >It would be much better to remove the sid tag when it gets uploaded >to unstable, turn off the sarge tag when it goes into testing, and >turn of the woody tag if it is lucky enough to get into stable. I agree, this could solve the problem, Alfie explained ... Regards Jan -- .''`.Jan-Hendrik Palic | : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,.. `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` ` `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` ` pgplVpA6AhJDe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:57:52PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: >On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:03:47AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: >> Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there >> is nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed >> to install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work >> for me, dunno why). >Man, I am seriously thinking about putting this quote to my archive of >best laughs ever :) *save* into my collection of fortunes :) -- One time, you all will be emulated by linux! Jan- Hendrik Palic Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de"; E-Mail: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w--- O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++ G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- pgpBKLfLpLCEC.pgp Description: PGP signature
