Re: Release n0w! Buuy online!
Christoph Berg schrieb: > GET YOUR RELEASE OUT NOW! > > EVERYTHING YOU NEED IN STOCK! > > http://www.df7cb.de/debian/shop/ > > > DISCLAIMER: THIS SPAM MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF NUTS. > *LOL* This was by far the most funny "spam" I ever got. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: woody-to-sarge test upgrade
Bill Allombert schrieb: > Hello Debian developers, [...] > Before I do more testing, I would like to make sure I know the proper > procedure: > > 1) What is the recommend way to perform such upgrade ? I'm not a DD, but the release notes seem to recommend aptitude for upgrades: http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-upgradingpackages Hope this helps, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic
Martin Braure de Calignon schrieb: > Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : > > >>>and not >>>"apt-get upgrade " >>> >>> >> >>Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, >>not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to >>overload the upgrade command. >> >>HTH, >>Daniel >> >> >> > > Yes, ok for that. But when I want to upgrade a package, it is not really > logical to use "install", because the package is already installed, no ? > If you think of "upgrading" as "installing the newest version" of a package, then it becomes more logical IMO. You can specify the version number of a package to be installed with "apt-get install package=version", and without explicit version argument it's simply the default behaviour to install the newest version. HTH, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
