Re: What would help the most?
Hmm ... I did not go deep into this situation, but if you would like to traing an agent and/or whatever, most likely you need a valid email address to post to a list. If this is an agent, it is trained to (by the emails before) - use/mimic older members address to show credentibility - collect and parse repliers name so the email can be personalized. These lower your guards. I think all information can be gathered from the mailing-list public archive. So if Syzbalski does not pop up and say, "hey guys, I was drunk and texted to my ex and debian lists", I am still considering this being a AI training. Best regars, Imre 2023. 10. 30. 8:52 keltezéssel, Tino Didriksen írta: That was also my initial reaction - so much so that I discarded the original email as Spam, because it hit all the factors in my head. But given other people took it seriously, I looked into whether szybal...@gmail.com has been active before, and sure enough there are mails going back more than a decade. So evidence would say it's not spam, but still a bizarre set of mails. -- Tino Didriksen On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 07:03, wrote: Hi, I have the feeling, that this is some kind of semi-AI generated chat. I think we should stop it now. Imre, Nagy 2023. 10. 30. 2:29 keltezéssel, Lukasz Szybalski írta: On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:41 AM Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, 2023-10-27 at 14:00 -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: > What is the minimum most value thing that would > help YOU accomplish your goals for Debian ? Check out this page if no-one gives anything more specific: https://www.debian.org/intro/help Paul, Marc, Andrey Thanks for replying. To narrow it down: *Vision of Debian:* Create a free operating system, freely available for everyone. *Goal:* Coding and Maintaining Packages <https://www.debian.org/intro/help> Testing and Bug Squashing <https://www.debian.org/intro/help> /In these 2 goals:/ What is the minimum most valuable thing that would help YOU accomplish your goals for Debian ? Thanks Lucas
Re: BinUtils /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
Hi Timothy, This link might be useful for you: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18406369/qt-cant-find-lgl-error Please keep in mind, that this is more a Qt related question, thus you would get correct answers faster on specific Qt forums and mailing lists. Also, please try to use google first, since the the chance that your question would be answered would be higher if you show that you put the necesseary effort to find the answer. Best regards, Imre On 2020.11.11. 18:31, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: All, I'm trying to built software with Qt Creator and I get the following error message /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL. I'm running Debian 10 with KDE fully patched to the latest point release. Timothy M Butterworth
Re: looking for debian friendly web app technology
Hi, What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and acceptance) of QT? As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check this information!) The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian. Best regards, Imre 2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta: I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt. Thanks for your time. QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be more accessible than a QT app even today. I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux desktop accessibility, although both are usable.
Re: looking for debian friendly web app technology
Hi Timothy, I understand that, but 2 years from now Qt would be around 6.8-6.9 ... possible Qt7? So I start to have doubt that Debian could ever catch up. Although you are right, that _I_ can install Qt6 from sources, but I cannot expect that from all my users. They just want to use it. So I am a bit disappointed with this now, although I would like to pay my respect and send kudos for all Debian people, since they are doing an enormous job. I. 2022. 12. 13. 14:08 keltezéssel, Timothy M Butterworth írta: On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:51 AM Imre Nagy wrote: Hi, What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and acceptance) of QT? As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check this information!) The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian. Qt 6 will not be in debian until debin 13. Bookworm will still have Qt 5 and KDE 5. You can manually download and install Qt6 on Debian. If you target Debian 13 for inclusion of your app that will give you about two years to finish it. Best regards, Imre 2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta: >> I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt. >> Thanks for your time. > > QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page > web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be > more accessible than a QT app even today. > I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux > desktop accessibility, although both are usable. > > -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀
